University of Groningen
Classroom Formative Assessment
van den Berg, Marian
IMPORTANT NOTE: You are advised to consult the publisher's version (publisher's PDF) if you wish to cite from it. Please check the document version below.
Document Version
Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record
Publication date: 2018
Link to publication in University of Groningen/UMCG research database
Citation for published version (APA):
van den Berg, M. (2018). Classroom Formative Assessment: A quest for a practice that enhances students’ mathematics performance. Rijksuniversiteit Groningen.
Copyright
Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons).
Take-down policy
If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim.
Downloaded from the University of Groningen/UMCG research database (Pure): http://www.rug.nl/research/portal. For technical reasons the number of authors shown on this cover page is limited to 10 maximum.
References
An, S., & Wu, Z. (2012). Enhancing mathematics teachers’ knowledge of students’ thinking from assessing and analyzing misconceptions in homework. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 10, 717-753. Anderson, T., & Shattuck, J. (2012). Design-based research: A decade of progress in
education research? Educational Researcher, 41(1), 16-25. doi:10.3102/0013189X11428813.
Andrade, H. L. (2013). Classroom assessment in the context of learning theory and research. In J. H. McMillan (Ed.), SAGE Handbook of research on classroom assessment (pp. 17-34). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE. Antoniou, P., & James, M. (2014). Exploring formative assessment in primary
school classrooms: Developing a framework of actions and strategies. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 26, 153-176. doi:10.1007/s11092-013-9188-4.
Ashford, S. J., & De Stobbeleir, K. E. M. (2013). Feedback, goal setting and task performance revisited. In E. A. Locke & G. P. Latham (Eds.), New
developments in goal setting and task performance (pp. 51-64). New York, NY: Routledge.
Ashlock, R. B. (2010). Error patterns in computation: Using error patterns to help each student learn. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Assessment Reform Group. (2002). Assessment for Learning: 10 principles. Research-based principles to guide classroom practice. Retrieved on January, 28, 2018, from
https://www.aaia.org.uk/content/uploads/2010/06/Assessment-for-Learning-10-principles.pdf
Ateh, C. M. (2015) Science teachers' elicitation practices: Insights for formative assessment. Educational Assessment, 20(2), 112-131.
doi:10.1080/10627197.2015.1028619.
Bangert-Drowns, R. L., Kulik, J. A., & Kulik, C. C. (1991). Effects of frequent classroom testing. Journal of Educational Research, 85(2), 89-99.
Banilower, E. R., Heck, D. J., & Weiss, I. R. (2007). Can professional development make the vision of the standards a reality? The impact of the National Science Foundation’s local systemic change through teacher enhancement initiative. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(3), 375-395. doi:10.1002/tea.20145.
Birman, B. F, Desimone, L. M., Porter, A. C, & Garet, M. S. (2000). Designing professional development that works. Educational Leadership, 57(8), 28-33.
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21(1), 5-31. doi:10.1007/s11092-008-9068-5.
Bonner, S. M. (2016). Teachers’ perceptions about assessment. Competing narratives. In G. T. L. Brown, & L. R. Harris (Eds.), Handbook of human and social conditions in assessment (pp. 22-39). New York, NY:
Routledge.
Boswinkel, N., Buijs, K., Klein Tank, M. (2014). Digilijn rekenen: doorlopende leerlijnen [Digital learning trajectories mathematics: continuous learning trajectories]. Enschede, the Netherlands: SLO.
Boyle, B., Lamprianou, I., & Boyle, T. (2005). A longitudinal study of teacher change: What makes professional development effective? Report of the second year of the study. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 16(1), 1-27. doi:10.1080/09243450500114819.
Brandon, P. R., Young, D. B., Shavelson, R. J., Jones, R., Ayala, C. C., Ruiz-Primo, M. A., & Yin, Y. (2008). Lessons learned from the process of curriculum developers’ and assessment developers’ collaboration of the development of embedded formative assessments. Applied Measurement in Education, 21, 390-402. doi:10.1080/08957340802347886.
Brookhart, S. M. (2011). Grading and learning: Practices that support student
achievement. Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree.
Brown, J. S., & Burton, R. R. (1978). Diagnostic models for procedural bugs in basic mathematics skills. Cognitive Science, 2, 155-192.
Brown, G. T. L., & Harris, L. R. (2013). Student self-assessment. In J. H. McMillan (Ed.), SAGE Handbook of research on classroom assessment (pp. 367-393). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Burrows, J. K. (1976). A review of the literature on computational errors with whole
numbers. Vancouver, Canada: Mathematics Education Diagnostic and
Instructional Centre.
Butler, A. C., Karpicke, J. D., & Roediger, H. L. (2007). The effect of type and timing of feedback on learning from multiple-choice tests. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 13(4), 273-281.
Callingham, R. (2008). Dialogue and feedback: Assessment in the primary mathematics classroom. Australian Primary Mathematics Classroom, 13(3), 18–21.
Carlson, D., Borman, G. D., & Robinson, M. (2011). A multistate district-level cluster randomized trial of the impact of data-driven reform on reading and
mathematics achievement. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 33(3), 378-398. doi:10.3102/0162373711412765.
Carnine, D. (1980). Preteaching versus concurrent teaching of the component skills of a multiplication algorithm. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 11(5), 375-379.
CBS [Central Bureau of Statistics]. (2016). Steeds meer vrouwen voor de klas in het
basisonderwijs [More and more female teachers in primary education]. Retrieved on December, 12, 2017, from
https://www.cbs.nl/nl- nl/achtergrond/2016/40/steeds-meer-vrouwen-voor-de-klas-in-het-basisonderwijs.
CBS [Central Bureau of Statistics], Dutch Ministry of Education, Culture and Science, & DUO [Education Executive Agency]. (2016). Onderwijs in cijfers [Education in numbers]. Retrieved on December, 12, 2017, from
https://www.onderwijsincijfers.nl/kengetallen/primair-onderwijs/personeelpo/leeftijd-personeel.
Coburn, C. E. (2004). Beyond decoupling: Rethinking the relationship between the institutional environment and the classroom. Sociology of Education, 77(3), 211–244.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Conderman, G., & Hedin, L. (2012). Classroom assessments that inform instruction. Kappa Delta Pi Record, 48(4), 162-168.
doi:10.1080/00228958.2012.733964.
Cooper, J. O., Heron, T. E., & Heward, W. L. (2007). Applied behaviour analysis. Upper Saddle, River, NJ: Pearson Merrill Prentice Hall.
Cowie, B., & Harrison, C. (2016). Classroom processes that support effective assessment. In G. T. L. Brown, & L. R. Harris (Eds.), Handbook of human and social conditions in assessment (pp. 335-350). New York, NY: Routledge.
Darling-Hammond, L. (1997). Doing what matters most: Investing in quality teaching. New York, NY: National Commission on Teaching and America’s Future.
Darling-Hammond, L., Wei, R. C., Andree, A., Richardson, N., & Orphanos, S. (2009). Professional learning in the learning profession: A status report on teacher development in the United States and abroad. Stanford, CA: National Staff Development Council and the School Redesign Network at Stanford University.
Daro, P., Mosher, F. A., & Corcoran, T. (2011). Learning trajectories in mathematics: A foundation for standards, curriculum, assessment, and
instruction (Research Report No. 68). Philadelphia, PA: Consortium for Policy Research in Education.
Dekker, S. (2016, 20 December). Kamerbrief over groepsgrootte in het
basisonderwijs en het voortgezet onderwijs [Letter to parliament about class size in primary education and secondary education]. Retrieved on
December, 12, 2017, from
https://www.rijksoverheid.nl/binaries/rijksoverheid/documenten/kamerstuk
ken/2016/01/20/kamerbrief-over-de-groepsgrootte-in-het- basisonderwijs/kamerbrief-over-de-groepsgrootte-in-het-basisonderwijs.pdf.
Desimone, L. M. (2009). Improving impact studies of teachers’ professional development: Toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educational Researcher, 38(3), 181-199.
Dunn, K. E., & Mulvenon, S. W. (2009). A critical review of research on formative assessment: The limited scientific evidence of the impact of formative assessment in education. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 14(7), 1-11.
Dunning, D., Heath, C., & Suls, J. M. (2004). Flawed self-assessment: Implications for health, education, and the workplace. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 5(3), 69–106.
Dutch Inspectorate of Education. (2008). De staat van het onderwijs:
Onderwijsverslag 2006/2007 [The status of education: Educational report 2006/2007]. Utrecht, the Netherlands: Dutch Inspectorate of Education. Dutch Inspectorate of Education. (2010). Opbrengstgericht werken in het
basisonderwijs. Een onderzoek naar opbrengstgericht werken bij rekenen-wiskunde in het basisonderwijs [Data-driven decision-making in primary education. A study after data-driven decision-making in primary
mathematics education]. Utrecht, the Netherlands: Dutch Inspectorate of Education.
Dutch Ministry of Education, Culture and Science. (2014). Kerncijfers 2009-2013 onderwijs, cultuur en wetenschap [Key figures 2009-2013 education, culture and science]. Den Haag, the Netherlands: Dutch Ministry of Education, Culture and Science. Retrieved on January, 28, 2018, from: https://www.rijksoverheid.nl/documenten/jaarverslagen/2014/05/21/ocw-kerncijfers
Ebby, C. B., Sirinides, P., Supovitz, J., Oettinger, A. (2013). TASK Technical Report. Philadelphia, PA: Consortium for Policy Research in Education. doi:10.12698/cpre.2013.tr.
Even, R. (2005). Using assessment to inform instructional decisions: How hard can it be? Mathematics Education Research Journal, 17(3), 45-61.
Falkoner Hall, E. (1992). Assessment for differentiation. British Journal of Special Education, 19(1), 20-23.
Fuchs, L. S., & Fuchs, D. (1986). Effects of systematic formative evaluation: A meta-analysis. Exceptional Children, 53(3), 199-208.
Fullan, M. (2007). The new meaning of educational change (4th ed). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Furtak, E. M., Morrison, D., & Kroog, H. (2014). Investigating the link between learning progressions and classroom assessment. Science Education, 98(4), 640-673. doi:10.1002/sce.21122.
Furtak, E. M., Ruiz-Primo, M. A., Shemwell, J. T., Ayala, C. C., Brandon, P. R., Shavelson, R. J., & Yin, Y. (2008). On the fidelity of implementing embedded formative assessments and its relation to student learning. Applied Measurement in Education, 21, 360-389.
doi:10.1080/08957340802347852.
Garet, M. S., Birman, B. F., Porter, A. C., Desimone, L. M., & Herman, R. (1999). Designing effective professional development: Lessons from the
Eisenhouwer Program. Washington, D.C.: Pelavin Research Center. Garet, M. S., Porter, A. C., Desimone, L. M., Birman, B., & Yoon, K. S. (2001).
What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 38(4), 915-945.
Geary, D. C. (2006). Development of mathematical understanding. In D. Kuhn, R. S. Siegler, W. Damon, & R. M. Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of child
psychology: Vol. 2, cognition, perception, and language (6th ed.) (pp. 777-810). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
Gerard, L. F., Varma, K., Corliss, S. B., & Linn, M. C. (2011). Professional development for technology-enhanced inquiry science. Review of Educational Research, 81(3), 408-448. doi:10.3102/0034654311415121. Ginsburg, H. P. (2009). The challenge of formative assessment in mathematics
education: Children’s minds, teachers’ minds. Human Development, 52(2), 109-128. doi:10.1159/000202729.
Goertz, M. E., Olah, L. N., & Riggan, M. (2009). From testing to teaching: The use of interim assessments in classroom instruction. (CPRE Research Rapport # RR-65). Philadelphia, PA: Consortium for Policy Research in Education. Good, T. L., Wiley, C. R. H., Florez, I. R. (2009). Effective teaching: An emerging
synthesis. In L. J. Saha & A. G. Dworkin (Eds.), International handbook of research on teachers and teaching (pp. 803-816). New York, NY: Springer. Graves Kretlow, A., & Bartholomew, C. C. (2010). Using coaching to improve the
Education and Special Education, 33(4), 279-299. doi:10.1177/0888406410371643.
Grierson, A. L., & Woloshyn, V. E. (2013). Walking the talk: Supporting teachers’ growth with differentiated professional learning. Professional Development in Education, 39(3), 401-419. doi:10.1080/19415257.2012.763143. Guskey, T. R. (2002). Professional development and teacher change. Teachers and
Teaching: Theory and Practice, 8(3), 381-391. doi:10.1080/135406002100000512.
Guskey, T. R., & Yoon, K. S. (2009). What works in professional development. Phi Delta Kappan, 90(7), 495-500.
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81-112. doi:10.3102/003465430298487.
Heller, J. I., Daehler, K. R., Wong, N., Shinohara, M., & Miratrix, L. W. (2012). Differential effects of three professional development models on teacher knowledge and student achievement in elementary science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(3), 333-362. doi:10.1002/tea.21004. Heritage, M. (2007). Formative assessment: What do teachers need to know and do?
Phi Delta Kappan, 89(2), 140-145.
Heritage, M. (2010). Formative assessment and next-generation assessment systems: Are we losing an opportunity? Washington, D.C.: Council of Chief State School Officers.
Heritage, M., & Niemi, D. (2006). Toward a framework for using student mathematical representations as formative assessments. Educational Assessment, 11(3), 265-282.
Heritage, M., Kim, J., Vendlinski, T., & Herman, J. (2009). From evidence to action: A seamless process in formative assessment? Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 28(3), 24-31.
Hill, H. C., Blunk, M. L., Charalambous, C. Y., Lewis, J. M., Phelps, G. C., Sleep, L., & Loewenberg Ball, D. (2008). Mathematical knowledge for teaching and the mathematical quality of instruction: An exploratory study. Cognition and Instruction, 26(4), 430-511.
doi:10.1080/07370000802177235.
Hill, H. C., Rowan, B., & Loewenberg Ball, D. (2005). Effects of teachers’ mathematical knowledge for teaching on student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 42(2), 371-406.
Hodgen, J., & Marshall, B. (2005). Assessment for learning in English and mathematics: A comparison. The Curriculum Journal, 16(2), 153-176. Hollingsworth, J. R., & Ybarra, S. E. (2008). Explicit direct instruction. The power
Irons, A. (2008). Enhancing learning through formative assessment and feedback. Abingdon: Routledge.
Janssen, J., Van Der Schoot, F., & Hemker, B. (2005). Balans van het reken-wiskundeonderwijs aan het einde van de basisschool 4: uitkomsten van de vierde peiling in 2004 [Overview of mathematics education at the end of primary education 4: Results of the fourth study in 2004]. Arnhem, the Netherlands: Cito.
Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1996). LISREL 8 user’s reference guide. Chicago, IL: Scientific Software International.
Keuning, T., & Van Geel, M. J. M. (2016). Implementation and effects of a schoolwide data-based decision making intervention: A large-scale study. (Doctoral dissertation). doi:10.3990/1.9789036541190.
Kingston, N., & Nash, B. (2011). Formative assessment: A meta-analysis and a call for research. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 30(4), 28-37. Kluger, A. N., & DeNisi, A. (1996). The effects of feedback interventions on
performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119(2), 254–284. Kouba, V., & Franklin, K. (1995). Multiplication and division: Sense making and
meaning. Teaching Children Mathematics, 1, 574–577. Kraemer, J.-M. (2009). Balans over de strategieën en procedures bij het
hoofdrekenen halverwege de basisschool [Overview of mathematical strategies and procedures half-way primary education]. Arnhem, the Netherlands: Cito.
Lalley, J. P., & Miller, R. H. (2006). Effects of pre-teaching and re-teaching on math achievement and academic self-concept of students with low achievement in math. Education, 126(4), 747-755.
Lantz, M. E. (2010). The use of ‘clickers’ in the classroom: Teaching innovation or merely an amusing novelty? Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 556–561. Leahy, S., Lyon, C., Thompson, M., & Wiliam, D. (2005). Classroom assessment:
Minute by minute, day by day. Educational Leadership, 63(3), 19-24. Lee, H., Feldman, A., & Beatty, I. D. (2012). Factors that affect science and
mathematics teachers’ initial implementation of technology-enhanced formative assessment using a classroom response system. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 21,523-539. doi:10.1007/s10956-011-9344-x.
Little, J. W. (1993). Teachers’ professional development in a climate of educational reform. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 15(2), 129-151. Little, J. W. (2006). Professional community and professional development in the
Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (2006). New directions in goal-setting theory. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15(5), 265-268.
Lumpe, A., Haney, J., & Czerniak, C. (2000). Assessing teachers’ beliefs about their science teaching context. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 275–292. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(200003)37:3<275::AID-TEA4>3.0.CO;2-2.
Mandinach, E. B. (2012). A perfect time for data use: Using data-driven decision making to inform practice. Educational Psychologist, 47(2), 71-85. doi:10.1080/00461520.2012.667064.
Marzano, R. J. (2006). Classroom assessment & grading that work. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
Marzano, R. J., Pickering, D., & Pollock, J. E. (2001). Classroom instruction that works: Research-based Strategies for increasing student achievement. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
Mastropieri, M. A., & Scruggs, T. E. (2002). Effective instruction for special education (3rd ed.). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
Mazur, E. (1997). Peer instruction: A user's manual. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
McGatha, M. B., & Bush, W. S. (2013). Classroom assessment in mathematics. In J. H. McMillan (Ed.), SAGE Handbook of research on classroom assessment (pp. 448-460). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
McGuire, P. (2013). Using online error analysis items to support preservice teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge in mathematics. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 13(3), 207-218.
McMillan, J. H., Venable, J. C., & Varier, D. (2013). Studies of the effect of formative assessment on student achievement: So much more is needed. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 18(2), 1-15.
Moon, T. R. (2005). The role of assessment in differentiation. Theory into Practice, 44(3), 226-233.
Moss, C. M., Brookhart, S. M., & Long, B. A. (2013). Administrators’ roles in helping teachers use formative assessment information. Applied Measurement in Education, 26(3), 205-218.
doi:10.1080/08957347.2013.793186.
Mulder, L., Roeleveld, J., & Vierke, H. (2007). Onderbenutting van capaciteiten in basis- en voortgezet onderwijs [Underachievement in primary and secondary education]. Den Haag, the Netherlands: Onderwijsraad. Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Foy, P., & Arora, A. (2012). TIMSS 2011
international results in mathematics. Retrieved on January, 28, 2018, from http://timssandpirls.bc.edu/timss2011/downloads/T11_IR_Mathematics_Fu llBook.pdf
Nicol, C. C., & Crespo, S. M. (2006). Learning to teach with mathematics
textbooks: How preservice teachers interpret and use curriculum materials. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 62(3), 331-355. doi:10.1007/s10649-006-5423-y.
Noteboom, A., Aartsen, A., & Lit, S. (2017). Tussendoelen rekenen-wiskunde voor het primair onderwijs [Learning goals for primary mathematics education]. Enschede, the Netherlands: SLO.
Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill, Inc.
OECD[The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development]. (2014). PISA 2012 results: What students know and can do. Student performance in mathematics, reading and science. Paris, France: OECD Publishing. doi:10.1787/9789264208780-en.
OECD [The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development]. (2016). PISA 2015 results (Volume 1). Excellence and equity in education. Paris, France: OECD Publishing. doi:10.1787/9789264266490-en.
Penuel, W. R., Fishman, B. J., Yamaguchi, R., & Gallagher, P. (2007). What makes professional development effective? Strategies that foster curriculum implementation. International American Educational Research Journal, 44(4), 921-958. doi:10.3102/0002831207308221.
Pfister, M., Moser Opitz, E., & Pauli, C. (2015). Scaffolding for mathematics teaching in inclusive primary classrooms: A video study. ZDM
Mathematics Education, 47, 1079-1092. doi:10.1007/s11858-015-0713-4. Porter, A. C., Garet, M. S., Desimone, L. M., Yoon, K. S., & Birman, B. F. (2000). Does professional development change teaching practice? Results from a three-year study. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Education. Quint, J. C., Sepanik, S., & Smith, J. K. (2008). Using student data to improve
teaching and learning. Findings from an evaluation of the formative assessments of student thinking in reading (FAST-R) program in Boston elementary schools. New York, NY: MDRC.
Rasbash, J., Browne, W., Healy, M., Cameron, B., & Charlton, C. (2015). MLwiN version 2.35 [Computer software]. Bristol, England: Centre for Multilevel Modelling.
Reynolds, D., Sammons, P., De Fraine, B., Van Damme, J., Townsend, T., Teddlie, C., & Stringfield, S. (2014). Educational effectiveness research (EER): A state-of-the-art review, School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 25(2), 197-230. doi:10.1080/09243453.2014.885450.
Riccomini, P. J. (2005). Identification and remediation of systematic error patterns in subtraction. Learning Disability Quarterly, 28(3), 233-242.
Richey, R. C., Klein, J.D., & Nelson, W.A. (2003). Development research: Studies of instructional design and development. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.),
Handbook of research for educational communications and technology (pp. 1099-1130), (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Ritzema, E. S. (2015). Professional development in data use. The effects of primary
school teacher training on teaching practices and students’ mathematical proficiency. (Doctoral dissertation). Groningen, the Netherlands: GION, University of Groningen.
Ruiz-Primo, M. A., & Li, M. (2013). Analyzing teachers’ feedback practices in response to students’ work in science classrooms. Applied Measurement in Education, 26, 163–175. doi:10.1080/08957347.2013.793188.
Ryan, J., & Willams, J. (2007). Children’s mathematics 4 – 15. Learning from errors and misconceptions. Maidenhead, England: Open University Press/McGraw - Hill Education.
Sadler, D. R. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, 18, 119-144.
Sadler, D. R. (1998). Formative assessment: Revisiting the territory. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 77-84.
doi:10.1080/0969595980050104.
Scheerens, J. (2016). Educational effectiveness and ineffectiveness: A critical review of the knowledge base. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.
doi:10.1007/978-94-017-7459-8.
Schneider, M. C., & Gowan, P. (2013). Investigating teachers’ skills in interpreting evidence of student learning. Applied Measurement in Education, 26(3). 191-204. doi:10.1080/08957347.2013.793185.
Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Company.
Shaw, S., & Wayman, J. C. (2012). Third-year results from an efficacy study of the acuity data system. Austin, TX: University of Texas.
Shepard, L. A. (2000). The role of assessment in a learning culture. Educational Researcher, 29(7), 4-14.
Shepard, L. A. (2005). Linking formative assessment to scaffolding. Educational Leadership, 63(3), 66-70.
Shepard, L. A. (2008). Formative assessment: Caveat emptor. In C. A. Dwyer (Ed.), The future of assessment: Shaping teaching and learning (pp. 279-303). New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Shavelson, R. J., Young, D. B., Ayala, C. C., Brandon, P. R., Furtak, E. M., Ruiz-Primo, M. A., Tomita, M. K., & Yin, Y. (2008). On the impact of curriculum-embedded formative assessment on learning: A collaboration
between curriculum and assessment developers. Applied Measurement in Education, 21, 295-314. doi:10.1080/08957340802347647.
Shute, V. J. (2008). Focus on formative feedback. Review of Educational Research, 78(1), 153-189. doi:10.3102/0034654307313795.
Siegel, S., & Castellan, N. J. (1988). Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences. New York, NY: McCraw-Hill.
Stylianides, G. J. (2007). Investigating the guidance offered to teachers in curriculum materials: The case of proof in mathematics. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 6, 191-215.
Supovitz, J., Ebby, C., & Sirinides, P. (2013). Teacher analysis of student knowledge (TASK): A measure of learning trajectory-oriented formative assessment. Philadelphia, PA: Consortium for Policy in Education. doi:10.12698/cpre.2013.taskir01.
Suurtamm, C., Koch, M., & Arden, A. (2010). Teachers’ assessment practices in mathematics: Classrooms in the context of reform. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 17(4), 399-417.
Topping, K. J. (2013). Peers as a source of formative and summative assessment. In J. H. McMillan (Ed.), SAGE Handbook of research on classroom
assessment (pp. 394-412). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
U.S. Department of Education. (2002). The No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. Retrieved on January, 28, 2018 from
http://www2.ed.gov/policy/elsec/leg/esea02/107-110.pdf
Van Den Akker, J. (2010). Building bridges: How research may improve curriculum policies and classroom practices. In S. Stoney (Ed.), Beyond Lisbon 2010: Perspectives from research and development for education policy in Europe (CIDREE Yearbook 2010) (pp. 177-195). Slough, United Kingdom: National Foundation for Educational Research.
Van Veen, K., Zwart, R., Meirink, J., & Verloop, N. (2010). Professionele
ontwikkeling van leraren: een reviewstudie naar effectieve kenmerken van professionaliseringsinterventies van leraren [Professional development of teachers: A review study about effective features of professional
development interventions of teachers]. Leiden, the Netherlands: ICLON/Expertisecentrum Leren van Docenten.
Van Weerden, J., Hemker, B., & Mulder, K. (2014). Peiling van de
rekenvaardigheid en de taalvaardigheid in jaargroep 8 en jaargroep 4 in 2013 [Study after the mathematics and language proficiency in sixth grade and second grade in 2013]. Arnhem, the Netherlands: Cito.
Veldhuis, M., Van Den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M., Vermeulen, J. A., & Eggen, T. J. H. M. (2013). Teachers’ use of classroom assessment in primary school mathematics education in the Netherlands. CADMO, 21(2), 35-53.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind and society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Wayman, J. C., Stringfield, S., & Yakimowski, M. (2004). Software enabling school improvement through the analysis of student data (Report No. 67).
Baltimore, MD: CRESPAR/Johns Hopkins University.
Wiliam, D. (2007). Keeping learning on track: Classroom assessment and the regulation of learning. In F. K. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning, vol. II (pp. 1053-1098). Reston, VA: NCTM.
Wiliam, D., & Thompson, D. (2008). Integrating assessment with learning: What will it take to make it work? In C. A. Dwyer (Ed.), The future of
assessment: Shaping teaching and learning (pp. 53–82). New York, NY: Erlbaum.
Wood, D., Bruner, J., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17, 89-100.
Wylie, E. C., & Lyon, C. J. (2015). The fidelity of formative assessment
implementation: Issues of breadth and quality. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 22(1), 140-160.
doi:10.1080/0969594X.2014.990416.
Young, V. M., & Kim, D. H. (2010). Using assessments for instructional improvement: A literature review. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 18(19), 1-40.
