• No results found

Determinants of fairness-based and favorability-based reactions to authorities' decisions

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Determinants of fairness-based and favorability-based reactions to authorities' decisions"

Copied!
7
0
0

Bezig met laden.... (Bekijk nu de volledige tekst)

Hele tekst

(1)

Determinants of fairness-based and favorability-based reactions to

authorities' decisions

Ståhl, T.

Citation

Ståhl, T. (2006, June 1). Determinants of fairness-based and favorability-based reactions to

authorities' decisions. Dissertatiereeks Kurt Lewin Instituut. Retrieved from

https://hdl.handle.net/1887/4472

Version:

Corrected Publisher’s Version

License:

Licence agreement concerning inclusion of doctoral thesis in the

Institutional Repository of the University of Leiden

Downloaded from:

https://hdl.handle.net/1887/4472

(2)

Determinants of Fairness-based and Favorabil

ity-based Reactions to Authorities’ Decisions

PROEFSCHRIFT

ter verkrijging van

de graad van Doctor aan de Universiteit Leiden, op gezag van de Rector M agnificus Dr. D. D. Breimer,

hoogleraar in de faculteit der W iskunde en Natuurwetenschappen en die der Geneeskunde, volgens besluit van het College voor Promoties

te verdedigen op donderdag 1 juni 2006 klokke 14.15 uur

door

(3)

Promotiecommissie

Promotoren: Prof. Dr. N. Ellemers (Leiden University) Prof. Dr. K. Y. Törnblom (University of Skövde)

Co-promotor Dr. R. Vermunt (Leiden University/University of Skövde) Referent: Prof. Dr. K. Van den Bos (Utrecht University)

(4)
(5)
(6)

Contents

1. Introduction 7

Overview of chapters 14

2. Reactions to ingroup versus outgroup authorities’ decisions 19

Experiment 1 20

Experiment 2 28

Experiment 3 33

General discussion 36

3. The role of ingroup identification 41

Experiment 4 43

Discussion 47

4. The role of expected bias 51

Experiment 5 54

Experiment 6 59

General discussion 64

5. The role of relational versus instrumental concerns 69

Experiment 7 73

Experiment 8 78

Experiment 9 82

General discussion 86

6. Summary and conclusions 89

Reactions to ingroup versus outgroup authorities’ decisions 89 The role of ingroup identification 91

The role of expected bias 92

The role of relational versus instrumental concerns 94

Conclusions 96

Endnotes 99

Samenvatting (Summary in Dutch) 101

References 109

(7)

Referenties

GERELATEERDE DOCUMENTEN

Since expression of Serpins may facilitate the immune escape of HLA positive tumors, we next analysed the effect of Serpin expression on survival in cases with normal/partial

Detection of amyloid plaques in mouse models of Alzheimer’s disease by magnetic resonance imaging.. Apostolova

More precisely, an upper bound for the variance of the test statistic R N ∗ is realized by the one-dimensional Moore-Rayleigh null hypothesis, whose distribution is similar to the

Self-stereotyping in the face of threats to group status and distinctiveness: The role of group identification, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23,

Whether a decision-making authority belongs to an ingroup or to an outgroup strongly affects to what extent procedural fairness versus outcome favorability guides reactions to the

Peripheral blood cells were stained with HLA-A2.1 tetramers containing the tyrosinase368–376 peptide followed by staining with a panel of lineage antibodies, as described in

Blades and blade fragments seem to have been especially used for longitudinal motions, mainly on plant material (7/12). Flake and flake fragments are used in different motions on

This shape also occurs in the combination artefacts (see below). The shape is the result of intensive use in a repetitive abrasive motion, carried out from different angles. In