• No results found

Myth and philosophy on stage in Platonic dialogues Tofighian, O.

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Myth and philosophy on stage in Platonic dialogues Tofighian, O."

Copied!
6
0
0

Bezig met laden.... (Bekijk nu de volledige tekst)

Hele tekst

(1)

Myth and philosophy on stage in Platonic dialogues

Tofighian, O.

Citation

Tofighian, O. (2010, January 19). Myth and philosophy on stage in Platonic dialogues. Faculty of Humanities, Leiden University. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/1887/14566

Version: Corrected Publisher’s Version

License: Licence agreement concerning inclusion of doctoral thesis in the Institutional Repository of the University of Leiden

Downloaded from: https://hdl.handle.net/1887/14566

Note: To cite this publication please use the final published version (if applicable).

(2)

Myth and Philosophy on Stage in Platonic Dialogues Table of Contents

1. Introduction 1

1.1 What do we mean by myth? The study of myth in general 3

1.2 The study of myth in philosophy 11

1.3 The study of myth in Plato 18

1.4 Methodology and genre 28

2. Mutual scaffolding as a method 34

2.1 Mutual scaffolding (a dialectical unity) 37

2.2 Plot structure 51

2.3 Character selection 53

2.4 Narrative mode 53

2.5 Mutual scaffolding as a trope 55

2.6 Liminality in Plato 64

3. Dialogue analysis (case studies) 67

3.1 Guidelines for the use of a myth/hypothesis – Meno 67

3.1.1 Introduction 67

a. Using a hypothesis and considering consequences 68

b. Comments on hypothesis in the Phaedo 71

3.1.2 Theme introduction, setting and narrative mode 73

3.1.3 The myth/hypothesis 76

3.1.4 The philosophical arguments 81

3.1.4 Mutual scaffolding 83

3.1.5 Plot structure 89

3.1.6 Character selection 91

a. Meno 91

b. Socrates 92

(3)

c. The slave boy 93

3.1.7 Index of themes and motifs 94

a. Setting (critical indications relating to method of analysis and arriving at unreasonable consequences) 94

b. Indications of, and references to, how a hypothesis must or must not be used 95

c. Liminality (the Trickster) 96

d. Plot (life-death-rebirth themes and motifs) 98

3.2 Demonstration of a beneficial myth/hypothesis – Protagoras 99

3.2.1 Theme introduction, setting and narrative mode 99

3.2.2 The myth/hypothesis 101

3.2.3 The philosophical arguments 105

3.2.4 Mutual scaffolding 108

3.2.5 Plot structure 112

3.2.6 Character selection 117

a. Socrates 117

b. Protagoras 118

c. The attendees 119

3.2.7 Index of themes and motifs 119

a. Motifs of the partnership theme (cooperation of different elements) 119

b. Socrates’ conservatism 120

c. Socrates’ inconducive attitude 121

d. Protagoras’ positive characteristics and favorable representation of sophists 121

3.3 Myth and the regulation of argument – Phaedo 123

3.3.1 Theme introduction, setting and narrative mode 123

3.3.2. The myth 127

3.3.3 The philosophical arguments 130

3.3.4 Mutual scaffolding 139

a. Preface 139

(4)

b. Regulation 145

3.3.5 Plot structure 147

3.3.6 Character selection 148

a. Phaedo 149

b. Echecrates 149

c. Socrates 150

d. Simmias and Cebes 150

3.3.7 Index of themes and motifs 151

a. Deliverance theme 151

b. Strict dualism theme 151

c. Pythagorean/ Platonic dynamics 151

d. Philosophical life as a preparation for death

(general hypothesis) 152

e. Two realities – the Pythagorean earth and the Platonic

dodecahedron 152

f. The prison 153

g. Liminal time 153

3.4 Myth/hypothesis, theoretical enhancement and transition – Phaedrus 155 3.4.1 Theme introduction, setting and narrative mode 155

3.4.2 The myth/hypothesis 161

3.4.3 The philosophical arguments 166

3.4.4 Mutual scaffolding 168

3.4.5 Plot structure 179

3.4.6 Character selection 181

a. Master 181

b. Student 182

3.4.7 Index of themes and motifs 183

a. Indications of former view/later view transition 183

b. Collection and division 184

c. Love, soul and knowledge connection 184

d. Liminal space 184

(5)

3.5 The Atlantis myth. The ideal, fantasy and critical commentary 185 Timaeus and Critias

3.5.1 Preface 185

3.5.2 Theme introduction, setting and narrative mode 187

3.5.3 The myth 193

3.5.4 The philosophical arguments (hypotheses) 198

3.5.5 Mutual scaffolding 199

a. Influence of the plot 200

b. Rethinking recollection 202

c. Revisiting the ideal state 205

d. Metaphysics as hypothesis 209

3.5.6 Plot structure 214

3.5.7 Character selection 217

a. Socrates 217

b. Critias 217

c. Timaeus 218

d. Egypt and the Egyptian Priest 219

e. Solon 219

f. Atlantis 220

3.5.8 Index of Themes and Motifs 221

a. Hypotheses 221

b. Recollection 221

c. Golden age (pure beginnings) 221

d. Regress 222

e. Athenian pride 222

4. Conclusion 223

Bibliography 233

Samenvatting 247

Curriculum Vitae 251

(6)

Referenties

GERELATEERDE DOCUMENTEN

In other words, the hypothesis is in the service of the plot which was designed to enforce a particular ideological distinction (Platonism against

5 For an interpretation that links Socrates‟ trip out to the country with his loss of composure and enthusiasm for listening to Lysias‟ speech see the introduction by Nehamas

As a historical account that arises as a response to the formal and rational principles used to develop the theory of recollection and the ideal state it is,

To appreciate fully the philosophical potential of literary features in the myths meant that the tools I used to connect them to the philosophical counterparts

“The Status of Myth in the Gorgias or: Taking Plato Seriously”, presented at the conference The Uses, Functions and Status of Platonic Myth.. University

Mijn doelstelling is om te beschrijven dat de rol van mythe in Plato niet gereduceerd kan worden tot één definitie en één functie, maar een integrale eigenschap

He has published an article in From Pariah to the Pedestal – the bourgeoning of Iranian cinema, (forthcoming 2010. Talattof [eds.]); in The Journal for the Sydney

Whether one accepts that the Dutch custom of Zwarte Piet is a remnant of a tradition based on prejudice or not its existence in contemporary Dutch culture affects the way