• No results found

University of Groningen Looking through the noise Johansson, Leonard Fredericus

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "University of Groningen Looking through the noise Johansson, Leonard Fredericus"

Copied!
5
0
0

Bezig met laden.... (Bekijk nu de volledige tekst)

Hele tekst

(1)

University of Groningen

Looking through the noise

Johansson, Leonard Fredericus

DOI:

10.33612/diss.95673752

IMPORTANT NOTE: You are advised to consult the publisher's version (publisher's PDF) if you wish to cite from

it. Please check the document version below.

Document Version

Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record

Publication date:

2019

Link to publication in University of Groningen/UMCG research database

Citation for published version (APA):

Johansson, L. F. (2019). Looking through the noise: novel algorithms for genetic variant detection.

University of Groningen. https://doi.org/10.33612/diss.95673752

Copyright

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons).

Take-down policy

If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim.

Downloaded from the University of Groningen/UMCG research database (Pure): http://www.rug.nl/research/portal. For technical reasons the number of authors shown on this cover page is limited to 10 maximum.

(2)

533332-L-bw-Johansson 533332-L-bw-Johansson 533332-L-bw-Johansson 533332-L-bw-Johansson Processed on: 3-9-2019 Processed on: 3-9-2019 Processed on: 3-9-2019

Processed on: 3-9-2019 PDF page: 227PDF page: 227PDF page: 227PDF page: 227

LIST OF TABLES

List of Tables

2.1 List of genes included in the targeted SureSelect Enrichment Kit . . . 37

2.2 Overview of the sequence performance for the validation runs . . . 42

2.3 Diagnostic workflow and implementation guidelines . . . 46

4.1 Panel 1 and 2 genes and ACMG and SFMPP inclusion . . . 70

4.2 Number of pathogenic variants found per referral cancer type . . . 73

4.3 Genes with pathogenic and likely pathogenic variants . . . 74

4.4 Screening for secondary findings against screening criteria . . . 78

5.1 TLA and benchmarking of results . . . 93

6.1 Coefficients of regression model chromosome 13 Illumina . . . 123

8.1 NIPTRIC Post-test probability summary table . . . 142

11.1 Properties of a complete DNA sequencing procedure . . . 187

(3)

533332-L-bw-Johansson 533332-L-bw-Johansson 533332-L-bw-Johansson 533332-L-bw-Johansson Processed on: 3-9-2019 Processed on: 3-9-2019 Processed on: 3-9-2019

(4)

533332-L-bw-Johansson 533332-L-bw-Johansson 533332-L-bw-Johansson 533332-L-bw-Johansson Processed on: 3-9-2019 Processed on: 3-9-2019 Processed on: 3-9-2019

Processed on: 3-9-2019 PDF page: 229PDF page: 229PDF page: 229PDF page: 229

LIST OF FIGURES

List of Figures

1.1 Human genome variation types . . . 18

1.2 DNA Next-generation sequencing workflows . . . 22

1.3 Overview of the topics addressed in the thesis chapters . . . 27

2.1 Average coverage per exon cardiomyopathy 48 gene panel . . . 41

2.2 Coverage profile of single target LDB3 exon 9 . . . 42

2.3 Summary of the results of our confirmation analyses . . . 43

3.1 CoNVaDING workflow . . . 52

3.2 CoNVaDING match control group . . . 54

3.3 CNV detections CoNVaDING, XHMM, CoNIFER, and CODEX . . . . 60

4.1 Number of detected variants in the cohorts . . . 75

6.1 Flowchart NIPT analysis steps . . . 105

6.2 Effect of peak correction . . . 112

6.3 Comparison of the effect of two GC correction methods . . . 113

6.4 Effect of chi-squared-based variation reduction control samples CV. . 114

6.5 Effect of the different prediction algorithms . . . 114

6.6 Z-scores for three trisomies . . . 115

6.7 Match QC scores and Z-scores . . . 117

6.8 Example effectχ2VR on bin counts . . . 120

6.9 Example CV per bin with and without χ2VR . . . 120

6.10 Example Z-score normal distribution sum chi-squared value . . . 121

6.11 Example χ2VR correction factor . . . 122

6.12 Example Weighted read counts after χ2VR . . . 122

6.13 Relative fractions chromosome 21 before and afterχ2VR . . . 123

6.14 Example of regression model chromosome 13 . . . 124

(5)

533332-L-bw-Johansson 533332-L-bw-Johansson 533332-L-bw-Johansson 533332-L-bw-Johansson Processed on: 3-9-2019 Processed on: 3-9-2019 Processed on: 3-9-2019

Processed on: 3-9-2019 PDF page: 230PDF page: 230PDF page: 230PDF page: 230

LIST OF FIGURES

6.15 Correlation between normalized read counts of chromosomes . . . 125

6.16 Ratios observed / predicted and Z-scores for chromosome 13 . . . 126

7.1 Workflow and functions of NIPTeR . . . 130

8.1 PPR at low and high risk . . . 141

8.2 PPR at different risks . . . 143

11.1 Workflow of laboratory procedures and variant detection . . . 184

Referenties

GERELATEERDE DOCUMENTEN

DNA, such as blood plasma or FFPE material, B) sources of high quality DNA, such as white blood cells, bone marrow cells or cultured cells, C) isolated frag- mented DNA, D)

In previous SS analyses, a total of 90 variants in 14 different genes had been identified in the 24 patients used for validation (2 runs).. All these variants were also detected with

CoNVaDING provides three different quality control (QC) metrics: Match QC shows how well the coverage pattern of the sample fits the selected control samples, Sample QC shows

When excluding the heterozygous CHEK2 and MUTYH variants and assuming variants in these genes are all heterozy- gous in the GoNL cohort, there is no significant difference in the

We performed a second dilution series in a range of 1% to >50% aberrant cells, involving test cell lines (KOPN-8, HAL-01, FKH-1, and MV4-11) to confirm the translocation

Results from the four different prediction algorithms (standard Z-score, MAD-based Z-score, Normalized Chromosome Value, and regression-based Z-score), in combina- tion with

Here we report NIPTeR, an R package that provides fast NIPT analysis for research and diagnostics and provides users with multiple methods for variation reduction, prediction

By combining the a priori risk (calculated based on the mother’s age and gestation, or based on other screening tests) with the indi- vidual NIPT result (computed as a Z-score),