• No results found

University of Groningen Optimal bounds, bounded optimality Böhm, Udo

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "University of Groningen Optimal bounds, bounded optimality Böhm, Udo"

Copied!
2
0
0

Bezig met laden.... (Bekijk nu de volledige tekst)

Hele tekst

(1)

University of Groningen

Optimal bounds, bounded optimality

Böhm, Udo

IMPORTANT NOTE: You are advised to consult the publisher's version (publisher's PDF) if you wish to cite from it. Please check the document version below.

Document Version

Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record

Publication date: 2018

Link to publication in University of Groningen/UMCG research database

Citation for published version (APA):

Böhm, U. (2018). Optimal bounds, bounded optimality: Models of impatience in decision-making. University of Groningen.

Copyright

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons).

Take-down policy

If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim.

Downloaded from the University of Groningen/UMCG research database (Pure): http://www.rug.nl/research/portal. For technical reasons the number of authors shown on this cover page is limited to 10 maximum.

(2)

Propositions

1) Reward rate maximisation provides an explanation for perceptual decision-making with a strong theoretical construction but weak empirical footing (Chapter 2) 2) In two-alternative forced choice decision tasks, the behaviour of human decision makers is not reward rate optimal (Chapter 3) 3) In perceptual decision-making under speed stress (but not under accuracy stress), fluctuations in CNV amplitude reflect the adjustment of response caution (Chapter 4) 4) Hierarchical Bayesian regression models that relate behavioural and physiological measurements to parameters in cognitive models provide a statistically sound way of testing linking hypotheses (Chapter 5) 5) Between-trial variability parameters in diffusion models increase model complexity and decrease usability (Chapter 6) 6) Hierarchical data require hierarchical models (Chapter 7)

Referenties

GERELATEERDE DOCUMENTEN

Our analysis showed that the average CNV amplitude was more negative in the speed than in the accuracy condition while average response times were shorter and average accuracies

Unlike in the case of un- correlated covariates, in the case of correlated covariates the median-split analysis now suggested a spurious effect of the first covariate on the w

On the other hand, the between-trial variabilities are often not the focus of psychological theories, and seem to make the model unnecessarily complex: Recently, Lerche and Voss

For example, of the most recent 100 empirical papers in Psychonomic Bulletin & Review’s Brief Report section (volume 23, issues 2-4), 93 used a hierarchical experimental design.

In fact, Khodadadi, Fakhariand and Busemeyer (2014) have proposed a model that combines rein- forcement learning mechanisms with a sequential sampling model to explain the

As described in the main text, the Bayes factors from the regression analysis showed strong evid- ence for an effect of the first covariate on the A parameter (dark grey dots,

From Poisson shot noise to the integrated Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process: Neurally principled models of information accumulation in decision- making and response time.. An integrated

Omdat de rest van de stippen echter toevallig beweegt, verschilt het totale aantal stippen dat naar links beweegt van moment tot moment en neemt de proefpersoon soms een