• No results found

Decision-making in the council of the European Union. The role of committees.

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Decision-making in the council of the European Union. The role of committees."

Copied!
2
0
0

Bezig met laden.... (Bekijk nu de volledige tekst)

Hele tekst

(1)

Decision-making in the council of the European Union. The role of committees.

Häge, F.M.

Citation

Häge, F. M. (2008, October 23). Decision-making in the council of the European Union. The role of committees. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/1887/13222

Version: Not Applicable (or Unknown)

License: Licence agreement concerning inclusion of doctoral thesis in the Institutional Repository of the University of Leiden

Downloaded from: https://hdl.handle.net/1887/13222

Note: To cite this publication please use the final published version (if applicable).

(2)

Stellingen behorende bij het proefschrift

Decision-Making in the Council of the European Union:

The Role of Committees van Frank M. Häge

1. A legally complex proposal is sufficient to avoid the direct involvement of ministers in EU legislative decision-making.

2. For a legislative proposal to be discussed by ministers, the proposal must either be of high salience to member states or prioritized by the Council Presidency.

3. Preference divergence among governments is a necessary but not sufficient condition for the direct involvement of ministers in EU legislative decision- making.

4. The Council Presidency’s scheduling and proposal-making prerogatives make it more influential in determining the outcome of Council negotiations than the European Commission.

5. A major legitimacy problem of EU legislative decision-making is the tendency of member states to represent national negotiation positions that reflect special interests rather than the interests of the domestic public at large.

6. Contrary to the assumptions of existing principal-agent theories, the main informational advantage of agents in legislative decision-making does not result from superior knowledge about the practical consequences of a proposal, but from superior knowledge about the meaning and interpretation of the legal text.

7. The European Commission refrains from introducing legislative proposals when it anticipates fundamental resistance to these measures by the EU’s legislative institutions.

8. Although Council members hardly outvote their peers to adopt legislation, the pure possibility of taking a decision through a vote rather than unanimous consent makes EU legislative decision-making more efficient.

9. Rejections of complex legal acts in public referenda do not tell us anything about the ‘will of the people’.

10. Just because you cannot see it, doesn’t mean that it isn’t there (referring to the political control of the bureaucracy).

Referenties

GERELATEERDE DOCUMENTEN

The effect of preference divergence on the core is not as straightforwardly determined as the effect of the voting rule. In the one-dimensional case, the core consists simply of

In the example of the Council adoption event, the routine copied the date of the adoption by the Council, the type of agenda item (i.e., A- or B- item), the session

Even if the Member States reached the final agreement in a ministerial meeting in which ministers discussed the dossier as a B-point, the ministers do not formally

These four Council formations also represent some of the busiest EU policy areas in as far as legislative decision-making is concerned (see Table 6.1). In order to

Table 8.1Characteristics of selected cases Selected Council formations AgricultureEnvironment Economic and Financial Affairs Sector characteristics Senior committee

8 Commission (2002): Proposal for a Council Regulation amending Regulation 2081/92/EEC of 14 July 1992 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin

Coreper adopted the agreement on 31 March without discussion and mandated the Presidency to inform the Parliament that the Council would be in a position to accept

Again, the Commission and the Irish delegation maintained that the existing rules already covered cases in which the parent company and the subsidiary were in