• No results found

Univariate Test of Significance for Planned Comparison (YBrits_Below.sta)Dependent variable: BELOW BIOMASSSourceSum ofSquaresDegr. ofFreedomMeanSquareFpEffectError23.5455263.9242531.2046700.33105597.72597303.257532

N/A
N/A
Info
Downloaden
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Univariate Test of Significance for Planned Comparison (YBrits_Below.sta)Dependent variable: BELOW BIOMASSSourceSum ofSquaresDegr. ofFreedomMeanSquareFpEffectError23.5455263.9242531.2046700.33105597.72597303.257532"

Copied!
1
0
0

Bezig met laden.... (Bekijk nu de volledige tekst)

Download het nu ( 1 pagina )

Hele tekst

(1)

Univariate Tests of Significance, Effect Sizes, and Powers for BELOW BIOMASS (YBrits_Below.sta) Sigma-restricted parameterization

Effective hypothesis decomposition Effect

SS Degr. of Freedom

MS F p Partial

eta-squared

Non-centrality Observed power Intercept TREATMENT Error 303.5459 1 303.5459 93.18277 0.000000 0.756459 93.18277 185.2504 9 20.5834 6.31870 0.000055 0.654650 56.86833 97.7260 30 3.2575

Between Contrast Coefficients (YBrits_Below.sta) Coefficients for each cell in the selected effect

Cell No. TREATMENT Cell N CNTRST1 CNTRST2 CNTRST3 CNTRST4 CNTRST5 CNTRST6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 C 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 D 4 -1 0 0 0 0 0 E 4 0 1 0 0 0 0 F 4 0 -1 0 0 0 0 A 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 I 4 0 0 -1 0 0 0 J 4 0 0 0 1 1 1 B 4 0 0 0 -1 0 0 G 4 0 0 0 0 -1 0 H 4 0 0 0 0 0 -1

Contrast Estimates (YBrits_Below.sta) Dependent variable: BELOW BIOMASS Contrast Estimate Std.Err t p -95.00% Cnf.Lmt +95.00% Cnf.Lmt CNTRST1 CNTRST2 CNTRST3 CNTRST4 CNTRST5 CNTRST6 -0.280000 1.276231 -0.219396 0.827828 -2.88641 2.326412 -0.335000 1.276231 -0.262492 0.794737 -2.94141 2.271412 3.250000 1.276231 2.546560 0.016250 0.64359 5.856412 0.952500 1.276231 0.746338 0.461272 -1.65391 3.558912 0.652500 1.276231 0.511271 0.612904 -1.95391 3.258912 0.317500 1.276231 0.248779 0.805227 -2.28891 2.923912

Univariate Test of Significance for Planned Comparison (YBrits_Below.sta) Dependent variable: BELOW BIOMASS

Source Sum of Squares Degr. of Freedom Mean Square F p Effect Error 23.54552 6 3.924253 1.204670 0.331055 97.72597 30 3.257532

Referenties

Download het nu ( PDF - 1 pagina - 31.21 KB )

GERELATEERDE DOCUMENTEN

Rayleigh quotient methods for estimating common roots of noisy univariate polynomials

Analogous to Gauss-Newton and Rayleigh quotient iteration for one matrix, the new Rayleigh quotient method estimates one common root only and should be provided with good

Rayleigh quotient methods for estimating common roots of noisy univariate polynomials

Analogous to Newton-Raphson and Rayleigh quotient iteration for one matrix, the new Rayleigh quotient method estimates one common root only and should be provided with good

Why checking model assumptions using null hypothesis significance tests does not suffice: A plea for plausibility

It is argued that while NHST-based tests can provide some degree of confirmation for the model assumption that is evaluated—formulated as the null hypothesis—these tests do not

STA OP VOOR EERLIJK

• De overheid kan een bedrag ter grootte van 3% tot 5% van het nationaal inkomen (in 2016 is dit € 21 tot € 35 miljard) per jaar aan geld scheppen, waar ze publieke uitgaven mee

Univariate Test of Significance for Planned Comparison (YBrits)Dependent variable: Fresh_aboveSourceSum ofSquaresDegr. ofFreedomMeanSquareFpEffectError1890.9626315.16041.1441470.3616088263.62930275.4543

Univariate Tests of Significance, Effect Sizes, and Powers for Fresh_above (YBrits) Sigma-restricted parameterization. Effective hypothesis decomposition Effect

Univariate Tests of Significance for Biomassa veld (YBRITS_VeldBIOMASSA.sta)Sigma-restricted parameterizationEffective hypothesis decompositionEffectSSDegr. ofFreedomMSFpInterceptTreatmentError581154.41581154.4107.92420.000000217814.1924201.64.49440.00247

Univariate Tests of Significance for Biomassa veld (YBRITS_VeldBIOMASSA.sta) Sigma-restricted parameterization. Effective hypothesis decomposition Effect

Explicit computation of dynamic bed form roughness for operational flood modelling using a time-lag approach

• The Coleman dune model coupled with Sobek can explain a large part of the bed form roughness that is normally calibrated in a field situation. In future work we will apply

Public Affairs in CEE: On the way to transparency?

[r]