• No results found

3 Finds from Unit III

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "3 Finds from Unit III"

Copied!
2
0
0

Bezig met laden.... (Bekijk nu de volledige tekst)

Hele tekst

(1)

Finds from Unit

In the author's opinion, the Unit 3 terrace gravels (lithostra-tigraphical Unit III-A) have yielded only two indisputable artefacts, along with a large number of 'dubieus' pieces.

Figure 21a shows a rolled flake found on October 6, 1981 by Mr W.M. Felder (Geological Survey, Heerlen). The presence of a bulbus, a large striking platform, and several dorsal negatives makes it quite certain that this flint is an artefact. The flake was found roughly in the middle of the gravel section. Mr Felder could not establish with certainty whether the flake was still in its original position; the depos-its overlying the Unit 3 terrace gravels had already been removed several months before the discovery and the gravel section was of recent date. The rolled flake must have come from the upper half or the middle of the Unit 3 terrace gravels though.

Figure 21b shows a flake found on March 2, 1988, in the final stage of the writing of this manuscript. The artefact was found by Mr A. Spieksma (Institute of Prehistory, Leiden).

The Unit 3 gravels have not been subjected to an in-tensive archaeological survey, but were only unsystem-atically surveyed for artefacts in several field campaigns. The gravels contained a large amount of flint and a large number of 'dubious' flakes were recovered by survey and screening. All of these have no, or only small striking plat-forms, no dorsal negatives, etc. The flints that are consid-ered artefacts on technical grounds, like the two illustrated here, had without any doubt been shifted from their original position, as is proven by their rolled condition.

At present, the Unit 3 gravels are thought to post-date the Needian interglacial which, on the basis of pollen-analytical evidence, is correlated with the Holsteinian in-terglacial (see: Zagwijn 1973). As indicated by the dating evidence obtained for the overlying Unit IV deposits (see chapter 8), the Unit 3 gravels were formed in the first sta-dia! of the Saalian (cf. Zagwijn 1973). The possible date of these rolled flakes is therefore the first stadial of the Saa-lian.

(2)

Referenties

GERELATEERDE DOCUMENTEN

Both the low sample size and the possible non-reliability of the subjective performance measure scale in this franchising context make it impossible to conclude that the

The parallel lamination in the bulk of this Unit 5.1 showing an alternation of coarse material (soil nodu- les and lithorelicts up to gravel size) with fine material (laminae of

As already suggested for the Site B evidence, the few finds encountered in the cobble layer at the base of Unit V can be interpreted as most likely reworked artefacts that were

The refitting indicated that some flint-knapping was done at the site: the two larger ventral/dorsal conjoining flakes 48/101-17 and 49/104-3 mus have been produced inside

The large Site K was discovered in 1986 during a system- atical investigation of the pit sections by K. Groenendijk and J.P. The site was excavated by a group of students of

Het aantal observandi voor wie de PJ-vragen over gelijktijdigheid, doorwerking, toe- rekeningsvatbaarheid en risicotaxatie zijn beantwoord, kan niet worden onderzocht op

The results are discussed in four sections: results regarding only the defendants on Unit 3, results regarding defendants of Unit 3 in comparison to the control group, results

The italic numbers denote the pages where the corresponding entry is described, numbers underlined point to the definition, all others indicate the places where it is used.