• No results found

A Cross-Sector Analysis of the Impact of BYOD in Higher Educational Institutes and IT Enterprises

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "A Cross-Sector Analysis of the Impact of BYOD in Higher Educational Institutes and IT Enterprises"

Copied!
91
0
0

Bezig met laden.... (Bekijk nu de volledige tekst)

Hele tekst

(1)
(2)
(3)

2

1 Introduction ... 4

1.1 Problem statement ... 4

1.2 Societal and scientific relevance ... 5

1.3 Research question ... 5

2 Methodology ... 6

2.1 Case study research ... 6

2.2 Research design ... 6 2.3 Data collection ... 7 2.4 Data analysis ... 8 2.4.1 Within-case results... 8 2.4.2 Cross-case results ... 9 2.4.3 Cross-sector results ... 9 2.5 Validity ... 9

2.5.1 Generalizability of the survey ... 9

3 Theoretical background ... 10

3.1 Socio-technical systems theory... 10

3.2 The socio-technical impact framework for analysis ... 11

3.3 Known impacts of BYOD for employees ... 12

4 Results and analyses ... 14

4.1 Within-case results: AUAS... 14

4.1.1 Introduction ... 14

4.1.2 BYOD policy ... 14

4.1.3 Impact ... 14

4.2 Within-case results: UvA ... 17

4.2.1 Introduction ... 17

4.2.2 BYOD policy ... 17

4.2.3 Impact ... 18

4.3 Analysis and discussion of cross-case results ... 21

4.4 Embedded unit of analysis sector-wide impact ... 24

4.5 Analysis and discussion of cross-sector results... 25

5 Conclusions ... 27

5.1 Future work ... 28

5.2 Reflection ... 29

6 Literature ... 30

(4)

3

8 Appendix B: Case study database - AUAS ... 35

9 Appendix C: Case study database – UvA ... 36

10 Appendix D: Survey data AUAS ... 37

11 Appendix E: Survey data UvA ... 54

12 Appendix F: In-depth within-case results AUAS ... 69

13 Appendix G: In-depth within-case results UvA ... 73

14 Appendix H: Initial sources impacts ... 78

15 Appendix I: Survey rational ... 82

(5)

4

(6)
(7)
(8)

7

(9)
(10)

9      

(11)
(12)

11

Table 2. Definitions of the components within a socio-technical system. Source: Chen & Nath, 2008

(13)

12

(14)

13

(15)
(16)
(17)
(18)

17

(19)
(20)
(21)

20

(22)

21

(23)
(24)

23

(25)

24

(26)

25

Table 9: Cross-sector results organizational impact BYOD. Adopted from Gravemaker (2014)

(27)
(28)
(29)
(30)
(31)
(32)

31 ‐

(33)
(34)
(35)
(36)

35

Table 11: Overview of interviews at the AUAS

(37)

36

Table 13: Overview of interviews at the UvA

(38)

37

Figure 3: Effect BYOD on job satisfaction 0,00% 5,00% 10,00% 15,00% 20,00% 25,00% 30,00% 35,00% 40,00% 45,00%

Negative effect No effect Positive effect

(39)

38

Figure 4: Effect BYOD on job satisfaction when utilizing BYOD

Figure 5: Effect BYOD on job satifaction when not utilizing BYOD 0,00% 5,00% 10,00% 15,00% 20,00% 25,00% 30,00% 35,00% 40,00% 45,00% 50,00%

Negative effect No effect Positive effect

Effect BYOD on Job Satisfaction when utilizing

BYOD

0,00% 10,00% 20,00% 30,00% 40,00% 50,00% 60,00% 70,00% 80,00%

Negative effect No effect Positive effect

Effect BYOD on Job Satisfaction when not utilizing

BYOD

(40)

39

Figure 6: Effect BYOD on employee learning 0,00% 5,00% 10,00% 15,00% 20,00% 25,00% 30,00% 35,00% 40,00% 45,00% 50,00%

Negative effect No effect Positive effect

(41)

40

Figure 7: Expectation of Employee Support 0,00% 5,00% 10,00% 15,00% 20,00% 25,00% 30,00% 35,00% 40,00% 45,00%

Negative effect No effect Positive effect

(42)

41

Figure 8: Expectation of Employee Support 0,00% 10,00% 20,00% 30,00% 40,00% 50,00% 60,00% 70,00%

Expect no support No comment on support Expect support

(43)

42

Figure 9: Effect BYOD on interaction and collaboration 0,00% 5,00% 10,00% 15,00% 20,00% 25,00% 30,00% 35,00% 40,00% 45,00% 50,00%

Negative effect No effect Positive effect

(44)

43

Figure 10: Effect BYOD on Quality of work environment

Figure 11: Difference between male and female on Quality of work environment 0,00% 5,00% 10,00% 15,00% 20,00% 25,00% 30,00% 35,00% 40,00% 45,00% 50,00%

Negative effect No effect Positive effect

Effect BYOD on Quality of work environment

0,00% 10,00% 20,00% 30,00% 40,00% 50,00% 60,00%

Negative effect No effect Positive effect

Difference between male and female on Quality

of work environment

(45)

44

Figure 12: Effect of BYOD on Quality of work environment between utilizers and non utilizers of BYOD 0,00% 10,00% 20,00% 30,00% 40,00% 50,00% 60,00% 70,00%

Negative effect No effect Positive effect

Effect of BYOD on Quality of work environment

between utilizers and non utilizers of BYOD

(46)

45

Figure 13: Effect BYOD on Employee Mobility 0,00% 10,00% 20,00% 30,00% 40,00% 50,00% 60,00% 70,00%

Negative effect No effect Positive effect

(47)

46

Figure 14: Opinion about costs BYOD IT support

Figure 15: Opinion about compatiblity problems 0,00% 5,00% 10,00% 15,00% 20,00% 25,00% 30,00% 35,00% 40,00% 45,00% 50,00%

Low cost Normal cost High cost

Opinion about costs BYOD IT support

0,00% 10,00% 20,00% 30,00% 40,00% 50,00% 60,00%

No problems No difference Problems

(48)

47

Figure 16: Effect BYOD on Ease of Use 0,00% 5,00% 10,00% 15,00% 20,00% 25,00% 30,00% 35,00% 40,00% 45,00% 50,00%

Negative effect No effect Positive effect

(49)

48

Figure 17: Willing to install control applications

Figure 18: Will attend meetings 0,00% 10,00% 20,00% 30,00% 40,00% 50,00% 60,00% No Maybe Yes

Willing to install control applications

0,00% 10,00% 20,00% 30,00% 40,00% 50,00% 60,00% No Maybe Yes

(50)

49

Figure 19: Aware of privacy issues 0,00% 10,00% 20,00% 30,00% 40,00% 50,00% 60,00% No Somewhat Yes

(51)

50

Figure 20: Approval of control by employer

Figure 21: Effect BYOD on job performance 0,00% 10,00% 20,00% 30,00% 40,00% 50,00% 60,00% 70,00% 80,00% 90,00% No Maybe Yes

Approval of control by employer

0,00% 5,00% 10,00% 15,00% 20,00% 25,00% 30,00% 35,00% 40,00% 45,00%

Negative effect No effect Positive effect

(52)

51

Figure 22: Difference male and female in effect BYOD on job performance 0,00% 10,00% 20,00% 30,00% 40,00% 50,00% 60,00%

Definitly no increase Maybe Increase

Difference male and female in effect BYOD on job

performance

(53)

52

Figure 23: Effect BYOD on Time saving

Figure 24: Effect BYOD on Task innovation 0,00% 5,00% 10,00% 15,00% 20,00% 25,00% 30,00% 35,00% 40,00% 45,00%

Negative effect No effect Positive effect

Effect BYOD on Time saving

0,00% 5,00% 10,00% 15,00% 20,00% 25,00% 30,00% 35,00% 40,00% 45,00% 50,00%

Negative effect No effect Positive effect

(54)

53

Figure 25: Effect BYOD on Individual productivity 28,00% 29,00% 30,00% 31,00% 32,00% 33,00% 34,00% 35,00% 36,00% 37,00%

Negative effect No effect Positive effect

(55)

54

Figure 26: Effect BYOD on Job Satisfaction 0,00% 5,00% 10,00% 15,00% 20,00% 25,00% 30,00% 35,00% 40,00% 45,00%

Negative effect No effect Positive effect

(56)

55

Figure 27: Effect BYOD on Employee Learning 0,00% 5,00% 10,00% 15,00% 20,00% 25,00% 30,00% 35,00% 40,00% 45,00% 50,00%

Negative effect No effect Positive effect

(57)

56

Figure 28: Effect BYOD on Employee Awareness 0,00% 5,00% 10,00% 15,00% 20,00% 25,00% 30,00% 35,00% 40,00% 45,00%

Negative effect No effect Positive effect

(58)

57

Figure 29: Expectation of Employee Support 0,00% 10,00% 20,00% 30,00% 40,00% 50,00% 60,00% 70,00%

Expect no support No comment on support Expect support

(59)

58

Figure 30: Effect BYOD on interaction and collaboration

Figure 31: Effect BYOD on Interaction and Collaboration (Employees older than 50) 0,00% 5,00% 10,00% 15,00% 20,00% 25,00% 30,00% 35,00% 40,00% 45,00% 50,00%

Negative effect No effect Positive effect

Effect BYOD on interaction and collaboration

0,00% 10,00% 20,00% 30,00% 40,00% 50,00% 60,00% 70,00%

Negative effect No effect Positive effect

Effect BYOD on Interaction and Collaboration

(Employees older than 50)

(60)

59

Figure 32: Effect BYOD on Quality of Work Environment 0,00% 5,00% 10,00% 15,00% 20,00% 25,00% 30,00% 35,00% 40,00% 45,00%

Negative effect No effect Positive effect

(61)

60

Figure 33: Effect BYOD on Employee Mobility 0,00% 5,00% 10,00% 15,00% 20,00% 25,00% 30,00% 35,00% 40,00% 45,00%

Negative effect No effect Positive effect

(62)

61

Figure 34: Opinion about costs BYOD IT support

Figure 35: Opinion about compatiblity problems 0,00% 5,00% 10,00% 15,00% 20,00% 25,00% 30,00% 35,00% 40,00% 45,00%

Low cost Normal cost High cost

Opinion about costs BYOD IT support

0,00% 10,00% 20,00% 30,00% 40,00% 50,00% 60,00%

No problems No difference Problems

(63)

62

Figure 36: Effect BYOD on Ease of Use 0,00% 5,00% 10,00% 15,00% 20,00% 25,00% 30,00% 35,00% 40,00% 45,00%

Negative effect No effect Positive effect

(64)

63

Figure 37: Willing to install control applications

Figure 38: Difference male and female in installing control applications 0,00% 10,00% 20,00% 30,00% 40,00% 50,00% 60,00% 70,00% No Maybe Yes

Willing to install control applications

0,00% 20,00% 40,00% 60,00% 80,00% 100,00% No Maybe Yes

Difference male and female in installing control

applications

(65)

64

Figure 39: Will attend meetings 0,00% 5,00% 10,00% 15,00% 20,00% 25,00% 30,00% 35,00% 40,00% 45,00% No Maybe Yes

(66)

65

Figure 40: Aware of privacy issues

Figure 41: Approval of control by employer 0,00% 5,00% 10,00% 15,00% 20,00% 25,00% 30,00% 35,00% 40,00% 45,00% 50,00% No Somewhat Yes

Aware of privacy issues

0,00% 10,00% 20,00% 30,00% 40,00% 50,00% 60,00% 70,00% 80,00% 90,00% No Maybe Yes

(67)

66

Figure 42: Effect BYOD on job performance 0,00% 5,00% 10,00% 15,00% 20,00% 25,00% 30,00% 35,00% 40,00% 45,00%

Negative effect No effect Positive effect

(68)

67

Figure 43: Effect BYOD on Time saving

Figure 44: Effect BYOD on Individual productivity 0,00% 5,00% 10,00% 15,00% 20,00% 25,00% 30,00% 35,00% 40,00% 45,00%

Negative effect No effect Positive effect

Effect BYOD on Time saving

0,00% 5,00% 10,00% 15,00% 20,00% 25,00% 30,00% 35,00% 40,00% 45,00% 50,00%

Negative effect No effect Positive effect

(69)

68

Figure 45: Effect BYOD on Individual productivity 0,00% 5,00% 10,00% 15,00% 20,00% 25,00% 30,00% 35,00% 40,00% 45,00% 50,00%

Negative effect No effect Positive effect

(70)
(71)
(72)
(73)
(74)
(75)
(76)
(77)
(78)
(79)
(80)

79

(81)
(82)
(83)
(84)
(85)

84 11.

(86)

85 17.

(87)
(88)
(89)

88

 

(90)
(91)

Referenties

GERELATEERDE DOCUMENTEN

In addition, an important theoretical implication of this study is that it provided more insight in the relationship between the characteristics of young (future) teachers and

(2009) argued that this form of reliability measurement has been identified to have two problems: “First, alpha always has a value, which cannot be equal to a test group

The collection is primarily a reflection of the academic inter- ests of the Institute; as well as teaching and research in Qu'ranic Exegesis, Tradition, Jurisprudence,

To gain insights into teachers’ current practices, teachers who had either heard of OER or were familiar with OER were asked if they had used OER in the previous aca- demic year

Ook hebben jullie mij altijd gesteund, zowel financieel toen ik nog een arme student was, praktisch met talloze ritjes van en naar Hoogeveen en vele andere klusjes waar ik zelf

unknown whether the non-enrolled patients, who were all likewise treated with Resolute and XIENCE V stents, differ from the ran- domised TWENTE trial population in terms of

Before the examination that child labour as such falls under the policy objectives of Article XX, it has to be clarified whether child labour as a PPM could even be under

Volgens Arendt is pluraliteit, als de paradoxale conditie van de gelijkwaardigheid van verschillende mensen (Arendt, 1958, p. 175), pas mogelijk als de technische vermogens van