• No results found

Myth and philosophy on stage in Platonic dialogues Tofighian, O.

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Myth and philosophy on stage in Platonic dialogues Tofighian, O."

Copied!
2
0
0

Bezig met laden.... (Bekijk nu de volledige tekst)

Hele tekst

(1)

Myth and philosophy on stage in Platonic dialogues

Tofighian, O.

Citation

Tofighian, O. (2010, January 19). Myth and philosophy on stage in Platonic dialogues. Faculty of Humanities, Leiden University. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/1887/14566

Version: Corrected Publisher’s Version

License: Licence agreement concerning inclusion of doctoral thesis in the Institutional Repository of the University of Leiden

Downloaded from: https://hdl.handle.net/1887/14566

Note: To cite this publication please use the final published version (if applicable).

(2)

251

Curriculum Vitae

Omid Tofighian has been a PhD candidate in Philosophy at Leiden University since October, 2005. He was born in Tehran in 1975 but left around the time of the Islamic Revolution to the United States for 4 years before immigrating to Australia (1982) where he completed a combined Honors degree in philosophy and studies in religion at the University of Sydney. Over the past six years he has lived in the UAE where he worked at Abu Dhabi University; Belgium where he was a visiting scholar at K.U. Leuven; The Netherlands to work on his PhD; and short periods in Iran and Australia. During this time he has organized numerous art and cultural events which focus on cultural awareness and social justice. These include painting exhibitions, cultural festivals, film screenings and music concerts. He recently launched a website detailing these events and future ones, see www.artculturetoday.com. He has published an article in From Pariah to the Pedestal – the bourgeoning of Iranian cinema, (forthcoming 2010. Seyed-Gohrab, A. and K. Talattof [eds.]); in The Journal for the Sydney Society for Literature and Aesthetics (forthcoming 2010); in Forum Philosophicum International Journal for Philosophy (forthcoming 2010); a chapter in International Handbook on the Preparation and Development of School Leaders, together with R.J.S. Macpherson (Routledge 2008); and two articles in Threskeiologia (The Greek Journal of Comparative Religion 2003 and 2005).

Referenties

GERELATEERDE DOCUMENTEN

License: Licence agreement concerning inclusion of doctoral thesis in the Institutional Repository of the University of Leiden.. Downloaded

He explains in Mythical Thought (p. 64) that myth categorizes its material like science but instead of logical categories of genus it classifies them according to “the law

plot structure; character selection; index of themes and motifs). I will move on from the Meno to deal with four other dialogues using the same framework of interpretation and

18 In light of these comments and observations the theme of the dialogue is not solely virtue and whether it can be taught but also, as I will analyze next, the place

After the myth Protagoras presents Socrates with a number of arguments in the form of examples which confirm the hypothesis – the position that political

In other words, the hypothesis is in the service of the plot which was designed to enforce a particular ideological distinction (Platonism against

5 For an interpretation that links Socrates‟ trip out to the country with his loss of composure and enthusiasm for listening to Lysias‟ speech see the introduction by Nehamas

As a historical account that arises as a response to the formal and rational principles used to develop the theory of recollection and the ideal state it is,