• No results found

Scientific Writing in Undergraduate Science Curricula: Reading and Analyzing Research Articles to Support Physics and Biology Students’ Written Argument Construction

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Scientific Writing in Undergraduate Science Curricula: Reading and Analyzing Research Articles to Support Physics and Biology Students’ Written Argument Construction"

Copied!
2
0
0

Bezig met laden.... (Bekijk nu de volledige tekst)

Hele tekst

(1)

University of Groningen

Scientific Writing in Undergraduate Science Curricula Lammers, Annelotte

DOI:

10.33612/diss.145239082

IMPORTANT NOTE: You are advised to consult the publisher's version (publisher's PDF) if you wish to cite from it. Please check the document version below.

Document Version

Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record

Publication date: 2020

Link to publication in University of Groningen/UMCG research database

Citation for published version (APA):

Lammers, A. (2020). Scientific Writing in Undergraduate Science Curricula: Reading and Analyzing Research Articles to Support Physics and Biology Students’ Written Argument Construction. University of Groningen. https://doi.org/10.33612/diss.145239082

Copyright

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons).

Take-down policy

If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim.

Downloaded from the University of Groningen/UMCG research database (Pure): http://www.rug.nl/research/portal. For technical reasons the number of authors shown on this cover page is limited to 10 maximum.

(2)

Propositions to accompany the PhD thesis

Scientific Writing in Undergraduate Science Curricula

Reading and Analyzing Research Articles to Support Physics and Biology Students’ Written Argument Construction

by Annelotte Lammers

1. Practice in reading and analyzing research articles with the use of the Scientific Argumentation Model helps undergraduate science students to construct a written argument (this thesis).

2. A dialogue between students about rhetorical moves in research articles is a necessary component of a genre approach to enhance their reading and writing (this thesis). 3. Universities only deserve to be called ‘‘research universities’’ when scientific reading

and writing activities have a central role in undergraduate curricula.

4. Integrating writing instruction in courses of undergraduate science programs requires mutual alignment, collaboration, and coordination by a driven group of faculty

members.

5. Reading pleasure is key in developing literacy skills. 6. Adults should read more often children books.

Referenties

GERELATEERDE DOCUMENTEN

There are a number of people who work or have worked at the faculty that I want to mention specifically: Martijn, Ernst, Danny and Thijs (for the always enjoyable pickup

The topics covered were: creative writing, storytelling, public speaking, science performance, science communication, scientific research writing and communicating it with the

18 Kommunale troos (mutuum colloquium) is volgens Luther een van die wesenlike verantwoordelikhede wat deur die evangelie self aan die kerk toevertrou word. Troos word ook nie

Geregistre er aan die Hoofposkantoor as 'n Nuu.,blad. Strydom sP Jyfblad. dat di~ hofuitspraak die horlosic vrn. ewabrandnag verbly hom in di e. Is die Vryhcidstatuut

Vertalen we dit naar een behandeling in de dagelijkse omgeving van de patiënt dan maken deze resultaten duidelijk dat het niet voldoende is in te grijpen op het totale

We discuss the application of these concepts in five different projects: a modular format for physics articles, an XML encyclopedia in pharmacology, a semantic data integration

The results suggest that teachers ’ goal statements about the research dispositions of students often tend to disagree with students’ experiences, while the emphasis on teachers’