Onze hersenen en ons gedrag
Moleculaire psychologie en neuroplasticiteit
Prof. Dr. Rudi D’Hooge
Laboratorium voor Biologische Psychologie
K.U.Leuven
•
•
huge neural matrix for information representation
more than 100 x 10
9brain cells & each cell may receive thousands of synaptic contacts
―MOLECULAR
PSYCHOLOGY‖
Jon Franklin, 1987
• molecules of the brain, neuropsychofarmacologie, therapeutische toepassingen
Synaptic plasticity & molecular psychology:
• hersenen gevormd door vroege ervaring (Rosenzweig, Hubel & Wiesel)
• Hebbiaanse plasticiteit in het volwassen zenuwstelsel (leervermogen,
compensatorische mechanismen, ziekteprocessen)
Solomon H. Snyder
Eric Kandel – Nobelprijs 2000
―Every human thought, hope, fear, passion, yearning, and insight results from
chemical interactions between transmitters and receptors‖
RESPONSE
US
CS
Hebb’s postulate
"When an axon of cell A is near enough to excite a cell B
and repeatedly or persistently takes part in firing it, some
growth process or metabolic change takes place in one or
both cells such that A’s efficiency, as one of the cells
firing B, is increased."
•
•
INFORMATION STORAGE IN THE BRAIN
localized vs. diffuse
diffuse network of cell
assemblies established by
strengthening of synaptic
connections between the
building blocks
NEOCORTEX
HIPPOCAMPUS
STORAGE & RECALL
INPUT
MEMORY DEFECT AFTER HIPPOCAMPAL DAMAGE
Donald O. Hebb Award (Canadian Society for Brain,
Behaviour and Cognitive Sciences, 2001):
Hippocampus
Thalamus Corpus callosum Striatum
MOUSE BRAIN
•
•
LONG-TERM POTENTIATION (LTP)
HIGH-FREQUENCY STIMULATION
rat hippocampal slice
S
: stimulation of Schaffer collaterals
R
: field excitatory postsynaptic
potentials (EPSPs) recorded from CA1
potentiation of responses
20 min after HFS
Molecules of the Hebbian Synapse
Ca
2+NMDA-R
AMPA-R
GLUTAMATE
RELEASE
CALCIUM-DEPENDENT
PROCESSES
PRESYNAPTIC
TERMINAL
POSTSYNAPTIC
TERMINAL
mGluR
mGluR
Ras
activation
Raf
Mek
Mapk
→ LR genes → IEG pCREBvGluT
Spred1
Assessing learning & memory in
laboratory mice
• mazes or labyrinths
• passive or active avoidance protocols
• contextual fear conditioning
• operant chamber training
• discrimination learning...
TRIAL 1
TRIAL 8
TRIAL 16
•
•
Acquisition
TRIAL BLOCK
1 2 3 4ESC
A
P
E LATENC
Y
(in s)
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 % TIME IN QU AD RA NT 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 target adjacent 1 adjacent 2 opposite(path length, swimming velocity)
(target entries)
Testing
MWM PERFORMANCE
IN HIPPOCAMPUS-LESIONED RATS
Swimming paths during
Trial 28 (end of training)
Probe trial
•
•
Molecules of the Hebbian Synapse
Ca
2+NMDA-R
AMPA-R
GLUTAMATE
RELEASE
CALCIUM-DEPENDENT
PROCESSES
PRESYNAPTIC
TERMINAL
POSTSYNAPTIC
TERMINAL
mGluR
mGluR
Ras
activation
Raf
Mek
Mapk
→ LR genes → IEG pCREBvGluT
Spred1
•
•
Ca
2 +NMDA-R
AMPA-R
GLUTAMATE
RELEASE
CALCIUM-DEPENDENT
PROCESSES
PRESYNAPTIC
TERMINAL
POSTSYNAPTIC
TERMINAL
m GluR
m GluR7
Ras
activation
Raf
Mek
Mapk
→ LR genes → IEG pCREBvGluT
Spred1
•
Deletion of VGLUT1 impairs robust LTP induced by strong, triple tetanization theta-burst stimulation (TBS) in the CA1 region of the hippocampus.
(A) Input/output-curves of VGLUT1-deficient heterozygous mice and wild-type controls. fEPSP-slopes were recorded at increasing stimulation intensities until a maximum was attained. There were no significant differences between both groups.
(B) Paired-pulse facilitation (PPF), calculated from the ratio of the second fEPSP-slope to the first fEPSP-slope. At all interpulse intervals, no significant differences were observed between VGLUT1+/- and VGLUT1+/+mice.
(C) Examples of LTP recordings from a VGLUT1+/+ slice (upper row) and a VGLUT1+/- slice (lower row). The insets represent analogue traces, taken during baseline recording (1), 10 min after tetanization to exclude post-tetanic potentiation (2) and 3 hours post-tetanus (3). The superimposed traces 1 + 3 indicate the remaining potentiation after 3 hours.
(D) Average values calculated as percentage of baseline measures. Note the lower initial magnitude of potentiation in VGLUT1 +/- mice and the
continuous increase of fEPSP-slope during the triple TBS as compared with the saturation of potentiation in wild-type mice after the 2nd TBS.
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 0 20 40 60 80 100 P1 P2 Acquisition L a te n c y ( s ) 1 2 3 30 40 50 60 70
*
# # Reversal trial Di s ta n c e t o p la tf o rm ( c m ) O 0 5 10 15 20 1 2 3 1 2 3 * # D u ra ti o n c lo s e t o p o o l w a ll (s ) Ne w position Forme r position VGLUT1+/+ Pe riphe ral zone sT