• No results found

University of Groningen Correlation, causation, and dynamics Bhushan, Nitin

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "University of Groningen Correlation, causation, and dynamics Bhushan, Nitin"

Copied!
21
0
0

Bezig met laden.... (Bekijk nu de volledige tekst)

Hele tekst

(1)

University of Groningen

Correlation, causation, and dynamics Bhushan, Nitin

DOI:

10.33612/diss.126588820

IMPORTANT NOTE: You are advised to consult the publisher's version (publisher's PDF) if you wish to cite from it. Please check the document version below.

Document Version

Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record

Publication date: 2020

Link to publication in University of Groningen/UMCG research database

Citation for published version (APA):

Bhushan, N. (2020). Correlation, causation, and dynamics: Methodological innovations in sustainable energy behaviour research. University of Groningen. https://doi.org/10.33612/diss.126588820

Copyright

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons).

Take-down policy

If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim.

Downloaded from the University of Groningen/UMCG research database (Pure): http://www.rug.nl/research/portal. For technical reasons the number of authors shown on this cover page is limited to 10 maximum.

(2)

References

Abrahamse, W., & Steg, L. (2011). Factors related to household en-ergy use and intention to reduce it: The role of psychological and socio-demographic variables. Human Ecolo Review, 18(1), 30–40.

Abrahamse, W., Steg, L., Vlek, C. A., & Rothengatter, T. (2005). A review of intervention studies aimed at household energy conservation. Journal of environmental psycholo , 25(3), 273–291. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2005.08 .002

Albers, C. J. (2015). Dutch research funding, gender bias, and Simpson’s paradox. Proceedings of the National Academy of Scienc , 112(50). doi: 10.1073/pnas.1518936112

Allcott, H., & Mullainathan, S. (2010). Behavior and energy policy. Science, 327(5970), 1204–1205. doi: 10.1126/science.1180775

Azzalini, A., & Valle, A. D. (1996). The multivariate skew-normal distribu-tion. Biometrika, 83(4), 715-726. doi: 10.1093/biomet/83.4.715

Bamberg, S., Rees, J., & Seebauer, S. (2015). Collective climate ac-tion: Determinants of participation intention in community-based

(3)

proenvironmental initiatives. Journal of Environmental Psycholo , 43, 155 -165. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.06.006

Behrens, J. T. (1997). Principles and procedures of exploratory data analy-sis. Psychological Methods, 2(2), 131–160. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.2.2.131

Bhushan, N., Mohnert, F., Sloot, D., Jans, L., Albers, C., & Steg, L. (2019). Using a Gaussian graphical model to explore relationships between items and variables in environmental psychology research. Frontiers in Psycholo , 10, 1050. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01050

Bhushan, N., Steg, L., & Albers, C. (2018). Studying the effects of interven-tion programmes on household energy saving behaviours using graphical causal models. Ener Research & Social Science, 45, 75 - 80. (Special Is-sue on the Problems of Methods in Climate and Energy Research) doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2018.07.027

Bollen, K. A. (2002). Latent variables in psychology and the social sciences. Annual review of psycholo , 53(1), 605–634. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.53 .100901.135239

Borsboom, D., & Cramer, A. O. (2013). Network analysis: an integrative approach to the structure of psychopathology. Annual review of clinical psycholo , 9, 91–121. doi: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050212-185608

Brewer, M. B. (1991). The social self: On being the same and different at the same time. Personality and Social Psycholo Bulletin, 17(5), 475-482. doi: 10.1177/0146167291175001

(4)

Buurkracht. (2018). Tips om direct energiewinst halen. Retrieved from

https://buurkracht.nl/jouw-voordeel (Accessed: 21 August, 2018)

Carey, T. A., & Stiles, W. B. (2016). Some problems with randomized controlled trials and some viable alternatives. Clinical psycholo & psy-chotherapy, 23(1), 87–95. doi: 10.1002/cpp.1942

Chatfield, C. (1985). The initial examination of data. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Seri A (General), 148(3), 214–253.

Clayton, S., Devine-Wright, P., Stern, P. C., Whitmarsh, L., Carrico, A., Steg, L., … Bonnes, M. (2015). Psychological research and global climate change. Nature Climate Change, 5(7), 640. doi: 10.1038/NCLIMATE2622

Cole, S. R., Platt, R. W., Schisterman, E. F., Chu, H., Westreich, D., Richardson, D., & Poole, C. (2010). Illustrating bias due to condition-ing on a collider. International journal of epidemiolo , 39(2), 417–420. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyp334

Cook, T. D., Campbell, D. T., & Shadish, W. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Houghton Mifflin Boston.

Cramer, A. O. J., Sluis, S., Noordhof, A., Wichers, M., Geschwind, N., Aggen, S. H., … Borsboom, D. (2012). Dimensions of normal person-ality as networks in search of equilibrium: You can’t like parties if you don’t like people. European Journal of Personality, 26 (4), 414–431. doi: 10.1002/per.1866

(5)

Crutzen, R., & Peters, G.-J. Y. (2017). Scale quality: alpha is an inadequate estimate and factor-analytic evidence is needed first of all. Health Psycholo Review, 11(3), 242-247. doi: 10.1080/17437199.2015.1124240

Dawid, A. P. (1980). Conditional independence for statistical operations. The Annals of Statistics, 8(3), 598–617. doi: 10.1214/aos/1176345011 Dawid, A. P. (2010). Seeing and doing: The Pearlian synthesis. In R. Dechter, H. Geffner, & J. Y. Halpern (Eds.), Heuristics, probability and causality: A tribute to Judea Pearl (pp. 309–325). London: College Publi-cations.

Deaton, A., & Cartwright, N. (2016). Understanding and misunderstand-ing randomized controlled trials (Workmisunderstand-ing Paper No. 22595). National Bureau of Economic Research. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3386/w22595

de Groot, J. I. M., & Steg, L. (2008). Value orientations to explain beliefs related to environmental significant behavior: How to measure egoistic, altruistic, and biospheric value orientations. Environment and Behavior, 40(3), 330-354. doi: 10.1177/0013916506297831

de Jongh, M., & Druzdzel, M. J. (2009). A comparison of structural distance measures for causal Bayesian network models. In M. Klopotek, A. Przepiorkowski, S. T. Wierzchon, & K. Trojanowski (Eds.), Recent ad-vanc in intelligent information systems, challenging problems of science, computer science seri (pp. 443 – 456). Warsaw, Poland: Academic Publish-ing House EXIT.

(6)

Dempster, A. P. (1972). Covariance selection. Biometrics, 157–175. doi: 10.2307/2528966

Denholm, P., O’Connell, M., Brinkman, G., & Jorgenson, J. (2015). Over-generation from solar ener in California. A field guide to the duck chart (Tech. Rep.). Golden, CO (United States): National Renewable Energy Lab.(NREL).

Dodge, Y., & Rousson, V. (2001). On asymmetric properties of the corre-lation coefficient in the regression setting. The American Statistician, 55(1), 51–54. doi: 10.1198/000313001300339932

Dong, Y., & Peng, C.-Y. J. (2013). Principled missing data methods for researchers. SpringerPl , 2(1), 222. doi: 10.1186/2193-1801-2-222

Eberhardt, F. (2016). Introduction to the foundations of causal discovery. International Journal of Data Science and Analytics, 3(2), 1–11. doi: 10 .1007/s41060-016-0038-6

Eftekharnejad, S., Vittal, V., Heydt, G. T., Keel, B., & Loehr, J. (2013). Impact of increased penetration of photovoltaic generation on power systems. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 28(2), 893-901. doi: 10.1109/TPWRS.2012.2216294

Elwert, F. (2013). Handbook of causal analys for social research (S. L. Mor-gan, Ed.). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.

(7)

Elwert, F., & Winship, C. (2014). Endogenous selection bias: The problem of conditioning on a collider variable. Annual Review of Sociolo , 40, 31– 53. doi: 10.1146/annurev-soc-071913-043455

Enders, C. K. (2001). A primer on maximum likelihood algorithms avail-able for use with missing data. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidis-ciplinary Journal, 8(1), 128-141. doi: 10.1207/S15328007SEM0801\_7 Enders, C. K., & Bandalos, D. L. (2001). The relative performance of full information maximum likelihood estimation for missing data in structural equation models. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 8(3), 430-457. doi: 10.1207/S15328007SEM0803\_5

Epskamp, S., Borsboom, D., & Fried, E. I. (2018). Estimating psychological networks and their accuracy: A tutorial paper. Behavior Research Methods, 50(1), 195–212. doi: 10.3758/s13428-017-0862-1

Epskamp, S., Cramer, A. O. J., Waldorp, L. J., Schmittmann, V. D., & Bors-boom, D. (2012). qgraph: Network visualizations of relationships in psy-chometric data. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(4), 1–18. Retrieved from

http://www.jstatsoft.org/v48/i04/ doi: 10.18637/jss.v048.i04

Fisher, R. A. (1937). The design of experiments. Oliver And Boyd; Edin-burgh; London.

Foygel, R., & Drton, M. (2010). Extended Bayesian information criteria for Gaussian graphical models. In Proceedings of the 23rd International

(8)

Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems - Volume 1 (pp. 604– 612). USA: Curran Associates Inc.

Frederiks, E. R., Stenner, K., Hobman, E. V., & Fischle, M. (2016). Evalu-ating energy behavior change programs using randomized controlled trials: Best practice guidelines for policymakers. Ener Research & Social Science, 22, 147–164. doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2016.08.020

Friedman, J., Hastie, T., & Tibshirani, R. (2008). Sparse inverse covariance estimation with the graphical lasso. Biostatistics, 9(3), 432–441. doi: 10 .1093/biostatistics/kxm045

Friedman, J., Hastie, T., & Tibshirani, R. (2014). glasso: Graphical lasso-estimation of Gaussian graphical models [Computer software manual]. Retrieved fromhttps://CRAN.R-project.org/package=glasso (R

package version 1.8)

Garant, D., & Jensen, D. D. (2016). Evaluating causal models by compar-ing interventional distributions. CoRR, abs/1608.04698. Retrieved from

http://arxiv.org/abs/1608.04698

Gautier, A., Hoet, B., Jacqmin, J., & Van Driessche, S. (2019). Self-consumption choice of residential pv owners under net-metering. Ener policy, 128, 648–653. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2019.01.055

Greenland, S., Pearl, J., & Robins, J. M. (1999). Causal diagrams for epidemiologic research. Epidemiolo , 10(1), 37–48. doi: 10.1097/ 00001648-199901000-00008

(9)

Haavelmo, T. (1943). The statistical implications of a system of simultane-ous equations. Econometrica, 11(1), 1–12. doi: 10.2307/1905714

Hastie, T., & Tibshirani, R. (1986). Generalized additive models. Statistical Science, 1(3), 297–310. doi: 10.1214/ss/1177013604

Heckman, J. J. (2006). Rejoinder: Response to Sobel. Sociological Method-olo , 35(1), 135-150. doi: 10.1111/j.0081-1750.2006.00166.x

Heinze-Deml, C., Maathuis, M. H., & Meinshausen, N. (2018). Causal structure learning. Annual Review of Statistics and Its Application, 5(1), 371-391. doi: 10.1146/annurev-statistics-031017-100630

Hernán, M. A., & Taubman, S. L. (2008). Does obesity shorten life? The importance of well-defined interventions to answer causal questions. Inter-national journal of obesity, 32, 8–14. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2008.82

Hornsey, M. J., & Jetten, J. (2004). The individual within the group: Balancing the need to belong with the need to be different. Personality and Social Psycholo Review, 8(3), 248–264. doi: 10.1207/s15327957pspr0803\ _2

Hyvärinen, A., & Smith, S. M. (2013). Pairwise likelihood ratios for esti-mation of non-Gaussian structural equation models. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 14(1), 111–152.

IPCC. (2014). Climate Change 2014–Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnera-bility: Regional Aspects. Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press.

(10)

Jans, L., Postmes, T., & Van der Zee, K. I. (2011). The induction of shared identity: The positive role of individual distinctiveness for groups. Personality and Social Psycholo Bulletin, 37(8), 1130–1141. doi: 10.1177/0146167211407342

Jones, P. J., Mair, P., & McNally, R. J. (2018). Visualizing psychological networks: A tutorial in R. Frontiers in Psycholo , 9, 1742. doi: 10.3389/ fpsyg.2018.01742

Kalisch, M., & Bühlmann, P. (2007). Estimating high-dimensional di-rected acyclic graphs with the PC-algorithm. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 8(1), 613–636.

Kalisch, M., Mächler, M., Colombo, D., Maathuis, M. H., & Bühlmann, P. (2012). Causal inference using graphical models with the R package pcalg. Journal of Statistical Software, 47(11), 1–26. doi: 10.18637/jss.v047.i11 Karlin, B., Zinger, J. F., & Ford, R. (2015). The effects of feedback on energy conservation: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 141(6), 1205-1227. doi: 10.1037/a0039650

Keirstead, J. (2007). Behavioural responses to photovoltaic systems in the UK domestic sector. Ener Policy, 35(8), 4128–4141. doi: 10.1016/ j.enpol.2007.02.019

Kievit, R. A., Frankenhuis, W. E., Waldorp, L. J., & Borsboom, D. (2013). Simpson’s paradox in psychological science: a practical guide. Frontiers in Psycholo , 4, 513. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00513

(11)

Klaassen, E., Frunt, J., & Slootweg, J. (2015). Assessing the impact of distributed energy resources on LV grids using practical measurements. In 23rd Interanational Conference on Electricity Distribution (CIRED), 15-18 June 2015, Lyon, France (pp. 1289–1).

Kobus, C. B., Mugge, R., & Schoormans, J. P. (2013). Washing when the sun is shining! How users interact with a household energy management system. Ergonomics, 56 (3), 451-462. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2012.721522

Koller, D., & Friedman, N. (2009). Probabilistic graphical models: Prin-cipl and techniqu - Adaptive computation and machine learning. Cam-bridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.

Lauritzen, S. (2001). Causal inference from graphical models. In O. E. Barndorff-Nielsen, D. R. Cox, & C. Klüppelberg (Eds.), Complex stochastic systems (pp. 63–107). London/Boca Raton: Chapman and Hal-l/CRC Press.

Lauritzen, S. L. (1996). Graphical models (Vol. 17). Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Leach, C. W., Van Zomeren, M., Zebel, S., Vliek, M. L., Pennekamp, S. F., Doosje, B., … Spears, R. (2008). Group-level definition and self-investment: a hierarchical (multicomponent) model of in-group identifi-cation. Journal of Personality and Social Psycholo , 95(1), 144–165. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.95.1.144

(12)

Lilienfeld, S. O., McKay, D., & Hollon, S. D. (2018). Why randomised controlled trials of psychological treatments are still essential. The Lancet Psychiatry, 5(7), 536–538. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(18)30045-2

Luthander, R., Widén, J., Nilsson, D., & Palm, J. (2015). Photovoltaic self-consumption in buildings: A review. Applied ener , 142, 80–94. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.12.028

Lynn, M., & Snyder, C. R. (2002). Uniqueness seeking. In C. R. Snyder & S. J. Lopez (Eds.), Handbook of positive psycholo (pp. 395–410). New York, NY, US: Oxford University Press.

Masson, T., Jugert, P., & Fritsche, I. (2016). Collective self-fulfilling prophecies: group identification biases perceptions of environmental group norms among high identifiers. Social Influence, 11(3), 185-198. doi: 10.1080/15534510.2016.1216890

Meehl, P. E. (1990). Why summaries of research on psychological theories are often uninterpretable. Psychological reports, 66 (1), 195–244. doi: 10 .2466/PR0.66.1.195-244

Meinshausen, N., & Bühlmann, P. (2010). Stability selection. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Seri B (statistical methodolo ), 72(4), 417-473. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9868.2010.00740.x

Nicholls, L., & Strengers, Y. (2015). Peak demand and the ‘family peak’ period in Australia: Understanding practice (in) flexibility in households

(13)

with children. Ener Research & Social Science, 9, 116–124. doi: 10.1016/ j.erss.2015.08.018

Nichols, A. L., & Webster, G. D. (2013). The single-item need to belong scale. Personality and Individual Differenc , 55(2), 189 - 192. doi: 10.1016/ j.paid.2013.02.018

Norwegian Centre for Research Data. (2016a). European social survey round 8 data file edition 2.1. Data Archive and distributor of ESS data for ESS ERIC.

Norwegian Centre for Research Data. (2016b). European social survey round 8 module on public attitud to climate change. Data Archive and distributor of ESS data for ESS ERIC.

Oberst, C. A., Schmitz, H., & Madlener, R. (2019). Are prosumer households that much different? Evidence from stated residential energy consumption in Germany. Ecological Economics, 158, 101–115. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.12.014

Pearl, J. (2009). Causality: Models, reasoning and inference (2nd ed.). New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press.

Pearl, J. (2014). Comment: Understanding Simpson’s paradox. The American Statistician, 68(1), 8-13. doi: 10.1080/00031305.2014.876829 Peters, A. M., van der Werff, E., & Steg, L. (2019). Mind the gap: The implications of not acting in line with your planned actions after installing

(14)

solar photovoltaics. Frontiers in Psycholo , 10, 1423. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg .2019.01423

Peters, J. (2015). Sid: Structural intervention distance [Computer software manual]. Retrieved fromhttps://CRAN.R-project.org/package=SID

(R package version 1.0)

Peters, J., & Bühlmann, P. (2015). Structural intervention distance for evaluating causal graphs. Neural Computation, 27(3), 771–799. doi: 10 .1162/NECO\_a\_00708

Postmes, T., Baray, G., Haslam, S. A., Morton, T. A., & Swaab, R. I. (2006). The dynamics of personal and social identity formation. In T. Postmes & J. Jetten (Eds.), Individuality and the group : Advanc in social identity (p. 215-236). Thousand Oaks, CA, US: Sage Publications, Inc. doi: 10.4135/9781446211946.n12

Postmes, T., Haslam, S. A., & Jans, L. (2013). A single-item measure of social identification: reliability, validity, and utility. British journal of social psycholo , 52(4), 597–617. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12006

Postmes, T., Haslam, S. A., & Swaab, R. I. (2005). Social influence in small groups: An interactive model of social identity formation. European review of social psycholo , 16 (01), 1–42. doi: 10.1080/10463280440000062 R Core Team. (2017). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria. Retrieved fromhttps://www.R-project .org/

(15)

Revelle, W. (2018). psych: Procedures for psychological, psychometric, and personality research [Computer software manual]. Evanston, Illinois. Retrieved fromhttps://CRAN.R-project.org/package=psych (R

package version 1.8.12)

RStudio Team. (2017). RStudio: Integrated Development Environment for R [Computer software manual]. Boston, MA. Retrieved fromhttp:// www.rstudio.com/

Rücker, G., & Schwarzer, G. (2014, 12). Presenting simulation results in a nested loop plot. BMC Medical Research Methodolo , 14(1), 129. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-14-129

Schafer, J. L. (1997). Analys of incomplete multivariate data. London: Chapman and Hall/CRC.

Schafer, J. L., & Graham, J. W. (2002). Missing data: our view of the state of the art. Psychological methods, 7(2), 147. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.7.2.147

Schick, L., & Gad, C. (2015). Flexible and inflexible energy engagements— A study of the Danish smart grid strategy. Ener Research & Social Sci-ence, 9, 51–59. doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2015.08.013

Schill, W.-P., Zerrahn, A., & Kunz, F. (2017). Prosumage of solar electric-ity: pros, cons, and the system perspective. DIW Berlin Discussion Paper No. 1637. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.2912814

Schmitt, N. (1996). Uses and abuses of coefficient alpha. Psychological assessment, 8(4), 350. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.8.4.350

(16)

Shadish, W. R., Clark, M. H., & Steiner, P. M. (2008). Can nonrandomized experiments yield accurate answers? A randomized experiment comparing random and nonrandom assignments. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 103(484), 1334-1344. doi: 10.1198/016214508000000733 Shimizu, S., Hoyer, P. O., Hyvarinen, A., & Kerminen, A. (2006). A linear non-Gaussian acyclic model for causal discovery. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 7, 2003–2030.

Shimizu, S., Inazumi, T., Sogawa, Y., Hyvärinen, A., Kawahara, Y., Washio, T., … Bollen, K. (2011). Directlingam: A direct method for learning a linear non-Gaussian structural equation model. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 12(2), 1225–1248.

Shrier, I., & Platt, R. W. (2008). Reducing bias through directed acyclic graphs. BMC medical research methodolo , 8(1), 70. doi: 10.1186/1471 -2288-8-70

Sloot, D., Jans, L., & Steg, L. (2017). The potential of environmental com-munity initiatives - a social psychological perspective. In A. K. Römpke, G. Reese, I. Fritsche, N. Wiersbinski, & A. W. Mues (Eds.), Outlooks on applying environmental psycholo research (pp. 27–34). Bonn: Federal Agency for Nature Conservation. doi: 10.19217/skr460

Sloot, D., Jans, L., & Steg, L. (2018). Can community energy initiatives motivate sustainable energy behaviours? The role of initiative involvement

(17)

and personal pro-environmental motivation. Journal of Environmental Psycholo , 57, 99 - 106. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2018.06.007

Sommerfeld, J., Buys, L., & Vine, D. (2017). Residential consumers’ expe-riences in the adoption and use of solar PV. Ener Policy, 105, 10-16. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2017.02.021

Sóskuthy, M. (2017). Generalised additive mixed models for dynamic analysis in linguistics: a practical introduction. arXiv e-prints.

Sovacool, B. K. (2014). What are we doing here? Analyzing fifteen years of energy scholarship and proposing a social science research agenda. Ener Research & Social Science, 1, 1 - 29. doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2014.02.003

Spirtes, P., Glymour, C. N., & Scheines, R. (2000). Causation, prediction, and search. Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT press.

Spirtes, P., Meek, C., & Richardson, T. (1995). Causal inference in the presence of latent variables and selection bias. In P. Besnard & S. Hanks (Eds.), Proceedings of the Eleventh Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (pp. 499–506). San Francisco, CA, USA: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc.

Spirtes, P., & Zhang, K. (2016). Causal discovery and inference: concepts and recent methodological advances. Applied Informatics, 3(1), 3. doi: 10.1186/s40535-016-0018-x

(18)

Steg, L., Dreijerink, L., & Abrahamse, W. (2005). Factors influencing the acceptability of energy policies: A test of VBN theory. Journal of Environ-mental Psycholo , 25(4), 415–425. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2005.08.003 Steg, L., Perlaviciute, G., & van der Werff, E. (2015). Understanding the human dimensions of a sustainable energy transition. Frontiers in Psychol-o , 6 , 805. dPsychol-oi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00805

Steg, L., Perlaviciute, G., van der Werff, E., & Lurvink, J. (2014). The significance of hedonic values for environmentally relevant attitudes, pref-erences, and actions. Environment and Behavior, 46 (2), 163-192. doi: 10.1177/0013916512454730

Steiner, P. M., Kim, Y., Hall, C. E., & Su, D. (2017). Graphical models for quasi-experimental designs. Sociological Methods & Research, 46 (2), 155-188. doi: 10.1177/0049124115582272

Stern, P. C. (2000). New environmental theories: toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. Journal of Social Issu , 56 (3), 407–424. doi: 10.1111/0022-4537.00175

Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (2001). An integrative theory of intergroup con-flict. In M. A. Hogg & D. Abrams (Eds.), Key readings in social psycholo . intergroup relations: Essential readings (p. 94-109). New York, NY, US: Psychology Press.

Textor, J., van der Zander, B., Gilthorpe, M. S., Liśkiewicz, M., & Ellison, G. T. (2016). Robust causal inference using directed acyclic graphs: the R

(19)

package “dagitty”. International journal of epidemiolo , 45(6), 1887–1894. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyw341

Tiefenbeck, V., Staake, T., Roth, K., & Sachs, O. (2013). For better or for worse? Empirical evidence of moral licensing in a behavioral energy conservation campaign. Ener Policy, 57, 160–171. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol .2013.01.021

Tukey, J. W. (1977). Exploratory data analys (Vol. 2). Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley.

Turner, J. C. (1991). Mapping social psycholo seri . social influence. Belmont, CA, US: Thomson Brooks/Cole Publishing Co.

van Rij, J., Wieling, M., Baayen, R. H., & van Rijn, H. (2017). itsadug: Interpreting time seri and autocorrelated data using GAMMs. (R package version 2.3)

van Borkulo, C., Boschloo, L., Kossakowski, J., Tio, P., Schoevers, R., Bors-boom, D., & Boschloo, L. (2017). Comparing network structur on three aspects. Working Paper. doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.29455.38569

Vandenbroucke, J. P. (2008, 03). Observational research, randomised trials, and two views of medical science. PLOS Medicine, 5(3), 1-5. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0050067

Van der Werff, E., Steg, L., & Keizer, K. (2013). The value of envi-ronmental self-identity: The relationship between biospheric values,

(20)

environmental self-identity and environmental preferences, intentions and behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psycholo , 34, 55–63. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2012.12.006

Van Zomeren, M., Spears, R., Fischer, A. H., & Leach, C. W. (2004). Put your money where your mouth is! Explaining collective action tendencies through group-based anger and group efficacy. Journal of Personality and Social Psycholo , 87(5), 649–664. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.87.5.649

Vine, E., Sullivan, M., Lutzenhiser, L., Blumstein, C., & Miller, B. (2014). Experimentation and the evaluation of energy efficiency programs. Ener Efficiency, 7(4), 627–640. doi: 10.1007/s12053-013-9244-4

West, S. G. (2009). Alternatives to randomized experiments. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18(5), 299-304. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8721 .2009.01656.x

Whittaker, J. (2009). Graphical models in applied multivariate statistics. Chichester, England: Wiley Publishing.

Wieling, M. (2018). Analyzing dynamic phonetic data using generalized additive mixed modeling: a tutorial focusing on articulatory differences between L1 and L2 speakers of English. Journal of Phonetics, 70, 86–116. doi: 10.1016/j.wocn.2018.03.002

Wittenberg, I., & Matthies, E. (2016). Solar policy and practice in germany: How do residential households with solar panels use electricity? Ener Research & Social Science, 21, 199–211. doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2016.07.008

(21)

Wood, S. (2017). Generalized Additive Models: An Introduction with R, Second Edition. Boca Raton, Florida, USA: Chapman & Hall/CRC Press. doi: 10.1201/9781315370279

Wood, S., Pya, N., & Säfken, B. (2016). Smoothing parameter and model selection for general smooth models. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 111(516), 1548–1563. doi: 10.1080/01621459.2016.1180986 Wright, S. (1934). The method of path coefficients. The Annals of Mathe-matical Statistics, 5(3), 161–215. doi: 10.1214/aoms/1177732676

Zhang, J. (2008, 11). On the completeness of orientation rules for causal discovery in the presence of latent confounders and selection bias. Artificial Intelligence, 172(16-17), 1873–1896. doi: 10.1016/j.artint.2008.08.001

Referenties

GERELATEERDE DOCUMENTEN

We break down the process into four steps: (i) explicate a theoretical model that explains how the intervention programme affects household energy saving behaviours, (ii) draw a

Furthermore, interestingly, the model indicates that during January, PV owning households consume more electricity than non-PV owning house- holds during moments of low PV

We illustrated the use and value of the Gaussian graphical model by ex- ploring relationships between items and variables included in a large dataset aimed to understand the effects

In this thesis, we introduced graphical models and generalised additive models to sustainable energy behaviours research, particularly to answers questions involving

Deze methodologiën kunnen doorgaans geclassificeerd wor- den in correlationeel onderzoek waarin verbanden onderzocht worden, (veld)experimenten die meer geschikt zijn om

In 2015, he started his PhD research on network models applied to envi- ronmental psychology at the Department of Psychometrics and Statistics at the University of Groningen,

Writing a thesis can sometimes be a frustrating experience, more so in a multi-disciplinary setting, and I am indebted to friends and loved ones - Niek, Faris, Harman, Jorine,

As indicated above, we included variables from personal factors, factors related to the social context, eval- uations (or opinions) about energy companies and the government,