• No results found

Why designers can't understand their users Verhoef, L.W.M.

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Why designers can't understand their users Verhoef, L.W.M."

Copied!
3
0
0

Bezig met laden.... (Bekijk nu de volledige tekst)

Hele tekst

(1)

Why designers can't understand their users

Verhoef, L.W.M.

Citation

Verhoef, L. W. M. (2007, September 19). Why designers can't understand their users.

Human Efficiency, Utrecht. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/1887/12347

Version: Corrected Publisher’s Version

License: Licence agreement concerning inclusion of doctoral thesis in the

Institutional Repository of the University of Leiden

Downloaded from: https://hdl.handle.net/1887/12347

Note: To cite this publication please use the final published version (if applicable).

(2)

Curriculum Vitae 227

Curriculum Vitae

Leonard Verhoef was born the 21st of January 1950 in Utrecht. After primary school and teacher training college (1971) he studied educational psychology (Universiteit Utrecht, 1975) and applied experimental psychology (Universiteit Utrecht, 1986). He performed research on the development of human thinking and the implementation of that knowledge in mathematics at school. As a psychologist at Netherlands Railways he was involved in the evaluation and development of several systems for train traffic control, drivers of high speed trains and passengers information systems. He is the intellectual ‘father’ of the interface of several generations train ticket vending machine. Another main project he was extensively involved with was the European Train Control System. This system enables the driver of a high speed train to understand what all computers in the cab are doing and at the same time to control the train in a save, efficient and comfortable way.

For more than twenty years now, he is work ing as an independent consultant in the application of psychological knowledge in all kinds systems (domotica, electronic banking, GUI, management information systems, process control, public transport information systems for passengers, traffic control, way finding, web). In all these projects he tried to maintain a psychological approach, even when the approach of the project was practical or technological.

• The methodology applied is reported in the thesis 'Why designers can't understand their users, developing a systematic approach using cognitive psychology’.

• He applied this methodology in the book: ‘GUI, webdesign, psychologie en human efficiency’ describing how to unenslave Windows users. Several hundreds of designers participated in a seminar on that subject.

• Another application is ‘Public information systems, psychology human efficiency’ describing how to present information on complex systems to passengers, drivers, tourists and other humans that get lost in the information presented in streets and stations.

Deleted: ¶

(3)

Why designers can’t understand their users

228

Formatted:

Right: 0,07 cm, Border:

Top:

(Single solid line, Gray-25%, 0,5 pt Line width), Tabs:

11,43 cm, Right + Not at 2 cm + 7,62 cm + 12,3 cm

• Now he is working on ‘How to organise our life in a technical future’

that specifies daily life using technology disconnected from today’s interfaces and completely driven by the characteristics of psycholo- gical processes.

More on www.humanefficiency.nl

Deleted: ¶

Referenties

GERELATEERDE DOCUMENTEN

• The last question is: “Why is this kind of experimental psychological information not summarised in some such way in human factors and ergonomics books?”.. Part II The solution,

Empty button with a large entry character having a reversed luminance contrast direction for entries, NS Netherlands Railways, in contrast, used a variety of solutions to the

The general conclusion is that theoretical considerations on visual dis- tance, an effect on human performance found in several experiments, and interface technology and

Therefore a systematic observation study was performed on passengers who used the Amsterdam Central Station trains indicator board to select a train going to their

structure (Hudson & Phaf, 1981). This random structure is probably not mentioned because this way of organising information is not fruitful. In daily life and in the domain

It can be concluded that the structures for applied cognitive psychology in the literature discussed all are different, and are all different from the structure of the

There were the following differences between the real life indicator in Amsterdam Central Station and the experimental one used by the passengers in the train.. • For some trains

Cognitive Engineering in the Design of Human-Computer Interaction and Expert