University of Groningen
The development of the Screening of Visual Complaints questionnaire for patients with neurodegenerative disorders: Evaluation of psychometric properties
Huizinga, Famke; Heutink, Joost; Haan, de, Gera; Lijn, van der, Iris; Feen, van der, Fleur; Vrijling, Anne; Melis-Dankers, Bart; Vries, de, Stefanie; Tucha, Oliver; Koerts, Janneke
IMPORTANT NOTE: You are advised to consult the publisher's version (publisher's PDF) if you wish to cite from it. Please check the document version below.
Publication date: 2019
Link to publication in University of Groningen/UMCG research database
Citation for published version (APA):
Huizinga, F., Heutink, J., Haan, de, G., Lijn, van der, I., Feen, van der, F., Vrijling, A., Melis-Dankers, B., Vries, de, S., Tucha, O., & Koerts, J. (2019). The development of the Screening of Visual Complaints questionnaire for patients with neurodegenerative disorders: Evaluation of psychometric properties. Poster session presented at 7th scientific meeting of the Federation of the European Societies of
Neuropsychology, Milaan, Italy.
Copyright
Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons).
Take-down policy
If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim.
Downloaded from the University of Groningen/UMCG research database (Pure): http://www.rug.nl/research/portal. For technical reasons the number of authors shown on this cover page is limited to 10 maximum.
The Development of the Screening of Visual Complaints Questionnaire
for Patients with Neurodegenerative Disorders: Evaluation of
Psychometric Properties
F. Huizinga
a, J. Heutink
a,b, G. A. de Haan
a,b, I. van der Lijn
a,b, F. E. van der Feen
a,b, A. C. L. Vrijling
b,
B. J. M. Melis-Dankers
b, S. M. de Vries
a,b, O. Tucha
a, J. Koerts
aBackground
Approximately 75% of patients with Parkinson’s disease (PD), 33% of patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) and 50% of early dementia patients tend to
suffer from visual problems1-3. Nevertheless, visual
complaints are little recognized in clinical care and there is a lack of clinical instruments that can be used to assess visual complaints. A 21-item Screening of Visual Complaints (SVC) questionnaire was developed to assess visual complaints in patients with PD, MS or early dementia.
Methods
1,461 healthy Dutch participants (18-95 years) were assessed with:
Screening of Visual Complaints
questionnaire (SVC)
Cerebral Visual Disorders
questionnaire (CVS)
National Eye Institute Visual Function
Questionnaire–25 (VFQ-25)
Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive
Function-A (BRIEF-A)
Results
• Exploratory and confirmatory factor
analyses resulted in a three-factor
structure (Figure 1):
• Altered visual perception (R2=28.6%)
• Reduced visual perception (R2=7.7%)
• Ocular discomfort (R2=6.8%)
• Sufficient convergent and divergent validity (Figure 2)
• High internal consistency
(Cronbach’s alpha= 0.85) and
test-retest reliability (ICC=0.82)
NAH-Progress
Discussion
The SVC can be used to screen
for the degree of visual
complaints and to define change over time in case of repeated
assessments. Subscale scores
can support a more detailed
evaluation and might guide
further assessment of visual
functioning. The SVC needs
further validation in clinical
groups of patients with PD, MS or early dementia.
VIVIS
Aim
To evaluate the psychometric properties of the SVC in a large community-sample by examining its factor structure,
internal consistency,
convergent and divergent
validity, and test-retest
reliability.
Conclusion
The SVC is a valid and reliable tool for the assessment of subjective visual complaints
in a community-sample and appears
promising for use in clinical practice of patients with PD, MS or early dementia.
Figure 2. Scatterplots of correlations of convergent
validity (A-B) and divergent validity (C-F)
A B C D E F svc svc svc svc svc svc Men tal he alt h (DASS -21) E xecutive fu nct ion (B RIEF -A) Sympt o m validity ( SI MS) A tt e ntio n (FE DA ) CVS V FQ -25 r=0.84 r=-0.71 r=0.26 r=0.34 r=0.40 r=0.29
Questionnaire for Experiences of
Attention Deficits (FEDA)
Analyses:
• Exploratory (subsample 1; n=730) and confirmatory
factor analyses (subsample 2; n=731) to evaluate the factor structure of the SVC • Correlation analyses to
assess convergent and • Reliability analyses to
evaluate internal consistency and
Figure 1. Factor structure of the SVC Screening of Visual
Complaints questionnaire
test-retest reliability
a University of Groningen, Clinical and Developmental Neuropsychology, Groningen, The Netherlands
b Royal Dutch Visio, Huizen, The Netherlands Contact:
Famke Huizinga f.huizinga@rug.nl
1 Davidsdottir, S., Cronin-Golomb, A., & Lee, A. (2005). Visual and spatial symptoms in Parkinson’s disease. Vision Research, 45(10), 1285–1296.
2 Jasse, L., Vukusic, S., Durand-Dubief, F., Vartin, C., Piras, C., Bernard, M., … Tilikete, C. (2013). Persistent visual impairment in multiple sclerosis: prevalence, mechanisms and resulting disability. Multiple Sclerosis
Journal, 19(12), 1618–1626.
3 Bowen, M., Edgar, D., Hancock, B., Haque, S., Shah, R. et. al. (2016). The Prevalence of Visual Impairment in People with Dementia (the PrOVIDe study): a cross-sectional study of people aged 60–89 years with
dementia and qualitative exploration of individual, carer and professional perspectives. Health Services and Delivery Research, 4(21).
divergent validity
Structured Inventory for
Malingered Symptomatology (SIMS)
Depression Anxiety Stress Scale-21