• No results found

Frequency Frequency

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Frequency Frequency"

Copied!
14
0
0

Bezig met laden.... (Bekijk nu de volledige tekst)

Hele tekst

(1)
(2)
(3)

Appendix 3

Country

Poland

Hungary

Slovakia

Slovenia

Estonia

Total

Number

138

82

68

67

46

401

Percent

34.4%

20.4%

17.0%

16.7%

11.5%

100%

Source: “CEEC subsidiary database” ( 2001-2002)

Appendix 4

Descriptive statistics: Firm characteristics (a)

(4)

Appendix 5

Descriptive statistics: Firm characteristics (b)

Number

Percent

Merger&Acquisitions

(Dummy= 0)

119

29,7

Greenfield

(Dummy= 1)

166

41,4

EntryMode

Total

285

71,1

(5)

Appendix 6

Independent- Sample T-test : Entry Mode

Group Statistics

Entry Mode N Mean Std. Deviation

Std. Error Mean Export Propensity 0 119 ,4906 ,36366 ,03334 1 166 ,6345 ,36944 ,02867

Independent Samples Test

Levene's Test for Equality of Variances t-test for Equality of Means

F Sig. t df Sig. (2-tailed)

(6)

Appendix 7

Independent - Sample T- test : Wage Rate

Group Statistics

Wage Rate N Mean Std. Deviation

Std. Error Mean

ExportP 1 205 ,4552 ,37688 ,02632

2 196 ,5771 ,38686 ,02763

Independent Samples Test

Levene's Test for Equality

of Variances t-test for Equality of Means

95% Confidence Interval of the Difference

F Sig. t df Sig. (2-tailed)

Mean Difference

Std. Error

Difference Lower Upper Equal variances

assumed ,310 ,578 -3,196 399 ,002 -,12189 ,03814 -,19687 -,04691

ExportP

Equal variances not

(7)

Appendix 8

Independent- Sample T-test : Productivity

Group Statistics

Productivity N Mean Std. Deviation

Std. Error Mean

ExportP 1 135 ,6714 ,36638 ,03153

2 266 ,4352 ,37196 ,02281

Independent Samples Test

Levene's Test for Equality

of Variances t-test for Equality of Means

95% Confidence Interval of the Difference

F Sig. t df Sig. (2-tailed)

Mean Difference

Std. Error

Difference Lower Upper Equal variances

assumed 1,056 ,305 6,040 399 ,000 ,23621 ,03911 ,15933 ,31310

ExportP

Equal variances not

(8)

Appendix 9

Independent- Sample T-test : Institutional Efficiency

Group Statistics

Institutional

Efficiency N Mean Std. Deviation

Std. Error Mean Export Propensity 1 181 ,6452 ,37361 ,02777 2 220 ,4074 ,36330 ,02449

Independent Samples Test

Levene's Test for Equality

of Variances t-test for Equality of Means

F Sig. t df Sig. (2-tailed)

Mean Difference Std. Error Difference 95% Confidence Interval of the Difference Lower Upper Export Propensity Equal variances assumed ,201 ,654 6,441 399 ,000 ,23785 ,03693 ,16525 ,31044

Equal variances not

(9)

Appendix 10

Independent- Sample T-test : Openness to Trade

Group Statistics

Openness to Trade N Mean Std. Deviation

Std. Error Mean Export Propensity 1 196 ,5771 ,38686 ,02763 2 205 ,4552 ,37688 ,02632

Independent Samples Test

Levene's Test for Equality

of Variances t-test for Equality of Means

F Sig. t df Sig. (2-tailed)

(10)

Appendix 11

Independent- Sample T-test : Infrastructure Quality

Group Statistics

Infrastruture

Quality N Mean Std. Deviation

Std. Error Mean Export Propensity 1 67 ,7053 ,31328 ,03827 2 334 ,4765 ,38845 ,02126

Independent Samples Test

Levene's Test for Equality

of Variances t-test for Equality of Means

F Sig. t df Sig. (2-tailed)

Mean Difference Std. Error Difference 95% Confidence Interval of the Difference Lower Upper Export Propensity Equal variances assumed 21,340 ,000 4,534 399 ,000 ,22883 ,05047 ,12960 ,32806

Equal variances not

assumed 5,227 110,898 ,000 ,22883 ,04378 ,14208 ,31558

(11)

Appendix 12

Independent- Sample T-test : Size of host country market

Group Statistics

Population N Mean Std. Deviation

Std. Error Mean Export Propensity 1 138 ,3337 ,34460 ,02933 2 263 ,6097 ,37316 ,02301

Independent Samples Test

Levene's Test for

Equality of Variances t-test for Equality of Means

F Sig. t df Sig. (2-tailed)

Mean Difference

Std. Error Difference

95% Confidence Interval of the Difference Lower Upper Export Propensity Equal variances assumed 4,782 ,029 -7,222 399 ,000 -,27603 ,03822 -,35117 -,20089

Equal variances not

(12)

Appendix 13

Correlations

Autonomy PDCap LgSize LgAge

Pearson

Correlation ,437(**) ,183(**) ,150(**) -,056

Sig. (2-tailed) ,000 ,000 ,003 ,261

ExportP

N 401 388 396 398

(13)

Appendix 14

Output of Multiple Regression

Variables Entered/Removed(b) Model Variables Entered Variables Removed Method 1 LgSize, PDCap, Autonomy(a) . Enter

a All requested variables entered. b Dependent Variable: ExportP

Model Summary(b) Model R R Square Adjusted R Square Std. Error of the Estimate 1 ,492(a) ,242 ,236 ,33746

(14)

ANOVA(b)

Model

Sum of

Squares df Mean Square F Sig.

Regression 13,795 3 4,598 40,379 ,000(a)

Residual 43,160 379 ,114

1

Total 56,955 382

a Predictors: (Constant), LgSize, PDCap, Autonomy b Dependent Variable: ExportP

Coefficients(a)

Model

Unstandardized Coefficients

Standardized

Coefficients t Sig. Collinearity Statistics

B Std. Error Beta Tolerance VIF

1 (Constant) ,166 ,066 2,507 ,013

Autonomy ,908 ,097 ,565 9,382 ,000 ,550 1,817

PDCap -,202 ,068 -,178 -2,965 ,003 ,555 1,802

LgSize ,058 ,027 ,097 2,132 ,034 ,963 1,038

Referenties

GERELATEERDE DOCUMENTEN

University of Bremen, Social Statistics and Research Group, Department of Social Sciences, Celsiusstrasse, Bremen 28359 Germany.

Proposition: Under the assumptions above, the parameter vector 6 is identified if and only if there does not exist a nonsin- gular matrix A-(a1,A2) such that l;~al is distributed no

Aanleiding voor het onderzoek is de geplande verkaveling van het gebied ten noorden van de Beersebaan, die een bedreiging vormt voor eventuele archeologische resten die zich hier

• the estimation problem compensates for disturbance and measurement errors by minimizing an appropriately defined cost functional over all trajectories of the system • the solution

Also, we will show that for systems described by partial differential equations, hidden variables occur unavoidably in potential representations, and in the storage function.. Many

[r]

TABLE 68 - Variables Entered/Removed(b) - Moderator Effect Overall Board Control / LTP ratio three country sample Model Variables Entered Variables Removed Method 1

This study shows that neighbourhood has a small additional predictive value when added to a model with only socio-demographic information. No improvement in predictive performance