• No results found

Patients need to be informed about the evidence

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Patients need to be informed about the evidence"

Copied!
1
0
0

Bezig met laden.... (Bekijk nu de volledige tekst)

Hele tekst

(1)

METAL-ON-METAL HIP IMPLANTS

Patients need to be informed about the evidence

Karla Douw Health Technology Assessment researcher

University, Hjallesevej 169, Odense, Denmark

I agree that regulators and industry have to improve the regulation of medical devices, but Godlee implies that this will increase the evidence on effectiveness and safety and will lead to improved safety for patients.1

Even if evidence on safety were available, there is a gap between knowing and informing or doing. Patients would still need to be informed by their clinicians to decide whether they wanted the metal-on-metal implant or the gold standard total hip implant. As recent media reports in the Netherlands, Denmark, and the UK on this “scandal” show, patients were not aware of the safety risk. But they could have been—information on the uncertainty of the evidence was available at the level of national Health Technology Assessment agencies, notified bodies, medical societies in Denmark and the UK, but it was not given to patients.

Whatever the level of evidence, patients need to be informed about it. Eucomed, which looks after the interests of the medical devices industry, once said that the level of uncertainty in evaluating medical devices may be greater than for other health

technologies, and that more emphasis may be placed on value judgments. It is equally important to enable patients to state their preferences and include them in decision making. Patients should be informed on the evidence and the uncertainty around the evidence, so that they can state their preference. Tools, such as Annalisa (www.annalisa.org.uk), are available to support this kind of decision making. Currently, these tools are targeted at national bodies and clinicians, but an iPad or smart phone app that patients could take into the consultation room would force transparency on the harms and benefits of new and unproved health technologies.

Competing interests: None declared.

1 Godlee F. Serious risks from metal-on-metal hip implants [Editor’s Choice]. BMJ 2012;344:e1539. (1 March.)

Cite this as: BMJ 2012;344:e2129 © BMJ Publishing Group Ltd 2012

karladouw@gmail.com

For personal use only: See rights and reprints http://www.bmj.com/permissions Subscribe:http://www.bmj.com/subscribe

BMJ 2012;344:e2129 doi: 10.1136/bmj.e2129 (Published 21 March 2012) Page 1 of 1

Letters

Referenties

GERELATEERDE DOCUMENTEN

Given that my profile in Groningen is the linguistics profile, in France I followed courses from the Sciences du langage program at the Université de Lille, campus pont de

The results have been put in table 7, which presents percentages that indicate the increase or decrease of the formants before elimination with respect to the vowels before

Deze notitie pleit niet alleen voor meer kennisdeling, kennisverbetering en een sterkere kennisinfrastructuur, maar ook voor de borging van evidence-informed werken en een

What Masud does in his own work on Shatibi and what was common among the scholars gathered during the Muslim Intellectuals workshop in Leiden was that each of us was, to a lesser

For the manipulation of Domain Importance we expected that in more important domains (compared to the control condition) participants would feel more envy, but also engage

Moreover the eight evaluation studies revealed little with regard to the question of whether 'building a safe group process and creating trust' is an important or unimportant

However, in the two-tier structure of the company in this case study, the supervisory board is a body that should be independent of the executive board and control this

If we had chosen to compare each metric to the average score of reviewers 1 and 2, this would have already cancelled out some ‘errors’ in the scores of the reviewers, and as a