Literatuurlijst
Athanassiadou, M., Court allows registration of famous painters name, World Trademark Review 27-06-2011
[online via www.worldtrademarkreview.com, laatst opgevraagd op 06-06-2015].
Baas, a., Lexplicatie, Bronnen en citaten bij: Verordening (EG) nr. 207/2009 inzake het Gemeenschapsmerk, Artikel
7 [online via Kluwer Navigator, bijgewerkt tot 18-05-2015].
Baird, S.R., Moral intervention in the Trademark Arena: Banning the registration of scandalous and immoral
trademarks, Trademark Reporter 1993/83, p. 661 - 800 [online via Hein Online, opgevraagd op 13-05-2015].
Blakely, T.W., Beyond the International Harmonization of Trademark Law: The Community Trade Mark as a Model
of Unitary Transnational Trademark Protection, University of Pennsylvania Law Review (University of
Pennsylvania) 149, 2000/1, p. 309 – 354.
Bonadio, E., Brand, morality and public policy: Some reflections on the ban on registration of controversial
trademarks, Marquette Intellectual Property Law Review 2015/19, p. 43-61 [online via HeinOnline, opgevraagd
op 06-06-2015].
Christophorakou, E., Report Q181 Griekenland: Conditions for registration and scope of protection of non-
conventional trademarks, AIPPI, Zurich: AIPPI, 2004 [online via www.aippi.org].
Cohen Jehoram, T., Het Benelux Merkenrecht in Europees perspectief, Universiteit Utrecht 2009.
Cohen Jehoram, T., Nispen, C.J.J.C. van & Huydecoper, J.L.R.A., Industriële Eigendom 2 – studenteneditie, Kluwer
2009.
DeMorgen, Bedenker 'Je suis Charlie' vecht tegen merchandising, DeMorgen 14-01-2015 [online via www.demorgen.be, laatst opgevraagd op 30-07-2015].
Dreyfuss, R.C., Expressive Genericity: Trademarks as language in the Pepsi generation, Notre Dame Law Review
1990/65.
Frankel, Trademarks and traditional knowledge, Victoria University of Wellington Legal Research Papers 2011/1
(nr. 2011/36).
Geiger, C. (ed.), Research handbook on human rights and intellectual property, Edward Elgar Publishing 2015. Gibney, A., Going clear: Scientology and the prison of belief, 2Doc VPRO 2015 [online via www.npo.nl].
Gielen, Ch. (ed.), Kort Begrip van het Intellectuele Eigendomsrecht, Kluwer 2014 (11e dr.).
Grad, R., Indigenous Rights and Intellectual Property Law: A Comparison of the United States and Australia, Duke
Journal of Comparative & International Law, 2003/13:203 [online via Hein Online, opgevraagd op 23-01-2015].
Graaf, van der & Co, Merkenwet en merkenpraktijk, Internationaal Merkenbureau Van der Graaf & Co 1962. Guest, R., Intellectual Property Rights and Native American Tribes, American Indian Law Review, 1995-96/20:111
Haan, J. de, Broek, A. van den & Schnabel, P., Het nieuwe consumeren: een vooruitblik vanuit demografie en
individualisering, Sociaal Cultureel Planbureau (in opdracht van het ministerie van Economische Zaken), maart
2001 [online via www.scp.nl].
Jansen, C.H.M., Onrechtmatige daad: algemene bepalingen, Kluwer 2009.
Kelley, J.K., Owning the sun: Can native culture be protected through current intellectual property law?, Suffolk
University Journal of High Technology Law 2007/2, p. 180 – 202.
Keramus, K.D. & Kozyris, P.J. (ed.), Introduction to Greek law, Kluwer 2008 (3e dr.).
Kilimiris, M., Napoleon registrable for toilet paper, Managing Intellectual Property, november 2009, p. 75 – 76. Kozyris, P.J., Reflections on the impact of membership of the European Communities on Greek legal culture, Journal
of Modern Greek studies, 1993/11, p. 29-49.
Kur, A. & Dreier, T., European Intellectual Property: Tekst, cases and material, Edward Elgar Publishing 2013. Max Planck Institute for Intellectual Property and Competition Law, Study on the Overall Functioning of the
European Trade Mark System, Max Planck Institute 2011.
McKenna, M.P., The normative foundations of trademark law, Trademark Reporter 2007/97, p. 1126. Meisser, D. e.a, World Trademark Review Yearbook 2009/2010, Globe Business Publishing 2010.
Milchan, S., Whose rights are these anyway? A rethinking of our societiy’s entellectual property laws in order to
better protect native American religious property, American Indian Law Review 2003-04/ 28, p. 157-172.
Modiano, M., Italy: Protecting the words of the Pope, Managing Intellectual Property, april 2007 [online via Hein
Online, opgevraagd op 04-03-2015].
Mom, G.J.H.M., Goede zeden en openbare orde in het intellectuele eigendomsrecht, Intellectuele Eigendom &
Reclamerecht 1995/3, p. 93-102.
Olaussen, B., The trademark holi wars and the case for protecting religious and cultural symbols and names from
commercial exploitation, Journal of the Patent and Trademark Office Society 2014/298, p. 96.
Oldenhuis, F.T., Schurende relaties tussen recht en religie, Kluwer 2008.
Olsen, T. (ed.), Court: Madonna trademark immoral, Christianity Today april 2011 [online via Hein Online,
opgevraagd op 04-02-2015].
Olsen, S.T., Protecting religious identity with American trademark law, Chicago-Kent Journal on Intellectual
Property 2013/12, p. 129-151 [online via Hein Online, opgevraagd op 06-06-2015].
Palethorpe, S. & Verhulst, S., Report on the international protection of expressions of folklore under intellectual
property law, University of Oxford 2000.
Papapanagiotou, M., Refusal to register an immoral mark. Ethical or not?, 2014, [online via www.indepentent.academia.edu, laatst opgevraagd op 30-07-2015].
Prentoulis, N., Greece: Religion and alcohol don’t mix, Marques 06-02-2014 [online via www.marques.org, laatst opgevraagd op 13-06-2015].
Prentoulis, N., Morality, sex and the Greek TM Office, Marques 13-06-2014 [online via www.marques.org, laatst opgevraagd op 13-06-2015].
Raciti, E.P., The harmonization of trademark in the European Community, Journal of the Patent and Trademark
Office Society 1996/78, p. 51 – 68 [online via Hein Online, opgevraagd op 24-02-2015].
Russell, N.C., Allocation of new top-level domain names and the effect upon religious freedom, The John Marshall
Review of Intellectual Property Law 2013/12 [online via Hein Online, opgevraagd op 06-06-2015].
Sakulin, W., Trademark protection and freedom of expression: an inquiry into the conflict between trademark
rights and freedom of expression under European, German, and Dutch law, Boxpress 2010.
Senftleben, M.R.F., Public Domain Preservation in EU Trademark Law — A Model for Other Regions?, The
Trademark Reporter 2013/4, International Trademark Association 103, p. 775 – 827 [online via Hein Online, opgevraagd op 08-07-2015].
Senftleben, M.R.F., Trademark Law and the Public Domain, in: Access to Information and Knowledge: 21st Century
Challenges in Intellectual Property and Knowledge Governance, Beldiman, D. (ed.), Edward Elgar Publishing 2013,
p. 112 – 138.
Senftleben, M.R.F., Free Signs and Free Use - How to Offer Room for Freedom of Expression within the Trademark
System, in: Research hanbook on human rights and intellectual property, Geiger, C. (ed.), Edward Elgar Publishing
2015, p. 354 – 376.
Seville, C., EU Intellectual property law and policy, Edward Elgar Publishing 2009.
Simon, D.A., Register trademarks and keep the faith: trademarks, religion and identity, IDEA - The Intellectual
Property Law Review 2009/49, p. 233 – 312 [online via Hein Online, opgevraagd op 06-02-2015].
Schweizer, M., Fucking hell is not blasphemous. Nor disparaging - for hell, Marques 24-03-2010 [online via www.marques.org, geraadpleegd op 13-01-2015].
Trademark Reporter, Greece, TMR 2007/97, p. 501-520 [online via www.inta.org, laatst opgevraagd op 06-06- 2015].
Trademark Reporter, Greece, TMR 2005/95, p. 424-437 [online via www.inta.org, laatst opgevraagd op 06-06- 2015].
Tsoutsanis, A., Het merkdepot te kwader trouw, Kluwer 2005.
Wagoner, B. (ed.), Symbolic transformation: the mind in movement through culture and society, Routledge 2010. Woensel, van C.P.L., Anne Frank is van mij, Ars Aequi 2013/372 [online via Boek9.nl].
Woensel, van C.P.L., Merk, God en verbod: oneigenlijk gebruik en monopolisering van tekens met een grote
symbolische waarde, Universiteit Leiden 2007.
Zaal, van der R., Inschrijving ‘Allah’-beeldmerk afgewezen, Mediareport 14-01-2013 [online via www.mediareport.nl, geraadpleegd op 16-02-2015].
Zaal, van der R., Plesner/Louis Vuitton uitspraak: artistieke vrijheid vs. intellectuele eigendomsrechten, Kennedy
Jurisprudentielijst
EHRM 7 februari 2012, 40660/08 en 60641/08 (Von Hannover II) [online via Hudoc]. EHRM 8 juli 2008, 33629/06 (Vajnai vs. Hungary) [online via Hudoc].
EHRM 13 september 2005, 42571/98 (I.A. vs. Turkije) [online via Hudoc].
EHRM 15 februari 2005, 68416/01 (Steel and Morris vs. United Kingdom) [online via Hudoc]. EHRM 6 mei 2003, 44306/98 (Appleby) [online via www.recht.nl].
EHRM 28 juni 2001, 32772/02 (Verein gegen Tierfabriken) [online vie Hudoc]. EHRM 16 maart 2000, 23144/93 (Özgür Gündem vs. Turkije) [online via Hudoc].
EHRM 20 september 1994, 13470/87 (Otto Preminger vs. Oostenrijk) [online via Hudoc]. EHRM 24 februari 1994, 15450/89 (Csado Coca vs. Spain) [online via Hudoc].
EHRM 24 november 1993, 13914/88, 15041/89, 15717/89, 15779/89 en 17207/90 (Lentia vs. Oostenrijk) [online via Hudoc].
EHRM 20 november 1989, 10572/83 (Markt Intern Verlag) [online via Hudoc]. EHRM 25 maart 1985, 8734/79 (Barthold v. Duitsland) [online via Hudoc].
ECHR 12 oktober 1978, 7050/75 (Arrowsmith vs. Verenigd Konikrijk), D&R 1978/19. ECRM 5 mei 1977, 7805/77 (X en Scientology kerk vs. Zweden).
EHRM 7 december 1976, 5493/72 (Handyside).
HvJ 9 maart 2012, T-417/10 (Hijoputa) [online via Curia]. HvJ 9 maart 2012, T-417/10 (López vs. OHIM) [online via Curia].
HvJ 5 oktober 2011, T-526-09 (PAKI Logistics GmbH vs. OHIM) (Frans) [online via Curia]. HvJ 19 november 2009, T-234/06, ECR II-4185 (Torresan vs. OHIM) [online via Curia]. HvJ 16 juli 2009, AMI 2009, 20, m.nt. Koeleman (Infopaq I).
HvJ 18 juni 2009, NJ 2009, 576, m.nt. Spoor; BIE 2009, 58, m.nt. Senftleben (L’Oréal/Bellure).
HvJ 16-06-2006 (Lancome vs. Kecofa), AMI 2006, 161 m.nt. Quaedvlieg, IER 2006/4, p. 54 m.nt. FWG, in IER 2006/6, p. 313.
HvJ 15 september 2005, C-37/03 P (BioID/OHIM) [online via Curia].
HvJ 12 september 2005, T-140/02 (Sportwetten vs. BHIM) [online via Curia].
HvJ 16 september 2004, C-329/02P (SAT.1/OHIM) [online via Curia].
HvJ 29 april 2004, C-456/01 P en 457/01 P (Henkel/OHIM) [online via Curia]. HvJ 21 april 2004, T-127/02 (Concept/OHIM) [online via Curia].
HvJ 12 februari 2004, C-363/99, NJ 2006, 531 (Postkantoor).
HvJ 27 november 2003, C-283/01, ECR I-14313 (Shield Mark vs. Kist) [online via Curia]. HvJ (Conclusie AG Colomer) 08 april 2003, C-53/01 t/m C-55/01 (Linde e.a.) [online via Curia]. HvJ (Opinie AG Colomer) 3 april 2003, C-283/01, ECR I-14313 (Shield Mark vs. Kist) [online via Curia]. HvJ 12 november 2002, C-206/01, NJ 2003, 265, m.nt. Mok (Arsenal/Reed).
HvJ 18 juni 2002, C-299/99 (Philips vs. Remington) [online via Curia].
HvJ 4 mei 1999, C-108/97 en C-109/97 (Windsurfing Chiemsee) [online via Curia]. Hoge Raad 5 maart 1999, ECLI:NL:HR:1999:ZC2869, NJ 2000, 306 (Route 66). Hoge Raad 30 november 1945, NJ 1946, 91; BIE 1946 (Horecaf).
Gerechtshof Amsterdam 30 november 2006, 04/213 (Stichting Werkgroep Agni vs. Shiva Entertainment C.V. &
Jaroe Entertainment B.V.) [online via ie-forum].
Rechtbank Amsterdam 18 september 2013, ECLI:NL:RBAMS:2013:6004 HJ/MV (Morpheus vs. Bremafa) [online via Rechtspraak].
Rechtbank Den Haag 4 mei 2011, ECLI:NL:RBSGR:2011:BQ3525 (Plesner vs. Louis Vuitton), m.nt. Sakulin, W. [online via Kluwer Navigator].
Rechtbank Utrecht 26 juli 2003, ECLI:NL:RBUTR:2003:AH9883 [online via Rechtspraak]. Rechtbank Den Haag 28 maart 1963, NJ 1964/39; BIE 1963, 66 (O.M. vs. A. Smits van Gils). BHIM 12 november 2013, 012047718 (This is Islam) [online via www.oami.europa.eu]. BHIM 31 mei 2013, 011610458 (Haika) [online via www.oami.europa.eu].
BHIM 17 september 2012, R 2613/2011-2 (Ataturk) [online via www.oami.europa.eu]. BHIM 9 maart 2012, T-417/10 (Hijoputa) [online via www.oami.europa.eu].
BHIM 20 september 2011, T-232/10 (Soviet coat of arms) [online via www.oami.europa.eu]. BHIM 1 september 2011, R 168/2011-1 [online via www.oami.euopa.eu].
BHIM 21 januari 2010, R 385/2008-4 [online via www.oami.europa.eu]. OLG Dresden 4 april 2001 (Back I-III).
Court of Appeal (District of Columbia) 15 mei 2009, 565 F.3d 880 (90 U.S.P.Q.2d 1593, 130 S. Ct. 631) (Harjo vs.
Court of Appeal (District of Columbia)15 juli 2005, 415 F.3d 44 (75 U.S.P.Q.2d 1525) (Harjo vs. Pro-Football, Inc.). Court of Appeal 25 juli 2002, 297 F.3d 662, 02-1381 (Te-ta-ma Truth Foundation vs. World Church of the Creator). USPTO.2d 111 1080 (T.T.A.B. 2014) (Blackhorse, Briggs-Cloud, Gover, Lone-Bentley, Pappan & Tsotigh vs. Pro-
Football, Inc.).
Court of Appeals 17 mei 2006, 137-06 (Woodman vs. French Connection) [online via www.ipo.gov.uk]. Intellectual Property Office 15 oktober 2013, 0-310-03 (Zürich Private Banking).