Uitvoeringsaspecten bij paalfunderingen
17 november 2021, Antwerpen
ir Noël Huybrechts, Afdeling Geotechniek, WTCB & KU Leuven ir Maurice Bottiau, Franki Foundations - ABEF
IE-NET cursus
Deel 1. Inleiding – normatief kader
(N. Huybrechts)Deel 2. Uitvoering Palen Categorie I, II en III
(M. Bottiau)Deel 3. Uitvoering Palen Categorie IV
(N. Huybrechts)Deel 4. Ervaringen bij de uitvoering van palen
(M. Bottiau)Categorieën van palen
Pieux battus, vibrofoncés..
Heipalen, ingetrilde palen Pieux forés, puits,...
Boorpalen, putten
Pieux vissés Schroefpalen
Micropieux..
Micropalen
Verdringing Uithaling
VERSCHILLEND GEDRAG NAARGELANG TYPE PAAL
groep type
1 Verdringing
2 Beperkte
verdringing/ontspanning
3 Belangrijke ontspanning
4 micropalen
paalkopzakking
Belasting op paalkop
RU verdringing
verdringingspaal 10%
Grote drukken tegen paal verdichting
paalkopzakking
Belasting op paalkop
RU verdringing
verdringingspaal Paal met
grote grond- verwijdering 10%
Kleine drukken tegen paal, geen verdichting, risico aanzienlijke ontspanning
paalkopzakking
Belasting op paalkop
RU verdringing
verdringingsp aal
Paal met grote grond-
verwijdering 10%
- Bij zeer grote zakking: Ruverdr = Ruboor
- Bij conventionele bezwijkbelasting 10%.D : Ru,verdr > Ru,boor
- Bij dienstlast: Rs,verdr > Rs,boor
Paalclassificatie in België volgens de nieuwe richtlijnen
Several tools and equipment are used for the pile construction
driving screwing no
removal
soil removal impact driven vibratory static pushing partial full
GROUP I - driven xx x (x) - -
GROUP I - Screwed - - - xx - -
GROUP II driven x xx (x) - -
GROUP II screwed - - - x -
GROUP III - - - - (x) xx
impact driving diesel hammer hydraulic hammer internal falling hammer
(steam hammer) vibratory driving fixed moment
high frequency, variable moment static pushing several techniques
screwing (and pull down)
boring table on rig separate boring table
soil removal auger
excavation tools
EXECUTION METHODS
Categorie 1 PALEN MET GRONDVERDRINGING
driving screwing no removal
soil removal impact driven vibratory static pushing partial full
GROUP I - driven xx x (x) - -
GROUP I - Screwed - - - xx - -
GROUP II driven x xx (x) - -
GROUP II screwed - - - x -
GROUP III - - - - (x) xx
impact driving diesel hammer hydraulic hammer internal falling hammer
(steam hammer) vibratory driving fixed moment
high frequency, variable moment static pushing several techniques
screwing (and pull down)
boring table on rig separate boring table
soil removal auger
excavation tools
Geheide palen
Pieux battus/Heipalen
▪ Pieux préfabriqués/Prefabpalen
▪ Béton/Beton
▪ Bois/Hout
▪ Acier (tubes, profilés,..)/Staal (buizen, profielen)
▪ Pieux battus moulés dans le sol/
In de grond gevormde palen
▪ Béton plastique/plastisch beton
▪ Béton sec/droog beton
• Nowadays usually prestressed high strength concrete , precast in factory and transported to site
• Full quality control
• Design prestress for handling and driving stresses
• Length is fixed and needs to be known beforehand
• No necking - bulging
Section D: 180, 220, 250, 290, 320, 350, 380, 400, 420, 450 and 500 mm
L: 50 to 80D
1 4
Geheide prefabbeton paal
1 6
Geheide prefabbeton paal
Less usefull when foundation level varies significantly over the site Tensile stress may lead to damage to pile (! From hard to soft ! )
1 7
Geheide prefabbeton paal
Driving can be done on water from barge Driving under water level is possible with hydraulic hammers
Difficulties when driving:
•Predrilling
•jetting !? Effect on ground ?
1 8
Geheide prefabbeton paal
Deepening of piles below ground level
Long steel anvil allows to reach depth of 4-5 m below GL
More difficult to guide
1 9
Geheide prefabbeton paal
Coupling of pile segments by special splicing device
Hercules koppeling
2
0
Geheide prefabbeton paal
Driving shoe for pinning precast pile in hard rock
In de grond gevormde heipalen
In de grond gevormde
heipalen d.m.v. een voorlopige voerbuis afgesloten aan de
basis met een verloren staalplaat
Diameters : 306 mm à 601 mm
Courante lengtes tot 32 m Plastisch beton
High bearing capacity
Through hard layer by heavy driving equipment
Length easy to adapt
Risk of necking / necking (very soft ground, waterflow, ..)
In de grond gevormde heipalen
Execution sequence
Typical diameter driving tube and bottom plate (mm)
273 (310, 330)
300 (330, 350, 365) 323 (365, 380, 400) 365 (400, 410, 435) 380 (435, 450, 465) 406 (465, 480, 500) 457 (520, 535, 560) 508 (560, 580, 615)
559 (615, 640, 660, 680) 610 (660, 680, 710, 740)
In de grond gevormde heipalen
Driving
Placing
Reinforcement
Concreting and extracting
In de grond gevormde heipalen
In de grond gevormde heipalen
Nominal diameter :
Db = diameter verloren staalplaat aan de punt (indien stijf genoeg) Ds = externe diameter heibuis
Static load tests: some results Mechelen (Bypass) – TUC RAIL
Conventional ultimate bearing capacity
ca. 90 à 98% of the calculated value according to the Belgian application of the NA-EC7
c.i.s.driven pile (vibro pile) temporary tube Ds = 508 mm, bottom plate Db = 550 mm
Static load tests: some results Mechelen (Bypass) – TUC RAIL
c.i.s.driven pile (vibro pile) temporary tube Ds = 508 mm, bottom plate Db = 550 mm
Static load tests: some results Mechelen (Bypass) – TUC RAIL
Conventional ultimate bearing capacity
ca. 72% of the calculated value according to the Belgian application of the NA-EC7
c.i.s.driven pile (vibro pile) temporary tube Ds = 508 mm, bottom plate Db = 600 mm
Static load tests: some results Mechelen (Bypass) – TUC RAIL
c.i.s.driven pile (vibro pile) temporary tube Ds = 508 mm, bottom plate Db = 600 mm
Heipalen met verbrede voet
De Franki paal
Execution sequence
De FRANKI paal
First Franki job Cockerill factory Ougrée
▪ Heipalen met verbrede voet/droog beton :
▪ S 0
▪ Consistentie beton : « Aardvochtig »
▪ Aangedamd
▪ Heipalen met verbrede voet/Plastisch beton
▪ Super Vibrex, Alpha, Kappa
▪ S3
▪ Basis gevormd d.m.v. herheien bovenaan de voorlopige voerbuis
Heipalen met verbrede voet
Socofonda – Vibro Alpha pile
Fundex – super-vibrex
Heipalen met verbrede voet alternatieven
Socofonda – Kappa pile
alternatieven
Heipalen met verbrede voet
Socofonda – Kappa pile
Paalbasisniveau : laagste niveau waarop de paalbasis zijn volledige sectie heeft
Nominale diameter :
Db = maximale diameter van de verbrede voet Ds = externe diameter heibuis
alternatieven
Heipalen met verbrede voet
So sure?
Long considered as the safest through measurement of the set.
However
◆Dynamic resistance should be preferred to set
◆Interpretation of dynamic resistance is still uneasy
◆Attention should be given to setup
In de grond gevormde heipalen
Comparison between measured and estimated bearing capacities using set-based dynamic formulae
(Billfinger, 2013)
Heien van palen
TOOLS
▪ Hydraulische hamers:
▪ Betere energy transfer
▪ Minder lawaai
▪ Hei-sequentie minder afhankelijk van de grond weerstand
▪ Diesel hamers:
▪ Robuust
▪ Geen externe power unit
▪ goedkoper Type of
hammer
Ram weight
Rated energy
Efficiency transfer Ratio (ETR)
KN KJ
Diesel <200 0.4- 600
31 %(steel) 25%(concrete) Hydraulic
drop hammers
<150 <200 55-85 %
Self-
monitored hydraulic
<1500 <200 55-85 %
After Rausche (2000)
Hydraulic hammer : Low noise impact Less vibration No exhaust gas
Adjustable energy and blow rate
Lower driving stresses Higher driving efficiency
Geheide palen
Alternatieven
voor inbrengen van prefabelementen▪ Intrillen (Vibratory driving)
▪ Heibaarheid
▪ Draagvermogen ingetrilde elementen?
▪ Statisch indrukken (jacked piling)
▪ Reactie nodig
Geheide kokerpalen
Close ended : groupe I Open ended with soil plug : groupe I
Open ended without soil plug : groupe II
Geheide kokerpalen
Field of application
• aggressive soil conditions
• unstable soil, cavities …
• very soft soils (cu < 15 kPa)
• underground water current
• piles above ground or water level
• if high bending stiffness and shear resistance is required
• confined area’s : rehabilitation, renovation
Geheide kokerpalen
Geheide kokerpalen
Geheide kokerpalen
Geheide kokerpalen
JACKED PILES
Mega palen/pieu Mega
Jacked piles
Key issues
•Vibration-free installation
•Equipment capacity
•Relaxation
Lehane (2005): Relaxation Ru,static < Rinstallation
Grondverdringende Schroefpalen
driving screwing no removal
soil removal impact driven vibratory static pushing partial full
GROUP I - driven xx x (x) - -
GROUP I - Screwed - - - xx - -
GROUP II driven x xx (x) - -
GROUP II screwed - - - x -
GROUP III - - - - (x) xx
impact driving diesel hammer hydraulic hammer internal falling hammer
(steam hammer) vibratory driving fixed moment
high frequency, variable moment static pushing several techniques
screwing (and pull down)
drilling table on rig separate drilling table
soil removal auger
excavation tools
EXECUTION METHODS
Historische perspectief
•Onstaan : einde van 19de eeuw
•Eerste generatie (jaren 1980) : vrij compacte verdringingsboren – specifieke installatieuitrusting (Fundex, Atlas) : Belgische oorsprong!
•Tweede generatie (jaren 1990):
•langere verdringingsboren die beperkt opwaarts grondtransport toelaten –De Waal, Omega
•Alternatieve systemen (eind jaren 1990 en later ): Olivier,…
Marktsituatie
•sinds de jaren 1980 enorme groei In België -Marktaandeel van 30 à 40 % (totale palenmarkt)
-Marktaandeel van 60 à 70 % (’gewone’
palenmarkt)
•Wereldwijd
-Marktaandeel wordt op 7% geschat -Groeiende belangstelling
Schroefpalen
▪ VOORDELEN
▪ Installatie zonder grondverwijdering
▪ Trillingsvrije en geluidsarme installatie (verstedelijkt gebied !)
▪ Hoog installatierendement, vooral 2e generatie systemen (150 à 300 m/dag tot zelfs 600 à 800 m/dag voor bep. firma’s in ideale
omstandigheden)
▪ Hoge draagvermogens vergelijkbaar met geheide systemen
▪ NADELEN
▪ Relatief hoge machinevermogens benodigd
▪ Penetratie van harde/dichtgepakte (tussen)lagen soms probleem
Grondverdringende Schroefpalen
▪ Emergence of a range of systems, types and labels
▪ Application of Displacement Auger Piles in more soil conditions
▪ Shape of the displacement auger and Execution process of the different systems existing on the market can present large differences in the
actual ratio of displacement as well as in the final result
Grondverdringende Schroefpalen
Grondverdringende Schroefpalen
Vergelijkende proefcampagnes te Sint-Katelijne- Waver & Limelette (in kader van EC7
toepassingsdocument)
▪ Coördinatie en proefgedeelte WTCB
▪ Partners : KUL (Prof. J. Maertens) & UCL (Prof. A.
Holeyman)
▪ Financiële steun : FOD Economie
▪ In samenwerking met 5 paalbedrijven:
- Fundex
- Franki Geotechnics B - Olivier
- De Waal - Socofonda
▪ Uitgebreid proefprogramma op gvs schroefpalen en geheide prefabpalen (als referentie)
→ Basis voor opstellen van toepassingsdocument EC 7
Grondverdringende Schroefpalen
Screw piles : Systems
• Shape of the auger – movement of the soil
• Shape of the auger – effect on end bearing
• Shape of the auger – shape of the final pile
• Power of the piling rig to Rotate
• Power of the piling rig to Push – force auger penetration
• Casting method (pressure) of the concrete placement
• Control of auger extraction – effect on the shape of the final pile
Grondverdringende Schroefpalen
Infofiche WTCB
Atlas schroefpaal
WTCB infofiche 67.5.1.2.1.2
WTCB infofiche 67.5.1.2.1.1
Db= max. diam screw Ds= max. diam. tube
Base level = level max. diam lost screw
Fundex schroefpaal
Omega pile De Waal pile
Reverse flighting
Soil
transport
Displacement screw piling second generation
WTCB infofiche 67.5.1.2.1.4
De Waal schroefpaal
Base
Ds=Db= max. diam. screw auger Base level = top lost bottom plate
WTCB infofiche 67.5.1.2.1.5
Omega schroefpaal
Ds=Db= max. diam. screw auger Base level = top lost bottom plate
WTCB infofiche 67.5.1.2.1.3
Olivier screw pile
Ds=Db= max. diam screw auger
Base level = level 1 rotation above lost bottom plate
En een aantal andere systemen…
Small details can make…
A big difference
Systems details
Static load tests: results SKW (o.c. Clay site)
0
5
10
15
20
25
0.00 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80
Qmeas/Rcu,calc ( Average CPT- NA-EC7 method)
S0/Db (%)
A1-prefab A4-prefab A2-Fundex A3-Fundex B1-De Waal B2-De Waal C1-Omega C2-Omega B4-Olivier B3-Olivier C4-Atlas (C3-Atlas)
s0 = 10%Db
- Global coeff. Screw piles :0.78 – 0.90 (0.98) - Global coeff. Prefab : 0.86 – 0.91
Normalised load-settlement curves
Static load tests: results LIM (Sand site)
Normalised load-settlement curves
Site Limelette I & II
0
5
10
15
20
25
0.00 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80
Qmeas/Rcu,calc (NA-EC7 method, ab = as = 1, Dnom)
Sb/Db (%)
B1-Prefab
B2-Prefab
A1bis-Fundex
A4-De Waal
C4-De Waal
A3-Omega
C3-Omega
A2-Olivier
C2-Olivier (no sb-meas.)
B3-Atlas
B4-Atlas
s0 = 10%Db
- Global coeff. Screw piles :0.8 – 1.0 - Global coeff. Prefab : 1 & 1.12
Static load tests: some results LIM (Sand site)
Normalised load-settlement curves
Site Limelette I & II
0
5
10
15
20
25
0.00 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80
Qmeas/Rcu,calc (NA-EC7 method, ab = as = 1, Dnom)
Sb/Db (%)
B1-Prefab B2-Prefab A1bis-Fundex A4-De Waal C4-De Waal A3-Omega C3-Omega A2-Olivier
C2-Olivier (no sb-meas.) B3-Atlas
B4-Atlas
P4-tubular (LIM I) P8 - Prefab (LIM I) P12 - Driven c-i-s (LIM I)
Prefab 29x29 (1995/96) Tubular pile 0.272m (1995/96)
Franki 0.42/047 (1995/96)
Site Limelette WTCB
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16
Schroefpaalproject Limelette II Horizontale Grondrukcoëfficient KD (-)
Diepte (m)
Gemidd. KD maagdelijke terrein KD langs prefab
Gemidd. KD langs schroefpalen
Grondverdringende Schroefpalen
Infofiche WTCB
Geschroefde KOKERPALEN
Geschroefde kokerpalen
Ds : 219mm, 273 mm, 324 mm Db : 350 …650 mm
Voordeel
Penetratie van harde/dichtgepakte (tussen)lagen mogelijk
D
s?
Geschroefde kokerpalen met groutinjectie
Categorie 3 PALEN MET GRONDVERWIJDERING
BOORPALEN
driving screwing no removal
soil removal impact driven vibratory static pushing partial full
GROUP I - driven xx x (x) - -
GROUP I - Screwed - - - xx - -
GROUP II driven x xx (x) - -
GROUP II screwed - - - x -
GROUP III - - - - (x) xx
impact driving diesel hammer
hydraulic hammer internal falling hammer
(steam hammer) vibratory driving fixed moment
high frequency, variable moment static pushing several techniques
screwing (and pull down)
boring table on rig separate boring table
soil removal auger
excavation tools
EXECUTION METHODS
BOORPALEN
BOORPALEN
Bor ed Piles
carry very high vertical and horizontal loads deal with most ground conditions
But:
◆Reliability of each pile is essential
◆The different methods used to drill the hole will play an important role on the contact between the pile and the surrounding soil
◆Cleaning of the pile basis is of outmost importance on the base resistance
◆Concreting phase
◆Influence of the drilling fluid both on execution reliability and on bearing capacity
◆Structural integrity is a critical point Able to
Bored piles
One name=different systems
82
Principle of execution
Bruface, Geotechnical Eng., C. Bauduin
België: meestal onder voerbuis
Diamètres/diameters:
0,62 m, 0.75m, 0.9m, 1.07m, 1.28m, 1.5m, 2.00 m
Bétonnage au tube
plongeur/betonneren met een plunjerbuis:
C25/30 ou C30/37 S4
Verwerkbaarheid – tijdsduur van het betonneren!
BOORPALEN
BOORPALEN
Voorafgaandelijk ingeboorde of ingetrilde stalen casing
Droge boring (zonder casing) Steunvloeistof (bentoniet, polymeren)
Tijdelijke stalen verbuizing/ casing
Support of borehole with drilling fluid Bentonite slurry
BOORPALEN
• to prevent water inflow (cake)
• to support ground pressure
Bentonite level min 1,5 to 2 m above ground water level
Casing tube on top few m to avoid local instability Requirements on properties of bentonite slurry
(viscosity, unit weight, sand content...: see EN 1536 );
check properties during pile execution
Bored piles: support steel casing –thickwalled steel ring casing elements
• Thick walled steel tubes connected with special dowels, placed during excavation and retrieved during pouring of concrete
• Casing over full or part of pile length
• Water of bentonite to equilibrate the ground water pressure
BOORPALEN
Bored piles: support steel casing –thickwalled steel ring casing elements
87
Placed by vibrator before start of excavation Bored piles: vibratory driven steel casing tube
BOORPALEN
Excavation
spiraalboor
grijper
bucket
spiraalboor
grijper
bucket
Auger at end of kelly bar for “soft” ground
BOORPALEN
spiraalboor
grijper
bucket
Bucket: turning Excavation
BOORPALEN
BOORPALEN
Soft Soils
Rock: bucket with rock teeth and chisel
BOORPALEN
Bucket met bijtelsvoor harde rots chisel om rots te breken
Reinforcement
Prefabricated (welded) cages, transported to site Equiped with tubes for sonic testing
BOORPALEN
Placement of cage in borehole Coupling of two cages Wapeningen
BOORPALEN
Concrete pouring
Pour through tremie pipe to avoid segregation
Pipe at pile bottom, concrete pushes aside residues and not cleaned deposits on bottom Continuous concrete pouring operation while tremie pipe remains 1,5 to 2 m in fresh
concrete; pipe is retracted during pouring
94
BOORPALEN
Concreting: mix and properties
Mix proportions (acc EN 1536)
Cement content
− Placement in dry conditions
− Placement in submerged conditions
≥ 325 kg/m³
≥ 375 kg/m³
Water – cement ratio (W/C) < 0,6
Fines content, d< 0,125( mm (inclusive cement)
− Coarse aggregate d > 8mm
− Coarse aggregate d≤ 8 mm
≥ 400 kg/m³
≥ 450 kg/m³
Consistency rate for fresh concrete in different conditions (acc EN 1536)
Flow diameter range mm
Slump range mm
Typical conditions (examples) 460 ≤ f ≤ 530 130≤ H ≤ 180 Concrete placed in dry conditions 530 ≤ f ≤ 600 H ≥ 160 Placed by pumping or
Concrete placed in submerged conditions under water by tremie
570 ≤ f ≤ 630 H ≥ 180 Concrete placed by tremie in submerged conditions under a stabilising fluid
Note: the measured slump (H) or flow diameter F is to be rounded up to the nearest 10 mm
BORED PILES
Na injectie
Om de stijfheid en het draagvermogen te verbeteren
Base grouting
96
BOORPALEN : Bijzondere uitvoeringstechnieken
Shaft grouting
In overgeconsolideerde klei om het basisdraagvermogen te verbeteren Underreaming
97
BOORPALEN : Bijzondere uitvoeringstechnieken
Bored piles : Drilling
– Full casing drilling:
• sufficient soil plug in order to limit the potential decompression of the surrounding soil
• smoother shaft will be realized.
– Drilling fluid :
• temporary under-pressures will develop above the drilling tool
during excavation or under the grab during lifting (Van Weele ,1988).
• Attention to lifting speed.
• Polymer vs bentonite
– Borehole roughness in soft rocks and cohesive soils.
Bored piles execution
• Cleaning of the pile basis:
– Effect on base resistance
– Time-effects of the bored pile construction (Poulos (2003))
• Concreting phase.
– Rate of casting, fluidity, permeability of both concrete and soil.
– Excess porewater pressures can drain off along the shortest draining path through the bentonite cake into the soil.
– Potential interaction between drilling fluid and concrete. (Ata and
O’Neill (2000))
Bored piles testing
• NDT : Non-Destructive Test methods to evaluate
structural integrity is pulse echo or low strain testing
• CSL : Crosshole Sonic Logging uses the propagation time
and relative energy of an ultrasonic pulse
• Core drilling of the base of
the pile (or the defect zone
identified by CSL)
TIP: Thermal Integrity Profiling (TIP)
CFA palen
Standard :
diameter 350 à 600 mm
Lengtes tot 22.00 m Risico van
ontspanning
Tweede generatie Diameters tot 1.2 m Lengtes tot 40.00 m Beperking van de ontspanning
CFA (Avegaar) palen
Heel gevoelig voor grondontspanning
▪ Over-augering: te grote grondverwijdering
▪ In onsamenhagende gronden
▪ Gelinkd aan het vermogen van de machine
▪ Equipment capacity
▪ Concreting phase :
▪ Probleem van het gecontroleerd terugtrekken
▪ Te snelle optrekken -> onderdrukken en ontspanning
▪ Systeem is zeer uitvoerings- en operatorgevoelig
▪ Plaatsing van de wapening na betonneren
CFA palen
Augercast : Over-augering
Screwing ratio SR= n.p/V
with
• n is the revolution rate of the auger (rpm)
• p is the pitch of the auger (meter p round)
• V is the rate of penetration of the auger (m/min)
Mechanism of over-augering (Viggiani, 1993)
• Consider the possibility of upward soil movement, after excavation, along the auger flanges ;
• The occurrence of excessive flighting is more likely to occur with large diameter augers
• Steepening of the flight angle may help reducing soil loosening
• Excessive flighting reduces as the shear angle of the undisturbed soil increases.
Flemming (1994)
CFA palen
CFA : Monitoring tijdens uitvoering
CFA palen (schroefpalen in het algemeen!)
– Inclinatie – Koppel
– Pull down kracht – Penetratiesnelheid – Rotatiesnelheid
– Betonneer druk
– Betonneervolume
– Terugtreksnelheid
« Verbeterde »
CFA palen: beperking van de grondonstpanning
▪ CFA palen van de 2e generatie (PCS/Starsol…)
▪ Monitoring v.d. uitvoeringsparameters
▪ Screwing ratio:
▪ Grotere koppels (>20 Tm) en rotatiesnelheden (>8 to 10 rpm)
▪ pull down (> 10 T)
▪ Betonneerfase:
▪ Betonneren onder gecontroleerd druk
▪ Betonpompen van hoge capaciteiten (50 tot 70 m3/h)
▪ Telescopische betonneerbuis
▪ CFA palen met grote centrale kern (PCS-l)
▪ CFA palen met tijdelijke verbuizing
allows larger diameter and length of reinforcement cage
CFA palen met grote centrale kern (PCS-l)
Cased auger pile, reverse rotation
CFA palen met tijdelijke verbuizing
•Twee boortafels: casing en avegaar
• Opgelet : uitgeboorde grond valt van grote hoogte
• Kan doorheen
metselwerk geboord worden
• Wordt veel toegpast voor de realisatie van secanspalenwanden
CFA palen
Case study : Tessenderlo
• Augercast with large stem – partial displacement
• Diam. 600/324 mm – 17,50 m deep
• Bearing capacity 2500 kN
• Compact glauconitic sands
Tessenderlo : preliminary test program
• 5 test piles
• Static and dynamic load tests
• Test load = 6000 kN
• Heavy duty equipment (Torque 220 kNm-
pulldown 200 kN)
• Execution quite
unsuccessful > 1,5 hours
drilling
-30 -25 -20 -15 -10 -5 0
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500
s (mm)
Q (kN)
T1
Vertical static load test & Capwap Analysis Dynamic Load test
Cycle 1 Cycle 2 Capwap Analysis
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
0,1 0,2 0,3 0,4 0,5 0,6 0,7 0,8 0,9 1
an = max (S30'/log(2))
Q/Qmax
T1 Creep Analysis
Qc/Qmax = +-0.85 Qc= 0.85 x 2250 kN Qserv = Qc /1.4 = 1366 kN
Case study : Mechelen RER site
• Augercast piles with large stem
• Diam. 600/324 mm
• CPT before and after installation
• Full instrumented load tests
Case study : Mechelen RER site
Case study : Mechelen RER site
-120 -110 -100 -90 -80 -70 -60 -50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500
Pile base displacement sb -end of loading step (mm)
Average load per loading step Q (kN)
Q KW04 Qb KW04 Qs KW04 Q KW15 Qb KW15 Qs KW15
10 % Db
mogelijks beïnvloed door ontlasten en herbelasten
Case study : Mechelen RER site
After Theys (2002)
CPT - CFA with casing
-5.00 0.00 5.00 10.00 15.00 20.00
0.00 10.00 20.00 30.00 40.00
qc (MPa)
Depth (mTAW)
Electrical CPT's before Mechanical CPT's before Mechanical CPT's afterwards
Soil loosening at the pile tip
CFA palen met tijdelijke verbuizing
Categorie 2 PALEN MET WEINIG
GRONDVERDRINGING OF ONTSPANNING
Piles with
Limited
soil relaxation
Intermediate systems Difficult to categorize
PALEN met weinig grondverdringing of ontspanning
driving screwing no removal
soil removal impact driven vibratory static pushing partial full
GROUP I - driven xx x (x) - -
GROUP I - Screwed - - - xx - -
GROUP II driven x xx (x) - -
GROUP II screwed - - - x -
GROUP III - - - - (x) xx
impact driving diesel hammer
hydraulic hammer internal falling hammer
(steam hammer) vibratory driving fixed moment
high frequency, variable moment static pushing several techniques
screwing (and pull down)
boring table on rig separate boring table
soil removal auger
excavation tools
EXECUTION METHODS
PILES WITH LOW DISPLACEMENT AND LIMITED RELAXATION
▪ Thin steel elements
▪ non plugging open ended steel tubes
▪ sheetpiles
▪ H profiles
▪ Piles that involve large extraction (decompression) but foreseen of measures to mitigate decompression
▪ auger piles with overpressure
▪ tubular cased auger piles
▪ large diameter stem auger piles
▪ Screw piles which have not been validated through the normalisation commission
Driven or vibrated
Auger screwed
Open ended steel tube
Bearing capacity by inner and outer friction
Large diameter, great depth;
great bending capacity In parts that are welded together
Durability (by sacrificial corrosion allowance; by cathodic protection)
Thin steel elements
PILES WITH LOW DISPLACEMENT AND LIMITED RELAXATION
Pile driving from SEP using hydrohammer and guide frame
Jetty on open ended steel rock socketed piles
1 2 8
Open buizen
PILES WITH LOW DISPLACEMENT AND LIMITED RELAXATION
H profile: for specific applications “wide flange bearing piles”
• Difficult access (water...)
• High bending moments due to imposed ground displacement
Thin steel elements
PILES WITH LOW DISPLACEMENT AND LIMITED RELAXATION
Systems to increase bearing capacity: provide some surface for “end resistance” by plugging
PILES WITH LOW DISPLACEMENT AND LIMITED RELAXATION
A trekkop
B elastomeren C excenters
D verstelmotor (niet
zichtbaar) met tandwielen E tandwielkast
F klem
G klembekken
Vibrator brings vertical vibrations into pile that “loosens” the ground
1 3
1
Vibratory driving
Vibratory driving
▪ Advantages:
▪ Which vibro-hammer could drive the pile to the required depth?
▪ Premature refusal can often be encountered.
▪ Fast and cheap
▪ Allows to retract piles and sheetpiles
▪ Penetration prediction quite difficult, based on:
▪ experience
▪ models
▪ Disadvantages:
▪ Produces important Noise and Vibrations
▪ Debate concerning effect of vibratory penetration on static pile bearing capacity;
▪ Comparative tests are not clear to define “one final rule”
▪ Plugging of open tubes ?
▪ Sometimes: redrive by impact hammer
After Borel et al (2002)
Vibratory driving
Schroefpalen
▪ Schroefpalen met verdringing zonder infofiche = categorie 2.
▪ CFA palen met voorzieningen om de ontspanning te beperken
LOOKOUT
Many systems
▪ All installation methods may prove to be inadequate in function of the soil conditions.
▪ Aspects governing the pile installation should all be considered.
▪ The response of some types of soils to the solicitation of pile installation procedure, can be dramatically different than expected.
▪ Execution systems are classified into generic groups but they are in constant evolution, and small details are sometimes changed resulting in major differences.
It’s all about
Reliability
MATERIALEN
Algemene
beschouwingen
MATERIALS and Structural considerations
▪ Concrete
▪ Composition
▪ Rheology
▪ Workability
▪ Stability
▪ Steel
▪ Reinforcement cages stifness
▪ Tubes, welding…
▪ Position, cover,…
Concrete for deep foundations
▪ Placement mostly in immersed conditions
▪ Tremie pipe or hollow stem of auger –Importance of workability/fluidity
–Stability of the mix against segregation or bleeding –Technological aspects linked with
reinforcement/cover/tolerances…
Self-placing/self-compacting concrete
▪ Other aspects:
▪ Quantity/continuity
▪ Supply cadence
Specific aspects
Concrete for deep foundations
Concrete for deep foundations
▪ Revised version of NBN EN 206-1:2013 : specification, performances, production and conformity of concrete
▪ Annex D : additionnal requirements for concrete for special geotechnical works (formerly in EN 1536:2010 and EN
1538:2010)
Revision of EN 206-1
Concrete for deep foundations
Example bored piles
Placement condition
Cement content [kg/m³]
Water-cement ratio
[-]
Slump [mm]
Flow diameter [mm]
Dry ≥ 325 ≤ 0.60
and in compliance with provisions valid for specified
exposure classes
150 ± 30 500 ± 30 submerged under
water,
≥ 375
180 ± 30 560 ± 30 under a stabilizing
fluid 200 ± 30 600 ± 30
Concrete for deep foundations
Recent evolution of concrete production
Monitori ng of pile exec ution
• Know what happens
• Prove reproducibility
• Track anomalies
Testing and monitoring
Testing and monitoring
It is essential to document
and verify proper pile
execution Pile performance depends on
❖local conditions
❖equipment & system details
❖crew
Increase of reliability
Monitoring of pile execution
▪ Automated recording of driven pile installation parameters
▪ Dynamic monitoring of driven piles
▪ Automated monitoring of augercast and screwed pile installation
▪ Detailed annotation of any abnormality during execution, unexpected phenomenon, response of soil during
installation (subsidence, uplift, lateral movement, …) or concreting (sudden loss of concrete, abnormal over-
break,..) during the execution of bored piles.
Monitoring also includes
▪ Execution of soil tests such as CPT after pile installation (Van Tol, 2009):
▪ Redesign of piles based on CPT’s performed after pile installation can be beneficial
▪ For bored and auger piles, CPT’s should be executed at different distances and around the tested piles.
▪ Integrity testing
▪ Sonic logging
▪ Impedance testing
▪ Thermal profiling
▪ Design Pile Load tests:
▪ Instrumented
▪ Define installation parameters aligned with detailed installation method
▪ Control load testing
▪ Static
▪ Dynamic or statnamic
▪ Execution control
Testing and monitoring
Reliability?
❖adequate understanding and documentation of the local soil conditions
❖correct specifications of expected performance (capacity, deformations, …)
❖ability of the contractor to demonstrate prior experience in similar ground conditions
❖verified system performance
❖in-situ documentation and monitoring of pile execution in order to ensure reproducibility
❖pile performance testing
ENGINEERING JUDGMENT
And don’t forget