• No results found

ENSO Prediction Skill in the NCEP CFS

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Share "ENSO Prediction Skill in the NCEP CFS"

Copied!
52
0
0

Bezig met laden.... (Bekijk nu de volledige tekst)

Hele tekst

(1)

ENSO Prediction Skill in the NCEP CFS

Renguang Wu

Center for Ocean-Land-Atmosphere Studies

Coauthors: Ben P. Kirtman (RSMAS, University of Miami) Huug van den Dool (CPC, NCEP, NOAA)

CTB Joint Seminar Series

February 3, 2010, NCEP

1

(2)

Spring prediction barrier

What is the spring prediction barrier?

A large drop in the prediction skill of eastern equatorial Pacific SST during boreal spring

2

(3)

The seasonality of forecast skill (NINO3 SST) May

Kirtman et al. 2001

Initial Month

Jan Dec

Lead time (month) 3

(4)

Spring Prediction Barrier: Attribution

Why is there a spring prediction barrier?

. Low variance of Equatorial Pacific SSTAs in boreal spring e.g., Xue et al.’94; Torrence and Webster’98; Clarke and van Gorder’99

. The physical argument: weak Walker Cell and minimum zonal pressure and SST gradient (Equatorial Pac) in spring, initial errors project strongly onto ENSO modes, leading to large error growth

Issue: Perfect ICs in observations are not necessarily perfect for models used in predictions

. The statistical argument: Signal/Noise ratio lowest in spring

But, cannot explain the El Nino versus La Nina skill difference 4

(5)

Spring Persistence Barrier: auto-lag cor drop

Reasons:

(1) The phase transition of ENSO (Torrence and Webster’98;

Clarke and van Gorder’99; Burgers et al.’05)

(2) The seasonal change in the ENSO variance (Xue et al.’94;

Balmaseda et al.’95; Schneider et al.’03)

(3) The seasonal change in the S/N ratio (Webster’95; Torrence and Webster’98)

(4) Biennial oscillation/component (Clarke and van Gorden’99;

Yu’05)

5

(6)

ENSO: tropical Pacific air-sea interaction

Q: Any prediction/persistence barrier in thermocline and wind?

A boreal winter prediction/persistence barrier in the heat

content/warm water volume (Balmaseda et al.’95; McPhaden’03) SST

heating winds

ocean waves thermocline

6

(7)

Winter prediction barrier

QuickTime™ and a decompressor

are needed to see this picture.

Balmesada et al.’95 r(HC’pred, HC’sim): a large drop in winter > a winter barrier

7

(8)

Winter persistence barrier

McPhaden’03

May Jan

8

(9)

Winter persistence barrier

Yu and Kao’07

May Jan

9

(10)

Questions

. How is the ENSO prediction skill in the CFS? Is there a spring prediction barrier?

. Can the CFS capture the persistence barrier?

. What are plausible reasons for the drop of skill in spring?

. Are these related to the S/N ratio?

. Is the prediction skill related to the ENSO phase, initial or current state, different between El Nino and La Nina?

10

(11)

NCEP CFS 24-year ensemble forecasts

CFS (Climate Forecast System) model

Atmosphere: NCEP GFS (Global Forecast System) T62 64 sigma levels

Ocean: GFDL MOM3

long 1degree, latitude 1/3 degree 10S-10N and 1 degree 30S/30N, 40 levels (27 levels 400m)

15 forecasts (each 9-month length): three groups

1st: 9th,10th,11th,12th,13th (atm) & 11th (ocn, pentad);

2nd: 19th,20th,21th,22th,23th (atm) & 21th (ocn, pentad);

3rd: 29th,30th, 1st, 2nd, 3rd (atm) & 1st (ocn, pentad)

11

(12)

Measure of the prediction skill & noise

. Anomaly correlation coefficient (ACC)

. Root-mean-square error (Interannual component) (RMSE) Three quantities: NINO3.4 SST, NINO3.4 d20, WEP taux . ACC or RMSE calculated based on ensemble mean or individual members (mean value displayed), similar results . Spread (noise): standard deviation of members with respect to ensemble mean

12

(13)

Background

Phase relationship:

EP SST

EP d20 WP wind

1 4-5 Observations

CFS [lead3]

13 WEP:130-170E,5S-5N

(14)

Correlation Skill

Target Month

Saha et al.’06

14

(15)

Correlation Skill

long-lead forecast

Dec SST July

Dec taux Jan d20

15

(16)

Correlation Skill

short-lead forecast Dec SST

Jan d20

Dec taux

Dec.

16

(17)

Is the spring skill drop due to noise?

If noise is critical to the low skill, then

We would expect to see large noise when the skill drops.

Is that so?

17

(18)

Correlation Skill vs Spread (noise)

NINO3.4 SST

WEP taux NINO3.4 d20

Target Month

Initial Month

18

(19)

NINO3.4 SST

NINO3.4 d20

WEP taux

Initial Month

Target Month

Correlation Skill vs Signal-to-Noise Ratio

19

(20)

Correlation Skill

“perfect model approach”

- skill drop due to noise -

Target Month

Saha et al.’06

20

(21)

Perfect Model Skill vs Prediction Skill

Target Month

21

(22)

Plausible Reasons for spring prediction barrier

Noise cannot explain the spring prediction barrier

What are the plausible reasons?

Bias in atmospheric model wind response

22

(23)

Spring Persistence Barrier

Reasons:

(1) The phase transition of ENSO (Torrence and Webster’98;

Clarke and van Gorder’99; Burgers et al.’05)

(2) The seasonal change in the ENSO variance (Xue et al.’94;

Balmaseda et al.’95; Schneider et al.’03)

(3) The seasonal change in the S/N (Webster’95; Torrence and Webster’98)

(4) Biennial oscillation (Clarke and van Gorden’99; Yu’05)

23

(24)

Persistence Barrier

(Auto-lag correlation)

Initial Month

Target Month

Persistence barrier delayed in CFS long-lead forecasts

24 CFS vs OBS

NINO3.4 SST

NINO3.4 d20

WEP taux

(25)

Seasonal change:

composite anomaly

Target Month

Initial Month

Peak and decay time delayed in CFS long-lead forecasts

25 CFS vs OBS

NINO3.4 SST

NINO3.4 d20

WEP taux

(26)

Persistence Barrier vs Anomaly (obs)

Initial Month

Target Month

consistent

NINO3.4 SST

NINO3.4 d20

WEP taux

26

(27)

Persistence Barrier vs Anomaly (cfs)

Initial Month

Target Month

consistent

NINO3.4 SST

NINO3.4 d20

WEP taux

27

(28)

Seasonal change:

variance

Initial Month

Target Month

28 CFS vs OBS

(29)

Persistence Barrier vs Variance (obs)

Target Month

Initial Month

NINO3.4 SST

NINO3.4 d20

WEP taux

29

(30)

Persistence Barrier vs Variance (cfs)

Target Month

Relation is good for SST, but not for d20 and wind

NINO3.4 SST

NINO3.4 d20

WEP taux

Initial Month

30

(31)

Persistence Barrier vs S/N (cfs)

Target Month

Initial Month

Not explained by seasonal change in S/N ratio

NINO3.4 SST

NINO3.4 d20

WEP taux

31

(32)

Persistence Barrier vs Spread (cfs)

Target Month

Initial Month

32 Auto-lag cor starts

to drop before the largest spread

WEP taux NINO3.4 d20 NINO3.4 SST

(33)

Plausible Reasons for spring prediction barrier

Noise cannot explain the spring prediction barrier

What are the plausible reasons?

Bias in atmospheric model wind response

33

(34)

Regression wrt Dec NINO3.4 SST

SSTA Observations txA

CFS ensm July

CFS ensm December

34

(35)

Anomaly (2S-2N):

regression wrt DEC NINO3.4 SST

CFS ensm December

Observations

SSTA txA*40 d20A/20

35

(36)

Anomaly (2S-2N):

regression wrt DEC NINO3.4 SST

CFS ensm July

Observations

SSTA txA*40 d20A/20

36

(37)

Area-mean Anomaly NINO3.4 SST

NINO3.4 d20

NINO3.4 taux WEP taux

37

(38)

Prediction skill:

El Nino vs La Nina

38

(39)

Prediction skill (RMSE): El Nino vs La Nina

39

Target Month

Initial Month

(40)

Prediction skill:

Dependence on current state

Large RMSE composite

Small RMSE composite

40

(41)

Prediction skill:

Dependence on initial state

Large RMSE composite

Small RMSE composite

41

(42)

Prediction skill: Relation to noise

42 rmsIA

(43)

Summary

1. The spring prediction barrier in EEP SST is preceded by a boreal winter prediction barrier in the WEP zonal

wind stress

2. The seasonal change in noise cannot entirely explain the spring prediction barrier

3. The prediction barriers could be related to the erroneous atmospheric model wind response to SST anomalies

4. The prediction skill is better for El Nino than for La Nina

43

(44)

Thanks!

Wu, R., B. P. Kirtman, and H. van den Dool, 2009: An

analysis of ENSO prediction skill in the CFS retrospective forecasts. J. Climate, 22, 1801-1818.

Wu, R., and B. P. Kirtman, 2009: Variability of El Niño- Southern Oscillation-related noise in the equatorial Pacific Ocean. J. Geophys. Res., 114, D23106,

doi:10.1029/2009JD012456.

44

Referenties

GERELATEERDE DOCUMENTEN

a) Individual A’s clear prior consideration of the act and its consequences therefore meets the premeditation requirement for murder under the Dutch Criminal Code. b)

Within the long practice group (executed 6 practice blocks), no significant effect occurred with regard to both contextual features, whereas the production seemed to be

For the Test phase RTs, a mixed ANOVA was executed with Hand Group as between subjects variable and number of Fingers (3), Familiar and Unfamiliar Chords (2), Hand Configuration

The results stated that there is a positive linear association between the performance variables time on task and wall contact on the population-level, as well as on

The problem that gave rise to this section on naive game play is the analysis.. Beginners 25 of skill. We want to find an objective measure of the skill involved in a game. Since it

An increase in the supply of skilled labour increases the degree of appropriability in the economy and causes the skill premium to fall (rise) when appropriability is low (high),. and

approach to stall descending turn with bank angle 20 °, approach

Use of checklist, airmanship, control of aeroplane by external visual reference, anti/de-icing procedures and principles of threat and error management apply in all sections..