• No results found

recenteontwikkelingen ERA

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Share "recenteontwikkelingen ERA"

Copied!
9
0
0

Bezig met laden.... (Bekijk nu de volledige tekst)

Hele tekst

(1)

ERA

recente ontwikkelingen

Symposium Vlaams Platform voor Europese Programma’s (EU-platform) 17 Oktober

Arie van der Zwan, RTD B2

(2)

What is ERA?

Lamy report:

• The achievement of a European Research Area –a unified area in which researchers and innovators, scientific knowledge and technology circulate freely – is enshrined in the EU’s Treaty as part of the EU’s objective to strengthen its scientific and

technological bases. It is fundamental to the EU’s research and innovation ambitions.

• The European Research Area does not mean that EU and Member States do the same thing. Complementarity should prevail.

Article 179 TFEU & Article 182.5 TFEU

W ha t is E R A ?

(3)

1. More effective national research systems

2. A. Jointly addressing grand challenges (JPI, ERA-nets)

2 B. Make optimal use of public investments in infrastructures 3 An open labour market for researchers (Euraxess, Resaver) 4 Gender equality and gender mainstreaming in research

5 A. Optimal Circulation and Transfer of Knowledge 5 B. Open Access

6. International collaboration

The 6 key ERA Priorities

The p ri ori tie s

(4)

• ERA Roadmap, May 2015

• By mid 2016, almost all MS and some Associated Countries have adopted an ERA National Action Plan

• The 2016 ERA Progress Report : Focus on monitoring. Indicators show strong progress in all ERA priorities across the EU thanks to a true partnership among Member States, Associated Countries, the Commission and research stakeholder organisations

• Big differences in progress and performance between Member States

• ERA remains a gradual process and it is still up to MS to implement the ERA reforms and make ERA work. EC monitors progress and implementation

• 4th ERA Progress Report to be adopted by end 2018

Where do we stand now?

Wha t's ne xt ?

(5)

Process & Background

 ERA Progress Report 2016 well received.

 Pure monitoring or more policy-oriented?

 Inclusion of progress on National Action Plans in future progress reports.

 More attention for policy implementation

 Belgian update of Roadmap is good example for other MS!

 May 2017 Council Conclusions on streamlining.

Important role for EU/OECD survey.

(6)

Involvement stakeholders

 CION: JRC (RIO country reports), Eurostat (Indicators) & EAC (MCSA)

 ERAC: prio 1: Effective National Research Systems- workshops for mutual learning

 Topics: Complementarity, Excellence, Funding mechanisms, Improvement EMM indicators

 ERA related groups: more detailed analysis of NAPs of their specific priorities

 SHO platform (European Research Organisations:

most Stakeholders Organisations still very attached to the ERA concept as political objective (ERA

declaration April 2017).

(7)

Future challenges

• More substantial analysis/inclusion of the

National Action Plans in the monitoring process.

(targets, baselines, timelines/ best practices)

• More focus on the impact of Horizon 2020 and the forthcoming FP9 on the fulfilling of ERA as political objective.(Lamy report & ERAC opinion FP9)

• Improvement of existing indicators/inclusion new

indicators

(8)

The Belgium/Flanders ERA Roadmap

• Four roadmaps in one (Federal, Flemish, Walloon, Brussels)

• One of the most systemic and detailed NAPs

• Well structured, clear indication of who is responsible for what –ownership -

• Prioritisation – focus on most important actions

• Inclusion of caveats

• Integration with other Belgium Regions

• Timelines could be improved (NB table in draft

versions)

(9)

• Belgium is among the overall top performers in terms of progress towards achieving the European Research Area (ERA) except for Gender

• Government budget appropriations for research and development as a share of government expenditures trails behind the EU-28 average by 11 %.

• Strong in transnational cooperation public-to-public partnerships and the co-invention with ERA partners

• Performance in open, transparent and merit-based hiring of researchers lagged slightly below the EU-28 average

• Despite efforts to improve gender balance, gender is one of Belgium’s weaker areas trailing the EU-28 average.

• Belgium performs very well on Knowledge Transfer, particularly for the share of public R&D funded through private sources, which exceeded the EU-28 average by far

• Belgium’s performance in the share of papers in green open access is among the strongest of all ERA countries. Gold open access is on average.

• Bilateral agreements at the Community or Federal level are the primary instrument through which international cooperation takes place in the Belgian R&I system

2016 ERA Progress Report: Belgium results (ERA Progress Report 2016)

The p ri ori tie s

Referenties

GERELATEERDE DOCUMENTEN

Existing and proposed legislation in all thirteen member states covers both direct and indirect sexual orientation discrimination, as required by art.. However, the wording of

1 Directive: ’it shall be for the respondent to prove that there has been no breach of the principle of equal treatment.’ The same regulation is provided by the federal

With the exception of the aforementioned new Article 456 concerning acts of discrimination committed by a person holding public authority or discharging a public service mission

PLACE Fayum Aswan Fayum Aswan Aswan Nubia Deir Abu Lifa Nubia Fayum Faras Aswan Nubia CONTENT REMAKKS Homily Gravestone Guard leaf Gravestone Gravestone.. Gravestone Greek; dates

All in all, this research will examine the ways in which Museum Catharijneconvent communicates its identity and Christian heritage, led by the following research

requirement but that of nationality of a Member State to claim citizenship rights under the Treaty, implying that it is not necessary to have exercised the right to move. In

The researchers found that serious forms of victimisation most often occurred in case of discrimination on the ground of race, sex or disablement, where it concerned a case

An organisation that owns several centres which provide daycare for young children asked the Equal Treatment Commission to give its opinion about the organisation’s intention to