• No results found

Self-tracking devices and sustainable employability

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Share "Self-tracking devices and sustainable employability"

Copied!
28
0
0

Bezig met laden.... (Bekijk nu de volledige tekst)

Hele tekst

(1)

Self-tracking devices and sustainable employability

Professorship Labourparticipation

(2)

Self-tracking devices and sustainable employability

Hanze UAS: Fit for sustainable employability (Fit4SE)

Hilbrand Oldenhuis (Professorship Labour Participation) Louis Polstra (Professorship Labour Participation)

Hugo Velthuijsen (Professorship New Business and ICT)

Martijn de Groot (Quantified Self Institute)

(3)

Self-tracking devices and sustainable employability

Sustainable employability: the extent to which a worker wants to and is able to continue to perform his/her

current and future jobs in a healthy and valued way (Van

Vuuren, 2011; van der Klink et al., 2010)

(4)

Self-tracking devices and sustainable employability

Health Sustainable employability

(e.g. Tuomi et al., 2001; Ilmarinen et al., 1997; Van den Berg et al., 2008)

(5)

Self-tracking devices and sustainable employability

Aim of this project:

Studying the effect of self-tracking devices as a means to increase employees’ sustainable employability

Self-tracking devices: technology that enables its users to gain an understanding of and obtain feedback about certain physiological parameters and/or lifestyle

behaviours over an extended period

(6)

Self-tracking devices and sustainable employability

Self-tracking devices as a means to influence behavior

Self-determination theory (o.a. Ryan & Deci, 2000; Vansteenkiste & Ryan, 2013):

Intrinsically motivated behavior is facilitated when basic needs are fulfilled:

1. Need for autonomy 2. Need for competence

(7)

Self-tracking devices and sustainable employability

Self-tracking devices as a means to influence behavior Goal-setting theory (o.a. Locke et al., 1981; Latham et al., 2011):

Goal-directed behavior is better performed when:

• Goals are specific and challenging

• Goals are accepted (see ‘autonomy’)

(8)

Self-tracking devices and sustainable employability

Supervision by a coach to formulate goals (SDT, goal- setting) and to meet need for relatedness (SDT)

(9)

Self-tracking devices and sustainable employability

Participating company: ‘Museumtechnische werken’

(10)

Self-tracking devices and sustainable employability

Employees could choose one of 5 domains to be measured (‘big five for healthy life’):

1. Daily physical activity 2. Food and nutrition 3. Sleep

4. Stress

5. Social interaction

(11)

Self-tracking devices and sustainable employability

Measures before, during and afterwards:

• Quality of Life (SF12)

• Interviews

• Diaries/logbooks

• Self-assessments under supervision of the coach

• Devices’ data

(12)

Self-tracking devices and sustainable employability

• Technical support

• Coaching: intake + 3 meetings

• 3-month period

(13)

Self-tracking devices and sustainable employability

Results:

12 participants, 23 – 64 years, 6 males, 6 females 9 physical activity trackers (3 Fitbits, 6 Withings) 1 sleep-tracker (Zeo)

2 stress-trackers (Inner Balance, Emwave2)

(14)

Self-tracking devices and sustainable employability

Fitbit: Zeo:

Withings: Emwave2: Inner Balance:

(15)

Self-tracking devices and sustainable employability

Logbooks:

Satisfaction: grades from 6 to 9 (max: 10) Mainly positive experiences

(16)

Self-tracking devices and sustainable employability

SF-12, differences before and afterwards

Functional status:

V

Wellbeing:

V

Physical health:

V

Mental health:

V

(17)

Self-tracking devices and sustainable employability

Self-asssessments:

Physical vitality:

V

Mental/emotional vitality:

±

Social vitality:

±

Giving meaning:

X

(18)

Self-tracking devices and sustainable employability

Devices’ data:

Based on the physical activity trackers:

Baseline compared to rest of the 3-month period:

3 devices too little data

3 devices significant increase of number of steps

3 devices no significant decrease of number of steps

(19)

Self-tracking devices and sustainable employability

5000 10000 15000 20000 25000 30000

(20)

Self-tracking devices and sustainable employability

Interviews:

Satisfaction influenced by:

1. Degree to which device answered to expectations (‘unconscious’, ‘online’ measurement)

2. Clear-cut feedback in relation to goals 3. Userfriendliness

(21)

Self-tracking devices and sustainable employability

Interviews:

Effect on health behaviors:

- More when feedback was perceived as reinforcing

- When feedback gave clear direction and was strongly related to personal goal

- Sometimes cross-over effect on other domains (‘when you do one thing, it becomes easier to do

(22)

Self-tracking devices and sustainable employability

Interviews:

Competence concerning health behavior increased:

- When feedback was perceived as positive, e.g. when goal was accomplished repeatedly

- When feedback could be interpreted clearly and as such led to heigthened insight

(23)

Self-tracking devices and sustainable employability

Interviews:

Personal view on sustainable employability:

- In general (but not always!) no perceived increase of sustainable employability

- Perceived positive effects are (in general) limited to specific health domain

(24)

Self-tracking devices and sustainable employability

Coaching valuable:

1. Setting goals

2. Connecting goals to other important goals (autonomy)

3. Social support

4. Additional incentive

Very important precondition: PRIVACY

(25)

Self-tracking devices and sustainable employability

Conclusion:

‘self-tracking devices, combined with coaching can help to increase employees’ sustainable employability’

Goal-setting theory and self-determination theory valuable theoretical framework

(26)

Succesfactors:

Devices:

Devices are in line with user’s expectations Feedback strongly related to user’s goal

Userfriendliness (functioning, battery, comfort)

Coaching (preconditions: privacy and expertise regarding self-tracking devices):

Setting goals (specific, challenging, suiting the device) Connecting goals to ‘higher order’ goals

Social support

Information:

Realistic view of (im)possibilities available devices Autonomous choice participation and device

Technical support constantly available

Additionally: Role of the management:

(27)

Self-tracking devices and sustainable employability

Discussion:

- No control group (e.g. to control for ‘season-effect’) - Disentangling effects of device and coach

- Not all measures pointed to positive effects - Is ‘sustainable employability’ really increased?

- Longterm effect? (4 participants bought their own device)

(28)

Thank you!

Professorship Labourparticipation

Referenties

GERELATEERDE DOCUMENTEN

[r]

Van een gelijkbenige driehoek ABC is de basis AB gelijk aan 8 cm en één opstaande zijde is gelijk aan 14 cm.. Men trekt de

Answering the question of what       are the main motivating factors for users to track their own behavior could help developers of       future health-related self-tracking apps

This chapter will work more closely with Deleuze and Guattari’s concepts, and apply them to unravel the different lines and forces that come together in the subject, as he or she

The many definitions of employability differ on all kinds of aspects, in conclusion definitions depend on the point of view from which it is written (van der Heijde & van

Both managers show the intention of the organization to influence shift workers in getting engaged in their individual sustainable employability by their awareness and

Instead of separating the devices per household by their used network, as would be possible in normal households, this shared network throws all devices on one pile.. Or at least

During the interview, open-ended questions were asked about the influence of the leaders on sustainable employability and the determinants that were investigated in this