Citation for published version (APA):
Hospers, G. D. (1981). Membrane pump with sniffer measurements and interpretation. (TU Eindhoven. Vakgr. Transportfysica : rapport; Vol. R-477-D). Technische Hogeschool Eindhoven.
Document status and date: Published: 01/01/1981
Document Version:
Publisher’s PDF, also known as Version of Record (includes final page, issue and volume numbers)
Please check the document version of this publication:
• A submitted manuscript is the version of the article upon submission and before peer-review. There can be important differences between the submitted version and the official published version of record. People interested in the research are advised to contact the author for the final version of the publication, or visit the DOI to the publisher's website.
• The final author version and the galley proof are versions of the publication after peer review.
• The final published version features the final layout of the paper including the volume, issue and page numbers.
Link to publication
General rights
Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain
• You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal.
If the publication is distributed under the terms of Article 25fa of the Dutch Copyright Act, indicated by the “Taverne” license above, please follow below link for the End User Agreement:
www.tue.nl/taverne
Take down policy
If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us at:
openaccess@tue.nl
providing details and we will investigate your claim.
EINDHOVEN
DOCUMENTATIECENTRUM B.O.S. - THE.
class.
I
hAll'
111.
ocr
dv.
I
Vdatum
I
MEMBRANE PUMP WITH SNIFFER MEASUREMENTS AND INTERPRETATION
G.D. HOSPERS april 1981
Windenergy Group
Eindhoven University of Technology P.O. Box 513
5600 MB Eindhoven The Netherlands
Symbols
I. The pump 2
2. Testing equipment 3
3. Measurement procedure 4
4. Calibrations, conversions and accuracy 6
5. Results and their interpretation 8
5.1. Recommandations 9
Table of results 10
Figures: Fig. I Membrane pump with sniffer and 15 testing equipment
Fig. 2 Graphs of test results 16
Fig. 3 Graph of theoretical behaviour 17
(in combination with appendix)
References 18
SYMBOLS A M; Mnom P U V; Vs' V nom a g h; h s' hp k 1 m n p; Patm; Ps; Pp r s t u v; v* r;;
n
p <Pv w; w* Area Torque; - nominal Power VoltageVolume; - stroke; - nominal Acceleration
Acceleration of gravity
Height; - suction; - pressure Polytropic exponent
Length Mass
Number of strokes; revolutions per minute Pressure; - atmospheric; - suction; - pressure Crankradius
Stroke Time
Displacement
Velocity; - sniffer critical Pressure loss coefficient Efficiency
Specific mass Flow of volume
1. THE PUMP
The tested pump is known as a membrane pump. An impression of it is given in figure 1. More details can be found in the drawings [ref. 1]. The test situation is an accurate copy of the field conditions in which it has worked for 1 year. This gave us the possibility to make a comparison between field and laboratory performance [ref. 2].
Some technical details of the pump:
Membrane. Material: Rubber sheet
Thickness: 4 mm
Diameter: ~ 240 mm (effective)
Stroke: 30 nun (max. 40 mm)
Valves. Lifting height: 10 nun
Diameter: $ 100 mm
Seat Diameter: $ 90 nun
Pressure airchamber volume: 9.0 1 (max. effective) Suction airchamber volume: 6.7 1 (max. effective) Pressure tube. Inside diameter: ~ 70 nun
Length: 1250 mm
Suction pipe. Inside diameter: ~ 105 nun
Lenght: 4100 nun
The sniffer is a special device to allow the·pump to run unloaded at very low speeds, which is very important for windmill applications. There is an airvalve on top. Through
this valve air can flow into the pump during the up-going stroke. The va~ve closes by the pressure drop caused by the passing air, and after that the suction begins. During the down-going stroke the air is pressed out through the same valve. It passes also a second smaller valve in the sniffer. This valve will be closed by water but not by air, thus avoiding that the water leaves the pump via the sniffer. More details about this sniffer can be found in (ref. 3] and [ref. 4]; a brief theoretical description can be found in the appendix.
2. TESTING EQUIPMENT
A general view of the testing equipment is given in figure 1. The guided pump rod is driven by a long (~ 2 m) connecting rod. The crankshaft is driven by a worm gearbox. This box can hinge along the crankshaft axis. The resulting misalignment compared to the rpm variator is taken up by a special selfadjusting teeth coupling. Another result is now that the reaction torque of the box can be measured. This is done by a strain gauge transducer, in combination with a strain meter that shows the instantaneous force.
By means of an integrator circuit (1
Mn,
19 ~F) we can read the average from the digital voltmeter. The water output is gathered in a bucket. The time for a number of strokes is found from a hand held stopwatch. To count the number of strokes we read a (continuously running) mechanical stroke counter. The amount of water during that number of strokes can be read from the balance.Some technical data:
10) kg Motor:
Variator range:
Strain gauge transducer: Strain meter: Volt meter: Balance: Stroke counter: Stopwatch: 2.2 kW/3 Hp at 1400 RPM, coupled to variator with V-belt
I : I : 5.8
kN, 4 x 600
n
Peekel, type CA 300Fluke, type 8010
A
(Digital) Berkel, type 3000, max. 50 (+ Mechanical type, 6 digits Mechanical type3. MEASUREMENT PROCEDURE
Choose rpm,
Wait for stable voltage (~ 90 s)*.
Choose required number of strokes and wait for countersetting which is easy to remember.
i
Start stopwatch.Start Shift tube from return to bucket. Measurement Remember countersetting.
Read and remember voltage. Notice number of strokes.
Stop
~top
stopwatch.MeasurementlShift tube from bucket to return.
Write: Voltage (ll)
Number of strokes (n) Time (t)
Weight (m)
Empty bucket~ reset stopwatch.
Next
* The integrator circuit has an RC-time of 19 s.
~
=
RC=
(106 n)x(19 x 10-6 F)=
19 s. To get less than1% error: -t
T
(1 - e ) > 0,99 + t > 4,6 T, + t > 87,55
With this procedure the measurements 1 .•. 125 have been carried out.
During measurements I ... 63 the speed has been increased only, while the behaviour of the pump is accurately studied.
During measurements 64 125 the speed has been decreased only, except for 83 .•• 92 to study the resonance effect.
In the table of results the groups of (mostly two) measurements are divided by thick lines. Within one group nothing is changed and the machine is not stopped in between the measurements.
4. CALIBRATIONS, CONVERSIONS AND ACCURACY
The only necessary calibration is that of the torque measurement system.
~~Eg-!2i~!~~~E' Turn crank to bottom on top dead center. On the strain meter we adjust voltage to zero.
!gEg~~_£!!~2E!£~g~.In the same crank position as for zero ad-justment a lever of 0.5 m length is clamped in horizontal position on the crank shaft. Read voltage U1. Now a weight of 40 N is connected to the lever at 0.5 m distance thus adding 20 Nm. Read voltage U2.
Conclusion:
The calibration in cold condition gave:
20 Nm :: (324 - 23)mV + 1 mV
It appeared that during the test the adjustment changed. The zero shifted to -2 or -3 mV. See table "calibration after measurement 63" at page 12.
The calibration check in hot condition gave:
o
Nm :: - 2.5 mV20 NM .... (322 - 19.5) mV :: 302.5 mV
The real torque (M) in hot condition (because the adjustments were done in cold condition) can now be found with:
The stroke volume is given by:
v
s = Vtotal nv
~ m (liters) s n p = 1000 kg/m3 1 m3 ~ 1000 litersThe angular speed is:
The efficiency is given by
w ~ ~ x 21T(rad/s) P out (water) p x cf>v n= = = P. Mxw ~n pgh x
Yt.o.t.
t pgh xPt
m f]= = MXE:. x 21T M xE:.
X 2'11"+n
=...
- x35 m x 100% t L 21T M x n g =·10 m/s2 h ::0 3.5 mThe accuracy of the different measurements is as follows: Torque voltage:
.!.
1.5 mV ~ + 0.1 NmMass measurement:
.!.
0. I kg Time measurement: + 0.2 sNumber of strokes: no error (is.taken into account with time) Delivery height:
.!.
0,05 m5. RESULTS AND THEIR INTERPRETATION
In the table measurements, results and remarks can be found. The measurements of the group 63 ••. 125 indicated with a dot
(0) are represented in graphs, see fig. 2. In figo 3 the results expected according the theory described in [ref. 4] are shown.
The figures show clear irregularities, see also the remarks
in the table of results. They are caused by airchamber resonances, which can be calculated with the formula [ref. 5]:
_ /k.A.p
wo - - - -poV.l 1.4 P=
1000 kg/m3=
0.00385 m2=
105 N/m2 W o=
6.9 rad/s=
9 x 10-3 m3 press=
1.25 m 1.4 P = 1000 kg/m3=
0,0086 m2=
0.7xlOs N/m2 = 6.7 x 10-3 m3 k=
A.
pJ.pe p V 1 k=
A. pJ.pe p V 1=
4.1 m w o . suctJ.on=
5.5 rad/sWe can conclude that at:
w
=
5.3w
=
10.3w
=
3 w=
9.7 rad/s rad/s rad/s rad/sResonance suction airchamber.
Possible second-harmonical resonance suction airchamber.
Irregularity at approximately half the resonance frequency of suction airchamber. Resonance of the pressure airchamber:
difference between practical and calculated frequency (6.9 rad/s) may be caused by short pipe, which also can be half empty.
w
=
4 ••• 5 rad/sw
> 12 rad/sThere is a very high stroke volume,
possibly we see an after admission effect. (The suction line still behaves as if undamped at this frequency.)
The torque graph is concave: Because of friction losses (L\p
=
~.!pv2) , we expected the required torque to be more and more increasing, a convex graph.At the same time we see the stroke volume going down, while it should increase. Apparently the friction losses required a bigger expansion of the air bubble under the sniffer, thus decreasing the effective stroke volume and the required torque. A very practical conclusion from the graph could be that the efficiency graph is mu~h more influenced by the stroke volume than by the torque. Efficiency and stroke volume graph also have the same shape. This all means that> an (easy) measurement of the stroke volume can give an impression of the efficiency
(for this type of pump).
5.1. Recommendations
a) Extend theoretical description of suction pump with sniffer, in relation to
(10) stroke volume change due to friction losses in the suction line,
(20) after admission.
b) In practical applications the resonance frequencies of airchambers should be less than the minimum operating frequency (3 rad/s) of the pump.
c) Avoid to build up a pressure head, because then the membrane may buckle.
CI
S
1:: .dI~ UI!:i
t- l.&J""
LU DC enz::
C IX '~::::] c:J~fJ'I
:::s
Q....
-E:
~
lti;s
It:REMARKS
If'
>
0
....
~ CS~
L&.. ~ w-'&
w
2:.~
ClI:-
,...
CS:z
t/"t ~::z
....
~-
~ 01-
~...
-
...,
"-'z
:::2
C...
.E
2::
>CJt
E::::-'
.3
i
. 78_
8~30
6'
$.8
5.52
o.~6
66.G
2.8'
2
108_112
30
66
2~.57.lf"
o.~B13.6 2.8'
3
80_ B9
35
18
2~1
5.7~
0.69 67.0
2.82.
4
SNIFFER
BECOMES
wr;T
~.32_38
3D
bb
5.3
2.~5
018
38.7 2.86
T I6
15
1.1~
NO OUTPUT
I7
15
30
'0
0
1.1b
0
03.14
NO DU1PUT
~I8
'b_70
3D
S3
~
12.8
JC'POSSI&.E 'ERIOR
'--12:a
9
70 _
7~30
53
16.s
4.93
0.55
62.2
3.56
Wee
~CJ10
76
_B2.
30
53
1~
5'.39
0.[,2
{'3.1
1S'6
ffi<X:
LL.~. !:!::a:11
81_B1
30
53
1~.8
~"2
D.6b b4.3 3.56
1~
12.
62._ 88
30
S3
20.8
£;.85
0.69
b6.0
3·.~'
1~B4 _8.9
30
53
21.2
5.B8
0.71
66.9
3.50
14
B"t _
B~30
53
21.6
&.8B
0.72
68.2
1~615
B{, _90
.30
S3
21.6 5.98
0.72.
67.D
3.56
l'
as_8.S
30
S3
212
5.92.
f).71
66.~
3.~617
117_121
3Cl
47
29.1
8.03 0.97
67.3 4.01
-18
118_12Z
25
385
25'.D
8.10
1.00
'B.8
It.o8
19
10B_116
30
Ii?
130.~
JepDSSJALE.
ER1DR
20
117_120
25
38.8 24.B
8.0D
0.99
69.1
~.05
.
21
12b_1~O
25
3~.~
liE
B.b3
o.~8
63.5
4.55
T
22 125_129
25
3~.5
24.2
B.~6
0.97
63.0
ltSS
&
I23
1lt1_1~S25
3l1D
23.~
~.62D.g,
5".~
5.2.11
\It- 4.&1 O z24
1
~1_14'
25
'30.~
2.19
9.65
0.96
5'5.2
5:15
oGZq:a:
2S
123_126
25
2.b.5
XxE.RRDR
z:E~c:d_w
26
125~
2S
2'-5
212
B.~b
0.85
55.2.
5.~3
..J~~121_1~
265
U&A.,27
l5'
20.1
8.30 0.8.3
5~.65.g:!
:::So&:t:l28 12(_125
25
2£\5 217
8.33
0.B7
58.0
5.Cl3
,
I
,.
J::
C-'
a
J::::z
.dJ~=
!:i
...
V"l UJ cJ'1 LUz:
...:
ex ;De:::S ;:j~tI1
::s Q LL. -E:~
jtis
i:R.EMARKS
.">
0
...
';i cs~
&.&.. ~ IoU-'&
uJ E.~
GI::-
,-...cs
::z
""
.:lIl::z
.." ~.:..
01-
...
""
-
....,
...,
z
:::I.
s:
...,J.E
z::
~
~:3
2~
121_125
25
26.5
211
B.~O
0.B5
56.9
5'.9.l
~uJWI 0 l ! :30
11~_121
25
215
23.~
g.10
O.9lf
6lf.lf
6.68
Ze
~=
31 117_119
x
2S
'122
.5
2.1.2
xl'OSSIBlE ERROR
%1: - w~2
11~_11b
25
21~
21.B
177
0.87
&l.S
6.'8
~l:
\.Ju..33
113_115
~5
23.5
21.8
1.
70
0.8,{63.1
6.&8
~o
I
34
113_115
25 23.2 21.8
7.70
0.87 63.1 £.77
J.
35
125 _12T
25
20.5
21.3
8.~o
0.85
5"5:9
7."
. 36
126_12&
25
2D.~
212
8.56
0.85
55:2
7.66
37
127
25
20.~
210
B.~()0.84
5~.77.&&
3B
12r_129
25
21.0
211
8.61
0.8'1
5'lf.~7.ltB
3~
129_1~1
25
18.0
1~.1
8.7lJ
0.16
48.(,
6.73
40
130_132
25
18.0
19.1
8.83
0.79
~9.T
8.73
41
13D
25
18.3
118
8.7~
0.19
SO.lf
8.58
42
1~1
2;
.143
1~.38.83
0.80 50.2
8.58
43
133
25
is.1t
lO.3
8.96
0.81
50.6
8.5lf
L
4~
13~
25
1&
20.5
9.02.
0.82.
50.6
8.lf~
31-1
.lI5
13~25
18.'
20.5
9.02
0.82
50.&
B.ltS
o~
-I\t-46
130
3D
19.0
22.~
8.7'
0.75 lfT.& 9.92
L&.y1~1cJ1
47
11G
2!i
1b.2
19.B
7.83 0.15
5'3.5
~.70;::::w
<IX:
41
1~8_1l925
16.2
itlG
6.'"
0.74
Lt7.~
9.70
~lr
::::I UJ43
117
3D
1~.~
218
'7.30 0.73
51..2
~.'72.
A..~ED
lib
25
14.0
19.&
7.83
0.'18
55.7
11.22
51
11G
25
11tn
1~.~T.83
0.78
55.2-
11.22
~2115
25
l~.D
19.5
7.17
0.78
5"5.9
1122
~3129
25
11.5
115
B.69
0.18
5D.0
8.98
~lf131
2~
17.5
1~.5
8.83
0.78
lf9.2
8.98
~5131
25
1'l3
1~7 6.8:1
o.'T! 49.7
9.08
5b
122
.30 15.0
2.3~
8.23
0.80
53.9
~2.~r
•
•
•
~
'"
""
i
::::s
l&J J: c~
cJ
S
J:: :2 .UI~....
!:j
....
L&Jw
ClC ct'I
z::
...:
CC ;~:::::I;:;
~CI1
:3 Q LI-
-I:~
/tns
ii:R.EMARKS
.,.
>
0
....
'\ii
c:'S,..?*
La.. ~""
-
'&
uJs:
,~
-=
-
-
cs
z
'"
.oX:z
....
~-
...
o.
-
'-oJ '\oJ-
' - ' '-oJZ
:::J
C...
.E
%:
>cJt
~3
5T
·122
30
14.8
2.1G
8.l3 0.79
53.2
12.11.t
58
122
30
1li.8
2.3.6
N.Z3
o.1~5"3.2
12..7lf
59
126_121
30
12.8
2l.9
8.5.3
0.76
4~.c31lf.13
60
127_12B
~D
1~.a
eZ.9
8.60
0.7'
lf~S'
14.7.3
-61
136_137
3D
11.2
22.2
1---.~.19
o.7~
4~.~
16.83
.{;2
l~B
30
11.2
22.2
9.2~
o.7'i
liLt.it
1&.83
63
13~_13r
30
Its:
22.3
9.i5
0.14
~~1
16.3~
_2.5
CALIBRATI0N
IN
tfED
lATE
LY
AFTER
MEASLlRI:PfENTH! 63
(,.HOT" CONllIT
ION)
1~.S
x
~Wl
TH LE.VE.R
322-
No3(
WITH
LEVER
+
20Nm
20.3
'C(WITH
L~VEK
_ 0.2
CALI
~RAll0N
I\FTER
=
2.
HOURS
REST
2.2.~
x
x
WITH
LE.V£l
32.4
l(x
WITH
LEV~R
+
2.D
Ntn
'tr
lit1
1t31
11.'
22.6
x
Pos
SI!J.E. foR{(O R
66
1~8
.30
11.4
21.'
9.29 0.12-
43.2
1&.53
66
138
3D
11.4
22.2
9.29
o.1~lIlt.1t
IG53
67
140
30
11.4
22J
~42 o.7~
1f3.~
16.5.1
68
12&
2.5
12.6
2.0.0
8.50
0.80
52.5
12.4r
69
121
25
12.2
l~.b
8.17
0.719
53.5
12.8B
70
12~
2G
110
2D.~
8.'.36
0.76
52.3
12.57
71
12.3
25
12A
19.6
8.30
0.18
52.6
12.27
72
130
25
16.~
1'.D
B.76
0.16
'18.3
~.5B
73
12~
25
16.2
18.9
8.36
0.76
50.'1
~.70
74
129
25
16.2
iRA
8.6C3
0.7'1
,,7.2.
~.10
-.~
-:::I
7'
131
25
1&.1)
1~.1
6.83
0.76 48.2 9.82
t-7_7-t----=:1...:::..:30=---+....=..:20::.-..j..-...:"112 15.5' 6.76
0.78
~9.3 ~.52
78
112'
25
16.0
1~.1
8.89
0.76
;'7.3 .9.82
7!3
114
25
1~~
19.2
7.70
0.77
55.S 3.58
•
&0
115
25
162
1~.2
7.77
0.77
5S".1
~.
70
•
81
12
fJ
30
20.D
22.7
8.63
0.76
lfB.9
~
,42
MOTOR RPM SLIGHTLY82
126
25
16.~
18.9
8.50
0.76
lf9.6
C'j.58
DEC.ftEA!aILD .. 83
112
Z,S
15.8
1~.2
7.S7
o.'{.,
56.5
~.9lf
•
81f
112.
25
15.8
1~.3
7.57
0.17
S6.8
9.9~
•
85
112.
25
15.2
18.8 7.57
0.75
55.310.33
86
112.
2S
15.2
l~.o
7.57
0.76
55.9 10.33
87
11~
2S
15.0
1~.~
7.70
0.78
S6.110.~7
•
I1B
113
25
15'.0
1~.2
1.b4
D.77 56.0
10.47
B~
i15
2S
1lt.6
19.4 1.71
0.7S
55.'
10.76
•
.9
0
115
25
1
~.6
19.'
1.
77
0.78 5b.2 1D.76
91
11~
25
i~.D
19.&
'T.B3 o.TlJ
55.7
11.22
•
92
116
25
1~.o
13.&
7.83
0.78
55.111.22
93
13
'3
2~
18.'
2o.~
8.9b
0.82
51.2
8.5lt
•
~L,
133
25' 18.4
20.7
9.~'
0.83 51.5
B.64
•
95
132
25
20.0
21.f
8.89
0.85
53.1.
7.85
9&
133
2S
2.QD
21.3
/lJ'
o.8~
5:iD
r.85
97
130
25
210
21.~
8.7& 0.88
5),1 7.'i8
•
~B
130
es
2jJJ 2i4
8.76
0.86
5~.4 1.~8
~9
132
2&"
210
21.1
B.~
0.87
5''1.'
1.4B
• 100
12'
2£
22~
22.0
6.50
0.88
51.1
7.01
1D1
12.
~
2S
22.6 "
x
£RRDR
1D2.
123
2.5"
22.~
21g 8.30
0.88
58.8 6.95
10.3
11 S
25
2J.~
22.5 7.97
0.90
62~
6.60
.~ ~z
-VI~
ce
loU ~ '-'!:.
~
1 - .:z::
c.!J- • -...J til ~. 0... Cl::11 .10•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
"
i
J: c cI1~
SZ::
Z .dI~....
!:i
:;;
l&J c./1 LU DC2::
c:
a:
Ia=:::s
':::i~fII
::s
Qu..
-E:
~ltis
-
R.EMARKS
It't .>
0
~ JL. ~ c"S,.?
tL. ~...
-
'&
uJ E.~
a.:::-
-
cJz
.n
...
:z
-..a
~•
o.
-
"oJ "--
...
' --z
:::2
C...,
.E
2::
>cI)
E::::-'
:3
tDli
.
11~2~
2.lt.O 22.7
8.03
0.91
63.0
6~SltiD5
11g
2.5
2.S-b
23.~
8.03 0.93
1;4.6
6.1lt
-1DG
119
2~
2.5.~
e3.1
8.03
0.92.
6lf.1
6.18
10T
119
25
27.&
2Z.~
8.0~
0.90
b2.'f
5.'9
108
1i~
2~
27.2
223
8.03
o.~
b1.9 5.71
109
134
25
29.0
21.2
~.O2
0.85
52.3
S.'12
}rUH1 IN TORQUE
110
159
25
29.~
2~.1
10.'8
o.~50.'3
~.34
AT
5AME. RPM
Y
t11
157
25
29.~
251
10.55
1.00
5.3.D
5.31
112
130
25
31.4
25.~
8.16
1.02
64.9
5.00
113
130
25
31.'
261
8.7'
1.0~
66.4
4.97
tilt
125
25
33.4
25.5
a.~3
1.02·
6T.lt
14.70
115
12.6
25
33.~25.;
9.'13
1.02
'T.lf
Jt.13
116
1Z~25
35.8
25.5
a
.~l»1.0l
'1.9
1t.39
fi'"
l~lf2S
3~8
25.3
B.3' 1.01
6'f.lf
4.39
'118.
119
25
40.6
2~.8
7.91
0.99
&9.1t
'181
119
119
2S
'10.2.
25.2-
6.D3
1.01
69.g
l~1
12D
102.
. 25
It&.C
21.2
6.~10.85 68.Jt
.3.49
121
100
25
45.D ZO.6
'.T8
0.B2
67.7
1't~
122
86
25
52J
159
5.85
o.<
bD.S
3.02
12.3
B8
25
525
15:7
5.~
0.63
58.5 2.99
124
~~~5
5bfJ
.1'.~
6.71
o.~6S't.B
2.90
125
~~
2.5
55IJ
15.~
6.11
0.64
52.8
2.86
I'"
VARIATOR
It~IIIV
,~'
"
, I...
,
..
' ... ~-
..
......
,
...
"
"
kg
SAI.A.."
•
STRAIII
MlTE.l
1~\"'4w1
(
M...
A _ - - - '
FIG. I MEUBRANE PilliP WITH SNIFFER AlID TESTING EQUIPMENT
-
-
-WATER
RETURN
SNIfFER
.$r
RAIN &AU&E
.TIAliIUCEI"
--
-
-
-
.
-~...
- -
--
- -
-
- -
- --
-
--
-
~. -- -- -- ---
-
-
- - - .-
-
-- -- - - - -
-- --
-
-
--
- - - -
-- - -
--
-
--
--- --
-
-
- -
---- --- --- --- --- --- ---
-REFERENCES
Drawings
"Membrane pump"
Dwg.nr. 7702-5 sheet I
&
22 Beurskens, Hageman, Hospers, Kragten, Lysen
"Low speed waterpumping windmills: rotor tests and overall performance"
Third International Symposium on Wind Energy Systems, August 26-29, 1980
3 Kragten
"Measurements piston pump Tunesia" (in Dutch) March 1979, R-376-D
4 Lenssen
"Matching of a single-acting piston pump and a windmill by means of a sniffer" (in Dutch)
September 1978, R-351-S
5 Hospers, Lysen
"Airchambers for piston pumps" to be published
All reports can be ordered from:
Wind Energy Group, Eindhoven University of Technology, P.O. Box 513, 5600 MB EINDHOVEN, Netherlands
APPENDIX
~!£!=E!~~_~=~~~!~~!_~!_£~£_~!E~_~~!!!=!
a) The piston (membrane) starts at bottom dead center.
u = r(I - coswt}
du .
v
=
dt=
wr s~nwtV
=
A.u=
A.r(I coswt); the maximum of this is: Vnom = A.2rb) The speed increases to v* and then the sniffer closes.
v*
=
wr sinwt ~ wt=
arcs~n. -v*wr
Definition: The angular speed w* is the minimum required angular speed to close the sniffer.
. w* wt
=
arCS~n-w
In the pump now air of atmospheric pressure is present, with a volume:
w*
VI
=
A.r{1 - cos arcsin(-)}w
c) The air is now expanded to suction pressure.
Pa mt
~ =
Ps~ ~
V2P ,lAc. w*
V2 = (.:...a.tm:r-.A.r{1 - cos arcs in(w-) } Ps
d) The suction of water begins, and stops at the top dead center. The total amount of water displaced is the real stroke volume:
v
s=
Vnom - V2p ...t-..
J1<.
w*
= A.2r - (~r.A.r{l - cos arcsin(W-)} Ps
w*
P ~k.=
Vnom-!V
nom.{l - cos arcsin(--)} x(~J--w Ps
w*
1 - cos{arcsin(-)} ~=
1 _ { ' ...- -=-_~w_} Vnom 2w*
Because: cos{arcsin(-)} w + 1 (see fig. 3)e) Downward stroke: expulsion of water and air gathered during upward stroke. The air leaves the pump again through the sniffer: this costs no energy.
The average torque for a full stroke is now:
- M__ - V 1 V
M