Object drop in the L1 acquisition of Dutch - References

UvA-DARE is a service provided by the library of the University of Amsterdam (https://dare.uva.nl)

Object drop in the L1 acquisition of Dutch

Thrift, K.E.

Publication date

2003

Link to publication

Citation for published version (APA):

Thrift, K. E. (2003). Object drop in the L1 acquisition of Dutch. LOT.

General rights

It is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), other than for strictly personal, individual use, unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons).

Disclaimer/Complaints regulations

If you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library know, stating your reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the material inaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Ask the Library: https://uba.uva.nl/en/contact, or a letter to: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands. You will be contacted as soon as possible.

References

Abbeduto, L., K. Short-Meyerson, G. Benson, J. Dolish & M. Weissman. 1998. Understanding of referential expressions in context: Use of common ground by children and adolescents with mental retardation. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 41: 1348-1362. Abney, S. 1987. The English Noun Phrase in its Sentential Aspect. Ph.D.

Dissertation, MIT.

Ackerman, B., J. Szymanski & D. Silver. 1990. Children’s use of the common ground in interpreting ambiguous referential utterances. Developmental Psychology, 26: 234-245.

Agnastopolou, E. 1997. Clitic left dislocation and contrastive left dislocation. In E. Agnastopolou, H. van Riemsdijk & F. Zwarts (eds). Materials on Left Dislocation. John Benjamins: Amsterdam. pp. 151-192.

Aksu-Koç, A. 1988. The Acqusition of Aspect and Modality: The case of past reference in Turkish. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Van Amstel, M. 1999. Het taalontwikkelingsniveau van Nederlandssprekende drielingen. M.A. Thesis, University of Amsterdam.

Antinucci, F. & R. Miller. 1976. How children talk about what happened. Journal of Child Language, 3: 167-189.

Armon-Lotem, S. 1998. Agreement mismatches and the economy of derivation. University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers in Linguistics, 22: 27-35.

Avrutin, S. & D. Brun. 2001. The expression of specificity in a language without determiners: Evidence from child Russian. In A. Do, L. Domínguez & A. Johansen (eds). Proceedings of the 25th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press. pp. 70-81.

Balkenende, P. 1995. Top ik Drop je: Over Topic-drop in het Nederlands. M.A. Thesis, Utrecht University.

Barbier, I. 1995. Configuration and Movement: Studies of the First Language Acquisition of Dutch Word Order. Ph.D. Dissertation, Cornell University.

Barbiers, S. 1992. Adjectives as auxiliaries of the noun phrase. In R. Bok-Bennema & R. van Hout (eds). Linguistics in the Netherlands 1992. pp. 13-24.

Behrens, Heike. 1992. Early encoding of temporal reference in German. In E. Clarke (ed). The Proceedings of the Twenty-Fourth Annual Child Language Research Forum. Stanford: CSLI. Pp. 60-71.

Bennis, H., M. den Dikken, P. Jordens, S. Powers & J. Weissenborn. 1995. Picking up particles. In D. MacLaughlin & S. McEwen (eds). Proceedings of the 19th Boston University Conference on Language Development I-II. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press. pp. 70-81.

Berman, R. 1983. Establishing a schema: Children’s construals of verb-tense marking. Language Sciences, 5: 61-78.

Den Besten, H. 1983. On the interaction of root transformations and lexical deletive verbs. In W. Abraham (ed). On the Formal Syntax of the West Germania: Papers from the “3rd Groningen Grammar Talks, Groningen, January, 1981”. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. pp. 47-131. Blankensteijn, & A. Scheper. forthcoming.

Language problems in

children with psychiatric disturbance: morpho-syntactic and

semantic-pragmatic aspects

Amsterdam.

Bloom, L. 1978. The semantics of verb in child language. Paper presented at the Eastern Psychological Association Meeting, New York.

---. & L. Harmer. 1989. On the developmental contour of child language: A reply to Smith and Weist. Journal of Child Language, 16: 207-216. ---, K. Lifter & J. Hafitz. 1980. Semantics of verbs and the development of

verb inflection in child language. Language, 36: 386-412.

Bloom, P. 1993. Grammatical continuity in language development: The case of subjectless sentences: Reply to Hyams and Wexler (1993). Linguistic Inquiry, 24: 721-734.

---. 1990. Subjectless sentences in child language. Linguistic Inquiry, 21: 491-504.

Bohnacker, U. 1997. Determiner phrases and the debate on functional categories in early child language. Language Acquisition, 6: 49-90. Bol, G. 1996. Optional subjects in Dutch child language. In C. Koster & F.

Wijnen (eds). Proceedings of GALA 1995. Groningen: Center for Language and Cognition. pp. 125-133.

---. 1995. Implicational scaling in child language acquisition: The order of production of Dutch verb constructions. In M. Verrips & F. Wijnen (eds). Papers from the Dutch-German Colloquium on Language Acquisition. Amsterdam: Institute of General Linguistics. pp. 1-13.

--- & F. Kuiken. 1988. Grammaticale Analyse van Taalwetenontwikkelingstornissen. PhD Dissertation, University of Amsterdam.

Borer, H. 1994. The projection of arguments. Ms, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA.

REFERENCES 253

German: Interactions between Syntax and Pragmatics. Ph.D. Dissertation, Cornell University.

---, B. Lust, L. Santelmann & J. Whitman. 1992. The syntax of CP and V2 in early child German (ECG): The strong continuity hypothesis. In Proceedings of NELS, 22. pp. 51-65.

Bresson, F. 1974. Remarks on genetic psycholinguistics: The acquisition of the article system in French. Problèmes actuels en psycholinguistique. Paris: Ce Nationale de la Recherche Scientifique. pp. 67-72.

Brown, R. 1973. A First Language: The Early Stages. London: George Allen and Unwin.

Cardinaletti, A. 1990. Es, pro and sentential arguments in German. Linguistische Berichte, 126: 135-165.

--- & M. Starke. 1994. Deficient pronouns: A view from Germanic. In H. Thráinsson, S.D. Epstein & S. Peter (eds). Studies in Comparative Germanic Syntax, 11: 21-65.

Chomsky, N. 1986. Barriers. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. ---. 1981. Lectures on Government and Binding. Dodrecht: Foris. ---. 1965. Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge: The MIT Press. Cinque, G. 1999. ‘Restructuring’ and the universal hierarchy of functional

heads. Talk presented at GLOW 1999, ZAS, Berlin.

Clahsen, H. 1990. Constraints on parameter setting: A grammatical analysis of some acquisition stages in German child language. Language Acquisition, 1: 361-391.

Clancy, P. 1997. Discourse motivations for referential choice in Korean acquisition. In H. Sohn & J. Haig (eds). Japanese/Korean Linguistics, 6. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications. pp. 639-659.

---. 1993. Preferred argument structure in Korean. In E.V. Clark (ed). Proceedings of the 25th Annual Child Language Research Forum. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications. pp. 307-314.

Clark, H. & T. Carlson. 1981. Context for comprehension. In J. Long & A. Baddaley (eds). Attention and Performance IX. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. pp. 313-331.

--- & C. Marshall. 1981. Definite reference and mutual knowledge. In A.H. Joshe, B. Webber & I.A. Sag (eds). Elements of discourse understanding. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. pp. 10-63. Cziko, G. 1986. Testing the language bioprogram hypothesis: A review of

children’s acquisition of articles. Language, 62: 878-898.

de Lemos, C. 1981. Interactional processes in the child’s construction of language. In W. Deutsch (ed). The Child’s Construction of Language. New York: New York Academic Press.

Diesing, M. 1992. Bare plural subjects and the derivation of logical representations. Linguistic Inquiry, 23: 353-380.

Dowty, D. 1979. Word Meaning and Montague Grammar: The Semantics of Verbs and Time in Generative Semantics and in Montague’s PTQ. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.

Engel, U. 1989. Deutsche Grammatik. Germany: Julian Groos Verlag.

Fodor, J. & I. Sag. 1982. Referential and quantificational indefinites. Linguistics and Philosophy, 5: 355-398.

Fujino, H. & T. Sano. 2000. ‘Some notes on the null object phenomenon in child Spanish’. In C. Howell, S. Fish & L. Keith (eds). Proceedings of the 24th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development I-II. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press. pp. 308-318.

Garton, A. 1983. An approach to the study of determiners in early language development. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 12: 513-525.

Gavruseva, E. forthcoming. Aspect, eventivity, and finiteness in early child grammar. Proceedings of GALA 2001, Palmela, Portugal, September 14-16, 2001.

Geerts, G., W. Haeseryn,, J. de Rooij. & M.C. van den Toorn, eds. 1984. Algemene Nederlandse Sprakkunst. Groningen: Wolters: Nordhoff. Gillis, S. 1984. De Verwerving van Talige Referentie. Ph.D. Dissertation,

University of Antwerp.

--- & J. Verhoeven. 1992. Developmental aspects of syntactic complexity in two triplets. Antwerp Papers in Linguistics, 70: 1-66.

Van Ginneken, J. 1917. De Roman van een Kleuter. ‘s-Hertogenbosch/Antwerpen: L.C.G. Malmberg.

Guerriero, S., A. Cooper, Y. Oshima-Takane & Y. Kuriyama. 2001. A discourse-pragmatic explanation for argument realization and omission in English and Japanese children’s speech. In A. Do, L. Domínguez & A. Johansen (eds). Proceedings of the 25th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press. pp. 319-330.

Van Haaften, T., Smits, R. & J. Vat. 1983. Left dislocation, connectedness and reconstruction. In W. Abraham (ed). On the Formal Syntax of the West Germania: Papers from the “3rd Groningen Grammar Talks, Groningen, January, 1981”. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. pp. 133-154. De Haan, G. 1987. A theory-bound approach to the acquisition of verb

placement. In G. de Haan & W. Zonneveld (eds). Formal Parameters of Generative Grammar. Yearbook III. Utrecht: Utrecht University. pp. 115-122.

---. 1986. De rol van morfologie en syntaxis in de ontwikkeling van het werkwoord. GLOT, 9: 28-41.

REFERENCES 255

In P. Jordens & J. Lalleman (eds). Language Acquisition. Dodrecht: Foris. pp. 101-121.

Haegeman, L. 1996. Root infinitives, clitics and truncated structures. In. H. Clahsen (ed). Generative Perspectives on Language Acquisition: Empirical Findings, Theoretical Considerations and Crosslinguistic Comparisons. Amsterdam: Benjamins. pp. 371-307.

---. 1993. The morphology and distribution of object clitics in West Flemish. Studia Linguistica, 41: 57-94.

---. 1990. Non-overt subjects in diary contexts. In J. Mascaró & M. Nespor (eds). Grammar in Progress. Dordrecht: Foris. pp. 167-179.

Hamann, C. 1996. Null arguments in German child language. Language Acquisition, 5: 155-208.

Hickmann, M. 1995. Discourse organization and the development of reference to person, space, time. In P. Fletcher & B. MacWhinney (eds). The Handbook of Child Language. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell. pp. 194-218.

---. 1986. Psychosocial aspects of language acquisition. In P. Fletcher & M. Garman (eds). Language Acquisition. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. pp. 9-29.

Hirakawa, M. 1993. Null subjects versus null objects in an early grammar of Japanese. McGill Working Papers in Linguistics, 9: 30-45.

Hoeksema, J. 1999. Verplichte topicalisatie van kale naamwoorden. Talk presented at TiNdag, Utrecht University, The Netherlands, February 6, 1999.

Hoekstra, E. & C. J.-W. Zwart. 1994. De structuur van de CP: Functionele projecties voor topics en vraagwoorden in het Nederlands. Spektator, 23: 191-212.

Hoekstra, T. 1992. Aspect and theta theory. In I.M. Roca (ed). Thematic structure, its role in grammar. Foris: Dordrecht. pp. 125-174.

--- & N. Hyams. 1998. Aspects of root infinitives. Lingua, 106: 81-112. Horton, W. & B. Keysar. 1996. When do speakers take into account

common ground? Cognition, 59: 91-117.

Van Hout, A. 2000. Event semantics in the lexicon-syntax interface: Verb frame alternations in Dutch and their acquisition. In C. Tenny and J. Pustejovsky (eds). Events as Grammatical Objects. Stanford: CSLI. pp. 239-282.

---. 1996. Event Semantics of Verb Frame Alternations: A Case Study of Dutch and its Acquisition. Ph.D. Dissertation, Tilburg University. Published in 1998. New York: Garland Publishing.

Huang, C.-T. 1989. Pro-drop in Chinese: A generalized control theory. In O. Jaeggli & K. Safir (eds). The Null Subject Parameter. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Press. pp. 185-214.

---. 1984. On the distribution and reference of empty pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry, 15: 531-574.

Hyams, N. 1994. V2, null arguments and COMP projections. In T. Hoekstra & B. Schwartz (eds). Language Studies in Generative Grammar: Papers in Honour of Kenneth Wexler from the 1991 GLOW Workshops. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. pp. 21-55.

---. 1986. Language Acquisition and the Theory of Parameters. Dordrecht: Reidel.

--- & K. Wexler. 1993. On the grammatical basis of null subjects in child language. Linguistic Inquiry, 24: 421-459.

Jakubowicz, C., Müller, N., Kang, O.K., Riemer, B. and C. Rigaut. 1997a. On the acquisition of the pronominal system in French and German. Ms, Laboratoire de Psychologie Expérimentale, CNRS, Universität Hamburg, Université Paris VIII.

---, Müller, N., Riemer, B. & C. Rigaut. 1997b. The case of subject and object omissions in French and German. In E. Hughes, M. Hughes & A. Greenhill (eds) (1997). Proceedings of the 21st Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, Volume 1. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press. pp. 331-342.

Jaeggli, O. & K. Safir. The null subject parameter and parametric theory. In O. Jaeggli & K. Safir (eds). 1989. The Null Subject Parameter. Dodrecht: Kluwer. pp. 1-44.

Jansen, F. 1981. Syntaktische Konstrukties in Gesproken Taal. Amsterdam: Huis aan Drie Grachten.

Johnson, K. 1991. Object Positions. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 9: 577-636.

Jordens, P. 2000. Particles in child Dutch. Ms, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.

---. 1990. The acquisition of verb placement in Dutch and German. Linguistics, 28: 1407-1448.

Kail, M. & M. Hickmann. 1992. French children’s ability to introduce referents in narratives as a function of mutual knowledge. First Language, 12: 73-94.

Van Kampen, J. 1997. The Acquisition of Wh-Movement. Ph.D. Dissertation, Utrecht University.

Karmiloff-Smith, A. 1981. The grammatical marking of thematic structure in the development of language production. In W. Deutsch (ed). The Child’s Construction of Language. New York: Academic Press. pp. 121-147.

REFERENCES 257

Determiners and Reference. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

Kayne, R. 1991. Romance clitics, verb movement and PRO. Linguistic Inquiry, 22: 647-686.

Klein, W. 1994. Time in Language. London: Routledge.

Koopman, H. 1993. The internal and external distribution of pronominal DPs. In K. Johnson & I. Roberts (eds). Beyond Principles and Parameters. Amsterdam: Kluwer. pp. 91-132.

Koster, J. 1978a. Why subject sentences don’t exist. In S.J. Keyser (ed). Recent Transformational Studies in European Languages. Cambridge, UK: MIT Press. pp. 53-64.

---. 1978b. Locality Principles in Syntax. Dordrecht: Foris.

---. 1975. Dutch as an SOV language. Linguistic Analysis, 1: 111-136. Krämer, I. 1995. The Occurrence of Subjects and Objects in Child Dutch: A

longitudinal study of the spontaneous speech of seven children aged 1;8 to 3;1. M.A. Thesis, University of Amsterdam.

---. 1993. The licensing of subjects in early child language. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, 19: 197-212.

Li Ping. 1990. Aspect and Aktionsart in Child Mandarin. Ph.D. Dissertation, Leiden University.

Llinas i Grau, M. 1997. Patterns of verbal complementation in the speech of a pre-two-year-old girl. Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses, 34: 101-113.

Longobardi, G. 1994. Reference and proper name: A theory of N-movement in syntax and logical form. Linguistic Inquiry, 25: 609-665.

MacWhinney, B. & C. Snow. 1991. The Child Language Data Exchange System: An update. Journal of Child Language, 17: 457-472.

Maratsos, M. 1976. The Use of Definite and Indefinite Reference in Young Children. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Massam, D. & Y. Roberge. 1989. Recipe context null objects in English. Linguistic Inquiry, 20: 134-139.

Mogford, K. 1993. Language development in twins. In D. Bishop & K. Mogford (eds). Language Development in Exceptional Circumstances. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone. pp. 80-95.

Müller, N., B. Crysmann & G. Kaiser. 1996. Interactions between the acquisition of French object drop and the development of the C-system. Language Acquisition, 5: 35-63.

--- & A. Hulk. 2001. Crosslinguistic influence in bilingual language acquisition: Italian and French as recipient languages. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 4: 1-21.

---, --- & C. Jakubowicz. 1999. Object omissions in bilingual children: Evidence for crosslinguistic influence. In A. Greenhill, H. Littlefield & C. Tano (eds). Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, I-II. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press. pp. 482-494.

Olsen, M., A. Weinberg, J. Lilly & J. Drury. 1998. Acquiring grammatical aspect via lexical aspect: The continuity hypothesis. University of Maryland Working Papers in Linguistics, 6: 122-151.

Piaget, J. 1959. The Language and Thought of the Child. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

---. 1923. Le langage et la pensée chez enfant. Neuchatel: Delachaux et Niestel.

Pinker, S. 1996. Language Learnability and Language Development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Poeppel, D. & K. Wexler. 1993. The full competence of clause structure in early German. Language, 69: 1-33.

Van der Putten, F. 1997.

Matter and Mind in Morphology - Syntactic

and lexical deverbal morphology in Dutch. PhD Dissertation,

Leiden University.

Ritter, E. 1991. Two functional categories in noun phrases: Evidence from Modern Hebrew. In Syntax and Semantics 25 (Perspectives on Phrase Structure). pp. 37-62.

Rizzi, L. 1997. The fine structure of the left periphery. In L. Haegeman (ed). Elements of Grammar: Handbook in Generative Syntax. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 281-337.

---. 1994. Early null subjects and root null subjects. In T. Hoekstra and B. Schwartz (eds). Language Acquisition Studies in Generative Grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. pp. 151-176.

---. 1986. Null subjects in Italian and the theory of pro. Linguistic Inquiry, 17: 507-557.

Roberge, Y. 1991. On the recoverability of null objects. In D. Wanner and D.A. Kibbee (eds). New Analyses in Romance Linguistics: Selected Papers from the 18th Symposium on Romance Languages. Amsterdam: Benjamins. pp. 219-312.

Savic, S. 1980. How Twins Learn to Talk. New York: Academic Press. Sawyer, J. 1999. Verb Adverb and Verb Particle Constructions: Their Syntax

and Acquisition. Ph.D. Dissertation, Boston University.

Schaeffer, J. 1997. Direct Object Scrambling in Dutch and Italian Child Language. Ph.D. Dissertation, UCLA.

Schaerlaekens, A.M. 1973. The Two-Word Sentence in Child Language Development. The Hague: Mouton.

REFERENCES 259

Wolters-Nordhoff.

Schlichting, L. 1996. Discovering Syntax: An Empirical Study in Dutch Language Acquisition. Nijmegen: Nijmegen University Press.

Shirai, Y. & R. Andersen. 1995. The acquisition of tense-aspect morphology: A prototype account. Language, 71: 743-762.

Sigurðsson, H. 1989. Verbal Syntax and Case in Icelandic in a Comparative GB Approach. Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Scandinavian Languages, University of Lund.

Stromswold, K. 1998. Analyzing children’s spontaneous speech. In D. McDaniel, C. McKee & H. Smith Cairns (eds). Methods for Assessing Children’s Syntax. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. pp. 23-53.

Tenny, C. 1994. Aspectual Roles and the Syntax-Semantics Interface. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Thrift, E. 2001. Unifying object drop in child Dutch and English. Talk presented at the Canadian Linguistics Association Conference, May 2001, Université de Laval.

--- & N. Hyams. 2001. The role of aspect in licensing object drop in child Dutch. In A. Do, L. Domínguez & A. Johansen (eds). Proceedings of the 25th _{Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development}

I-II. pp. 756-767.

Valian, V. 1991. Syntactic subjects in the early speech of Italian and American children. Cognition, 40: 21-81.

Valois, D. 1991. The Internal Syntax of DP. Ph.D. Dissertation, Univversity of California at Los Angeles.

Verhulst-Schlichting, L. 1985. De ontwikkeling van het werkwoord: plaats, vorm, type. Interdisciplinair Tijdschrift voor Taal- en Taalwetenschap, 5: 285-298.

Verkuyl, H. 1999. Aspectual issues: Studies on Time and Quantity. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.

---. 1972. On the Compositional Nature of the Aspects. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.

Verrips, M. & J. Weissenborn. 1992. Routes to early verb placement in early German and French: The independence of finiteness and agreement. In J. Meisel (ed). The Acquisition of Verb Placement. Dordrecht: Kluwer. pp. 283-331.

--- & F. Wijnen. 1998. The acquisition of Dutch syntax. In S. Gillis & A. De Houwer (eds). The Acquisition of Dutch. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. pp. 223-299.

Vygotsky, L. 1934/1962. Myshlenic I rech'. Moscow: Sotsekviz. Transl. E. Hanfmann & G. Vakan. Thought and Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Wagner, L. 1999. The Semantics and Acquisition of Time in Language. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.

Wang, Q., D. Lillo-Martin, C. Best & A. Levitt. 1992. Null subject versus null object: Some evidence from the acquisition of Chinese and English. Language Acquisition, 2: 221-254.

Webber, B. 1991. Structure and ostension in the interpretation of discourse data. Language and Cognitive Processes, 6: 107-135.

Weissenborn, J. 1990. Functional categories and verb movement: German syntax reconsidered. Spracherwerb und Grammatik: linguistische Untersuchungen zum Erwerb von Syntax und Morfologie [Special Issue]: Linguistische Berichte, 3: 190-224.

Weverink, M. 1989. What’s missing in Dutch. Papers and Reports on Child Language Development, 29: 125-132.

Weerman, F. 1989. The V2 Conspiracy: A Synchronic and Diachronic Analysis of Verbal Positions in the Germanic Languages. Dordrecht: Foris.

Wexler, K. 1994. Optional infinitives, head movement, and the economy of derivations. In D. Lightfoot & N. Hornstein (eds). Verb Movement. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press. pp. 305-350.

Wijnen, F. 1998. The temporal interpretation of Dutch children’s root infinitivals: The effect of eventivity. First Language, 18: 397-402. ---. 1995a. Clause structure develops. In M. Verrips & F. Wijnen (eds).

Papers from the Dutch-German Colloquium on Language Acquisition (= Amsterdam Series in Child Language Development 3). Amsterdam: Institute of General Linguistics. pp. 203-216.

---. 1995b. Incremental acquisition of phrase structure. In Proceedings of NELS 25. Amherst, MA: GLSA. pp. 105-118.

--- & G. Bol. 1993. The escape from the optional infinitive stage. In A. de Boer, J. de Jong & R. Landweerd (eds). Language and Cognition 3. Yearbook of the Research Group for Theoretical and Experimental Linguistics of the University of Groningen. Groningen: Centre for Language and Cognition. pp. 105-118.

Zaenen, A. 1997. Contrastive Dislocation in Dutch and Icelandic. In E. Agnastopolou, H. van Riemsdijk & F. Zwarts (eds). Materials on Left Dislocation. John Benjamins: Amsterdam. pp. 119-148.

Zwart, C.J.-W. 1997. Morphosyntax of Verb Movement: A Minimalist Approach to the Syntax of Dutch. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Zwarts, J. 1993. Pronouns and N-to-D-Movement. In OTS Yearbook 1993. pp. 93-112.