setting
Platteel, T.L.
Citation
Platteel, T. L. (2010, February 11). Knowledge development of secondary school L1 teachers on concept-context rich education in an action-research setting. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/1887/14738
Version: Corrected Publisher’s Version
License: Licence agreement concerning inclusion of doctoral thesis in the Institutional Repository of the University of Leiden
Downloaded from: https://hdl.handle.net/1887/14738
Note: To cite this publication please use the final published version (if applicable).
References
References
Abell, S. K. (2008). Twenty years later: Does pedagogical content knowledge remain a useful idea? International Journal of Science Education, 30(10), 1405-1416.
Ainley, M., & Patrick, L. (2006). Measuring self-regulated learning processes through tracking patterns of student Interaction with achievement activities. Educational Psychology Review, 18(3), 267-286.
Altrichter, H., Posch, P., & Somekh, B. (1993). Teachers investigate their work. An introduction to the methods of action research. London: Routledge.
Anderson, G. L., & Herr, K. (1999). The new paradigm wars: is there room for rigorous practitioner knowledge in schools and universities? Educational Researcher, 28(5), 12-40.
Bakhtin, M. (1981). The dialogic imagination. Austin, Texas: University of Texas Press.
Bakhtin, M. (1986). Speech genres and other late essays. (V. McGee, Trans.) Austin:
University of Texas Press.
Ball, D. L. (2000). Bridging practices. Intertwining content and pedagogy in teaching and learning to teach. Journal of Teacher Education, 51(3), 241-247.
Banks, P. (1997). Students' understanding of chemical equilibrium. Master's Thesis.
University of York, UK.
Barber, M. (2001). A comparison of NEAB and Salters a-level chemistry: Student views and achievements. Master's thesis. University of York, UK.
Beattie, M. (2002). Finding new words for old songs: Creating relationships and community in teacher education. In H. Christiansen & S. Ramadevi (Eds.), Reeducating the educator: Global perspectives on community building. Albany, N.Y.: State University of New York Press.
Beijaard, D., & Verloop, N. (1996). Assessing teachers’ practical knowledge. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 22(3), 275-286.
Bencze, & Hodson, D. (1999). Changing practice by changing practice: towards more authentic science and science curriculum development. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(5), 521-539.
Bennett, J., Hogarth, S., & Lubben, F. (2003). A systematic review of the effects of context-based and Science-Technology-Society (STS) approaches in the teaching of secondary science. London: EPPI centre.
Bennett, J., & Holman, J. (2002). Context-based approaches to the teaching of chemistry: What are they and what are their effects? In J. K. Gilbert (Ed.), Chemical education: Towards research-based practice (Vol. 17, pp. 165-184).
Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Bennett, J., & Lubben, F. (2006). Context-based chemistry: The Salters approach.
International Journal of Science Education, 28(9), 999-1015.
Berk, L. E., & Winsler, A. (1995). Scaffolding children's learning: Vygotsky and early childhood education. Washington, DC: NAEYC.
Boyle-Baise, M., & McIntyre, J. (2008). What kind of experience? Preparing teachers in PDS or community settings. In M. Cochran-Smith, S. Feiman-Nemser, J.
McIntyre & K. Demers (Eds.), Handbook of research on teacher education (3rd ed., pp. 307-329). New York and London: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
Brand, S., Reimer, T., & Opwis, K. (2007). How do we learn in a negative mood?
Effects of a negative mood on transfer and learning. Learning and Instruction, 17(1), 1-16.
Bransford, J. D., & McCarrell, N. S. (1977). A sketch of a cognitive approach to comprehension: Some thoughts about understanding what it means to
comprehend. In P. N. Johnson-Laird & P. C. Wason (Eds.), Thinking: Readings in cognitive science (pp. 377-399). Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press.
Brickhouse, N. W. (1990). Teachers' beliefs about the nature of science and their relationships to classroom practice. Journal of Teacher Education, 41, 53-62.
Brooker, R., Smeal, G., Ehrich, L., Daws, L., & Brannock, J. (1998). Action research for professional development on gender issues. In B. Atweh, S. Kemmis & P.
Weeks (Eds.), Action research in practice: Partnerships for social justice in education (pp. 189-211). London: Routledge.
Brookfield, S. (1995). Becoming a critically reflective teacher. San Francisco: Jossey- Bass.
Caldwell, W. (2007). Taking Spanish outside the box: A model for integrating service learning into foreign language study. Foreign Language Annals, 40(3), 463-471.
Campbell, A., McNamara, O., Furlong, J., Lewis, S. F., & Howson, J. (2007). The evaluation of the national partnership project in England: processes, issues and dilemmas in commissioned evaluation research. Journal of Education for Teaching, 33(4), 471-483.
Capobianco, B. M. (2007). Establishing a collaborative community to support teachers' professional identities. In J. Van Swet, P. Ponte & B. E. Smit (Eds.),
Postgraduate programmes as platform (pp. 83-96). Rotterdam: SensePublishers.
Carter, K. (1990). Teachers' knowledge and learning to teach. In W. R. Houston (Ed.), Handbook of research on teacher education (pp. 291-310). New York: Macmillan.
Clarke, D., & Hollingsworth, H. (2002). Elaborating a model of teacher professional growth. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18, 947-967.
Clift, R., Veal, M. L., Johnson, M., & Holland, P. (1990). Restructuring teacher education through collaborative action research. Journal of Teacher Education, 41(2), 52–62.
Cronin, J. F. (1993). Four misconceptions about authentic learning. Educational Leadership, 50(7), 78-80.
CVEN Commissie vernieuwing eindexamenprogramma's (1991). Het CVEN-rapport eindverslag van de commissie vernieuwing eindexamenprogramma's Nederlandse taal en letterkunde. v.w.o. en. h.a.v.o [The CVEN-report: Final report of the commission for the revision of the national syllabus of Dutch secondary education] 's-Gravenhage: Sdu Uitgeverij.
Darling-Hammond, L. (1997). What matters most: 21st-century teaching. Education Digest, 63(3), 4-10.
Darling-Hammond, L., Banks, J., Zumwalt, K., Gomez, L., Sherin, M. G., Griesdorn, J., et al. (2005). Educational goals and purposes: Developing a curricular vision for teaching. In L. Darling-Hammond & J. Bransford (Eds.), Preparing teachers for a changing world (pp. 169-201). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Darling-Hammond, L., & McLaughlin, M. (1999). Investing in teaching as a learning profession: Policy problems and prospects. In L. S. Darling-Hammond & G. Sykes (Eds.), Teaching as the learning profession: Handbook of policy and practice (pp. 376-411). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Day, C. (1991). Roles and relationships in qualitative research on teachers' thinking: A reconsideration. Teaching and Teacher Education, 7(5/6),
537-547.
Day, C. (1999). Developing teachers, the challenge of lifelong learning. London, Philadelphia: Falmer Press.
Day, C., & Hadfield, M. (2004). Learning through networks: Trust, partnerships and the power of action research. Educational Action Research, 12(4), 575-585.
Day, C., & Townsend, A. (2007). Ethical issues for consultants in complex
collaborative action research settings: Tensions and dilemmas. In A. Campbell &
S. Groundwater-Smith (Eds.), An ethical approach to practitioner research:
Dealing with issues and dilemmas in action research (pp. 42-62). Oxon:
Routledge.
De Bock, D., Verschaffel, L., Janssens, D., Van Dooren, W., & Claes, K. (2003). Do realistic contexts and graphical representations always have a beneficial impact on students' performance? Negative evidence from a study on modeling non- linear geometry problems. Learning and Instruction, 13, 441-463.
Dewey, J. (1913). Interest and effort in education. Cambridge MA:
Riverside Press.
Dewey, J. (1985). How we think and selected essays 1910-1911 (Vol. 6). Carbondale and Edwardsville: Southern Illinois University Press.
Donald, J. G. (1983). Knowledge structures. Methods for exploring course content.
Journal of Higher Education, 54(1), 31-41.
Doyle, D. (2007). Transdisciplinary enquiry: Researching with rather than on. In A.
Campbell & S. Groundwater-Smith (Eds.), An ethical approach to practitioner research - dealing with issues and dilemmas in action research (pp. 75-87).
London: Routledge.
Duffee, L., & Aikenhead, G. (1992). Curriculum change, student evaluation, and teacher practical knowledge. Science Education, 76, 493-506.
Ebenezer, J. V., Lugo, F., Beirnacka, B., & Puvirajah, A. (2003). Community building through electronic discussion boards: Pre-service teachers' reflective dialogues on science teaching. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 12(4), 397- 411.
Eijkelhof, H. M. C., & Van der Veen, K. (1989). Werken met contexten in het natuurkundeonderwijs [Working with context in science education].
Zeist: NIB.
Elmore, R., & Burney, D. (1999). Investing in teacher learning: Staff development and instructional improvement. In L. S. Darling-Hammond (Ed.), Teaching as the learning profession: Handbook of policy and practice (pp. 263-291). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Evans, D. A. (1980). Faith, authenticity and morality. Edinburgh: Handsel Press.
Evelein, F. (2006). Pop and world music in Dutch music education: Two cases of authentic learning in music teacher education and secondary education.
International Journal of Music Education, 24(2), 178-187.
Farmer, F. (1998). Dialogue and critique: Bakhtin and the cultural studies writing classroom. College Composition and Communication, 49(2), 186-207.
Fenstermacher, G. D. (1994). The Knower and the known: The nature of knowledge in research on teaching. In L. Darling-Hammond (Ed.), Review of research in education (Vol. 20, pp. 3-56). Washington DC: American Educational Research Association.
Fernández-Balboa, J. M., & Stiehl, J. (1995). The generic nature of pedagogical content knowledge among college professors. Teaching and Teacher Education, 11(3), 293-306.
Ferrari, M., & Mahalingham, R. (1998). Personal cognitive development and its implication for teaching and learning. Educational Psychology, 33(1), 35-44.
Flecknoe, M. (2000). Can continuing professional development for teachers be shown to raise pupils' achievement? Journal of In-Service Education, 26(3), 437-457.
Fottland, H. (2004). Memories of a fledgling teacher: a beginning teacher's autobiography. Teacher and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 10(6), 639-662.
Frykholm, J. A. (1998). Beyond supervision: Learning to teach mathematics in community. Teaching and Teacher Education, 14(3), 305-322.
George, J. M., & Lubben, F. (2002). Facilitating teachers' professional growth through their involvement in creating context-based materials in science. International Journal of Educational Development, 22, 659-672.
Gilbert, J. (2006). On the nature of ‘context’ in chemical education. International Journal of Science Education, 28(9), 957-976.
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine.
Goedhart, M., Kaper, W., & Joling, E. (2001). Het gebruik van contexten in het natuurkunde- en scheikundeonderwijs [The use of contexts in science education]. Tijdschrift voor Didactiek der B-Wetenschappen [Journal of Pedagogy of Science Education], 18(2), 111-139.
Goldstein, L. (2000). Ethical dilemmas in designing collaborative research: Lessons learned the hard way. Qualitative Studies in Education, 13(5),
317-330.
Gordon, J. J., Hazlett, C., Ten Cate, O., Mann, K., Kilminster, S., Prince, K., et al.
(2000). Strategic planning in medical education: Enhancing the learning environment for students in clinical settings. Medical Education, 34, 841-850.
Grossman, P. L. (1990). The making of a teacher: Teacher knowledge and teacher education. New York: Teachers College Press.
Gudmundsdottir, S. (1991). Ways of seeing are ways of knowing. The pedagogical content knowledge of an expert English teacher. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 25(5), 409-421.
Habermas, J. (1984). The theory of communicative action: Vol 1. reason and rationalization of society. London: Heinemann.
Habermas, J. (1987). The philosophical discourse of modernity: Twelve lectures (F.G.
Lawrence, Trans.). Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
Habermas, J. (1996). Between facts and norms (W. Rehg, Trans.). Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
Hall, B. L. (2001). I wish this were a poem of practices of participatory research. In P.
Reason & H. Bradbury (Eds.), Handbook of action research: Participative inquiry
& practice (pp. 171-178). London: Sage.
Holt, J. (1964/1982). How children fail. New York: Perseus Press.
Honerød, M., & Hoveid, H. (2007). Research in, on or with practice? In P. Ponte & B.
Smit (Eds.), The quality of practitioner research (pp. 43-56). Rotterdam:
SensePublishers.
Huberman, M. (1995). Networks that alter teaching: Conceptualizations, exchanges and experiments. Teachers and Teaching, Theory and Practice, 1(2), 193-211.
Hulshof, H. (1997). Nederlands. Een vakvertaling bij Onderwijskunde [Dutch. A translation of educational theory into the school subject]. Groningen: Wolters- Noordhoff.
Hulshof, H., Rietmeijer, M., & Verhagen, A. (2006). Taalkunde voor de tweede fase van het vwo [Linguistics for the second phase of pre-university education].
Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
Hulshof, H., & Verloop, N. (2005). Do teachers need instructional analogies to teach mother-tongue (L1)? Teachers' perceptions and representations of difficult topics in mother-tongue education. L1 - Educational Studies in Language and
Literature, 5(1), 23-37.
Hulshof, H., & Vroegop, P. (1990). De vakinhoudelijk analyse van leerstof: een theoretisch kader [The content analysis of subject matter: a theoretical framework]. Leiden: Iclon, Leiden University.
Jennings, Z. (1993). Curriculum change in school systems in the commonwealth Caribbean: Some implications for the management of curriculum development.
International Journal of Educational Development, 13(3), 131-143.
Johnsen, H. C. G., & Normann, R. (2004). When research and practice collide: The role of action research when there Is a conflict of interest with stakeholders.
System Practice and Action Research, 17(3), 207-235.
Johnston, S. (1992). Images: A way of understanding the practical knowledge of student teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 8, 123-136.
Jones, L. (1997). Talking about "everyday issues" in the formal classroom setting: A framework for understanding the dynamics of interaction. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 29(5), 559-567.
Kagan, D. M. (1990). Ways of evaluating teacher cognition: Inferences concerning the goldilocks principle. Review of Educational Research, 60(3), 419-469.
Kemmis, S. (2001). Exploring the relevance of critical theory for action research:
Emancipatory action research in the footsteps of Jürgen Habermas. In P. Reason
& H. Bradbury (Eds.), Handbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice (pp. 91-102). London: Sage.
Kemmis, S. (2007). Participatory action research and the public sphere. In P. Ponte &
B. H. J. Smit (Eds.), The quality of practitioner research: Reflections on the position of the researcher and the researched (pp. 9-27). Rotterdam:
SensePublishers.
Kemmis, S. (2008). Critical theory and participatory action research. In P. Reason &
H. Bradbury (Eds.), The Sage handbook of action research (pp. 121-138).
London: Sage.
Kemmis, S., & McTaggart, R. (1988). The action research planner (3rd ed.). Geelong, Australia: Deakin University Press.
Kemmis, S., & McTaggart, R. (2005). Participatory action research: Communicative action and the public sphere. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (pp. 559-603). Thousand Oaks, California:
Sage.
KNAW [RNAAS] (2003). Ontwikkeling van talent in de tweede fase. Advies van de knaw-klankbordgroep voortgezet onderwijs, KNAW [Development of talent in the second phase. Notice from Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences]. Amsterdam: Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences.
Kneppers, L., Van Boxtel, C., & Van Hout-Wolters, B. (2009). De weg naar transfer:
een concept- en context benadering voor het vak economie in het voortgezet onderwijs [The road to transfer: concept and context approach to the subject of Economics in secondary school]. Pedagogische Studiën, 86, 41-61.
Koens, F. (2005). Vertical integration in medical education: Studies on the required basic science knowledge and the concept of context. Master's thesis, University of Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Koens, F., Mann, K. V., Custers, E. J. F. M., & Ten Cate, O. T. J. (2005). Analyzing the concept of context in medical education. Medical Education, (39), 1243- 1249.
Koens, F., Ten Cate, O. T. J., & Custers, E. J. F. M. (2003). Context-dependent memory in a meaningful environment for medical education: In the classroom and at the bedside. Advances in Health Science Education, 8, 155-165.
Kooy, M. (2006). Telling stories in book clubs. Women teachers and professional development. Toronto: Springer.
Lantz, O., & Kass, H. (1987). Chemistry teachers' functional paradigms. Science Education, 71, 117-134.
Little, J. W. (2002). Locating learning in teachers’ communities of practice: Opening up problems of analysis in records of everyday practice. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18(8), 917-946.
Little, J. W. (2007). Teachers' accounts of classroom experience as a resource for professional learning and instruction decision making. In P. Moss (Ed.), Evidence and decision making: 2007 NSSE Yearbook (Vol. 106, pp. 217-240). San Francisco:
Wiley - Blackwell.
LWM Leidse werkgroep moedertaaldidactiek (1980). Moedertaaldidactiek. Een handleiding voor het voortgezet onderwijs [Teaching mother-tongue education.
A manual for secondary education]. Muiderberg: Coutinho.
Macpherson, I., Arcodia, C., Gorman, S., Shepherd, J., & Trost, R. (1998).
Collaborative action research: Learnings from a social science project in a secondary school. In B. Atweh, S. Kemmis & P. Weeks (Eds.), Action research in practice (pp. 212-238). London: Routledge.
Macpherson, I., Aspland, T., Elliott, J., Proudford, C., Shaw, L., & Thurlow, G.
(1998). A journey into a learning partnership: A university and a state system working together for curriculum change. In B. Atweh, S. Kemmis & P. Weeks (Eds.), Action research in practice: Partnerships for social justice in education (pp. 141-162). London: Routledge.
Magnusson, S., Krajcik, J. S., & Borko, H. (1999). Nature, sources, and development of pedagogical content knowledge for science teaching. In J. Gess-Newsome &
N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge (pp. 95-132).
Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Mason, R. (2005). Art teachers and action research. Educational Action Research, 13(4), 563- 579.
Mayer, D., & Marland, P. (1997). Teachers' knowledge of students: A significant domain of practical knowledge? Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 25(1), 17-35.
Mayer, R. E. (1998). Cognitive, metacognitive and motivational aspects of problem solving. Instructional Science, 26, 49-63.
Mayoh, K., & Knutton, S. (1997). Using out-of-school experience in science lessons:
reality or rhetoric? International Journal of Science Education, 19(7), 849-867.
McKernan, J. (1994). Curriculum action research (2nd ed.). London: Kogan Page.
McLaughlin, C. (2006). Researching schools. Stories from a schools-university partnership for educational research. London: Routledge.
McLaughlin, C. (2007). Cambridge SUPER networked learning community. In C.
McLaughlin, K. Black-Hawkins, D. McIntyre & A. Townsend (Eds.), Networking practitioner research (pp. 139-146). London: Routledge.
McLaughlin, C., Black-Hawkins, K., McIntyre, D., & Townsend, A. (2007). Networking practitioner research. London: Routledge.
McLaughlin, C., Black Hawkins, K., & Townsend, A. (2005). Practitioner research and enquiry in networked learning communities. Cambridge: University of
Cambridge Faculty of Education for The National College of School Leadership (Networked Learning Communities).
McNiff, J., & Whitehead, J. (2006). All you need to know about action research.
London: Sage.
Meijer, P. C. (1999). Teachers' practical knowledge: Teaching reading comprehension in secondary education. Doctoral thesis, Leiden University, the Netherlands.
Meijer, P. C., Verloop, N., & Beijaard, D. (1999). Exploring language teachers' practical knowledge about teaching reading comprehension. Teaching and Teacher Education, 15(1), 59-84.
Meijer, P. C., Verloop, N., & Beijaard, D. (2001). Similarities and differences in teachers' practical knowledge about teaching reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Research, 94(3), 171-184.
Messner, E., & Rauch, F. (1995). Dilemmas of facilitating action research. Educational Action Research, 3(1), 41-54.
Ministery of Education, Culture and Science (2008). Dossier Tweede Fase [File Second Phase] from http://www.minocw.nl/tweedefase/index.html (June 15th 2009).
Moore, M. T., & Freeman, R. D. (1993). Problem finding and teacher experience.
Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of American Educational Research Association (AERA), Atlanta, U.S.
Newmann, F. M. (1992). Student engagement and achievement in American secondary schools. New York: Teachers College Press.
Nicaise, M., Gibney, T., & Crane, M. (2000). Toward an understanding of authentic learning: Student perceptions of an authentic classroom. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 9(1), 79-94.
Nikitina, S. (2006). Three strategies for interdisciplinary teaching: Contextualizing, conceptualizing, and problem-centering. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 38(3), 251-271.
Nystrand, M. (1997). Opening dialogue: Understanding the dynamics of language and learning in the English classroom. New York: Teachers College Press.
Oja, S. N., & Smulyan, L. (1989). Collaborative action research: A developmental approach. Basingstoke, Hampshire: Taylor & Francis Ltd.
Olson, M. (2000). Linking personal and professional knowledge of teaching practice through narrative inquiry. The Teacher Educator, 35(4), 109-127.
Olson, M. R., & Craig, C. J. (2001). Opportunities and challenges in the development of teachers' knowledge: the development of narrative authority through knowledge communities. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17(6), 667-684.
Oolbekkink-Marchand, H. (2006). Teachers' perspectives on self-regulated learning.
An exploratory study in secondary and university education. Doctoral dissertation, Leiden University, the Netherlands.
Oolbekkink-Marchand, H., Van Driel, J. H., & Verloop, N. (2006). Secondary and university teachers' perspectives on self-regulated learning. In F. Oser, F.
Achterhagen & U. Renold (Eds.), Competence oriented teacher training: Old research demands and new pathways (pp. 219-236). Rotterdam:
SensePublishers.
Orland-Barak, L., Kemp, J., Ben-Or, T., & Levi, Z. (2004). Seeing the 'new' in light of the 'old': Evolving interpretations of a new national English curriculum. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 36(3), 321-339.
Osborne, J., & Collins, S. (2001). Pupils' views of the role and value of the science curriculum: A focus-group study. International Journal of Science Education, 23(5), 441-468.
Palmer, P. (1998). The courage to teach. Exploring the inner landscape of a teacher's life. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Park, S., & Oliver, J. S. (2008). Revisiting the conceptualisation of pedagogical content knowledge (PCK): PCK as a conceptual tool to understand teachers as professionals. Research in Science Education, (38), 261-284.
Parke, H. M., & Coble, C. R. (1997). Teachers designing curriculum as professional development: A model for transformational science teaching. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34, 773-790.
Pieters, J. M., & Verschaffel, L. (2003). Beïnvloeden van leerprocessen [Influencing learning processes]. In N. Verloop & J. Lowyck (Eds.), Onderwijskunde
[Educational theory] (pp. 251-284). Groningen: Wolters-Noordhoff.
Pilling, G., Holman, J., & Waddington, D. (2001). The salters experience. Education in Chemistry, 38(5), 131-136.
Pilot, A., & Bulte, A. M. (2006). Why do you "need to know": Context-based education. International Journal of Science Education, 28(9) 953-956.
Platteel, Hulshof, H., & Van Driel, J. H. (2008). Teachers of MTE in action. L1 – Educational Studies in Language and Literature, 8(4), 85-105.
Platteel, T., Hulshof, H., & Van Driel, J. H. (2006). Wat betekent de concept-context benadering voor het Schoolvak Nederlands? [What does the concept-context approach mean for the subject of mother-tongue education?]. Levende Talen Tijdschrift, 7(3), 3-9.
Ponte, P. (2002). How teachers become action researchers and how teacher educators become their facilitators. Educational Action Research, 10(3), 399- 422.
Ponte, P., Ax, J., Beijaard, D., & Wubbels, T. (2004). Teachers' development of professional knowledge through action research and the facilitation of this by teacher educators. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20, 571-588.
Quintana, C., Reiser, B. J., Davis, E. A., Krajcik, J., Fretz, E., Golan Duncan, R., et al. (2004). A scaffolding design framework for software to support science inquiry. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(3), 337-386.
Rahman, A. (2008). Some trends in the praxis of participatory action research. In P.
Reason & H. Bradbury (Eds.), The Sage handbook of action research (pp. 49-62).
London: Sage.
Reason, P., & Bradbury, H. (2008). Introduction. In P. Reason & H. Bradbury (Eds.), The Sage handbook of action research (pp. 1-10). London: Sage.
RNAAS (2003). Ontwikkeling van talent in de tweede fase. Advies van de knaw- klankbordgroep voortgezet onderwijs, KNAW [Development of talent in the
second phase. Notice from Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences].
Amsterdam: Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences.
Roodhardt, A. (1991). Enkele aspecten van het gebruik van contexten. Een
opsomming met voorbeelden uit havo wiskunde-A [Some aspects of the use of context: examples from general secondary math education]. In H. G. B.
Broekman, L. C. Spijkerboer & J. J. M. Terlingen (Eds.), Algoritmen en
heuristieken in contextrijk reken-wiskundeonderwijs [Algorithms and heuristics in contextrich math education] (Vol. 13, pp. 167-186). Culemborg: Technipress.
Rubio, M. L. (1996). Leerlingbegeleiding: Wens & werkelijkheid [Student fascilitation: Wish & reality]. Apeldoorn/Leuven: Garant.
Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action.
New York: Basic Books.
Schwarzer, D. (2004). Student and teacher strategies for communicating through dialogue journals in Hebrew: A teacher research project. Foreign Language Annals, 37(1), 77-84.
Seago, N. (2004). Using video as an object of inquiry for mathematics teaching and learning. In J. Brophy (Ed.), Using video in teacher education: Advances in research on teaching (Vol. 10, pp. 259-286). Orlando: Elsevier, LTD.
Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching.
Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14.
Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform.
Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1-22.
Skinner, E., Marchand, G., Furrer, C., & Kindermann, T. (2008). Engagement and disaffection in the classroom: Part of a larger motivational dynamic? Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(4), 765-781.
SLO Stichting Leerplan Ontwikkeling (1995). Advies Examenprogramma's havo en vwo Nederlands [Advice Exam programmes General Secondary Education and Pre University Education Dutch]. Enschede: SLO.
SLO Stichting Leerplan Ontwikkeling (2009). Examenprogramma Nederlandse taal en literatuur havo/vwo [Exam program Dutch language and literature]. Retrieved from http://www.slo.nl/voortgezet/tweedefase/schoolexamen/
examenprogramma/.
Stocklmayer, S., & Gilbert, J. (2002). Informal chemical education. In J. K. Gilbert (Ed.), Chemical education: Towards research-based practice (Vol. 17, pp. 143- 164). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Sykes, G. (1999). Teacher and student learning: Strengthening the connection. In L.
Darling-Hammond & G. Sykes (Eds.), Teaching as the learning profession (pp.
151-179). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
TVB Taakgroep Vernieuwing Basisvorming (2003). Design new core targets basic secondary curriculum [Ontwerp nieuwe kerndoelen onderbouw VO]. Zwolle:
Taakgroep Vernieuwing Basisvorming [Taskforce Innovation Basic Secondary Curriculum].
Taylor, S. J., & Bogdan, R. (1984). Introduction to qualitative research: the search for meaning. Toronto: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Ten Brinke, S. (1976). The complete mother-tongue curriculum. Groningen: Wolters- Noordhoff Longman.
Ten Brinke, S. (1983). Bij Nederlands leer je iets! [You learn something in mother- tongue education lessons!]. Inaugural lecture. Nijmegen. Groningen: Wolters- Noordhoff.
Ten Dam, G., & Vermunt, J. (2003). De leerling [The student]. In N. Verloop & J.
Lowyck (Eds.), Onderwijskunde [Educational theory] (pp. 151-193). Groningen - Houten: Wolters-Noordhoff.
Van Beinum, H. (1998). On the practice of action research. Concepts and Transformation, 3(12), 1-29.
Van Calcar, W. I. M., & Van Calcar, C. (1974). De bevrijding van het schoolboek of het taalschema en taalbaksysteem [The liberation of the textbook or the language scheme and language-index system]. Moer, 6, 280-298.
Van de Ven, P.-H. (2007). A collaborative dialogue - research in Dutch language education. English Teaching: Practice and Critique, 6(3), 112-132.
Van den Akker, J. J. H. (2003). Curriculum perspectives: An introduction. In J. Van den Akker, W. Kuiper & U. Hameyer (Eds.), Curriculum landscape and trends (pp. 1-11). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Van Driel, J. H., Beijaard, D., & Verloop, N. (2001). Professional development and reform in science education: The role of teachers' practical knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(2), 137-158.
Van Driel, J. H., Verloop, N., & De Vos, W. (1998). Developing science teachers' pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Education, 35(6), 673-695.
Van Oers, B. (1998). From context to contextualizing. Learning and Instruction, 8(6), 473-488.
VanLehn, K. (1996). Cognitive skill acquisition. Annual Review of Psychology, 47, 513- 539.
Verloop, N. (1992). Praktijkkennis van docenten: Een blinde vlek in de
onderwijskunde [Craft knowledge of teachers: A blind spot in educational research]. Pedagogische Studiën, 69(6), 410-423.
Verloop, N., Van Driel, J., & Meijer, P. (2001). Teacher knowledge and the knowledge base of teaching. International Journal of Educational Research, 35(5), 441-461.
Vygotsky, L. L. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard.
Wadsworth, Y. (1997). Navigating by embodied emotion through large-scale systems change: setting out to get consumer feedback into a human service system.
Paper presented at the Australian Sociological Association Conference, Australia.
Wadsworth, Y. (2001). The mirror, the magnifying glass, the compass and the map:
Facilitating participatory action research. In P. Reason & H. Bradbury (Eds.), Handbook of action research. Participative inquiry & practice (pp. 420-432).
London: Sage.
Whitmore, E., & McKee, C. (2001). Six street youth who could. In P. Reason & H.
Bradbury (Eds.), Handbook of action research. Participatory inquiry & practice (pp. 396-402). London: Sage.
Wierstra, R. F. A., & Wubbels, T. (1994). Student perception and appraisal of the learning environment: Core concepts in the evaluation of the PLON Physics curriculum. Studies in Educational Evaluation 20, 437-455.
Winograd, K. (2002). The negotiative dimension of teaching: teachers sharing power with the less powerful. Teaching and Teacher Education, (18), 343-362.
Zembal-Saul, C., Krajcik, J. S., & Blumenfeld, P. C. (2002). Elementary student teachers' science content representations. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(6), 443-463.
Zyngier, D. (2008). (Re)conceptualising student engagement: Doing education not doing time. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24, 1765-1776.
Publications
Scientific publications
Platteel, Hulshof, H., & Van Driel, J. H. (2008). Teachers of MTE in action. L1 – Educational Studies in Language and Literature, 8(4), 85-105.
Manuscripts submitted for publication
Platteel, T., Hulshof, H., Ponte, P., Van Driel, J.H., Verloop, N. (submitted). Pearls and puzzles of a collaborative action research partnership.
Platteel, T., Hulshof, H., Van Driel, J.H., Verloop, N. (submitted). Teachers’
interpretations of the concept-context approach for L1 education.
Platteel, T., Hulshof, H., Van Driel, J.H., Verloop, N. (submitted). Partners in learning through dialogue.
Other publications
Platteel, T., Hulshof, H., & Van Driel, J. H. (2006). Wat betekent de concept- context benadering voor het Schoolvak Nederlands? [What does the concept-context approach mean for the subject of mother-tongue education?]. Levende Talen Tijdschrift, 7(3), 3-9.
Papers
Platteel, T. (2008, December). Docent in ontwikkeling met actieonderzoek. [Teacher development through action research], Paper presented at the Woudschoten Natuurkunde Didactiek conferentie, Noordwijk, The Netherlands.
Platteel, T., Hulshof, H., Van Driel, J.H., & Verloop, N. (2008, June). The concept- context approach for mother-tongue education. Paper presented at the Onderwijs Research Dagen (ORD), Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Platteel, T., Hulshof, H., Ponte, P., Van Driel, J.H., & Verloop, N (2008, January).
The pearls and puzzles of a collaborative action research partnership. Paper presented at the Winterschool of the Dutch Interuniversity Centre for Educational Research, Jyväskylä, Finland.
Platteel, T., Hulshof, H., Ponte, P., Van Driel, J.H., & Verloop, N. (2007, November).
The pearls and puzzles of a collaborative action research partnership. Paper presented at the annual conference of the Collaborative Action Research Network (CARN), Umeå, Sweden.
Platteel, T., Hulshof, H., Van Driel, J.H., Ponte, P. & Verloop, N., (2007, March).
Teachers designing concept-context enriched education by doing action
research. Paper presented in a symposium conducted at the biennial conference of International Association for the Improvement of Mother-Tongue Education conference (IAIMTE), Exeter, UK.
Platteel, T., Van den Bosch, E., Roseboom, P., (2006, November). Taalconcepten in Context. Het ontwikkelen van kennis over concept-contextrijk onderwijs Nederlands. [Language concepts in context. Developing knowledge on concept- context rich L1 education]. Paper presented at the annual conference Het Schoolvak Nederlands (HSN), Gent, Belgium.
Platteel, T., Hulshof, H., Van Driel, J.H., & Verloop, N. (2006, November).
Taalconcepten in context. Onderzoek naar (de ontwikkeling van) een kennisbasis voor contextgericht onderwijs Nederlands in de tweede fase havo/vwo
[Language concepts in context. Research focused on the development of a knowledge base for concept-context rich L1 education in upper secondary education in the Netherlands]. Paper presented at the ICO Toogdag, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Platteel, T., Hulshof, H., Ponte, P., Van Driel, J.H., & Verloop, N. (2006, August).
The development of knowledge about concept-context enriched education in the Netherlands by doing action research. Paper presented at the 7th Action Learning Action Research and 11th Participatory Action Research (ALARMP/PAR) conference, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Platteel, T., Hulshof, H., Van Driel, J.H. & Verloop, N. (2005, May). The knowledge base for mother-tongue education focused on context in upper secondary school. Paper presented at PhD-session of the biennial conference of International Association for the Improvement of Mother-Tongue Education conference (IAIMTE), Albi, France.
Poster presentations
Platteel, T., Hulshof, H., Van Driel, J.H., & Verloop, N. (2009, June). Practical knowledge development of secondary L1 teachers on concept-context rich education in an action-research setting. Poster presented at the biennial conference of International Association for the Improvement of Mother-Tongue Education conference (IAIMTE), Toronto, Canada.
Platteel, T., Hulshof, H., Van Driel, J.H., & Verloop, N. (2009, May). Practical knowledge development of secondary L1 teachers on concept-context rich education in an action-research setting. Poster presented at the Onderwijs Research Dagen (ORD), Leuven, Belgium.
Platteel, T., Hulshof, H., Van Driel, J.H., & Verloop, N. (2007, March). Teachers developing knowledge on concept-context enriched mother-tongue education.
Poster presented at the biennial conference of International Association for the Improvement of Mother-Tongue Education conference (IAIMTE), Exeter, UK.
Platteel, T., Hulshof, H., Van Driel, J.H., & Verloop, N. (2005, May). The knowledge base for mother-tongue education focused on context in upper secondary school. Poster presented at the biennial conference of International Association for the Improvement of Mother-Tongue Education conference (IAIMTE), Albi, France.
