• No results found

Advances in multidimensional unfolding Busing, F.M.T.A.

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Advances in multidimensional unfolding Busing, F.M.T.A."

Copied!
7
0
0

Bezig met laden.... (Bekijk nu de volledige tekst)

Hele tekst

(1)

Advances in multidimensional unfolding

Busing, F.M.T.A.

Citation

Busing, F. M. T. A. (2010, April 21). Advances in multidimensional unfolding. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/1887/15279

Version: Not Applicable (or Unknown)

License: Licence agreement concerning inclusion of doctoral thesis in the Institutional Repository of the University of Leiden

Downloaded from: https://hdl.handle.net/1887/15279

Note: To cite this publication please use the final published version (if

applicable).

(2)

curriculum vitae

Frank Busing was born on December 28, 1963 in Amsterdam as Franciscus (af- ter his uncle) Martinus (after his father’s father) Theodorus (after his mother’s father) Antonius (after his father) Busing. In 1983 he graduated from the Fioretti College in Lisse (vwo-a). Before receiving his master’s degree (1993) in Psychology, Frank studied Law, as well as Child and Education Studies (pro- pedeuse 1987), all at Leiden University. In 2000 he received his qualification to teach at primary schools from the Hogeschool ipabo in Amsterdam.

During his studies, Frank was employed by Leiden University as research assistant and by levob Assurance Company in Amersfoort as researcher and programmer. From 1993 on, he works for Leiden University as researcher and statistical programmer. His research topics are estimation and resampling pro- cedures in multilevel analysis and multidimensional scaling. During this pe- riod, Frank developed computer programs for ‘automatiseren t/m 20’ (auto), multilevel analysis (mla), multidimensional scaling (ibm spss proxscal), and multidimensional unfolding (ibm spss prefscal). From 2000 to 2007, Frank was a part time teacher at the primary school Oostelijke Eilanden in Amsterdam.

Frank is co-author of publications on resampling in multilevel analysis, multidimensional scaling, and multidimensional unfolding. Currently, Frank is employed as researcher and teacher to the Section for Psychometrics and Re- search Methodology, Institute of Psychology, Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences, Leiden University.

(3)
(4)

colophon

This thesis was typeset with LATEX 2ε using an adapted version of the memoir class file (Wilson, 2008), augmented with quite a few style packages. The typo- graphic style was inspired by The Elements of Typographic Style (Bringhurst, 2005) and The Form of the Book (Tschichold, 1991). The cover was designed in Adobe InDesign and inspired by Typographic Systems (Elam, 2007). The paper used is 100 grams g-print, which is bound in 18 sheets of 16 pages each, inside the 240 grams one-sided sulfate cardboard cover. The page format is 160mm by 240mm, proportion 2:3, a basic medieval structure, with margin proportions 2:3:4:5for the inner, top, outer, and bottom margins, respectively.

The margins are set in ninths. Placement of the type area follows the sug- gestions of van de Graaf (1946). Each page consists of about 42 text lines.

The body text is typeset in the Adobe MinionPro font, while text in tables, figures, and captions use the Adobe MyriadPro font, both designed by Robert Slimbach, and both converted from OpenType (Adobe Illustrator) with lcdf Typetools (Kohler, 2008) and Fontinst (Jeffrey, 2007) for use in LATEX 2ε. The math is typeset with Euler-VM, a set of virtual fonts by Walter Schmidt, based primarily on the Euler fonts designed by Hermann Zapf. This font design is an upright cursive alphabet that represents a mathematician’s handwriting on a blackboard and can be used in place of italic. The text font, 10pt MinionPro, needs 119.43001pt for the string ’abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz’. Since the text block is 303.0pt wide, this amounts to the generally considered ideal of 66 character and 10 words per line (calculation). The five full (English) text pages of this monograph, however, counted about 2400 words and 15000 characters leading to 75characters and 12 words per line (counting), thus illustrating the everlasting difference between model and reality.

(5)
(6)

notes

(7)

Referenties

GERELATEERDE DOCUMENTEN

The subsequent respondent-conditional mono- tone transformation of the rank numbers is optimally determined by the least squares unfolding technique, and consequently provides a

genfold- 2 (DeSarbo & Rao, 1984) (Kim, Rangaswamy, & DeSarbo, 1999, even mention a genfold) was never made publicly available, but the loss function is simple enough to

In this chapter, a simple but effective solution is proposed to the degener- acy problem in metric unfolding: Penalize the undesirable intercept to avoid identical

To avoid such degeneracies, Kruskal and Carroll (1969) proposed alterna- tive badness-of-fit functions that incorporate normalization factors based on the variance of the

This rules in favor of internal preference analysis (over external preference analysis) and we will therefor compare the restricted unfolding solution with three such analyses, a

Figure 6.7 Boxplots of the recovery measures ( φ xy , φ y , and τ b , for the left-hand, middle, and right-hand panels, respectively; lower left-hand panel includes both φ high

Examples of such devel- opments were presented in subsequent chapters: Chapter 5 elaborated on a previously published model extension, restricting the coordinates to be

Depending on the individual differences model and the restrictions on the configuration, updates are determined for the row coordinates X, the column coordinates Y, the space weights