• No results found

Interstate liability for climate change-related damage - Table of cases

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Interstate liability for climate change-related damage - Table of cases"

Copied!
5
0
0

Bezig met laden.... (Bekijk nu de volledige tekst)

Hele tekst

(1)

UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository)

Interstate liability for climate change-related damage

Kosolapova, E.

Publication date

2013

Link to publication

Citation for published version (APA):

Kosolapova, E. (2013). Interstate liability for climate change-related damage.

General rights

It is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), other than for strictly personal, individual use, unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons).

Disclaimer/Complaints regulations

If you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library know, stating your reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the material inaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Ask the Library: https://uba.uva.nl/en/contact, or a letter to: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands. You will be contacted as soon as possible.

(2)

Table of Cases

1. Permanent Court of International Justice

German Settlers in Poland, Advisory Opinion, 1923 PCIJ (Ser. B) No. 6

Factory at Chorzów (Germany v. Poland), Merits, Judgment 1928 PCIJ (Ser. A)

No. 17

2. International Court of Justice

Corfu Channel (United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland v. Albania), Judgment of 9 April 1949, ICJ Rep. 4

Case Concerning the Barcelona Traction, Light and Power Company, Limited (Belgium v. Spain), Judgment of 5 February 1970, ICJ Rep. 3

Case Concerning United States Diplomatic and Consular Staff in Tehran (United States of America v. Iran), Judgment of 24 May 1980, 1980 ICJ Rep. 3

Military and Paramilitary Activities In and Against Nicaragua (Nicaragua v. United States of America), Judgment of 27 June 1986,1986 ICJ Rep. 14

Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons, Advisory Opinion of 8 July

1996, 1996 ICJ Rep. 226

Case Concerning the Gabčíkovo-Nagymaros Project (Hungary v. Slovakia),

Judgment of 25 September 1997, 1997 ICJ Rep. 7

Case Concerning Pulp Mills on the River Uruguay (Argentina v. Uruguay),

Judgment of 20 April 2010, 2010 ICJ Rep. 14

3. International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea

Responsibilities and Obligations of States with Respect to Activities in the Area,

Advisory Opinion of 1 February 2011, 2011 ITLOS Rep. 10

4. Arbitral Awards

(3)

INTERSTATE LIABILITY FOR CLIMATE CHANGE-RELATED DAMAGE

Rainbow Warrior (New Zealand v. France), 30 April 1990, UNRIAA, vol. XX, p. 215 (2006)

5. Inter-American Commission on Human Rights

Petition to the Inter American Commission on Human Rights Seeking Relief from Violations Resulting from Global Warming caused by Acts and Omissions of the United States, submitted by Sheila Watt-Cloutier, 7 December 2005

6. National Decisions 6.1 Australia

Aldous v. Greater Taree City Council [2009] NSWLEC 17

Australian Conservation Foundation v. Commonwealth [1980] 146 CLR 493 Australian Conservation Foundation v. Minister for Planning [2004] VCAT 2029 Charles & Howard Pty Ltd v. Redland Shire Council [2007] QCA 200

Gippsland Coastal Board v. South Gippsland SC & Ors (No 2) (includes Summary) (Red Dot) [2008] VCAT 1545

Gray v. Minister for Planning and Ors [2006] NSWLEC 720

Greenpeace Australia Ltd v. Redbank Power Company Pty Ltd [1994] NSWLEC 178 Minister for Planning v. Walker [2008] NSWCA 224

Northcape Properties Pty Ltd v. District Council of Yorke Peninsula [2008] SASC 57 Queensland Conservation Council Inc. v. Xstrata Coal Queensland P/L & Ors

[2007] QCA 338

Re Xstrata Coal Queensland Pty Ltd & Ors [2007] QLRT 33

Taralga Landscape Guardians Inc. v. Minister for Planning and RES Southern Cross Pty Ltd [2007] NSWLEC 59

Thornton v. Adelaide Hills Council [2006] 151 LGERA 1 Walker v. Minister for Planning [2007] NSWLEC 741

Wildlife Preservation Society of Queensland Proserpine/Whitsunday Branch Inc. v. Minister for the Environment & Heritage & Ors [2006] FCA 736

(4)

6.3 Canada

Friends of the Earth – Les Ami(e)s de la Terre v. The Governor in Council and The Minister of the Environment, 2008 FC 1183, 20 October 2008

6.4 Germany

Bund für Umwelt- und Naturschutz Deutschland e.V. (BUND) & Germanwatch e.V. gegen Bundesminister für Wirtschaft und Arbeit, Verwaltungsgericht Berlin, Beschluss VG 10 A 215.04, 2006; unofficial English translation available from: <www.climatelaw.org/cases/case-documents/germany/de-export-jan06-eng.doc>

6.5 New Zealand

Genesis Power Ltd v. Franklin District Council [2005] NZRMA 541

Greenpeace v. Northland Regional Council & Mighty River Power Ltd [2006]

NZHC 1212

Environmental Defence Society (Inc) v. Auckland Regional Council [2002]

NZRMA 492

Meridian Energy Limited & Ors v. Wellington City Council and Wellington Regional Council [2007] W031/2007

Unison Networks Ltd v. Hastings District Council [2007] NZHC 1435 6.6 Nigeria

Jonah Gbemre v. Shell Petroleum Development Company Nigeria Ltd., Suit No.

FHC/B/CS/53/05, Federal High Court of Nigeria, Benin Judicial Division, 2005

6.7 United Kingdom

Dimmock v. Secretary of State for Education and Skills [2007] EWHC 2288

(Admin)

6.8 United States

American Electric Power Company, Inc. v. Connecticut, 131 S.Ct. 2527, U.S., 2011 Baker v. Carr, 369 U.S. 186 (1962)

(5)

INTERSTATE LIABILITY FOR CLIMATE CHANGE-RELATED DAMAGE

California v. General Motors Corp., 2007 WL 2726871 (N.D.Cal.)

Center for Biological Diversity v. Abraham, 218 F.Supp. 2d 1143 (N.D.Cal. 2002) Center for Biological Diversity v. Brennan, 571 F.Supp. 2d 1105 (N.D.Cal. 2007) Center for Biological Diversity v. United States Department of the Interior, 563

F. 3d 466 (D.C.Circ. 2009)

Coalition for a Sustainable Future in Yucaipa v. City of Yucaipa, 198 Cal.App.4th

939 (Cal.App. 4 Dist. 2011)

Comer v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co., WL 1066645 (S.D.Miss.)

(23 February 2006)

Comer v. Murphy Oil USA, Inc., 2007 WL 6942285 (S.D.Miss.) (20 August

2007) (NO. CIVA 1:05-CV436LGRHW)

Comer v. Murphy Oil USA, Inc., 585 F.3d 855, C.A.5 (Miss.), 2009

Comer v. Murphy Oil USA, Inc., Case 1:11-cv-00220-LG-RHW (S.D.Miss.)

(20 March 2012)

Connecticut v. American Electric Power Co., Inc., 406 F.Supp. 2d 265 (S.D.N.Y.

2005)

Connecticut v. American Electric Power Co., Inc., 582 F.3d 309, C.A.2 (N.Y.),

2009

Engle v. Liggett Group, Inc., 945 So.2d 1246 (Fla. 2006)

Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services, Inc., 120 S.Ct. 693

(U.S. 2000)

Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Mosbacher, 488 F.Supp. 2d 889 (N.D.Cal. 2007) Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Watson, 35 ELR 20179 (N.D.Cal. 2005)

Habitat and Watershed Caretakers v. City of Santa Cruz, 149 Cal.Rptr.3d 574

(Cal.App. 6 Dist. 2012)

Healdsburg Citizens for Sustainable Solutions v. City of Healdsburg, 206

Cal.App.4th 988 (Cal.App. 1 Dist. 2012)

Korsinsky v. EPA, 2005 WL 2414744 (S.D.N.Y.)

Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife, 112 S.Ct. 2130 (U.S.Minn. 1992) Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. (1 Cranch) 137 (1803)

Massachusetts v. EPA, 127 S.Ct. 1438, U.S., 2007

Native Village of Kivalina v. ExxonMobil Corp., 663 F.Supp.2d 863

(N.D.Cal. 2009)

Native Village of Kivalina v. ExxonMobil Corp., 2012 WL 4215921 (9th

Cir.(Cal.)) (21 September 2012) (NO. 09-17490)

Natural Resources Defence Council v. Kempthorne, 506 F.Supp. 2d 322 (E.D.Cal.

2007)

Northwest Environmental Defense Center v. Owens Corning Corp., 434 F.Supp. 2d

Referenties

GERELATEERDE DOCUMENTEN

Dood in Brazilië: Het opmerkelijke is dat politici die de democratie om zeep helpen de neiging hebben om dit aan te kondigen.,

Vanuit het oogpunt van flexibiliteit voor werkgever en werkzekerheid voor de werknemer verdient het aanbeveling dat in alle sociale plannen waar interne herplaatsing gezien

As for the educational levels, the national education systems in the six countries have been recoded to the ISCED levels, ranging from 0 = no educa- tion to 6 = second stage

(This gives us the factivity of tell when embedding an interrogative.) From the formulation (28) it is also obvious that the possibility that of some individuals John is not

Khk-C is both necessary and sufficient to enforce fructolysis in the cardiomyocyte. Intriguingly, heart- specific loss of SF3B1 or Khk prevents the metabolic switch and

In this thesis, we have tried to add new insight into the regulation of alternative splicing, molecular mechanisms that underlie alternative splicing associated heart disease,

with RBM20 mutations have an increased risk of malignant ventricular arrhythmias as compared to TTN mutation carriers even though cardiac dilation and function is comparable in

(C) Proposed mechanism of Rbm20-dependent circRNA production from the titin gene. In the normal situation, when functional Rbm20 is present, the Ig repeats, N2A and PEVK regions