• No results found

Basis of organization Which type of organic structure is the basis of the organization

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Basis of organization Which type of organic structure is the basis of the organization"

Copied!
7
0
0

Bezig met laden.... (Bekijk nu de volledige tekst)

Hele tekst

(1)

APPENDIX 1 MEASURES OF INDICATORS ORGANIZATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS

1. MEASURES OF STRUCTURE

The questions that were asked during the interviews were principally open questions with regard to the development of the characteristics of the relevant variables of organizational effectiveness. Descriptions and definitions of these characteristics were partially adapted from the Miller and Friesen (1983) study, a recent theory developed by Nieuwenhuis (2006), and the model developed by Chandler, Hanks, Jansen and Watson (1994).

Basis of organization

Which type of organic structure is the basis of the organization?

- Simple structure

The founder of the company is assisted by individuals with varying responsibilities.

- Functional structure

Individual departments or functions according to specific knowledge and skills. (F-format) - Divisional structure

Specific groups for similar products, markets, or geographic regions.

(P-,M-, or G-format) - Matrix structure

A combination of the vertical functional structure with the horizontal structure. Normal work can be found in the regular sections and specific projects are done by project groups across departments.

Formalization

The degree of formalization is the extent to which roles are independent of specific personal attributes of individuals occupying the roles. Formalization tries to standardize and regulate behaviour and consists of the following sub variables.

- Differentiation

Dividing of activities or tasks, responsibilities and authority in separate activities, like preparation, implementation, support and control. Differentiation can be vertical (adding another management level) or horizontal (job enrichment and job enlargement).

- Delegation of Operating Authority

The amount of authority transferred to lower and middle levels of management for administration of the day-to-day operation of the business. Operating decisions involve equipment replacement, production planning, adjusting prices of goods, inventory purchases, hiring of personnel, etc.

- Decision-making structure

Distribution of power for making strategic decisions regarding acquisitions, diversification, major new product introductions, long term goals etc.

(2)

Centralization is high if the top executives alone make most of the decisions with a minimum of consultation, low, if decision-making is more decentralized.

- Coordination or Institutionalized governance

Directing activities towards achieving the organizational goals. Coordination is high when policies, methods and procedures guide organizational activities.

Specialization

The division of labour is the specialisation of cooperative labour in specific, circumscribed tasks and roles, intended to increase efficiency of output.

- Technocratization

The number of highly trained staff specialists and professionally qualified people (accountants, engineers, scientists, marketers, lawyers, etc.) in the organization.

- Organic specialization

The number of employees of different functional areas, specialized in a certain product, market or geographical region (P-, M-, or G-format).

Centralization

Who is the last person whose permission must be obtained before legitimate actions may be taken on strategic, tactical or operational level?

Delegation is the process that a task has been articulated and systematized to someone else.

Decentralization is more than delegation, it includes the transfer of discretionary powers.

2. MEASURES OF STYLE

Definitions of the characteristics of the variable management style were adapted from a theory developed by Goleman, D., Boyatzis, R., and McKee, A. (2002).

Authoritative or visionary style

Builds resonance by moving people towards shared dreams.

Coaching style

Builds resonance by connecting what a person wants with the organization’s goals.

Affiliative style

Builds resonance by connecting people to each other.

Democratic style

Builds resonance by valuing people’s input and commitment through participation.

Pacesetting style

Builds resonance by meeting challenging and exciting goals.

Coercive or commanding style

Builds resonance by giving clear direction in an emergency.

(3)

3. MEASURES OF SYSTEMS

Definitions of the characteristics of the variable systems, also referred to as MAS in this study, were adapted from a theory developed by Moores and Yuen (2001).

Selection of information

Reliance on

1. Monthly profit and loss statement 2. Monthly balance sheet

3. Cash-flow statements 4. Cost accounting

5. Authoritative budgetary control 6. Participative budgetary control 7. Capital budgeting

8. Long-term planning and forecasts 9. Responsibility accounting 10. Quality controls

11. Environmental scanning

12. Financial information for performance evaluation 13. Long-term criteria for performance evaluation

Presentation of information

Scope

1. Internal 2. External 3. Financial 4. Non-financial 5. Historic 6. Future

(4)

APPENDIX 2 PROCESS STRUCTURE Figure 1: The working of a process structure

Figure 2: Integration of organizational structure and process structure

Figure 2: Integration of organizational structure and process structure

(5)

APPENDIX 3 LITERATURE RESEARCH STRUCTURE AND STYLE DURING GROWTH AND MATURITY

1. THEORY BY ADIZES (2004)

THEORIES FROM LITERATURE

Variables Who and

when?

Current situation Growth phase

Demanded situation Maturity phase

STRUCTURE Adizes

(2004)

Go-Go stage Adolescence Prime

1. Basis of organization

Functional Moderatly divisionalized

Divisionalized 2. Formalization

a. Differentiation Some

differentiation

Moderate degree of differentiation

High degree of differentiation b. Delegation of

operating authority

Low Moderate High

c. Decision making structure

Directive by top management

More professional by higher management

Integrative and participative d. Coordination or

institutionalized governance

Direct

supervision by founder

Rules and procedures Integrative system and team approach towards management

3. Specialization Low Moderate High

4. Centralization Centralized Moderately

Centralized

Decentralized

2. THEORY BY CHANDLER, HANKS, JANSEN AND WATSON (1993) THEORIES FROM LITERATURE

Variables Who and when? Current situation

Growth phase

Demanded situation Maturity phase STRUCTURE Chandler, Hanks, Jansen and

Watson (1994)

Expansion Consolidation

1. Basis of organization

Departmentalized, Functional

Departmentalized, Functional 2. Formalization

a. Differentiation b. Delegation of operating authority

Limited delegation Sufficient delegation c. Decision making

structure

d. Coordination or institutionalized governance

Formal systems begin to emerge, but enforcement is lax

Formal, bureaucratic;

planning and control is enforced

3. Specialization

4. Centralization Centralized Moderately centralized

MANAGEMENT STYLE

Adizes (2004) (Go-Go and

Adolescence)

Degree of importance Prime 1. Management Style

a. Authorative Entrepreneurial X Equal X

b. Coaching Integrative Increase X

c. Affiliative Integrative Increase X

d. Democratic Administrative (bureaucrat) X Decrease

e. Pace setting Productive X Decrease

f. Coercive Productive X Decrease

(6)

3. THEORY BY MOORES AND YUEN (2001)

THEORIES FROM LITERATURE

Variables Who and when? Current situation

Growth phase

Demanded situation Maturity phase

STRUCTURE Moores and Yuen (2001) Growth Maturity

1. Basis of organization 2. Formalization

a. Differentiation Moderate degree of

differentiation

Moderate degree of differentiation b. Delegation of

operating authority

Limited delegation Sufficient delegation c. Decision making

structure

Integrative Hierarchical d. Coordination or

institutionalized governance

Differentiated Moderately differentiated

3. Specialization Specialized Moderately specialized

4. Centralization Centralized Moderately decentralized

MANAGEMENT STYLE

Moores and Yuen (2001) Growth Degree of importance Maturity 1. Management Style

a. Authorative High Decrease Medium

b. Coaching

c. Affiliative High Decrease Medium

d. Democratic High Decrease Medium

e. Pace setting High Decrease Medium

f. Coercive High Decrease Medium

4. THEORY BY SMITH. MITCHELL AND SUMMER (1985) THEORIES FROM LITERATURE

Variables Who and when? Current situation

Growth phase

Demanded situation Maturity phase STRUCTURE Smith, Mitchell and Summer

(1985)

High Growth Maturity

1. Basis of organization

Functional/simple Divisional/more complex 2. Formalization

a. Differentiation Developing High degree of

differentiation b. Delegation of

operating authority

Limited delegation Moderate/High delegation c. Decision making

structure

Professional management makes decisions with analytical tools

Professional management makes decisions through bargaining

d. Coordination or institutionalized governance

Moderately formal Budgets

Highly formal Rules and regulations

3. Specialization Top level management:

specialists

Top level management:

Strategists, planners

4. Centralization Centralized Decentralized

(7)

5. THEORY BY MILLER AND FRIESEN (1983, 1984)

THEORIES FROM LITERATURE

Variables Who and when? Current situation

Growth phase

Demanded situation Maturity phase

STRUCTURE Miller and Friesen (1984) Growth Maturity

1. Basis of organization

Some formalization of structure

Functional

Formal bureaucratic structure

Functional (more complex) 2. Formalization

a. Differentiation Moderate differentiation Moderate differentiation b. Delegation of

operating authority

Low Low/Moderate

c. Decision making structure

Initial development of less centralized

decision-making system

Further development of less centralized decision- making system

d. Coordination or institutionalized governance

Initial development of formal information processing

Initial development of formal information processing

3. Specialization Few staff support

functions

Low specialisation

Increasing number of staff support functions

Moderate specialisation

4. Centralization Somewhat less

centralized

Moderate centralization

Referenties

GERELATEERDE DOCUMENTEN

Although in eukaryotes much of genome regulation occurs at the level of nucleosomes (via histone tail modifications and nucleosome density) [7,8], at a coarse grained, structural

Volume in 2005: 220 tons by vessel and 80 tons by airplane Type of mangoes: Conventional.. Almost

This study will use a questionnaire to collect data from the business division of KPN with the purpose of giving an adequate answer to the research question, to what

For the structure domain, mechanistic firms prefer to balance their alliance portfolio between collaborating with new partner firms and partner firms with prior ties to the firm..

After discussion on and the selection of functions and aspects of importance for the specific design the designers with different disciplines based backgrounds can

Since London University does not address alumni by means of telephone fund raising, students do not have a direct link with the development office.. However, the development office

But whether a 1:1 or a lower 1:2–4 ratio is true or not needs to be established by further work on the supramolecular organization of PSII within the membrane and by analyzing the

Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of