Egbert de Weert (CHEPS) International workshop “Academic Profession in Russia:
International and Comparative
The diversifying academic
The diversifying academic
profession: The case of NL
profession: The case of NL
on institutional profiles,
on institutional profiles,
teaching and research and
teaching and research and
professional careers
professional careers
Russia – the Netherlands in the golden
age (1698)
Czar Peter the Great (statue and
picture in Zaandam)
Diversity in the academic profession
Looking at the fault lines between teaching and research at three levels:
Level of institutional types and profiles Programme level
Personal level: the divide between men and women
Diversity of institutional types
Binary divide: Research universities versus professional (teaching) institutions: eg. Germany, Finland, Netherlands More diversified: research institutes outside the universities:
France (national research centers); Russia (institutes of Academy of Science)
Highly layered systems, including private HE institutions: USA, Japan, Russia
Governments to decide:
which institutions ought to do what define budget allocations
Distribution of working tasks of faculty
Traditional division teaching (40%), research (40%) and administration (20%)
Now more flexible patterns, no formal standards Also teaching-only and research-only positions
In Russia teaching load determined according to formal standards corresponding to rank and position. On average 8 hours per week research against 29 hours teaching (G. Androushchak & M.Yudkevich 2012).
Binary systems distinguishing
Research Universities and Universities
of Applied Sciences (UAS)
Vertical degree level: sub-degree programs, bachelor, master, doctoral programs
Academic versus vocational dimensions
Distinction between research and teaching focused institutions
Profile of research at Universities of
Applied Sciences
Practice-based and practitioner research oriented towards
utilization and transformation of knowledge and research results into innovation, mainly on the regional level.
It is customer driven and close to the market, responding to requests from enterprises (mainly SME’s) and other social
organizations with product and customer-oriented research for the short and medium term.
It should be relevant for the quality of professional education, for curriculum innovation and the professionalization of the teaching faculty.
Views of UAS faculty in NL
Research contributes to innovation of professional practice Research reinforces the dialogue with business and the
professional field
Research benefits teaching and curricular development Research at UAS is different in nature from university
research
Higher faculty ranks (strongly) agree more (70-90%) than lower faculty ranks (65-77%)
Relative research time spent by higher and
lower ranks and institutional type, (7
countries)
• Higher university ranks are homogenous
• Lower University ranks high in Norway, Finland, Germany
• UAS sector more varied: Norway and Portugal
close to university
• UAS lower ranks spent more time on reseach in Norway; higher ranks
Pressures to pull teaching and
research more apart in research
universities
Financial support for research separated from funding of teaching
Separate organisation of teaching and research:
concentration of research in research institutes, centers, graduate schools
Bologna process of two phases creates divide between teaching at BA and MA level
Previous research: synergy between teaching and research increases with level of education
Separation of teaching and research tasks possible? desirable?
Percent of respondents agreeing with the
statement:
‘teaching and research are hardly
compatible with each other’
by teaching time in BA and MA programs
(universities)
%
Incompatibility increases in the extent to which the
teaching proportion in BA programs increases
For Masters it is the
reverse: disagreement with the statement relates with a higher teaching time in
Per cent of respondents agreeing with
the statement: ‘Your research
activities reinforce your teaching’
by teaching time in BA and MA
programs (universities)
%
The link between teaching and research is stronger when the proportion of
teaching at masters’ level is larger.
Added value of productive researchers in BA programs is the lowest.
Gap between frontier
knowledge and teachable codified knowledge
Diversity on the personal level: men
and women in Dutch higher education
Gender bias
Functional distinctions between teaching and research. Do women carry a disproportionate share of teaching loads?
Are women more committed to teaching/ do they have a preference for teaching over research?
Those who spend more time on teaching have lower levels of job satisfaction?
However:
CAP data reveal that:
Male and female hardly differ in their preferences for research or teaching
Male and female hardly differ in the proportion of total working hours devoted to teaching and research
Relationship between teaching time
and satisfaction
Conclusions
In binary systems research and teaching institutions less demarcated. More diverse patterns emerge
More flexibility of teaching and research tasks at BA and MA level (new career trajectories on the basis of teaching qualifications
Teaching and research dimension as such does not account for gender differences.
Current national policies on HE:
Emphasis on international rankings/ flagship universities
Priority research areas (Top sectors) /Skolkovo Innovation Center This should not be detrimental to the UAS given their important
contribution in the national research agenda (translating research into practice)