Determinants of fairness-based and favorability-based reactions to authorities' decisions Ståhl, T.

We have reviewed 67 judgments that were rendered by the Competition Appeal Tribunal and the Court of Appeal between 6 February 2004 and 11 October 2010 in relation to Ofcom’s

% ( : Risk aversion is significantly negatively correlated to the probability of having a risky asset and the share invest in risky assets. The decision to acquire debt

A reduced sensitivity for APC, as measured with the APTT- or the ETP-based APC sensitivity test, is associated with an increased risk of venous thrombosis both in the absence

License: Licence agreement concerning inclusion of doctoral thesis in the Institutional Repository of the University of Leiden Downloaded from: https://hdl.handle.net/1887/4472..

Substantial effort has been made, particularly from the perspective of the relational model, to explain why acceptance of decisions is influenced by procedural fairness (e.g., Lind

We have shown that when people are faced with an outgroup authority and do not know the outcome of a comparison other, the impact of procedures on subsequent reactions such

Finally, because high identifiers differentiate between the ingroup and outgroups to a larger extent than low identifiers, we expect that the authority’s group membership

Adding to this line of reasoning, we proposed and demonstrated that perceptions of outcome fairness mediate the interaction effect between bias information and outcome favorability