• No results found

Validating a Multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) framework for health care decision making

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Validating a Multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) framework for health care decision making"

Copied!
1
0
0

Bezig met laden.... (Bekijk nu de volledige tekst)

Hele tekst

(1)

Abstract #33773

VALIDATING A MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION ANALYSIS (MCDA) FRAMEWORK FOR HEALTH CARE DECISION MAKING

Lieferink MA1, Til JAV1, Groothuis-Oudshoorn K1, Goetghebeur MM2, Dolan JG3

1

University of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands, 2BioMedCom Consultants Inc., Dorval, QC, Canada,

3

University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA

OBJECTIVES: When evaluating healthcare interventions, decision-makers are increasingly asked to

consider multiple criteria to support their decision. The MCDA-based EVIDEM framework was developed to support this process. It includes a simple weight elicitation technique, designed to be easily applicable by a broad range of users. The objective of this study was to compare the EVIDEM technique with more traditional techniques.

METHODS: An online questionnaire was developed comparing the EVIDEM technique with four

alternative techniques including AHP, best/worst scaling, ranking and point-allocation. A convenience sample of 60 Dutch and Canadian students were asked to fill out the questionnaires as if they were sitting in an advisory committee for reimbursement/prioritization of healthcare interventions. They were asked to provide weights for 14 criteria using two techniques, and to provide feedback on ease of use and clarity of concepts of the different techniques.

RESULTS: Results based on the first 30 responses show that EVIDEM is easy to understand and takes

little time to complete, three minutes on average. Criteria weights derived using the EVIDEM technique and best/worst scaling are divergent. Comparing the rank order of criteria respondents gave using these two techniques; there is more resemblance in rank order of criteria weighted with the EVIDEM technique. Compared to AHP/ranking/point-allocation, EVIDEM takes less time to complete but is only preferred by 33% of decision-makers. AHP/ranking and point allocation were often described as clearer and more reflective of the respondents’ opinion.

CONCLUSIONS: The simple technique is proposed as a starting point for users wishing to adapt the

EVIDEM framework to their own context. Other techniques may be preferred and their impact on the MCDA value estimate generated by applying the framework is being explored. This project is part of a large collaborative work that includes developing and validating this framework to facilitate sound and efficient MCDA-applications.

Referenties

GERELATEERDE DOCUMENTEN

When comparing the results of this study in the public sector to the previous studies in the private sector it seems that the most obvious difference is the

In his research, Lorentz has related the regional production location comparison to supply chain management issues, facility location analysis and multi criteria decision

In his research, Lorentz has related the regional production location comparison to supply chain management issues, facility location analysis and multi criteria decision

Ook heeft u een infuus, deze wordt in overleg met de arts meestal een dag na de operatie verwijderd.. De pijn na de operatie valt over het algemeen mee en is te vergelijken met

Here, three clinically relevant nanomedicines, i.e., high-density lipoprotein ([S]-HDL), polymeric micelles ([S]-PM), and liposomes ([S]-LIP), that are loaded with the HMG-CoA

'Ga door met wat we al hebben en richt je op de groepen die we niet goed kunnen helpen, zoals mensen met chronische depressies, mensen bij wie bestaande therapieën niet aanslaan

Op basis van de paarsgewijze vergelijkingen wordt voor elk criterium de relatieve voorkeur voor de verschillende alternatieven berekend.. Per criterium sommeren de

Table 3 Study design of the 17 integrated care programmes for individuals with multi-morbidity Count ry/Programme Study de sign Interve ntion group Comp arator group Data col