Amsterdam Business School
Master Thesis
The Influence of Environmental, Social and
Governance on Chinese Company’s Resources
Related Investments in Africa
Xiheng Shen
10667938
Supervisor: Prof. Tomislav Ladika
September 15, 2014
Table of Contents:
Abstract ... 3
1. Introduction ... 4
2. Literature Review and Hypotheses ... 8
2.1 The institutional background of Africa ... 8
2.2 Political Stability and Absence of Violence and FDI ... 10
2.3 Government Effectiveness and FDI ... 12
2.4 Control of Corruption and FDI ... 13
2.5 Health and FDI ... 15
2.6 Security Risk and FDI ... 17
3. Methodology ... 18
3.1 Dataset ... 19
3.2 Data Collection and Measures ... 20
3.2.1 Dependent Variable ... 20 3.2.2 Independent Variables ... 21 3.2.3 Control Variable ... 23 3.3 Method of Analysis ... 25
4. Results ... 26
4.1 Descriptive Statistics ... 26 4.2 Correlation Analysis ... 27 4.3 Regression Analysis ... 285. Robustness Checks ... 32
5.1 Robustness Regressions ... 325.2 Additional Analysis – Variation of Chinese FDI under Major Events ... 34
6. Discussions ... 39
6.1 Conclusions ... 39
6.2 Limitations and Direction for Future Research ... 39
Abstract
Under the background of Chinese increasing need of natural resources from Africa, this
thesis examines how host country’s ESG issues, including five factors: Political
stability and absence of violence, government effectiveness, control of corruption,
improved sanitation facilities and country security risk, affect Chinese resources related
investment in Africa. Due to the data availability, I use net FDI instead of firm-level
Chinese resources related investments as the dependent variable. It is assumed that
political stability and absence of violence, government effectiveness, control of
corruption and improved sanitation facilities are positively related to net FDI. Country
security risk is negatively related to net FDI. In this study, I employ the panel date of
20 African countries from 2003 to 2012 to test the hypothesis. Considering the
population, GDP growth rate and population as the control variable, my results show
that political stability and absence of violence (PV) and country security risk have
negative relation with FDI. Control of corruption and improved sanitation facilities
have positive relation with FDI, while Government effectiveness is not directly related
to FDI.
1. Introduction
According to the statistical data from IMF (2013), the average annual growth rate of
GDP in African area is roughly about 5.33%. As potential market growth in Africa has
been shown as outstandingly strong, Africa is estimated to be the hottest investment location in the next decade. This has large to do with the African continent’s huge
amount of mineral resources. As a matter of fact, Africa has been ranked by the US
Geological society as the largest or second-largest reserve of industrial diamonds,
manganese, bauxite, phosphate rock, cobalt, zirconium and platinum group metals.
During 2011, 6.5% of the world’s mineral exports is directly contributed from mining 20% of the world’s land area - the African continent.
Figure A: Chinese FDI to the Africa
Units: 100MM US dollars
In the recent years, Chinese foreign investments mainly focus on the two areas in the
0 50 100 150 200 250 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Flow Stock
world --- Southeast Asia and Africa (Figure A above shows both Chinese FDI flow and
stock to the Africa from 2003 to 2012), and nearly all the resources related investments
concentrated on Africa. From year of 2000, the volume of trading between Africa and
China first exceeded the amount of 10 billion US dollars and has been growing at a
high speed ever since. In 2009, China become the top 1 trading partner of Africa from
the third place in the previous year. Deborah (2013) states that from 2010 to 2012, the
annual growth rate of China-Africa trade reached to 19.3% with an absolute amount of
198.5 billion US dollars reported in 2012(Figure 1 shows China-Africa Trade Volume
from 2000 to 2012). Currently there are roughly 2000 companies from China running
business in Africa (Chinese Ministry of Commerce).
On the other hand, however, Africa is also believed to be a place with high risk of
continuous war chaos, political instability and corruption. Especially sub-Saharan
African countries have notoriously reputation of political conflicts and unstable
environment in the world. Such country risks lead to huge loss of Chinese firms’
investments in Africa for the last several years. As an illustration, in year 2011 a joint
investment of Iron project in Madagascar by two Chinese companies, which are Wuhan
Iron and Steel Corporation and Hony Capital, failed due to the political crisis of the
host country. Earlier that year, Wuhan Iron and Steel Corporation had invested in
Madagascar for about 100 million US dollars to get the rights of prospecting in iron ore.
Due to the political crisis in Madagascar, the iron project did not conduct successfully.
And share price of Wuhan Iron and Steel failed from 4.3 RMB per share in May 2011
Also on year 2011, 16th February Libya outbroke large scale of military chaos and later
the chaos transformed into internal strife. More than 50 large investments projects from
China were forced to suspended, which led to the loss of about 18.8 billion US dollars.
Chinese thirteen state owned companies such as China State Construction Engineering
Corporation, Metallurgical Corporation Of China Ltd., China Railway Construction
Corporation ltd, China GEZHOUBA Group Corporation and so on, which focus on the
business of infrastructural construction, mining and telecommunication, had given up
all their projects within Libya. Most of the loss were deducted from the revenue of the companies’ annual income statement and hence reduce their net income subsequently.
And more than 33 thousand people from Chinese companies were asked to evacuate
from Libya. Therefore, for Chinese company it is extremely important to know how to
prepare for the political risk prevention. And examining the impact of different ESG
related factors on FDI will help the future Chinese companies to be more cautious.
In this study, I will research on the topic of: The Influence of Environmental, Social
and Governance on Chinese company’s resources related Investments in Africa
Certain amounts of literatures have already examined how was foreign companies
investments affected by political risks, corruption, health and security risk,
correspondingly. Other than the impact of political risks on investments that mentioned
earlier, corruption is also found to have significantly negative effect on firm’s value and
hence investments (Stefan Z 2014). Elizabeth and James (2008) also claims that
corruption has a negative and significant impact on investments for firms. And
changes the ownership structure into joint ventures (Javorcik and Wei 2009).
In 2008, Elizabeth and James find that Transition countries are more significantly
negatively affected by corruption, while in Sub-Saharan African and Latin America,
corruption has no obvious effect on firms’ investment. Using sample data covering
2,752 companies from 53 developing countries, they also state that corruption is the
most essential determinant of investments for transition countries. Later in 2009,
Javorcik and Wei indicate that corruption makes the government less transparent and
thus it is considered as a tax on foreign firms. They also mention that corruption reduces
the effectiveness of protection for foreign firms’ intangible assets and lower the value
of foreign companies’ cooperation with a local business partner. Moreover, Stefan Z
also claim that UK firms running business in higher corruption level area of the world
show negative irregular returns on passage of the UK Bribery Act 2010. He points out
that company operating exclusively in the least corrupt area has a 6.2% increase in
value compares to the company operating exclusively in the most corrupt area. Thus
companies would not be willing to invest lots of capital in more corrupt area due to
decreasing in firm value.
Therefore, this paper will consider not only the political and corruption risks but also
factors of health and security risk to make the analysis more comprehensive. Then the
thesis is going to find out the relation between all these determinants and the net FDI
by running multiple linear regression. The data sample will cover 20 specific African
2. Literature Review and Hypotheses
In the below section the literature review of the thesis will be conducted with, firstly,
the institutional background of Africa will be studied. Secondly, ESG issues will be
explored in two areas: For the part of governance, it includes Political stability and
absence of violence, government effectiveness and control of corruption. For the part
of society and environment, it includes improved sanitation facilities and country
security risk. The explanation will focus on how does each factor affect Chinese companies’ foreign investment in African countries.
2.1 The institutional background of Africa
Political stability and control of corruption are two important aspects when I study on
Africa political development. On the basis of World Bank research report focusing on measuring 212 countries’ government performance from 1996 to 2006, African
countries had made the most impressive progress in the area of control of corruption.
The measurement criteria of the report mainly contained freedom of the press, political
stability, law-based administration and control of corruption. Researcher in World Bank
claims that decreasing frequency of government corruption activities contributes to the
effective implementation of international aid and countries’ sustainable development.
The report had specifically spoken highly of Kenya, Niger and Sierra Leone, saying
those countries improved significantly in the realm of democratic accountability and
Another survey from the Political Risk Services in 2012 shows the level of government
control in corruption. In the data, the survey measures the level from 0 to 1 and lower
score represents higher level of corruption. I may see from the data that other than
countries of Botswana, Namibia, Ghana, Liberia, Senegal, SA, Tunisia and Zambia, the
rest of African countries were ranking in the bottom 50% of all countries. This survey
revealed that though African countries had made big progress in corruption
management, their level in general are still far behind other countries around the world.
The same survey also provided the result of ranking in the aspect of political stability
and absence of violence. The measure standards in this one remained the same as the
previous item - control of corruption. There are four African countries including
Namibia, Mozambique, Botswana and Zambia ranked in the top 30 countries around
the world, while the rest African countries still largely ranked in the bottom 50% of all
countries.
Except for the improvement in the area of political stability and control of corruption,
African countries has made preferential policies and rule of law in order to attract
foreign direct investment.
Ping Guo (2004) states that more than 37 African countries are member countries of
multilateral investment guarantee agency, which was established by world bank group;
More than 42 African countries are convention signed countries of international centre
for settlement of investment disputes; Over 26 African countries have signed
Convention of the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitration Awards; More
protection of investments with foreign countries; Over 40 Africa countries are member
countries of world trade organization. Ping Guo also claims that most African countries
implement preferential policies towards foreign investment including: First, law is
enacted to ensure that government will not nationalize the foreign investment asset, and
fair and timely compensation will be provided to company if such nationalization
happened for the reason of national security and public interest. Second, tax incentives
are provided to import goods related to foreign investment and to corporate business
tax and income tax. The last but not least, some foreign investment projects will receive
subsidies for capital expenditure and other expenses.
On the other hand, Guimei Yao (2006) mentions that some African countries have
limitation towards FDI, such as the minimum requirements for project investment will
be at least 0.5 million U.S. dollars in Ethiopia; The license system is required in the
import and export business in Gabon; Compensation package has minimum
requirements when foreign companies recruited local employees and so on.
Based on Estrin and Bevan (2004), host country policies including recognition of
country risk, framework of legal system, government efficiency and so on are the most
related determinants of foreign direct investment. Thus, the following part of this
section will comprise the review of literature of governance, which consists of Political
stability and absence of violence, government effectiveness and control of corruption.
2.2 Political Stability and Absence of Violence and FDI
unstable politics, policies and foreign-exchange regime. And the result of this
uncertainty may affect the target operating result of international project or company
covers the area of revenue, cost, profit, market share, continuing business running and
etc. He also claims that political risk can be seen as economic variation caused by
political power, and thus variation would bring significant loss to the investment of
multinational enterprise (MNE). Thus MNE faces political risk covering several risks
that related to politics, policies and corruptions. In this part, I will review political
stability and absence of violence.
MIGA-Vale Columbia Center Political Risk Survey (2009) shows that no significant
difference had been found in the sequence of political risk between large companies
and small and medium enterprises (SME). All the investors consider political risk as a
serious limitation in the medium level; large firms may viewed it somewhat more so.
Nathan M. Jensen (2007) states that though high levels of political risk diminish company’s investment into several emerging markets, MNEs have found multiple
strategies to face the risks. Using a sample firm-level data on all American foreign
subsidiaries, he also explains that under high levels of political risk, MNEs choose to
invest in more liquid assets which can be easily transferred if the political condition
goes wrong and to maximize political influence by taking active cooperation with local
governments or participating in funding election of politics.
Iris and Monika (2010) finds that the ownership share of MNEs have in the host country
tends to go down under higher level of political risk, while whether leverage ratio
that investors prefer to reduce their debt exposure to avoid costly dead weight losses,
since political violence would increase the risk of default.
Further, MIGA (2011) from World Bank Group indicates in its survey that political risks
have led to huge losses to numerous foreign enterprises having business in certain
countries, and they have come up with three ways to mitigate the risks. Firstly, some
MNEs will use outside consultants or internal professionals to assess the level of risks
from time to time. Secondly, MNEs may prefer to implement non-contractual
mitigation strategies such as maintain a good relationship with government or establish
a joint ventures with local companies to hedge the political risks. Thirdly, certain
companies will choose to use contractual strategies such as buying political risk
insurance products or credit default swaps.
Due to the firm-level data availability, in this study we use the aggregate net FDI flows
instead to examine how political instability and absence of violence influence Chinese
firms. Given the literature that listed above, I assume political stability and absence of
violence is positively related to FDI.
H1a: Level of political stability and absence of violence in host country is positively
related to FDI.
2.3 Government Effectiveness and FDI
The worldwide governance indicators (WGI) defines the government effectiveness as
the measurement to examine the quality of public and civil services, policy formation
Due to the firm-level data availability, in this study we use the aggregate net FDI flows
instead to examine how government effectiveness influences Chinese firms.
Mora, Garibaidi, Sahay and Zettelmeyer (1999) state that government effectiveness as
well as other three factors are major indicators of foreign companies’ investments.
Brindusa (2005) mentions that she considered government effectiveness as an indicator
of good quality of the bureaucracy, as well as political stability and other factors, to
characterize better performance of governments. And all the data she used from 1996,
1998 and 2000 covers 140 observations, which are scored between -2.5 to 2.5, with
lower scores refer to worse outcomes. Shanta (2011) claims that high level of
government effectiveness has positive effect on foreign companies’ investment by using
the fact that when Rwanda government loosed its control in transportation the average
price decrease 75%, which attracts more investments from foreign companies than
before. Adhikary and Mengistu (2011) examine the effect of six factors on the inflows
of foreign companies’ investment covering 15 countries from 1996 to 2007. Their result
also reveals that government effectiveness with other determinants are the important
factors impacting foreign companies’ decision on investment location. Mainly, they
infer that more FDI can result from improving the environment of governance.
Therefore, I assume that:
H2a: Level of government effectiveness in host country is positively related to FDI.
2.4 Control of Corruption and FDI
measurement to examine the level of how much public power has been used for private
benefit, containing both small and significant size of corruption. Currently, there are
not so many literatures that have examined the impact of corruption on firm-level
investments. For the simple reason that “firm-level data are more difficult to assemble”
(Wei 2001). However, several surveys such as world business environment survey and
so on have revealed that corruption do impact company performance. So it is still
important to analyze how firm-level investment affected by corruption.
Generally, there are three relation between corruption and investments: positive,
negative or none-significant connection. Wei (1997) and Campo (1999) mentions that
corruption increases operational cost, raises uncertainty and hence deters company’s
investment. Batra (2003) uses sample data covering 81 countries with 3,100 companies and indicates that corruption has significantly negative effect on companies’ investment
growth. Stefan (2014) also claims that UK companies running business in high level of
corruption regions in the world show negative irregular returns on passage of the UK
Bribery Act 2010. He also mentions that UK companies develop their subsidiaries’ less
into the higher level of corruption area and their annual revenue in those area grow
more slowly. Nishat, Vikram and Chong (2014) states that firm value is outstandingly
lower in higher level of corrupt areas, while companies are less negatively impacted by
corruption if they provide goods and services to the local government.
Some other literatures’ view show in contrast to what I list earlier in this section. Gaviria
(2002) uses sample data covering 29 countries with 2,612 companies and states that no
corruption. Hellman (2002) claims that, all else equivalent, companies that profit from
corruption may increase their investment to expand their business in the host country.
Elizabeth and James (2008) explain that negative impact of corruption on investment
may be offset when corruption brings chances for illegal profits to companies – for
instance, company may pay cash or cash equivalent for lucrative contracts, which will
help company to have access to natural resource at preferencial price or to receive loan
from banks at lower interest rates.
All these previous literature suggest that general effect of corruption on firm-level
investment is not certain. Due to the firm-level data availability, in this study we use
the aggregate net FDI flows instead to examine how control of corruption influence
Chinese firms. And I consider that corruption is negatively related to FDI, which equals
to that control of corruption is positively related to FDI.
H3a: Level of control of corruption in host country is positively related to FDI.
2.5 Health and FDI
DSAED (2010) states in the report that healthier lives help people to live longer and
more meaningful. And better health condition also leads to great benefits such as
improved performance of company. In an early work of Bloom and Canning (2004),
they also indicates that health, which is considered as a kind of human capital, would
improve the performance of economy both on the level of company’s performance and
impact on countries from different background. Bhargava (2001) claims that economic
improvement of developing countries benefit more from health enhancement than that
of developed countries. In addition, Alsan (2006) indicates that there are various
reasons of health’s impact on foreign companies’ investment. For example, higher employee compensation and decreasing worker’s productivity may increase the labor
cost per unit due to bad health condition. Strauss and Thomas (1998) also states that
workers in healthier condition are much more energetic and agile than those who suffer
from illness and disability.
More recently, the outbreak of the Ebola virus has showed fears that fulminating
infectious disease outbursts would reduce the inflows of foreign companies’ investment.
Some evidences support this point of view. Elizabeth, Yi and Isaac (2012) use panel
data of 40 countries in SSA (sub-Saharan Africa) from year 1990 to 2008 to identify
the extent of causal effect of HIV/AIDS on foreign companies’ investment. They reach
to the conclusion that HIV/AIDS do have negative effect on foreign companies’
investment, but the level of effect would decrease as the population infection rate
decrease to 0.1 percent below.
In this thesis, due to the data availability, I choose the factor of improved sanitation
facilities to measure the health’s impact on foreign companies’ investment. Judging
from the general literature listed above, I assume that this factor has positive relation
with FDI.
2.6 Security Risk and FDI
Conventional security risk mainly covers the aspects of terrorism activities and
territorial conflicts. Alberto and Javier (2005) point out that foreign companies’
investment in lower levels have relation with terrorism risk in higher levels. Some
literature argues that the effect of terrorism on inflows of FDI varied from country to
country. Daniel (2006) mentions that MNEs deciding investing in Canada would have
far less concern of terrorism risk than one investing Iraq.
Later a point of view supported by other researchers indicates that untraditional security
risk has newly come to show. Such security risks mainly arises from the area of culture,
race and religion conflicts. Luo and Huang (2009) claim that nowadays some terrorists
and religious extremists in certain countries would conduct terrorism activities in order
to achieve their political aims. For instance, in year of 2004 two employees from Liao
He Oil and Construction Company were killed in the Sudan. Jiang (2012) also mentions
that the untraditional security risk are larger than before for foreign countries. For
example, over 10,000 people’s deaths in the religion conflicts since year of 1999 has
negative impact on the oil investments from china. Moreover, on January 2012, 29
employees from the Sinohydro Corporation Limited were kidnapped by the
anti-government militants in the Southern Kordofan state of Sudan. Due to the firm-level
data availability, in this study we use the aggregate net FDI flows instead to examine
how security risk influences Chinese firms’ investment. Therefore, due to the majority
of related literatures, I assume:
3. Methodology
To identify the impact of environmental, social and governance on Chinese Resource
related investments involving Africa, this thesis would start by employing a multiple
linear regression on FDI. Since it is almost impossible to get access to all the data of
the specific resource related investments of the total Chinese companies in different
African countries from the last 10 years, I measure FDI as a general indicator to
represent the Chinese resource related investments. It is quite obvious that the reason
why China would invest large sum of money in Africa is that over the last decade, the
rapid growth of Chinese economy needs huge amount of resource to support, including
metal, oil, gas and so on. In order to get access to the rights of mining and energy
harvesting, Chinese government and enterprises have made agreements with
government of African countries that Chinese companies would not only invest in the
resource industry but also put large amount of capital into the infrastructural
construction along with other industries such as manufacturing, telecommunication,
agriculture, banking, health and etc. Several literatures and reports have also supported
this point of view. Sarah (2012) from Standard Chartered states that Chinese
investments in African countries show its long-term goal of ‘going global’, which is
finding stable natural resources and matching the benefits of government-owned
companies. Thompson and Olusegun (2014) also claim that Chinese foreign investment
in Africa is significantly stimulated by the increasing needs of resources to support its
illustrate how the ESG factors affect the investment. Previous important FDI
determinants will be contained in the regression. These determinants used by varied
empirical literatures include political stability and absence of violence, government
effectiveness and control of corruption, which have been proven to have significant
relation to the inflows of FDI.
Compared to the previous papers that researched on relevant topics, this thesis is at an
advantage in two ways. Firstly, former literatures tend to research only one or two aspects of determinants’ impact on FDI, while this paper include the factor of health
and security to make the analysis more comprehensive. Secondly, previous papers use
data sample in the way of either covering certain areas of African countries or combine
the data between different continents, such as Asia and Africa, Africa and Middle East
and etc. However, this thesis mainly focus on the twenty Africa countries that Chinese
companies prefer to invest largely because of their natural resources.
The following section will introduce the part of dataset, measures and analysis of model.
3.1 Dataset
The Chinese FDI data in different African countries comes from the Statistical Bulletin
of China's Outward Foreign Direct Investment from year 2003 to 2012. This FDI report
is published by the State Statistics Bureau of China, Ministry of Commerce of China
and State Administration of Foreign Exchange of China. This Statistical Bulletin
generally covers six part related to Chinese foreign direct investment. It is an
over 50 African countries, on the base of year by year. Among the 50 African countries,
I choose 20 African countries which has large inflows of resources related investment
from China base on the information provided by three sources: The China Global
Investment Tracker 2013 from The Heritage Foundation; Chinese Companies in Africa
from the Profundo company (2014) and Africa’s path to growth: Sector by sector from
the Mckinsey company (2010).
The data on the part of governance and improved sanitation facilities to the percentage
of total population are from the World Bank Database, and cover the period 2003-2012.
Another data of the country’s security risk is from iJET Country Security Risk Ratings
(IJT). I include all the African countries that receive Chinese significant resources
related investment for which completed data are trackable, which includes a sample of
20 countries: Botswana, Cameroon, DRC, Egypt, Ghana, Guinea, Ivory Coast, Liberia,
Malawi, Morocco, Mozambique, Namibia, Niger, Nigeria, Sierra Leone, South Africa,
Sudan, Uganda, Zambia and Zimbabwe.
3.2 Data Collection and Measures
This part will introduce the data collection and statistic description regarding the
measures. It will discuss in detail about the dependent variable, independent variables
and control variable. Data-table of all the variables in summary will be illustrated in the
final part.
3.2.1 Dependent Variable
earlier, FDI can be a good indicator to measure the Chinese resources related investment
in certain African countries. And also the amount of FDI inflows is a proper way to
reveal the global understanding of the country’s economic fundamentals and market’s
future opportunities (Andrea 2003). The inflows of FDI from China can be extracted
from the Statistical Bulletin of China’s Outward Foreign Direct Investment in the period
of 2003 to 2012.
3.2.2 Independent Variables
Political Stability and Absence of Violence. Generally there are two factors measuring
the procedure of how governments are elected, monitored and changed (Daniel and
Aart 2010). They are Voice and Accountability (VA) and Political Stability and Absence
of Violence (PV). And Voice and Accountability here measures the extent of the
probability that the government will be destabilized or replaced by democratic election
or military violence, containing both politics related violence and terrorism. Chinese
investment are more obviously affected by the fragile political stability instead of voice
and accountability, which measures the democratic election and freedom of press. For
example, in year 2011 a joint investment of Iron project in Madagascar by two Chinese
companies, which are Wuhan Iron and Steel Corporation and Hony Capital, failed due
to the replacement of the host country. The value of the data of VA ranges from 0 (weak)
to 1 (strong) regarding the performance of government. That is the lower the country
graded, the higher the risk of the political instability that country had.
performance in formulating and implementing the policies (Daniel and Aart 2010).
They are Government Effectiveness (GE) and Regulatory Quality (RQ). In this paper I
examine the impact of GE on FDI. GE measures the quality of public and civil services, policy formation and execution, the fulfillment of government’s promise to its public
policies and so on. The value of the data of GE ranges from 0 (weak) to 1 (strong)
regarding the performance of government. That means the higher the country scored,
the more efficiently the government operated its daily affairs.
Control of Corruption. Two common indicators are generally used to measure the extent
of citizens being respected and of how institutions monitor the social and economic
interactions (Daniel and Aart 2010). They are Rule of Law (RL) and Control of
Corruption (CC). In this study, I identify the effect of control of corruption on FDI. CC
here examines the level of how much public power has been used for private benefit,
containing both small and significant size of corruption. The value of the data of CC
ranges from 0 (weak) to 1 (strong) regarding the control of corruption. That means the
higher the country scored, the more honest that the country has been considered.
Health. As mentioned earlier health, considered as a kind of human capital, would
improve the performance of economy both on the level of individual and macro
economy. In this paper, I use improved sanitation facilities (ISF) as the indicator to
measure the impact of health on FDI. According to the World Bank database, access to
improved sanitation facilities directs to the percentage of the country’s total population
utilizing the ISF. The value of the data of ISF ranges from percentage 0 (weak) to 100
percentage, the more the people using improved sanitation facilities and the less
probability that people getting affected by infectious disease.
Country Security Risk. In this thesis, I use country security risk (CSR) to measure how
FDI inflows is affected by the security risk, which covers the aspect of religion, race
and territorial conflicts. The value of the data of CSR ranges from 0 (weak) to 1 (strong)
regarding the security level of country, which indicates that the higher the country
graded, the better security condition that the host country has. For the convenience of
explanatory, the security index in the dataset is multiplied by -1 and thus higher security
score refers to a higher insecure environment of the host country.
3.2.3 Control Variable
As mentioned earlier, several literatures believes that market size plays an important
role in FDI, and one reason can be that it brings profitability to both local and export
sales and various resources (Pfefferman and Madarassy 1992). Another report claims
that GDP growth rate and size of middle class are the ways to measure market size
(Pravakar 2006). Chakrabarti (2001) also states that country’s openness to trade and
GDP growth rate are most likely correlated with FDI. Asiedu and Lien (2004) further
mentions that openness to trade is outstandingly essential for MNEs which export goods
from the host country to the world. Besides, African countries’ population is also
important correlated with FDI. Due to the data availability and that other control
variables using as labor costs, tax and so on are less statistically significant when
well as the openness rate, as the control variable to test the relative effect of other ESG
related factors on FDI amount in this study.
Table I: Variables in Summary
Variable Name Type Measures Data Source
FDI Main FDI per country Statistical Bulletin of China’s Outward Foreign Direct Investment 2003-2012
PV Main Political Stability and Absence of Violence
Political Risk Services International Country Risk Guide (PRS)
GE Main Government
Effectiveness
Political Risk Services International Country Risk Guide (PRS)
CC Main Control of Corruption Political Risk Services International Country Risk Guide (PRS)
Health
Improvement(HI)
Main Improved Sanitation Facilities
The World Bank
SR Main Security Risk iJET Country Security Risk Ratings (IJT)
GDP Growth Control GDP Growth per country
The World Develop Indicators
Population Control Population per country The World Develop Indicators
Openness Control Goods and services trade openness
United Nations Conference on Trade and Development
3.3 Method of Analysis
In this report I choose multiple linear regression analysis to test the hypotheses. And
the software implemented in the analysis is SPSS 20. The formula can be written as
follows:
Y
NOFDI=α+β
1*X
PV+β
2*X
GE+β
3*X
CC+β
4*X
HI+β
5*X
SR+β
6*X
GDP Growth+β
7*X
Population+β
8*X
Openness+ε
Through this formula, Y represents the dependent variable, while XPV ~ XSR stands for
the independent variables and XGDP Growth ~ XOpenness represents control variables .
ε
means the residual term and α represents the point where the line intersects the axis of
Y. I will test three regression models:
1. To find the connection between the outcome variable and control variables.
2. To find the connection between the outcome variable and hypothesized predictor
4. Results
4.1 Descriptive Statistics
All the results of variables from descriptive statistics analysis are shown in Table 2:
Descriptive Statistics
N Minimum Maximum Mean Std. Deviation
FDI 200 -81491.0000 480786.0000 6426.055000 35890.4264939 PV 200 .4280 .8864 .683657 .1179168 GE 200 .0000 .6250 .333750 .2013265 CC 200 .0000 .6667 .328333 .1353880 HI 200 7.1000 95.9000 34.072000 23.1732413 SR 200 .0000 .7500 .383750 .2376041 GDP Growth 200 -32.8321 33.7358 4.807249 5.6162609 Population 200 1832602.0000 168833776.0000 29407893.345000 33594741.8937139 Openness 200 176.8530 123823.5000 14164.254398 24488.5700164 Valid N (listwise) 200 ----Table 2
The explanation of all the variables from the descriptive analysis can be as listed as
follows: Firstly, the amount of net FDI inflows changes from country to country,
varying from -81,491 to 480,786 (measured in 10K US dollars). The negative FDI are
reasons of disinvestment or reverse investment. Comparing to the average level of the
rest countries in the world, the mean amount of African countries’ governance
4.2 Correlation Analysis
All the results of independent and control variables from correlation analysis, which also includes the Pearson’s correlation coefficients, are shown in Table 3:
Coefficient Correlationsa
Openness GDPGrowth Population PV CC GE HI SR
Openness 1.000 GDPGrowth .170** 1.000 Population -.910 .082* 1.000 PV -.120 .133** .173 1.000 CC -.365 .059 .437 .338*** 1.000 GE .014*** .026 -.116 .484** .141*** 1.000 HI -.108 .081* .084 .050 -.196 -.670 1.000 SR .015** -.094 .053 -.352** -.028* -.413* .463 1.000
a. Dependent Variable: Normal Score of FDI using Blom's Formula b. *Significant at 10% level
c. **Significant at 5% level d. ***Significant at 1% level
----Table 3
From above, I can see that correlations between independent and control variables
reveal different results. There are seven pairs of variables show relation between each
other. GDP Growth is positively related to Openness (β=.170, p<0.05), showing that
more goods and services trade would lead to higher GDP growth rate. Political
stability and absence of Violence is positively related to GDP (β=.133, p<0.05),
indicating that better political stability would lead to higher amount of GDP. Control
of corruption is positively related to Political stability and absence of violence
(β=.338, p<0.01), showing that higher level of political stability would lead to lower
level of corruption. Government effectiveness is positively related to both control of
p<0.05). This shows that enhanced government performance will increase the level of
control of corruption and political stability, correspondingly. Country security risk is
negatively related to political stability (β=-.352, p<0.05), indicating that higher level
of security risk will decrease political stability. In addition, Country security risk is
negatively related to government effectiveness (β=-.413, p<0.1), showing that lower
level of security risk will improve the government efficiency.
4.3 Regression Analysis
In this study, I examine the impact of independent variables on dependent variable.
Before conducting the regression model, the distribution of the residuals is found to be
non –normality. Consequently, I use a normalizing (Blom) transformation to all the
variables. Next, I establish three regressions in this thesis. The first model merely
contains three control variables and dependent variable: GDP growth rate, population,
openness and FDI. I add three independent variables including political stability and
absence of violence, government effectiveness and control of corruption to the second
model. The third model contains all the variables, including independent variables,
control variables and dependent variable.
In order to eliminate the effect of multi-collinearity, I check the analysis of collinearity
statistics in the Table 4 below. There is no significant evidence showing
multi-collinearity from the column of Tolerance and Variance Inflation Factor. Normally, if
the tolerance is higher than 0.1 and the VIF is less than 10, there will be no
Seen from the Table 4, the lowest Tolerance is 0.116 and the highest VIF is 8.586,
showing that no significant multi-collinearity exist in this model.
Coefficientsa
Standardized Coefficients
t Collinearity Statistics
Beta Tolerance VIF
GDP Growth .491 -1.191 .860 1.163 Population .242 2.124 .116 8.586 Openness .162 1.898 .439 7.209 PV -.234 -2.583 .189 5.581 GE .053 4.573 .379 2.603 CC .362 2.183 .184 5.446 HI .263 3.901 .243 4.120 SR -.440 2.656 .422 8.199
a. Dependent Variable: Normal Score of FDI using Blom's Formula
----Table 4
Table 5 below indicates the result of all three models. Since the third model has the
highest R2 (.633), which shows that independent variables accounts for a higher
percentage of variation in dependent variable. Therefore, I choose the third model in
this study.
In model 3, political stability and absence of violence is negatively (β=-.234) and
significantly (p<0.05) related to Chinese net FDI, indicating that political instability overall did not have negative impact on the decision of Chinese company’s investment
decision. This is contrary to what I assume in literature review that level of political
stability and absence of violence in host country is positively related to FDI. Thus the
Table 5: Regression Results Model 1 2 3 R2 .333 .487 .633 Adj. R2 .110 .237 .401 Number of Observations 200 200 200 Independent Variables
Political Stability and Absence of Violence -.398 -.234
(.035**) (.015**) Control of Corruption .567 .362 (.002***) (.037**) Government Effectiveness .332 .053 (.414) (.284) Health Improvement .263 (.000***) Security Risk -.440 (.012**) Control Variables Openness .177 .229 .162 (.043**) (.067*) (.046**) GDP Growth .517 .505 .491 (.089*) (.025**) (.034**) Population .541 .371 .242 (.021**) (.044**) (.042**) a. Dependent variable: Normal Score of FDI using Blom's Formula
b. Control variables: Openness, GDP growth and Population
c. Model 1 plus political stability and absence of violence, corruption of corruption and government effectiveness
d. Model 2 plus health improvement and security risk e. P value of beta coefficients are listed in parentheses above f. *. Significant at the 0.1 level
g. **. Significant at the 0.05 level h. ***. Significant at the 0.01 level
Besides, the result indicates that government effectiveness is not significant (β=.053,
p>0.1). Thus there is no direct link between Chinese net FDI inflows and government
effectiveness. This is also contrary to what I assume earlier that level of government
effectiveness in host country is positively related to FDI. Therefore the hypothesis 2a
does not hold either.
The standardized coefficients result shows that control of corruption is positively (β=.362) and significantly (p<0.05) related to FDI. This reveals that higher level of
control of corruption in host country will attract more FDI inflows from China. The
result is consistent with the assumption I list earlier. Therefore, the hypothesis 3a holds.
The above result indicates that health improvement is positively and significantly (β=.263, p<0.01) related to FDI. Thus this represents higher level of health
improvement would lead to more Chinese net FDI inflows. This is also consistent with
what I assume earlier that level of improved sanitation facilities in host country is
positively related to FDI. Therefore the hypothesis 4a holds.
From the standardized coefficients result, the last independent variable – country
security risk is negatively (β=-.440) and significantly (p<0.05) related to FDI. This
reveals that higher level of security risk in host country will attract less FDI inflows
from China. The result is consistent with the assumption I list earlier. Hence, the
5. Robustness Checks
5.1 Robustness Regressions
We have tested that control of corruption is positively related to foreign companies’
investments, which indicates that lower level of corruption would attract MNEs to
invest in the host country. However, it is also understandable that corruption may have
positive impacts on foreign companies’ investment if the host country has very strict
rules for MNEs to do business and corruption may accelerate the decision process of
the government. Moreover, it can be concluded that the willingness to participate in the
corrupt activities for the Chinese companies largely depends on the profitability of the
return from the investment in the host countries. Generally, we can assume that Chinese
firms are less deferred by the corruption if potential profits are much higher than the
cost of corruption such as paying cash for projects or contracts.
Thus I further test for robustness by splitting the sample countries into two groups: high
growth and low growth African countries, and repeating the regressions in each
subsample. We use geometric mean method to choose the 10 higher GDP growth rate
African countries from sample data in the period of 2003 to 2012 as: Nigeria, Ghana,
Mozambique, Uganda, Sierra Leone, Zambia, DRC, Namibia, Niger and Egypt. The
rest countries from sample data are the ones with the lower GDP growth rate, which are
Morocco, Botswana, Liberia, Malawi, Sudan, South Africa, Cameroon, Guinea, Ivory
Coast and Zimbabwe. Therefore, we assume H1b: corruption has less negative effect
Table 6: Robustness Regression Model 4 5 6 7 R2 .589 .640 .259 .388 Adj. R2 .347 .409 .067 .151 Number of Observations 100 100 100 100 Independent Variables
Political Stability and Absence of
Violence -.209 -.148 -.416 -.427 (.029** ) (.043**) (.055*) (.027**) Control of Corruption .361 .406 -.075 -.047 (.000** *) (.000***) (.051*) (.076*) Government Effectiveness .259 .188 .226 .150 (.284) (.174) (.329) (.251) Health Improvement .385 .427 (.098*) (.025**) Security Risk -.126 -.101 (.042*) (.078*) Control Variables Openness .092 .274 .042 .120 (.675) (.081*) (.819) (.052*) GDP Growth .429 .503 .412 .458 (.068*) (.039**) (.096*) (.013**) Population .404 .229 .117 .102 (.003** *) (.045**) (.017**) (.092*)
a. Dependent variable: Normal Score of FDI using Blom's Formula b. Control variables: Openness, GDP growth and Population
c. Model 4&5 represents sample countries with higher GDP growth, Model 6&7 represents sample countries with lower GDP growth
d. Model 5&7 plus independent variables of health improvement and security risk e. P value of beta coefficients are listed in parentheses above
f. *. Significant at the 0.1 level g. **. Significant at the 0.05 level h. ***. Significant at the 0.01 level
From Table 6, we find that control of corruption in higher growth rate African countries
(Model 5 with higher R square) is positively (β=.406) and significantly (p<0.01) related
to the FDI. While control of corruption in lower growth rate African countries (Model
7 with higher R square) is not significant (β=-.047, p<0.1). This indicates that
corruption have much larger negative effects on foreign companies’ investment in the
host countries with higher growth rate than those with lower growth rate. This is
contrary to what we assume earlier, and thus H1b dos not hold.
5.2 Additional Analysis – Variation of Chinese FDI under Major Events
In this thesis, we have also find that political instability overall did not have negative
impact on the decision of Chinese companies’ investment. This could be explained that
for the majority of the African countries, the rapid economic growth and large natural
resources are significantly appealing to Chinese companies’ investment so that most of
the companies are willing to take the risks of political instability, which in the last
decade happens not so often comparing to the last century. However, this may not be
the case for the countries who have been through serious political crisis or chaos.
Further, I will compare Chinese FDI before and after these events in certain African
On January 2009, Madagascar outbroke political crisis during which at least 130 people
were killed. This political crisis lasted until the end of 2013 when the presidential
elections were considered as credible. As mentioned earlier, investments from two
Chinese companies- Wuhan Iron and Steel Corporation and Hony Capital failed in 2011
due to this political crisis. And share price of Wuhan Iron and Steel failed from 4.3
RMB per share in May 2011 to 2.9 RMB per share in December 2011. We can see that political risk do affect Chinese firms’ investment profitability, and hence net FDI.
Shown from the Table 7, Chinese FDI in Madagascar reached to pitch in 2008 and
decreased significantly since the political crisis happened in 2009.
In the late of 2010, a revolutionary activity of demonstrations, strikes and protests
named “Arab Spring” had outbroken in the Middle East and North Africa. Countries
such as Algeria, Egypt, Libya and Tunisia had been affected radically in the area of
politics and economy. Foreign investments decision from MNEs were also impacted
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Table 7: Chinese FDI in Madagascar before and after political crisis in 2009. Unit: MM US dollars
significantly. Shown from the Table 8 above, we can see that Chinese companies’
investments in Algeria had decreased dramatically from year 2009 to 2011, while
Chinese FDI in Egypt decreased first in 2010 and then increases ever since. Country of
Tunisia had been affected less significantly, because its relatively less amount of natural
resources reservation are not appealing to Chinese MNEs.
As mentioned earlier, over 13 Chinese companies had suffer huge loss due to the chaos
happened in Libya in 2011. Four listed Chinese companies each has over 4 billion US
dollars of contracts with Libya local government at that year. From the February 16th
of the outburst of political chaos till the end of March when all the Chinese companies
evacuated from Libya, share price of China State Construction Engineering
Corporation dropped about 7.1% from RMB 3.77 to 3.51; share price of Metallurgical
Corporation Of China Ltd dropped about 3.9% from RMB 4.15 to 3.99; share price of
China Railway Construction Corporation ltd dropped about 17.8% from RMB 8.21 to
6.87; and share price of China GEZHOUBA Group Corporation dropped about 22.1%
-100 -50 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Table 8: Chinese FDI in North African countries before and after "Arab Spring" in 2010. Unit: MM US dollars
from RMB 14.63 to 11.73.This matches with the outcome in Table 8 that Chinese FDI
decreases largely since 2011.Given the above analysis, we may see that the extent of
impact from political risks on Chinese MNEs investment varied in different African
countries.
Another point earlier mentioned in the independent variables of methodology part that
two common indicators are generally used to measure the extent of citizens being
respected and of how institutions monitor the social and economic interactions (Daniel
and Aart 2010). They are Rule of Law (RL) and Control of Corruption (CC). We only
includes control of corruption in the regression analysis, so in the additional analysis
we will discuss how the rule of law impact the Chinese companies’ financial
performance with a specific case.
China Nonferrous Mining Corporation Limited is listed in Hong Kong and operating
business mainly in southern Africa. Among all the 15 projects, 13 of which company
possesses are located in Zambia. According to the article of Zambian Economist in July, Zambia’s mining minister made a statement on June 28th, suggesting that mining taxes
were going to be reduced in its new mining taxation policy. Shown from the Table 9
below, CNMC’s share price increased about 5.3% after June 28th. However, several
days later the same minister said to CNBC Africa during an interview that Zambia will
be benefiting from mining, which indicates that mining taxes will have to increase since
the Zambian government has a huge funding hole of around US $700 million at the moment. Seen from the Table 9, we may see that company’s share price decreased about
would also affect Chinese MNEs financial performance, and hence Chinese FDI.
Source: Bloomberg Markets.
1.65 1.7 1.75 1.8 1.85 1.9 1.95 2 2.05
Table 9: China Nonferrous Mining Corporation Limited's (CNMC) share price. Unit: HKD
6. Discussions
6.1 Conclusions
In this thesis, I use multiple linear regression model to identify the impact of ESG
related factors on Chinese net FDI inflows. I separate the environmental, social and
governance into five aspects: Political stability and absence of violence, government
effectiveness, control of corruption, improved sanitation facilities and country security
risk. I found that Political stability and absence of violence (PV) and country security
risk are negatively related to FDI; Control of corruption and improved sanitation
facilities are positively related with FDI; And Government effectiveness has no direct
relation with FDI. Our results support the findings of Swain and Wang (1997), who
points out that corruption and non-transparent system has negative effect on economic
environment and thus decrease the level of FDI inflows. Our results are also consistent
with the result of Alberto and Javier (2005), who argues out that net FDI in lower levels
have relation with terrorism risk in higher levels. However, for the aspects of Political
stability and government effectiveness, our result do not support the theory previously
mentioned in the existing literature.
6.2 Limitations and Direction for Future Research
Firstly, I use Chinese net FDI inflows as the indicator of resources related investment.
Although generally all the Chinese foreign investment in Africa is significantly
growing and industry expanding (Thompson and Olusegun 2014), certain amounts of
Chinese investment projects in these 20 African countries still exist and have indirect
relation with the resource. Future studies should examine the amount of resources
related investments from China in a certain range of areas, such as metal, oil and gas,
coal and etc. Secondly, in this study I only employ GDP growth rate, population and
openness as control variable. There are other factors which also have effect on FDI and
should be eliminated from affecting the dependent variable in the thesis. For future
study, determinants such as inflation, exchange rate, tax policy, education, income and
so on may also be taken into consideration. Thirdly, I choose 20 specific African
countries which has large inflows of Chinese resources related investments to be the
sample data. But the time period only lasts for 10 years. Since Chinese economy has
been expanded at the growth rate of almost 10% during the last 30 years (Graeme 2010),
future study should focus on a longer time period to examine the impact of different
ESG determinants on Chinese companies’ investment. Lastly, in this study I use
governance, health and security to measure the whole effect of ESG issues due to the
availability of data source. Following studies should also include the aspects of climate
changing, environment pollution, human rights and so on to represent a more
Reference
Andrea v, D., Lotte, G., and Chloe, J. (2012). Bridging the Gaps: Effectively Addressing
ESG Risks in Emerging Markets. Sustainalytics emerging markets’ report, June, 1-35.
Bailey, Warren, & Peter, C. (1995). Exchange Rate Fluctuations, Political Risk, and
Stock Returns: Some Empirical Evidence. Journal of Financial and Quantitative
Analysis, 541-61.
Beck, T., Demirguc, A., & Maksimovic, V. (2005). Financial and Legal Constraint to
Growth: Does Firm Size Matter? Journal of Finance, 60 (1), 137 -157.
Besada, H., Wang, Y., & Whalley, J. (2008). China’s Growing Econimic Activity in
Africa. National Bureau of economic research, May 14024.
Campbell, R. H. (1994). Predictable Risk and Returns in Emerging Markets. Review of
Financial Studies, 1995, pp. 773-816.
Christa, H., & Stefanie, K. (2012). Political risk, project finance, and the participation
of development banks in syndicated lending. Journal of Financial Intermediation, April,
287-314.
Daniel, A. A., Beatriz, M. R., & Antonio, R. D. (2001). Innovation and firm size: an
empirical study for Spanish engineering consulting companies. European Journal of
Innovation Management, Vol. 4 Iss: 3, pp.133 – 142.
David, V. (2013). China’s bribery culture poses risks for multinationals. Bloomberg
Dierk, H. & Peter, N. (2012). FDI and health in developed economies: A panel
cointegration analysis. Kiel Institute for the world economy, February, No. 1756.
Domowitz, I., Glen, & Madhavan. (1998). Country and Currency Risk Premia in an
Emerging Market. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 33(2): 189-216.
DSAED. (2010). The role of health in economic development. DSAED Press, July.
Elizabeth, A., & James, F. (2008). The effect of corruption on investment growth:
evidence from firms in Latin America, Sub-Saharan Africa and Transition Countries.
Wheaton College Press, Feb, G31, O16.
Finance and economics. (2003). Political-risk analysis: The new bull market. The
Economist, May, 1-2.
Haglund, D. (2008). Regulating FDI in weak African states: a case study of Chinese
copper mining in Zambia. The Journal of Modern African Studies, 46(04), 547.
Haque, N.U., Nelson, M., & Matheison, D.J. (2000). Rating Africa: The Economic and
Political Content of Risk Indicators. In P. Collier and C. Pattillo (Eds.), Investment and
Risk in Africa, pp. 33-70.
Javorcik, B. S., & Wei, S.-J. (2009). Corruption and cross-border investment in
emerging markets: Firm-level evidence. Journal of International Money and Finance,
28(4), 605–624.
Jiang, X. L. (2012). Study on political risk of Chinese enterprises’ direct investment in
Kolstad, I., & Wiig, A. (2011). Better the devil you know? Chinese foreign direct
investment in Africa. Journal of African Business, 12(1), 31–50.
Lauren, G., Alexander, H., & Lin, J. (2013). China’s trade and investment relationship
with Africa. USITC executive briefings on trade, April, 1-2.
Laza, K. (2007). The spread of political risk: A growing threat to foreign investment.
The Economist, Nov, 1-2.
Lubos, P., & Pietro, V. (2011). Political uncertainty and risk premia. Journal of
Financial Economics, Sep, 520-545.
Luo, H. Y., & Huang, C. J. (2009). Political risk management of the investment in
Africa from Chinese enterprises. Yunnan Business and Economics Press, April,
1674-4543(2009)04-0140-06.
Marcella, A., David, E. B., & David, C. (2004). The effect of population health on
foreign direct investment. National bureau of economic research, June, 10596
Maya, F., Simon, Z., & Yang, G. (2010). Corporate social responsibility and African
Development. Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, April, 1-34.
Nadine, M. (2012). Egypt post-Mubarak legal challenges test foreign investors.
Bloomberg Markets. Oct, 1-2.
Nishant, D., Vikram, N., & Chong, X. (2014). Firms in corrupt environments and the
value of corporate governance. Georgia Institute of Technology press, May, D73, G34.
in Africa. China Academic Journal, 7, 55-60.
Rodolphe, D., & Celine, A. (2008). Public governance, health and foreign direct
investment in Sub-Saharan African. University of Strathclyde Press.
Roland, D. (2012) China’s Foreign investment in natural resources. University of
Westminster Press, December, N.62.
Sarah, B. G. (2012). Beyond trade – China-Africa investment trends. Standard
Chartered Press, February, GR12JA.
Scharfstein, D. S. & Jeremy, C. S. (2000). The dark side of internal capital markets:
divisional rent-seeking and inefficient investment, Journal of Finance, Dec, 2537-2564.
Smarzynska, B. K. & Wei, S. (2002). Corruption and Cross-Border Investment:
Firm-Level Evidence. NBER Working Paper.
Soku, B. & Zhao, X. (2014). Contracts, Governance, and Country Risk in Project
Finance: Theory and Evidence. Journal of Corporate Finance, March, G32, 56.
Sophie, R. (2013). Mining the ESG Ground: Assessing the financial component of
sustainability strategies in the mining sector. Schroders research’s paper, December,
1-22.
Stefan, Z. (2014). Bribes and Firm Value. Finance Department of INSEAD press, April,
2-32.
Stevens, F. Y. (1997). Quantitative perspective on political risk analysis for direct
The World Bank (2008). Economic impacts of sanitation in Cambodia. Research Report,
February 2008.
Thomas, L., & Anne-C.H-T. (2009). The Listed Mining sector & ESG risks. Novethic’s
CSR research, September, 1-60.
Thompson, A., & Olusegun, S. (2014). China in Africa: An evaluation of Chinese
investment. Initiative For Public Policy Analysis Press.
Zhang, X., & Daly, K. (2011). The determinants of China’s outward foreign direct
investment. Emerging Markets Review, 12(4), 389–398.
Zadek, Simon, Chen X-H, Li Zhaoxi, Jia Tao, Zhou Yan, Kelly Yu, Maya Forstater, and
Guy Morgan. (2009). Responsible Business in Africa: Chinese Business Leaders’
Perspectives on Performance and Enhancement Opportunities. Development Research
Centre of the State Council of P.R. China (DRC-ERI), November, 1-22.
Zeng, G. J., Li, J., & Peng, Q. (2008) A study on determinants of public companies’