• No results found

U-Multirank: A user-driven multi-dimensional international ranking of HE institutions

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "U-Multirank: A user-driven multi-dimensional international ranking of HE institutions"

Copied!
1
0
0

Bezig met laden.... (Bekijk nu de volledige tekst)

Hele tekst

(1)

U-Multirank

Centre for Higher Education (CHE), Center for Higher Education Policy Studies (CHEPS), Centre for Science and Technology Studies (CWTS)

(with partner organisations folge 3; INCENTIM/Catholic University Leuven; Elsevier; Push)

Why another ranking?

RESULT

RESULTS and FUTURE PLANS

• U-Multirank demonstrates for the first time the diversity of university profiles in an international context

• The findings indicate that it is not possible to meaningfully identify “the world’s top 100 or 200 universities overall”

• U-Multirank offers a wealth of information and the potential for many comparative analyses

• Over 1000 universities will be included in the tool in 2015 • Psychology, computer science and medicine will

be added as new subject fields in 2015, with more fields to follow

• New edition of the ranking to be published in 2015

Transparency

• Higher education institutions need to be transparent towards their multiple stakeholders w.r.t. their contributions to society • Rankings provide a snapshot of performance

Diversity

• The popular global university rankings that suggest a comprehensive performance measure cannot display the wide variety of societal contributions by different types of higher education institutions (HEIs)

• Those rankings contribute to the myth of an ideal type of university and disregard differences in mission across HEIs

U-Multirank

• Users compare university performances on five activity domains (Teaching, Research, Knowledge Transfer, International orientation, Regional Engagement)

• Design is based on Feasibility study (CHERPA consortium, 2011) financed by European Commission

• Stakeholder-oriented design process: Inclusion of stakeholders in development of U-Multirank (choice of indicators and web-tool) • Launched on 13 May 2014 by European Commission

U-Multirank characteristics

 Multidimensional ranking - Going beyond the traditional focus on research excellence

• No summing across indicators (no single “winner”); no pre-defined weights on individual indicators

 User-driven ranking

• A flexible web-tool: Personalised ranking allows users to rank by their own preferences on dimensions and indicators

 Comparing like with like

• Users first use the web-tool to select the characteristics of institutions they would like compare, and then ‘rank’

 Multi-level ranking

• Combining institutional ranking (whole institutions) and field-based rankings

 U-Multirank 2014 is the most comprehensive international data comparison in higher education

• > 850 universities are included (510 with comprehensive self-reported data; 360 with bibliometric and patent data only) • > 70 countries have universities in U-Multirank

• > 1000 departments are included in the four field-based rankings (physics; electrical and mechanical engineering; business studies)

• > 5000 study programmes within these departments are included

• > 60,000 students completed a student satisfaction study (giving judgments on their teaching and learning experience)

The U-Multirank web-tool

• U-Multirank covers five dimensions of performance: teaching and learning, research, knowledge transfer, international orientation and regional engagement.

• Performance in each dimension is assessed through 30+ indicators, with institutions ranked separately on each individual indicator. On each indicator institutions are ranked into five groups: from “A” (very good”) to “E”

(weak).

• Web-tool offers four main tracks:

Compare Track: allows users to compare HE institutions of similar profiles or make comparisons

with a specific institution in mind

Student Track: allows students to compare study programs or universities of their choice, and

has a special focus on teaching and learning.

At a Glance: allows users to view the entire performance profile of a selected institution.

Three Readymade Rankings: (1) Research and Research Linkages; (2) Economic Involvement; and (3) Business Studies programmes ranking (below)

A

user

-driven mul

ti

-dimensional

international

ranking

of

HE instituti

ons

For more information on U-Multirank visit:

www.umultirank.org Contact: info@umultirank.org +49 (0) 5241 9761 58 Like/follow us: /U-Multirank @UMultirank 2012 publication by the U-Multirank project team

At a glance impression of the

performance profile of a university

Share of institutions that have provided valid data for the computation

of U-Multirank’s 31 performance measures (institutional ranking)

A wide distribution of “A” (= very good) scores across universities

for the 31 indicators in U-Multirank (institutional ranking)

Referenties

GERELATEERDE DOCUMENTEN

This study focused on the satisfaction with business performance of returnee entrepreneurs in Brazil and investigated the research question: “Is the satisfaction with

(2008) empirical research on the IO still is rather scant. Both concepts – EO and IO – seem to be important determinants for the international performance of firms. However, as

Wong and Merrilees (2008) argue that the determinants of brand performance lead to better financial performance by better attracting customers due to higher

Maar daarnaast heeft u de wens dat zij beschikken over de deskundigheid om nieuwe technologie te kunnen beoordelen, de deskundigheid om een goede samenwerkingspartner van

This study contributes to the extant business literature by providing evidence for; (1) the optimal partner conditions in alliance portfolio to improve TCI; (2) the effect of TCI

The leaves at the top represent graphs corresponding to processes, and the internal vertices represent products, e.g., the internal vertex numbered 1 represents the product of G 16

 Optredens en muziekstijlen die als te verschillend van de rest van de programmering worden ervaren en waarvan het vermoeden bestaat dat dit publiek niet naar het betref-

For a prediction rule specified with a Dirichlet process we will see that for many choices of θ and P ∗ the generated probability measure converges to P 0 , in which case we will