• No results found

Discharge-related variation of the chemical composition of suspended sediment of the River Rhine in the Netherlands

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Share "Discharge-related variation of the chemical composition of suspended sediment of the River Rhine in the Netherlands"

Copied!
1
0
0

Bezig met laden.... (Bekijk nu de volledige tekst)

Hele tekst

(1)

1. Background and aim

The response of the chemical composition of suspended sediment to variations in river discharge may reveal the sources of sediment and associated contaminants.

In this study, we used the Waterbase database of Rijkswaterstaat (Dutch Ministry of Infrastructure and Water Management) to examine the relation between

the concentration of 53 elements in suspended sediment and discharge of the River Rhine at the Lobith monitoring station near to the German-Dutch border.

Discharge-related variation of the chemical composition of suspended sediment of the River Rhine in the Netherlands

MARCEL VAN DER PERK, ALVARO ESPINOZA VILCHES, HANS MIDDELKOOP

Department of Physical Geography, Utrecht University, P.O. Box 80115, 3508 TC Utrecht, The Netherlands; e-mail: m.vanderperk@uu.nl

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4

0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000

Ag in Suspended Solids [mg/kg]

Discharge [m3/s]

Ag vs Q

Winter Spring Summer Autumn

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35

0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000

Ar in Suspended Solids [mg/kg]

Discharge [m3/s]

Ar vs Q

Winter Spring Summer Autumn

0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800

0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000

Ba in Suspended Solids [mg/kg]

Discharge [m3/s]

Ba vs Q

Winter Spring Summer Autumn

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4

0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000

Cs in Suspended Solids [mg/kg]

Discharge [m3/s]

Cd vs Q

Winter Spring Summer Autumn

40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120

0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000

Cr in Suspended Solids [mg/kg]

Discharge [m3/s]

Cr vs Q

Winter Spring Summer Autumn

0 20 40 60 80 100 120

0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000

Cu in Suspended Solids [mg/kg]

Discharge [m3/s]

Cu vs Q

Winter Spring Summer Autumn

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5

0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000

Mo in Suspended Solids [mg/kg]

Discharge [m3/s]

Mo vs Q

Winter Spring Summer Autumn

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1

0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000

Na in Suspended Solids [mg/kg]

Discharge [m3/s]

Na vs Q

Winter Spring Summer Autumn

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5

0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000

Phosphate in Suspended Solids [mg/kg]

Discharge [m3/s]

Phosphate vs Q

Summer Winter Spring Autumn

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180

0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000

Pb in Suspended Solids [mg/kg]

Discharge [m3/s]

Pb vs Q

Winter Spring Summer Autumn

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9

0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000

Sb in Suspended Solids [mg/kg]

Discharge [m3/s]

Sb vs Q

Winter Spring Summer Autumn

0 1 2 3 4 5 6

0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000

Sn in Suspended Solids [mg/kg]

Discharge [m3/s]

Sn vs Q

Winter Spring Summer Autumn

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9

0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000

Ti in Suspended Solids [mg/kg]

Discharge [m3/s]

Ti vs Q

Winter Spring Summer

Autumn 0

100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800

0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000

Zn in Suspended Solids [mg/kg]

Discharge [m3/s]

Zn vs Q

Winter Spring Summer Autumn

2. Elements showing a negative relation with discharge

Elements originating

primarily from anthropogenic point source discharges

Diluton during periods of high discharge

(Shift of source area to

regions with relatively low concentrations of these

elements during high flows) Seasonality with positive

residuals during autumn and winter and negative residuals during spring and summer

Elements mainly associated with inorganic sediment

particles; dilution by primary production of organic

particulate matter during summer

3. Elements showing a positive relation with discharge

0 5000 10000 15000 20000 25000 30000 35000 40000 45000 50000

0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000

Al in Suspended Solids [mg/kg]

Discharge [m3/s]

Al vs Q

Winter Spring Summer Autumn

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3

0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000

Be in Suspended Solids [mg/kg]

Discharge [m3/s]

Be vs Q

Winter Spring Summer Autumn

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16

0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000

Cs in Suspended Solids [mg/kg]

Discharge [m3/s]

Cs vs Q

Winter Spring Summer Autumn

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45

0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000

Fe in Suspended Solids [mg/kg]

Discharge [m3/s]

Fe vs Q

Winter Spring Summer

Autumn 0

2 4 6 8 10 12 14

0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000

Ga in Suspended Solids [mg/kg]

Discharge [m3/s]

Ga vs Q

Winter Spring Summer

Autumn 0

2 4 6 8 10 12

0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000

K in Suspended Solids [mg/kg]

Discharge [m3/s]

K vs Q

Winter Spring Summer Autumn

0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1 0.12 0.14 0.16 0.180.2

0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000

Li in Suspended Solids [mg/kg]

Discharge [m3/s]

Li vs Q

Winter Spring Summer

Autumn 0

2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16

0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000

Mg in Suspended Solids [mg/kg]

Discharge [m3/s]

Mg vs Q

Winter Spring Summer

Autumn 0

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80

0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000

Ni Suspended Solids [mg/kg]

Discharge [m3/s]

Ni vs Q

Winter Spring Summer Autumn

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90

0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000

Pr in Suspended Solids [mg/kg]

Discharge [m3/s]

Rb vs Q

Winter Spring Summer

Autumn 0

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000

Th in Suspended Solids [mg/kg]

Discharge [m3/s]

Th vs Q

Winter Spring Summer

Autumn 0

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4

0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000

U in Suspended Solids [mg/kg]

Discharge [m3/s]

U vs Q

Winter Spring Summer Autumn

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000

V in Suspended Solids [mg/kg]

Discharge [m3/s]

V vs Q

Winter Spring Summer

Autumn 0

0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4

0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000

Dy in Suspended Solids [mg/kg]

Discharge [m3/s]

Dy vs Q

Winter Spring Summer Autumn

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2

0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000

Eu in Suspended Solids [mg/kg]

Discharge [m3/s]

Eu vs Q

Winter Spring Summer Autumn 0

5000 10000 15000 20000 25000 30000 35000 40000 45000 50000

0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000

Al in Suspended Solids [mg/kg]

Discharge [m3/s]

Al vs Q

Winter Spring Summer Autumn

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3

0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000

Be in Suspended Solids [mg/kg]

Discharge [m3/s]

Be vs Q

Winter Spring Summer Autumn

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16

0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000

Cs in Suspended Solids [mg/kg]

Discharge [m3/s]

Cs vs Q

Winter Spring Summer Autumn

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45

0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000

Fe in Suspended Solids [mg/kg]

Discharge [m3/s]

Fe vs Q

Winter Spring Summer

Autumn 0

2 4 6 8 10 12 14

0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000

Ga in Suspended Solids [mg/kg]

Discharge [m3/s]

Ga vs Q

Winter Spring Summer

Autumn 0

2 4 6 8 10 12

0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000

K in Suspended Solids [mg/kg]

Discharge [m3/s]

K vs Q

Winter Spring Summer Autumn

0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1 0.12 0.14 0.16 0.180.2

0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000

Li in Suspended Solids [mg/kg]

Discharge [m3/s]

Li vs Q

Winter Spring Summer

Autumn 0

2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16

0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000

Mg in Suspended Solids [mg/kg]

Discharge [m3/s]

Mg vs Q

Winter Spring Summer

Autumn 0

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80

0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000

Ni Suspended Solids [mg/kg]

Discharge [m3/s]

Ni vs Q

Winter Spring Summer Autumn

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90

0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000

Pr in Suspended Solids [mg/kg]

Discharge [m3/s]

Rb vs Q

Winter Spring Summer

Autumn 0

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000

Th in Suspended Solids [mg/kg]

Discharge [m3/s]

Th vs Q

Winter Spring Summer

Autumn 0

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4

0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000

U in Suspended Solids [mg/kg]

Discharge [m3/s]

U vs Q

Winter Spring Summer Autumn

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000

V in Suspended Solids [mg/kg]

Discharge [m3/s]

V vs Q

Winter Spring Summer

Autumn 0

0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4

0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000

Dy in Suspended Solids [mg/kg]

Discharge [m3/s]

Dy vs Q

Winter Spring Summer Autumn

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2

0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000

Eu in Suspended Solids [mg/kg]

Discharge [m3/s]

Eu vs Q

Winter Spring Summer Autumn

Elements of geogenic origin

Sediment source area shifts to regions with relatively

high concentrations of these elements during high flows

Negative correlation with organic C, indicating

association with clay minerals

Residuals of the relations show the same seasonality as or elements that are

negatively related to discharge

There are also elements that do not show any relation with discharge, but show a similar seasonal variation

There are also elements that show a negative relation

with discharge, but without seasonality

4. Conclusions

- The direction of the relationship between the element concentration in suspended sediment and discharge indicates whether the elements originate primarily from anthorpogenic or

geogenic sources.

- Primary production of organic carbon affects the element concentration in suspended sediment.

- Future study will examine to what extent the chemical composition of suspended sediment in the River Rhine allows the demarcation of the geographic source area of the sediment.

Referenties

GERELATEERDE DOCUMENTEN

a) This thesis has developed an approach to select the optimal XCT scanning parameters in high density ores in order to obtain mineralogical and textural information rapidly by

There has been a clear increase in the amount of dredging in the ports and harbours in recent years (Figure 2) which we propose is linked to changing sediment circulation and

Figure 7: The sediment budget for the Rhine-Meuse delta as calculated using multibeam survey data and measured dredging and flux data. Note the DEM data is often missing the

suspended sediment loads in the Rhine River, we re- examined the annual suspended loads at the Lobith monitoring station near the Dutch-German border for the period since the start

Comparison of the current cut bank position and height with the digital elevation model of the area indicates that only 31 m 3 sediment eroded between 2009

The top 5 lowest discharges for the GRADE Reference data, shown in Table 3.4 are much lower compared to the top 5 based on the Waterinfo data using the block method, shown in

The calculation of the current flood risk is based on the discharge statistics at Lobith. Modification of the discharge distribution will change the discharge statistics of each of

When it appears to be possible, longer weather series can be constructed leading to more annual discharge maxima (after processed by HBV). Possibly this leads to higher confidence