• No results found

SWG Open Science and Innovation

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Share "SWG Open Science and Innovation"

Copied!
7
0
0

Bezig met laden.... (Bekijk nu de volledige tekst)

Hele tekst

(1)

SWG Open Science and Innovation

in a few words

Brussels 8 November 2017

(2)

SWG OSI mandate and scope of action (1)

ERAC's adoption of the group's mandate on 4 May 2016

Chair = Clara E. Garcia (ES)

Vice-Chair = Marc Vanholsbeeck (BE)

Most (but not all) Member States and ACs represented

7 meetings: 17 June 2016, 6 October 2016, 14 February 2017, 25 April 2017, 22 June 2017, 4 September 2017, 25 October 2017

(3)

SWG OSI mandate and scope of action (2)

Provides strategic advice to Council and Commission wrt Priority 5 of the ERA Roadmap:

Access to scientific information

Circulation and use of knowledge

For the benefit of scientists, research institutions, education, businesses, citizens and society at large

(4)

Work Programme 2016-2017 Thematic priorities

5 thematic priorities:

Open Research Data and infrastructures

Open Access to publications: models, costs and metrics

Research and researchers’ incentives, evaluation and impact assessment

Innovation (incl. Open Innovation, Knowledge Transfer and IPR) (transversal priority)

Training and skills (transversal priority)

(5)

Work Programme 2016-2017

Assessment of the Amsterdam Call for Action [on Open Science]

Following Council Conclusions of 27 May 2016

Feasibility, effectiveness and prioritisation of the Actions

Questionnaires to the delegations:

Q1: Open Research Data and e-infrastructures (November 2016)

Q2: Open Access, OS implementation and monitoring, Citizen Science (Summer 2017)

Q3: Rewards, TDM, IPR, transparency (Summer 2017)

Answers from AT, BE, BG, CY, DE, DK, EE, ES, FI, FR, GR, IE, LV, MD, MT, PL, PT, SI, UK

(6)

WP 2016-2017

European Open Science Cloud (EOSC)

 SWG OSI as privileged interlocutor of the EOSC team of the Commission for discussing/co-designing the future governance of the Cloud

 Written consultation of the delegates wrt a proposition from the Commission

 Complementary process to the adoption of a Council opinion on the EOSC Roadmap to be published in

December

(7)

Next Steps

Report on the assessment of the Amsterdam Call for Action

November 2017: adoption of the report by the SWG OSI

1 December 2017: presentation at Competitivity Council

November 2017: publication of the SWG OSI position on the EOSC governance

Referenties

GERELATEERDE DOCUMENTEN

In the first place, the exchange of views and discussions with experts from the Member States prior to the finalisation of guidance documents facilitates an informal dialogue

There is no need for consumer organizations to manage incidents because they can do nothing if the infrastructure is not under the control of the

This research question is answered by conducting a discourse analysis, applying a coding scheme to search for typical Neo-Luddite elements (namely the conflict between humanity

– Secure young brains being able to work on these new value chains • At Hanze University of Applied Sciences, together with partners from. industry and society we co-created En Tran

City authorities endorse a living lab ’s presence in urban space; commercial firms shape its objectives and processes; academic researchers use it to conduct research supported by

To design an approximate MAC (xMAC) in compliance with the state- of-the-art self-healing methodology [14], the multiplication is considered as an approximation stage and the

One of the drivers for the discussion on the ethics in producer-consumer relationships was and is a shared desire by a number of participants to the Dagstuhl seminar to share more

en de restrictie dat alle geschillen dienen te worden opgelost binnen de Servische grondwet. Het is evident dat de Servische constitutie van 1989 – waarin