• No results found

Aanbevelingen voor toekomstig onderzoek

In document ONDERSCHEIDEND ZIJN… (pagina 65-71)

5. CONCLUSIE EN AANBEVELINGEN

5.6 Aanbevelingen voor toekomstig onderzoek

Nadat kwalitatief onderzoek is uitgevoerd en de meest opvallende factoren voor het onderscheidende vermogen in kaart zijn gebracht, zijn er meerdere opties aanwezig om meer onderzoek te doen naar de differentiatiemogelijkheden tussen twee soorten binnen hetzelfde merk.

Aangezien binnen dit onderzoek niet de servicegerichte ZBG formules Hanos en Sligro onderzocht zijn (vanwege de tijdsplanning), kan een onderzoek opgestart worden waarbij meer tijd gereserveerd wordt om onderzoek uit te voeren bij deze ZBG formules. Hierna kunnen de resultaten uit dit onderzoek met elkaar vergeleken worden.

Een moeilijker uit te voeren onderzoek, maar die zeker voor interessante informatie kan zorgen, is het doen van kwantitatief onderzoek onder ZBG klanten. Wanneer een kwantitatief onderzoek zou plaatsvinden in de ZBG‟s, dan dient veel tijd ingepland te worden voor het afnemen van de enquêtes. Daarnaast zal hoogstwaarschijnlijk een vergoeding/incentive voor de respondent aanwezig moeten zijn, anders zullen de haastige klanten niet mee willen werken aan het onderzoek.

Als laatste mogelijkheid, zou een experiment kunnen plaatsvinden waarbij productverpakkingen uit twee soorten assortimenten binnen hetzelfde merk gebruikt worden. De gevonden factoren van het marketingmix instrument Product zouden gebruikt en aangepast kunnen worden, om uiteindelijk te bepalen of klanten de factoren ook daadwerkelijk als onderscheidend ervaren.

REFERENTIES

Boeken/proefschriften

ACNielsen (1992). Category Management: Positioning your Organization to Win. NTC Business

Books, Chicago.

Alsem, K.J. (2001). Strategische marketingplanning: theorie, technieken en toepassingen. 2de druk. Wolters-Noordhoff.

Blackwell, R.D., Miniard, P.W. & Engel, J.F. (2006). Consumer Behavior. International student edition. 10th edition. Thomson, South-Western.

Davis, M.L. (1987). Vi.mal Design in Dress. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

De Vries, M. (2006). Meer halen uit schap en winkelruimte. RetailTrends, September.

Keller, K.L. (2008). Strategic brand management : building, measuring, and managing brand equity. Upper Saddle River, NJ : Pearson/Prentice Hall.

Kooiker, R. (1997). Marktonderzoek. 5de druk. Wolters-Noordhoff, Groningen.

Kotler, P. (2003). Marketing Management, 11th edition. Upper Saddle River, NJ : Pearson Prentice Hall.

Kotler, P., Armstrong, G. (2008). Principles of marketing, 12th edition. Upper Saddle River, NJ : Pearson Prentice Hall.

Lawson. B. (1983). How Designers Think. Westfield. NJ: Eastview Editions.

Leeflang, P.S.H. (2000). Probleemgebied marketing: analyse van de omgeving. 3de druk. Stenfert Kroese, Houten.

Levy, M., Weitz, B.A. (2007). Retail Management. 6th edition. Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill/Irwin.

Lewalski. Z.M. (1988). Product E.uhetics: An Interpretation for Designers. Carson City, NV: Design & Development Engineering Press.

Malhotra, N.K. (2007). Marketing Research. An applied Orientation. New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall.

McCarthy, E.J. (1960). Basic Marketing: A Managerial Approach. Homewood IL: Irwin.

De Pelsmacker, P., Van Kenhove, P. (1994). Marktonderzoek : methoden en toepassingen. 1ste druk. Garant Uitgevers, Apeldoorn.

Percy, L., Rossiter, J.R., Elliott, R.H. (2005). Strategic advertising management. Oxford : Oxford University Press.

Sloot, L.M., Verhoef, P.C. (2005). Understanding the impact of brand delistings on assortment

evaluations and store switching and complaining intentions. Erasmus Research Institute of

Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam.

Sloot, L.M. (2006). Understanding consumer reactions to assortment unavailability. Erasmus

Research Institute of Management. Erasmus University Rotterdam.

Schwartz, B. (2004). The Paradox Of Choice: Why More Is Less. New York: Harper Collins.

Van Herpen, E. (2001). Perceptions and evaluations of assortment variety (Proefschrift). CentER, Tilburg University.

Van Ketel, Van Bruggen, Smidts, (2003). How Assortment Variety Affects Assortment Attractiveness:

Artikelen

 Amine, A., Cadenat, S. (2003). Efficient retailer assortment: a consumer choice evaluation perspective. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 31: 486-497.

Agrawal, J., Grimm, P.E. en Srinivasan, K. (1993). Quantity surcharges on groceries. Journal of

Consumer Affairs. 27: 335-357.

Alba, J.W. en Hutchinson, J.W. (1987). Dimensions of consumer expertise. Journal of Consumer

Research. 13: 411-454.

 Anderson, E.T., Simester, D.L (2001). Are Sale Signs Less Effective When More Products Have Them?, Marketing Science, 20: 121-122.

Anderson,E., Simester, D. (2003). Mind Your Pricing Cues. Harvard Business Review. 9: 96-103.

 Basuroy, S., Mantrala, M.K., Walters, R.G. (2001). The Impact of Category Management on Retailer Prices and Performance: Theory and Evidence. Journal of Marketing. 65: 16-32.

Blattberg, R.C.; Neslin, S.A. (1989). Sales Promotion: The Long and the Short of It. Marketing

Letters, 1: 81-97.

Blattberg, R.C., Briesch, R., Fox, E.J. (1995). How Promotions Work. Marketing science: the

marketing journal of TIMS/ORSA. 14: 122-132.

Peter H. Bloch, P.H. (1995). Seeking the Ideal Form: Product Design and Consumer Response .

Journal of Marketing. 59: 16-29.

Baumol, W.J., Ide, E.A. (1956). Variety in Retailing. Management Science. 3: 93-101.

 Boulding, W., Lee, E.; Staelin, R. (1994). Mastering the mix: Do advertising, promotion, and sales force activities lead to differentiation?. Journal of Marketing Research. 31: 159-172.

 Broniarczyk, S.M., Hoyer, W.D., McAlister, L. (1998). Consumers' Perceptions of the Assortment Offered in a Grocery Category: The Impact of Item Reduction. Journal of Marketing Research, 35: 166-176.

 Campo, K., Gijsbrechts, E., Goossens, T., Verhetsel, A., (2000). The impact of location factors on the attractiveness and optimal space shares of product categories. International Journal of Research in

Marketing 17: 255-279.

 Campo, K. en Gijsbrechts, E. (2005), Retail assortment, shelf and stockout management: issues, interplay and future challenges; John Wiley & Sons, 21: 383-392.

 Carpenter, G.S., Glazer, R. en Nakamoto, K. (1994). Meaningful Brands From Meaningless Differentiation: The Dependence on Irrelevant Attributes. Journal of Marketing Research. 31: 339-350.

 Central Office of Information (1996). Price comparisons: consumer awareness of unit pricing.

Research Division, Central Office of Information. June.

 Chernev, A., Hamilton, R. (2005). Too Much of a Good Thing? Option Attractiveness and Assortment Choice, working paper. Kellogg School of Management, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL.

Chernev, A. (2006). Differentiation and Parity in Assortment Pricing. Journal of Consumer Research. 33: 199-210.

 Cole, C.A. (1983). Elderly consumers‟ responses to advertising. Graduate School of Business, University of Wisconsin.

 Commission of the European Communities (1976). A study of the evolution of concentration in the food distribution industry for the United Kingdom. Volume II: Price Surveys. Brussels, ESSC/EEC/EAEC.

 Consumer Reports (1971). Progress Report on Unit Pricing. (February): 84-85.

Corstjens, M., Doyle, P., (1981): A model for optimizing retail space allocations. Management

Science 27: 822-833.

 Corstjens, J., Lal, R., Corstjens, M. (1994). Shelf Space Allocation for Store Brands. Working Papers (Faculty). Stanford Graduate School of Business. 1-35.

Coyle, J.S. (1971). Dual prices settle in. Progressive Grocer. 50: 46-59.

 Cude, B. en Walker, R. (1984). Quantity Surcharges: Are They Important in Choosing a Shopping Strategy?. Journal of Consumer Affairs. 18: 287-295.

 Desmet, P., Renaudin, V. (1998). Estimation of product category sales responsiveness to allocated shelf space. International Journal of Research in Marketing. 15: 443-457.

 Dickson, P., A.G, Sawyer (1986). Methods to research shoppers‟ knowledge of supermarket prices.

Advances in Consumer Research. 13: 584-588.

Dickson, P., A.G. Sawyer (1990). The price knowledge and search of supermarket shoppers. Journal

of Marketing. 54: 42-53.

Drèze, X., Hoch, S.J., Purk, M.E., (1994). Shelf management and space elasticity. Journal of Retailing 70: 301-326.

 Duncan, C.P. (1990). Consumer Market Beliefs: A Review of the Literature and Agenda for Future Research. Advances in Consumer Research. 17: 729-736.

 Feldman, J.M., Lynch, J.G. (1988). Self-Generated Validity and Other Effects of Measurement on Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology. 73: 421-435.

 Figee, E. (2004). Kiezen én Delen, De Nederlandse consument zet nieuwe spelregels voor Foodservice. Cap Gemini Ernst & Young.

Friedman, M.P. (1966). Consumer Confusion in the Selection of Supermarket Products. Journal of

Applied Psychology. 57: 529-534.

 Garber, L.L., Burke, R.R., Jones, J.M. (2000). The role of package color in consumer purchase consideration and choice. Marketing Science Institute.

 Gijsbrechts, E. (2000). Prices and pricing research in consumer marketing: Some recent developments.

International Journal of Research in Marketing. 10: 115-151.

 Goodman, J.K. (2006). Consumer and Retailer Strategies when Choosing from Large Assortments.

The University of Texas at Austin.

 Gourville, J.T., Soman, D. (2000). Is More Choice Always Better?: The Effect of Assortment Type on Consumer Choice. Harvard University / Hong Kong University of Science and Technology.

Granger, C.W.J., Billson, A. (1972). Consumers' Attitudes Toward Package Size and Price. Journal of

Marketing Research. 9: 239-248.

Grewal, D., Levy, M. (2007). Retailing research: Past, present, and future. Journal of Retailing. 83: 447-464.

 Hanssens, D. en Weitz, B.A. (1980). The effectiveness of industrial print advertisements across product categories. Journal of Marketing Research. 17: 53-62.

 Hardesty, D.M.; Bearden, W.O. (2003). Consumer evaluations of different promotion types and price presentations: the moderating role of promotional benefit level. Journal of Retailing, 79: 17-25.

 Heckler, S.E. en Childers, T.L. (1992). The role of expectancy and relevancy in memory for verbal and visual information: What is incongruency?. Journal of Consumer Research. 18: 475-492.

 Hinrichs, J.V. en Novick, L.R. (1982). Memory for numbers: Nominal vs. magnitude information.

Memory and Cognition. 10: 479-486.

Hoch, Stephen, Eric T. Bradlow, and Brian Wansink (1999). The Variety of an Assortment, Marketing

Science. 18: 527-546.

 Houston, M.J. (1972). The Effect of Unit Pricing on Choices of Brand and Size in Economic Shopping. Journal of Marketing. 36: 51-69.

 Jacoby, J., Speller, D.E., Kohn, C.A. (1974). Brand Choice Behavior as a Function of Information Load. Journal of Marketing Research. 11: 63-69.

 Jacoby, J., Hoyer, W.D., Zimmer, M.R. (1983). To Read, View, or Listen? A Cross-Media Comparison of Comprehension. Current Issues & Research in Advertising. 6: 201-217.

Jacoby, J. (1984), Perspectives on Information Overload, Journal of Consumer Research

 Jager, W. (2003) Breaking 'bad habits': a dynamical perspective on habit formation and change. in: L. Hendrickx, W. Jager, L. Steg, (Eds.) Human Decision Making and Environmental Perception. Understanding and Assisting Human Decision Making in Real-life Settings. Liber Amicorum for Charles Vlek. Groningen: University of Groningen.

 Kahn, B.E. en McAlister, L. (1996). Grocery Revolution: The New Focus on the Consumer. MA: Addison-Wesely.

 Kahn, B.E., Wansink, B. (2004). The Influence of Assortment Structure on Perceived Variety and Consumption Quantities. Journal of Consumer Research, 30: 519-533.

 Kellaris. J.J. en Robert J.K. (1993), Exploring Responses Elicited by Music Varying in Tempo, Tonality, and Texture. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 2: 381-401.

 Keller, K.L., Staelin, R. (1987). Effects of Quality and Quantity of Information on Decision Effectiveness. Journal of Consumer Research, 14: 200-213.

 Koelemeijer, K., Oppewal, H. (1999). Assessing the effects of an assortment and ambience: a choice experimental approach. Journal of Retailing, 75: 319-345.

Kotler, P., Rath, G.A. (1984). Design-A Powerful but Neglected Strategic Tool, Journal of Business

Strategy, 5: 16-21.

Kristenson, L. (1983). Strategic planning in retailing. European Journal of Marketing. 17: 43-59.

Lancaster, K. (1990). The Economics of Product Variety: A Survey. Marketing Science. 9: 189-206.

 Lichtenstein, D.R., Ridgway, N.M. en Netemeyer, R.G. (1993). Price Perceptions and Consumer Shopping Behavior: A Field Study. Journal of Marketing Research. 30: 234-245.

 Lyengar, S. en Lepper, M. (2000). When Choice is Demotivating: Can One Desire Too Much of a Good Thing?. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 79: 995-1006.

Manning, K.C., Sprott, D.E., Miyazaki, A.D. (1998). Consumer Response to Quantity Surcharges: Implications for Retail Price Setters. Journal of Retailing. 74: 373-399

 Manning, K.C., Sprott, D.E., Miyazaki, A.D. (2003). Unit price usage knowledge: Conceptualization and empirical assessment. Journal of Business Research. 56: 367-377.

 McGoldrick, P.J. en H. Marks (1985). Price-size relationships and customer reactions to a limited unit pricing programme. European Journal of Marketing. 19: 47-64.

 McLaughlin, E.W., Hawkes, G.F. (1994). Category Management: Current Status and Future Outlook.

Food Industry Management Program. Cornell University.

Mitchell, V.W., Lennard, D. en McGoldrick, P. (2003). Consumer Awareness, Understanding and Usage of Unit Pricing. British Journal of Management. 14: 173-187.

Miyazaki, A.D., Sprott, D.F., Manning, K.C. (2000). Unit Prices on Retail Shelf Labels: An Assessment of Information Prominence. Journal of Retailing. 76: 93-112.

 Monroe, K.B. en Lee, A.Y. (1999). Remembering versus knowing: Issues in buyers' processing of price information. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science. 27: 207-225.

 Nason, R.W.; Bitta, A.J. (1983). The Incidence and Consumer Perceptions of Quality Surcharges.

Journal of Retailing. 59: 40-54.

Nelson, P. (1974). Advertising as Information. Joumal of Political Economy. 82: 729-754.

Nussbaum, B. (1988), Smart Design. Business Week, 102-17.

Nussbaum, B. (1993). Hot Products. Business Week, 54-57.

O'Brien, T. (1971). Stages of Consumer Decision Making. Journal of Marketing Research. 8: 283-289.

 Payne, J.W. (1976). Task complexity and contingent processing in decision making: An information search and protocol analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance. 16, 366-387.

 Payne, J.W., Braunstein, M.L., Carroll, J.S. (1978). Exploring Predecisional Behavior: An Alternative Approach to Decision Research. Organizational Behavior & Human Performance. 22: 17-44.

 Pieters, R., Warlop, L. (1999). Visual attention during brand choice: the impact of time pressure and task motivation. International Journal of Research in Marketing. 16: 1-16.

Reid, R., Brown, S. (1996). I hate shopping! An introspective perspective. International Journal of

Retail & Distribution Management. 24: 4-16.

Roulet, D.G., 1993. ECR: better information cuts costs. Transportation and Distribution. 34: 63.

 Russo, J.E., Richard, S., Nolan, C.A., Russell, G.J. en Metcalf, B.L. (1986). Nutrition Information in the Supermarket. Journal of Consumer Research. 13: 48-70.

 Sloot, L.M., Fok, D., Verhoef, P.C. (2006). The Short- and Long-Term Impact of an Assortment Reduction on Category Sales. Journal of marketing research. 43: 536-548.

 Sprott, D.E., Manning, K.C. en Miyazaki, A.D. (2003). Grocery Price Setting and Quantity Surcharges. Journal of Marketing. 67: 34-46.

 Tzelgov, J., Meyer, J. en Henik, A. (1992). Automatic and intentional processing of numerical information. Journal of Experimental Psychology. 18: 166-179.

 Underwood, R.L.; Klein, N.M. (2001). Packaging communication: attentional effects of product imagery. Journal of Product & Brand Management. 10: 403-422.

Van Bodegom, R. (2006). Er is geen onderscheid tussen trademarketing en marketing. Tijdschrift voor

Marketing. 36.

 Van Herpen, E., Pieters, R. (2002). The Variety of an Assortment: An Extension to the Attribute-Based Approach. Marketing science. 21: 331-341.

 Van Herpen, E., Pieters, R. (2002). The Influence of Expertise on Preferences for Assortment Variety; When Less Variety is Better. Advances in Consumer Research. 29: 438-439.

 Van Herpen, E., Pieters, R. (2007). Anticipated identification costs: Improving assortment evaluation by diagnostic attributes. International Journal of Research in Marketing. 24: 77-88.

Viswanathan, M. en Childers, T.L. (1996). Processing of numerical and product information. Journal

of Consumer Psychology. 5: 359-386.

 Wagner, W.F. (1988). Yellow Pages report. Scotts Valley, CA: Mark Publishing.

Wansink, Brian (1996). Can Package Size Accelerate Usage Volume?. Journal of Marketing. 60: 1-14.

 Wax, S.B. (1974). Social Science Inputs to Public Policy Formulation: Massachusetts and the Unit Pricing Regulation. Advances in Consumer Research. 915-923.

Widrick, S.M. (1979a). Measurement of Incidents of Quantity Surcharge Among Selected Grocery Products. Journal of Consumer Affairs. 13: 99-107.

 Widrick, S.M. (1979b). Quantity surcharge: A pricing practice among grocery store items – validation and extension. Journal of Retailing. 55: 47-58.

Yudelson, J. (1999). Adapting Mccarthy‟s Four P‟s for the Twenty-First Century. Journal of

Marketing Education, 21: 60-67.

Zeithaml, V. (1982). Consumer response to in-store price information environments. Journal of

Consumer Research. 8: 357-369.

 Zeithaml, V. (1988). Consumer perceptions of Price, quality and value: A means-end mode! and synthesis of evidence. Journal of Marketing. 52: 2-22.

 Zotos, Y., Lysonski, S. (1993). An Exploration of the Quantity of the Surcharge Concept in Greece.

European Journal of Marketing. 27: 5-18.

Instellingen

 American Marketing Association (AMA)

 Distrifood

 Elsevier Voedingsmiddelen Industrie (EVMI)

 European Food Management Institute (EFMI)

 FoodService Instituut Nederland (FSIN).

 Point Of Purchase Advertising International (POPAI)

 Rabobank Internet sites:

 CBS (Nederlanders drinken minder koffie) www.cbs.nl

 ConsumentenTrends 2006 www.consumententrends.nl

 Foodguru www.foodguru.nl

 Foodvakbeurs www.foodvakbeurs.nl

 Media Marketing (Sexy merk, trendy pack) www.mm.be

 Sara Lee www.saralee.com

In document ONDERSCHEIDEND ZIJN… (pagina 65-71)