• No results found

The embanked floodplains along the lower River Rhine distributaries in the Netherlands (Fig. 1) act as a prominent sink for fine

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Share "The embanked floodplains along the lower River Rhine distributaries in the Netherlands (Fig. 1) act as a prominent sink for fine "

Copied!
1
0
0

Bezig met laden.... (Bekijk nu de volledige tekst)

Hele tekst

(1)

1. Introduction

The embanked floodplains along the lower River Rhine distributaries in the Netherlands (Fig. 1) act as a prominent sink for fine

sediments and associated pollutants. Current river management for the lower River Rhine focuses on enhancing the discharge capacity

and biodiversity of the floodplain areas. There is no doubt that the different landscaping

measures being proposed or implemented to fulfill these objectives have a significant impact on the morphological and hydraulic conditions and, therefore, on the sediment trapping

potential of the floodplains. To assess the effects of these measures on sediment

transport and retention in the lower Rhine floodplains, detailed quantification of the sediment deposition rates and patterns is needed.

Quantification of fine sediment retention in the Rhine delta using a Quantification of fine sediment retention in the Rhine delta using a

two-dimensional floodplain sedimentation model two-dimensional floodplain sedimentation model

Marcel van der Perk 1, Menno Straatsma 1 , Hans Middelkoop 1 , and Claus van den Brink 2

1

Department of Physical Geography, Utrecht University, the Netherlands;

2

Duurzame Rivierkunde, Olst, the Netherlands m.vanderperk@geo.uu.nl / Fax: +31 30 2531145 / Phone: + 31 30 2535565

2. Methods

To quantify contemporary sedimentation rates and patterns on the floodplains along the main branches of the River Rhine in the Netherlands (total surface area = 399 km

2

), a two-

dimensional floodplain sedimentation model was adopted at the scale of the entire Rhine delta. This model consists of two components:

1) the hydrodynamic WAQUA model that

simulates the two-dimensional water flow patterns and

2) the SEDIFLUX model that simulates sediment transport and deposition.

The model was run for 13 steady state

discharge stages between 3500 m

3

s

-1

and

16000 m

3

s

-1

at Lobith near the German-Dutch border. Model parameter values of sediment settling velocity (6.7 10

-5

m s

-1

) and critical bed shear stress for sedimentation (2.0 N m

-2

) were assigned based on previous modelling studies.

The annual average sediment deposition rates were calculated using the discharge frequency distribution for a period and a sediment rating curve (Fig. 2).

3. Results and discussion

Figure 3 shows the spatial pattern of annual

average accumulation rate of fine sediments on the floodplains along the Rhine branches in the Netherlands. The average annual

accumulation rate is 1.91 kg m

-2

y

-1

or 610 million kg yr

-1

. This corresponds to a

conveyance loss rate of 44% for discharges greater than 3500 m

3

s

-1

and 25% of the total annual suspended sediment load (Fig. 4).

These numbers are greater than those previously reported for lower River Rhine

floodplains (Asselman and Van Wijngaarden 2001; Thonon 2006), which can largely be attributed to the fact that this study also

considered sediment deposition at discharges less than 5000 m

3

s

-1

. However, a large

proportion of the sediment at the lower

discharge stages is deposited in areas where the bed shear stress exceeds 2 N m

-2

once a year on average (total 157 million kg y

-1

).

Therefore, it is likely that part of this sediment is resuspended and transported downstream

during annual flood events.

< 0.25

0.25 – 0.5 0.5 – 1.0

1.0 – 2.0

> 2.0

Sediment deposition rate (kg m

-2

y

-1

)

Fig. 1 Location of the model area

Fig. 2 Discharge frequency (1901-2000) and sediment rating curve (1970-2006) for the River Rhine at Lobith

Fig. 4 Longitudinal profiles of sediment load in the River Rhine branches

Fig. 3 Sediment deposition rate along the River Rhine branches

4. Conclusions

• The embanked floodplains along the River Rhine in the Netherlands trap 610 million kg of suspended sediment annually.

• About 25% of the sediment is deposited in areas where it is likely susceptible to

resuspension during high discharge.

• To improve the estimation of sediment retention rates in floodplain areas, it is

necessary to quantify resuspension of fine sediments from the river bottom and banks.

References

Asselman, N.E.M., and M. van Wijngaarden, 2002. Development and application of a 1D floodplain sedimentation model for the River Rhine in the Netherlands. J. Hydrol. 268:127–

Thonon, I., 2006. Deposition of sediment and 142.

associated heavy metals on floodplains.

Utrecht: KNAG/Faculty of Geosciences,

Utrecht University. Netherlands Geographical

Studies 337.

Referenties

GERELATEERDE DOCUMENTEN

Moreover, the combined effects of physical processes and biological activity 4 th bar in figure 4- 27 are responsible for decreasing the storage of the mussel beds in the

There has been a clear increase in the amount of dredging in the ports and harbours in recent years (Figure 2) which we propose is linked to changing sediment circulation and

Figure 7: The sediment budget for the Rhine-Meuse delta as calculated using multibeam survey data and measured dredging and flux data. Note the DEM data is often missing the

suspended sediment loads in the Rhine River, we re- examined the annual suspended loads at the Lobith monitoring station near the Dutch-German border for the period since the start

- Future study will examine to what extent the chemical composition of suspended sediment in the River Rhine allows the demarcation of the geographic source area of

• Nevertheless, the lack of agreement between the occurrence of positive peaks in the similarities and the occurrence of historical floods suggests that the sediment derived from

more prominent were the contacts from the end of the fifth millennium onward, with the in many respects differently organised neolithic communities of the loess

Because not all needed date is available the model is based on the following assumptions: (1) the groundwater level is constant in time, (2) the soil is homogeneous and