Pole-like road furniture interpretation in Mobile Laser
Scanning data
FASHUAI LI
Supervisor: Sander Oude Elberink
Promotor: George Vosselman
INTRODUCTION
HOW TO CLASSIFY THIS ROAD FURNITURE? MULTI-CLASSES
The interpreted road furniture (Orange: Street signs, Yellow: Street lights, Cyan: Traffic lights, Green: vertical poles, Blue:
Horizontal poles)
Traffic light?
Street light?
Street sign?
TO SEPARATE ATTACHMENTS
POLE-LIKE ROAD FURNITUE DECMOPOSITION
Road furniture point cloud 2D point density based method RANSAC line fitting method Slice cutting based method
Remove poles and connected components
analysis Precognition
Pole-extraction optimization
Street light Traffic sign Street sign
Traffic information sign Traffic light
POLE-LIKE ROAD FURNITURE INTERPRETATION
Relative position: top, middle, bottom
Relative height: from the bottom of the connected pole Geometric structure: linear, planar, scattered
Ratio of high reflectance
Relative angle: the normal of attachments and principal direction of pole Size: the area
Ratio of height to length
TO DISTINGUISH DIFFERENT ATTACHMENTS
Street lights connected to a vertical pole Top (normally)
Relative height
POLE-LIKE ROAD FURNITURE INTERPRETATION
Traffic signs connected to a vertical pole Planar
Relative angle -> perpendicular
Size ->small
Ratio of height to length -> close to 1
TEMPLATES
Street signs connected to a vertical pole Planar or linear
Relative angle -> perpendicular
Size -> small
Ratio of height to length ->small
TEMPLATES
Traffic information signs connected to a vertical pole Planar
Relative angle -> perpendicular
Size -> large
Ratio of height to length
TEMPLATES
Traffic lights connected to a vertical pole
Scattered
Relative height
TEMPLATES
Traffic lights connected to a horizontal pole
Connected to horizontal poles
Scattered
TEMPLATES
Street signs connected to a horizontal pole Planar or linear
Relative angle -> perpendicular
Size -> small
Ratio of height to length ->small
TEMPLATES
Traffic information signs connected to a horizontal pole Planar
Relative angle -> perpendicular
Size -> large
Ratio of height to length
TEMPLATES
The evaluation of road furniture interpretation in Enschede dataset
EVALUATION
Visual interpretation FP (%) P S1 S2 T1 T2 T3 Other Total P 111 0 0 0 0 0 0 111 0 S1 1 50 0 3 5 1 5 65 23.1 S2 0 0 7 5 0 0 0 12 41.7 T1 0 1 5 27 1 1 1 36 25.0 T2 0 0 1 0 3 0 0 4 25.0 T3 0 0 0 4 0 16 1 21 23.8 M 7 2 4 14 2 13EXPERIMENTAL RESULT
EXPERIMENTAL RESULT
CONCLUSION AND FUTURE WORK
Conclusion
Fast and better interpretation (more detailed)
Templates not generic enough (more classes, more templates need to be defined)
Future work