• No results found

Individual teacher learning in a context of collaboration in teams Meirink, J.A.

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Individual teacher learning in a context of collaboration in teams Meirink, J.A."

Copied!
13
0
0

Bezig met laden.... (Bekijk nu de volledige tekst)

Hele tekst

(1)

Individual teacher learning in a context of collaboration in

teams

Meirink, J.A.

Citation

Meirink, J. A. (2007, November 15). Individual teacher learning in a context of collaboration in teams. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/1887/12435

Version: Corrected Publisher’s Version

License: Licence agreement concerning inclusion of doctoral thesis in the Institutional Repository of the University of Leiden

Downloaded from: https://hdl.handle.net/1887/12435

Note: To cite this publication please use the final published version (if applicable).

(2)

Individual teacher learning

in a context of

collaboration in teams

(3)

Leiden University Graduate School of Teaching

This research was carried out in the context of the Interuniversity Center for Educational Research.

This research was funded by the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO) (Project no. 411-01-251).

Title: Individual teacher learning in a context of collaboration in teams

Titel: Individueel leren van docenten in een context van samenwerking in teams

Print: Mostert & Van Onderen! Leiden Cover design: Friederike van der Boon Lay-out: Dirk Jan Meirink

ISBN 978-90-804722-7-3

© 2007, Jacobiene Meirink

All rights reserved. No part of this thesis may be reproduced, stored in retrieval systems, or transmitted in any form of by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise without the prior written permission of the author.

(4)

Individual teacher learning

in a context of

collaboration in teams

Proefschrift

ter verkrijging van

de graad van Doctor aan de Universiteit Leiden,

op gezag van de Rector Magnificus prof. mr. P.F. van der Heijden, volgens besluit van het College voor Promoties

te verdedigen op donderdag 15 november 2007 klokke 16.15 uur

door

Jacobiene Albertina Meirink geboren te Leiden

in 1980

(5)

Promotiecommissie Promotores

Prof. Dr. N. Verloop Prof. Dr. T.C.M. Bergen Copromotor

Dr. P.C. Meijer

Overige leden

Dr. H.H. Tillema (referent), Universiteit Leiden Prof. Dr. A. Aelterman, Universiteit Gent

Prof. Dr. M.L.L. Volman, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam

(6)

Voor pap en mam

(7)
(8)

Table of contents

Chapter 1. Introduction

1.1 Background to the study

1.1.1 Teacher learning in a context of collaboration in interdisciplinary teams

1.1.2 Fostering active and self-regulated student learning as a context for learning

1.2 Theoretical framework

1.2.1 Characterization of collaboration in interdisciplinary teams 1.2.2 Conceptualization of teacher learning

1.3 Design of the study 1.4 Outline

Chapter 2. Collaboration in teams: Teacher learning activities and self-reported outcomes 2.1 Introduction

2.2 Conceptual framework

2.2.1 Collaboration as a context for teacher learning 2.2.2 Learning activities in teacher collaboration 2.3 Method

2.3.1 Enlisting schools to participate

2.3.2 Characterization of collaboration in teams

2.3.3 Participants

2.3.4 Data collection 2.4 Analysis

2.5 Results

2.5.1 Learning activities in teacher collaboration 2.5.2 Succession of learning activities

2.5.3 Configurations: types and frequencies

2.5.4 Similarities and differences in configurations 2.6 Conclusions and discussion

15 16 17

17 17 19 21 22

30 31 31 32 34 34 34 34 35 36 39 39 40 41 43 44

(9)

Chapter 3. The relations of teacher learning activities to changes in beliefs about teaching and learning 3.1 Introduction

3.1.1 Perspectives on teacher learning

3.1.2 Teacher beliefs about teaching and learning 3.1.3 Teacher learning activities

3.1.4 The present study 3.2 Method

3.2.1 Participants 3.2.2 Data collection 3.3 Analysis

3.4 Results

3.4.1 Changes in teacher beliefs about teaching and learning 3.4.2 Teacher activities

3.4.3 Exploration of changed beliefs in relation to learning activities 3.4.4 Differences in the nature and topics of the learning activities 3.4.5 Differences in initial teacher beliefs about teaching and learning 3.5 Conclusions and discussion

Chapter 4. The relations of teacher learning activities to changes in preferences for learning activities 4.1 Introduction

4.1.1 Preferences for learning activities 4.1.2 Teacher learning activities 4.1.3 The present study

4.2 Method

4.2.1 Participants 4.2.2 Data collection 4.3 Analysis

4.4 Results

4.4.1 Preferences for learning activities

4.4.2 Changes in preferences for learning activities

4.4.3 Reported sequences of learning activities in digital logs 4.4.4 Associations between changed preferences for learning

activities and specific learning activities reported in the digital logs

4.5 Conclusions and discussion

52 52 53 54 55 56 56 57

60 64 64 65 67 69 71 73

82 82 83 84 84 84 85 87 88 88 89 89 90

98

(10)

Chapter 5. Characterizing collaboration in interdisciplinary teams and its relation to teacher learning

5.1 Introduction

5.2 Conceptual framework

5.2.1 The educational reform as a context for collaboration and learning in interdisciplinary teams

5.2.2 Teacher learning in collaboration 5.2.3 Teacher collaboration

5.2.3.1 Interdependency 5.2.3.2 Alignment

5.2.4 Group and organizational characteristics affecting collaboration in teams

5.3 Method 5.3.1 Design

5.3.2 Participants

5.3.3 Data collection methods 5.4 Analysis

5.5 Results

5.5.1 Within-case analyses: Collaboration and teacher learning in the five teams

5.5.2 Cross-case analysis: Patterns in collaboration and teacher learning in the five teams

5.6 Conclusions and discussion

Chapter 6. General conclusions and discussion 6.1 Short overview of the research project

6.2 Main findings with regard to the research questions 6.2.1 Research question 1

6.2.2 Research question 2 6.2.3 Research question 3 6.2.4 Research question 4

6.3 General conclusions and discussion 6.4 Limitations of the study

6.5 Implications and suggestions for future research

108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115

117 117 118 118 120 122 124 128 131

141 142 142 144 146 149 150 154 156

(11)

Nederlandse samenvatting References

Publications Curriculum Vitae Dankwoord

ICLON PhD dissertation series

163 173 181 183 185 187

(12)

List of Tables, Figures and Appendices

Chapter 2

Table 2.1 Learning activities categories found in three studies and starting learning activities categories for the present study

Table 2.2 Teacher characteristics and quantity of data collection Table 2.3 Specifications of teachers’ learning activities categories Table 2.4 Frequencies of configurations

Figure 2.1 Configurations of reported learning activities and changes in cognition or behavior

Appendix 2.1 Visualization of the information asked for in the digital log

Appendix 2.2 Example of how original data from interviews and digital logs was converted into configurations

Chapter 3

Table 3.1 Questionnaire ‘Beliefs about teaching and learning’

Table 3.2 Numbers of teachers with congruent, incongruent, or no changes in beliefs about teaching and learning

Table 3.3 List of learning activity sequences

Table 3.4 Relative frequencies of activity sequences 1, 7, and 9 according to changes in student- and subject-matter- oriented beliefs about teaching and learning.

Table 3.5 Initial means, standard deviations, minimum scores, and maximum scores for different patterns of change in student- and subject-matter-oriented beliefs about teaching and learning (October 2004)

Table 3.6 Characterization of activity sequences and belief changes in terms of nature and topic of learning experiences and initial belief scores Figure 3.1 Example of a configuration of teacher activities plus outcome

Chapter 4

Table 4.1 Composition of the five teams

Table 4.2 Categories of learning activities identified in the literature and used in the questionnaire

Table 4.3 Example situation of the questionnaire ‘Preferences for learning

activities’

(13)

Table 4.4 Means and standard deviations for the questionnaire

Table 4.5 Number of teachers with significant changes in their preferences for learning activities after one year (N=34)

Table 4.6 Relative frequencies of learning experiences involving

‘experimentation’ for teachers with changed preference scores for

‘trying different things’

Appendix 4.1 Situations in the questionnaire ‘Preferences for learning activities’

Chapter 5

Table 5.1 Overview of variables

Table 5.2 Sample items of questionnaire ‘Organizational characteristics’

Table 5.3 Description and classification of the collaboration in the five teams Table 5.4 Patterns in scores on the variables collaboration and teacher

learning in interdisciplinary teams

Figure 5.1 Teacher collaboration and learning in interdisciplinary teams within the school organization

Appendix 5.1 Matrix of results for type of collaboration, group and organizational characteristics, and teacher learning

Referenties

GERELATEERDE DOCUMENTEN

that ‘experimentation’ was often preceded by other activities, such as individually or collectively thinking up alternatives or solutions for a particular problem. We concluded

In such a context, it might be expected that teachers would change not merely their knowledge and skills with regard to teaching and student learning, but also their own

Activities fitting in category 1, doing (cf. Table 2.1), were not found in the data we used for this study. This category entails activities that take place in teachers’

In order to explore the relations between the learning activities reported by the teachers and changes in their beliefs about teaching and learning, the following calculations for

Comparison of the questionnaire scores showed some of the teachers’ preferences for learning activities to change and particularly their preference for the activity ‘trying

The teams in which teachers exchanged ideas for and experiences of experimentation with alternative methods, and aimed at shared instructional problem-solving, which implies a

which was used in the questionnaire. We concluded that the teachers in this study did not learn much from collaborating with colleagues to solve particular individual problems;

The author is not responsible for any losses which may result from the use or Distribution of this artwork as part of the xfig package, where xfig is part of a commercially