University of Groningen
Correlation, causation, and dynamics Bhushan, Nitin
DOI:
10.33612/diss.126588820
IMPORTANT NOTE: You are advised to consult the publisher's version (publisher's PDF) if you wish to cite from it. Please check the document version below.
Document Version
Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record
Publication date: 2020
Link to publication in University of Groningen/UMCG research database
Citation for published version (APA):
Bhushan, N. (2020). Correlation, causation, and dynamics: Methodological innovations in sustainable energy behaviour research. University of Groningen. https://doi.org/10.33612/diss.126588820
Copyright
Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons).
Take-down policy
If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim.
Downloaded from the University of Groningen/UMCG research database (Pure): http://www.rug.nl/research/portal. For technical reasons the number of authors shown on this cover page is limited to 10 maximum.
Summary
The global consensus today states that climate change is due to human ac-tivities. The main driver of anthropogenic climate change is rising levels of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere. Encouraging households to engage in sustainable energy behaviours would help mitigate climate change. To under-stand which factors are related to sustainable energy behaviours researchers have employed different methodological approaches and statistical models. Typically, these methodologies can be classified into correlational research which involves exploring relationships, (field) experiments which are better suited to establish causality, and longitudinal designs which examine how relationships between factors and sustainable energy behaviours change over time.
In this thesis, we introduced graphical models and generalised additive models to sustainable energy behaviours research, particularly to answers questions involving exploratory research, causal inference, and capturing dif-ferences in dynamic energy use patterns between groups. The first part of the thesis (Chapters 2 and 3) introduces tools for exploratory analyses. Ex-ploratory analyses provide a first understanding of the relationships between items and variables related to sustainable energy behaviours, which enables researchers to better understand the data before opting for more complicated
analyses.
In Chapter 2, we illustrate how the Gaussian graphical model provides an easy to grasp overview of relationships between items and variables related to sustainable energy behaviours. Further, in new lines of research, so-called causal search algorithms can be used to explore probabilistic causal relation-ships between variables related to sustainable energy behaviours. To the best of our knowledge, the performance and applicability of causal search meth-ods to sustainable energy behaviours research is yet to be investigated. In Chapter 3, we conduct a simulation study to compare the performance of two constraint-based causal search methods (PC algorithm and LiNGAM algorithm) in sustainable energy behaviours research. The results indicated that researchers must use these methods with care as the two methods tend to be inaccurate and sensitive to errors due to sampling variation.
The second part of the thesis proposes novel tools for causal inference. Randomized controlled trials have been strongly advocated to evaluate the effects of intervention programmes on sustainable energy behaviours. While randomized controlled trials are the ideal, in many cases, they are not feasible. Hence, an important question is: which would be an appropriate solution to carefully evaluate effects of intervention programmes on sustainable energy behaviours when randomized controlled trials are not feasible? In chapter 4, we propose a potential solution to this question using graphical causal models and in particular, directed acyclic graphs (DAGs).
Lastly, we focus on examining dynamic patterns in sustainable energy behaviours. To mitigate anthropogenic climate change, many households
engage in sustainable energy behaviours such as purchasing photo-voltaic panels (PV). Purchasing PV can be a highly effective mitigation strategy, particularly when households utilize their PV in a sustainable way (e.g., use less electricity when PV production is low). However, the literature pro-vides competing explanations on the likelihood that PV owners use their PV in a sustainable way. Extending previous studies which were based on self-reports, in Chapter 5, we use generalized additive models to study to what extent PV owners use their PV in a sustainable way using actual net electric-ity usage data obtained from smart meters. We did not observe differences between PV owning households and household without PV in net electricity use at times where PV production is low, suggesting that PV owning house-holds do not use their PV is a sustainable way.
