Correction to: The varieties of impartiality, or, would an egalitarian endorse the veil?

University of Groningen

Correction to: The varieties of impartiality, or, would an egalitarian endorse the veil?

Bruner, Justin P.; Lindauer, Matthew

Published in:

Philosophical Studies

DOI:

10.1007/s11098-018-1202-8

IMPORTANT NOTE: You are advised to consult the publisher's version (publisher's PDF) if you wish to cite from

it. Please check the document version below.

Document Version

Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record

Publication date:

2020

Link to publication in University of Groningen/UMCG research database

Citation for published version (APA):

Bruner, J. P., & Lindauer, M. (2020). Correction to: The varieties of impartiality, or, would an egalitarian

endorse the veil? Philosophical Studies, 177(2), 479-481. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-018-1202-8

Copyright

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons).

Take-down policy

If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim.

Downloaded from the University of Groningen/UMCG research database (Pure): http://www.rug.nl/research/portal. For technical reasons the number of authors shown on this cover page is limited to 10 maximum.

C O R R E C T I O N

Correction to: The varieties of impartiality, or, would

an egalitarian endorse the veil?

Justin P. Bruner

_{Matthew Lindauer}

Published online: 28 November 2018  Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Correction to: Philos Stud

https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-018-1190-8

The citations of Figs. 1, 2, 3 and 4 were placed after the figures in the original

publication of the article. However, they should be placed prior the placement of

figures.

The correct citations with the figures are given in this correction.

The original article was corrected.

The original article can be found online athttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-018-1190-8. & Matthew Lindauer

matthew.lindauer@brooklyn.cuny.edu 1

Department of Theoretical Philosophy, Faculty of Philosophy, University of Groningen, Oude Boteringestraat 52, Groningen, The Netherlands

2 _{Department of Philosophy, Brooklyn College, City University of New York, 3308 Boylan Hall,} 2502-2600 Campus Road, Brooklyn, NY 11210, USA

123

Philos Stud (2020) 177:479–481 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-018-1202-8

Figure

1

displays histograms for the three impartiality frames (Thick, Spectator

and Thin):

Figure

2

shows the mean ratings that participants gave to each impartiality frame:

Figure

3

displays histograms for three impartiality frames, first-personal (Thick,

Spectator and Thin):

Fig. 1 Histograms for the three impartiality frames

Fig. 2 Mean ratings for each impartiality frame

123

Figure

4

shows the mean ratings given to each first-personal impartiality frame:

Fig. 4 Mean ratings for each first-personal impartiality frame

123