• No results found

University of Groningen Methodological aspects and standardization of PET radiomics studies Pfaehler, Elisabeth

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "University of Groningen Methodological aspects and standardization of PET radiomics studies Pfaehler, Elisabeth"

Copied!
2
0
0

Bezig met laden.... (Bekijk nu de volledige tekst)

Hele tekst

(1)

University of Groningen

Methodological aspects and standardization of PET radiomics studies

Pfaehler, Elisabeth

DOI:

10.33612/diss.149306583

IMPORTANT NOTE: You are advised to consult the publisher's version (publisher's PDF) if you wish to cite from it. Please check the document version below.

Document Version

Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record

Publication date: 2021

Link to publication in University of Groningen/UMCG research database

Citation for published version (APA):

Pfaehler, E. (2021). Methodological aspects and standardization of PET radiomics studies. University of Groningen. https://doi.org/10.33612/diss.149306583

Copyright

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons).

Take-down policy

If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim.

Downloaded from the University of Groningen/UMCG research database (Pure): http://www.rug.nl/research/portal. For technical reasons the number of authors shown on this cover page is limited to 10 maximum.

(2)

Propositions

1. A standardization of each step in the radiomics pipeline is essential for the clinical implementation of PET radiomic features. (this thesis, Chapter 2-5)

2. Radiomic studies should be described in a way that each step can be easily reproduced by other research groups. (this thesis, Chapter 2)

3. Results of radiomic studies should be regarded with caution. (this thesis, Chapter 2,6) 4. Before the implementation of radiomics in the clinic, a large scale validation involving

multiple centers and PET scanners needs to be performed. (this thesis, Chapter 4-6)

5. Each segmentation method used for tumors in PET images has some limitations. (this thesis Chapter 7-9)

6. For the determination of treatment response, the repeatability of a segmentation method is essential. (this thesis, Chapter 8 and 9).

7. With four parameters I can fit an elephant, and with five I can make him wiggle his trunk. John von Neumann

8. And whatever we wish to find, we should (once found) regard with particular mistrust. Bertolt Brecht – Life of Galilei

9. There is nothing more wonderful than being a scientist, nowhere I would rather be than in my lab, staining up my clothes and getting paid to play.

Referenties

GERELATEERDE DOCUMENTEN

To ease a further documentation, two additional output files are created: The first output is a copy of the used configuration file so that the user can easily access

The aim of this study was to explore how feature space reduction and repeatability of 18 F-FDG PET radiomic features are affected by various sources of variation such as

The differences between clinically preferred and EARL-compliant reconstructions were also not significant, but the clinical preferred reconstruction yielded the highest and

Methods: Twenty PET images of bulky tumours were delineated independently by six observers using four approaches: (I) manual, (II) interactive threshold-based,

Together with a majority vote approach (combining the results of four conventional segmentation approaches) the proposed segmentation methods were superior to the

Figure 7: Jaccard Coefficient (JC) values dependent on lesion size: JC values for bigger (left figure) and smaller (right figure) lesions for all segmentation approaches

Therefore, the aim of this thesis was to identify the image reconstruction and discretization setting that lead to the highest number of comparable PET radiomic

First of all, I would like to thank my supervisors Ronald and Johan for giving me the opportunity to make a PhD in the exciting field of medical image processing