THE FUTURE OF THE EUROPEAN LAW OF CIVIL PROCEDURE
THE FUTURE OF THE EUROPEAN LAW OF CIVIL PROCEDURE
Coordination or Harmonisation?
Edited by
Fernando Gasc ó n Inchausti Burkhard Hess
Intersentia Ltd 8 Wellington Mews
Wellington Street | Cambridge CB1 1HW | United Kingdom Tel.: +44 1223 736 170 Email: mail@intersentia.co.uk
www.intersentia.com | www.intersentia.co.uk
Distribution for the UK and Ireland:
NBN International
Airport Business Centre, 10 Th ornbury Road Plymouth, PL6 7PP
United Kingdom
Tel.: +44 1752 202 301 | Fax: +44 1752 202 331 Email: orders@nbninternational.com Distribution for Europe and all other countries:
Intersentia Publishing nv Groenstraat 31 2640 Mortsel Belgium
Tel.: +32 3 680 15 50 | Fax: +32 3 658 71 21 Email: mail@intersentia.be
Distribution for the USA and Canada:
Independent Publishers Group Order Department
814 North Franklin Street Chicago, IL 60610 USA
Tel.: +1 800 888 4741 (toll free) | Fax: +1 312 337 5985 Email: orders@ipgbook.com
Th e Future of the European Law of Civil Procedure. Coordination or Harmonisation?
© Th e editors and contributors severally 2020
Th e editors and contributors have asserted the right under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, to be identifi ed as authors of this work.
No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form, or by any means, without prior written permission from Intersentia, or as expressly permitted by law or under the terms agreed with the appropriate reprographic rights organisation. Enquiries concerning reproduction which may not be covered by the above should be addressed to Intersentia at the address above.
Artwork on cover: Gurgen Bakhshetyan – Shutterstock
ISBN 978-1-78068-859-6 D/2020/7849/9
NUR 822
British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data. A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library.
Intersentia
v
CONTENTS
List of Cases . . . .ix
List of Authors . . . .xix
Introduction Fernando Gascón Inchausti and Burkhard Hess . . . 1
PART I. METHODOLOGICAL APPROACHES Initial Remarks on the Methodological Approaches to Procedural Harmonisation Stefan Huber . . . 9
1. Instruments Designed to Harmonise Procedural Law . . . 9
2. Th e European Experience . . . 11
3. Instruments for Future Challenges . . . 14
Procedural Harmonisation by the European Court of Justice: Procedural Autonomy and the Member States’ Perspective Stephanie Law and Janek T. Nowak . . . 17
1. Introduction . . . 18
2. EU Law Rights and National Remedies: Th e Legal and Political Context . . 19
3. Unpacking Procedural Autonomy: Legislative and Judicial Practices. . . 27
4. Procedural Autonomy and the Relationship between the National Legal System and the EU . . . 43
5. Procedural Harmonisation via the ECJ: Introducing the Member States’ Perspective . . . 45
6. Th e Importance of the Specifi c Case . . . 46
7. Solving a Particular Problem in a Particular Member State . . . 51
8. Harmonisation within One Member State . . . 58
9. Th e Principle of Sincere Cooperation – Intensifying the Fragmenting Eff ects of the Principle of Equivalence . . . 60
10. Spontaneous Harmonisation by the Member States . . . 65
11. Concluding Remarks . . . 67
Intersentia Contents
vi
Constitutionalisation of European Civil Procedure as a Starting Point for Harmonisation?
Dominik Düsterhaus . . . 69
1. Introduction . . . 69
2. Th e Concept of Fair Trial under ECHR and EU Law . . . 70
3. Th e Scope of Procedural Constitutionalisation under EU Law . . . 74
4. Th e Court of Justice’s Method . . . 83
5. Conclusion . . . 87
PART II. THE CURRENT SITUATION: VERTICAL AND HORIZONTAL HARMONISATION Have the EU Regulations on Judicial Cooperation Fostered Harmonisation of National Procedures? Fernando Gascón Inchausti . . . 91
1. National Diversity, Mutual Recognition and Horizontal Harmonisation . . . 91
2. European Judicial Cooperation Rules with (a Possible) Harmonising Impact . . . 99
3. Conclusions . . . 108
Harmonisation of the Rules on Protective Measures? Th e European Account Preservation Order María Luisa Villamarín López . . . 111
1. Uniform Standards in the EAPO Regulation . . . 114
2. Th e Harmonising Rules in the EAPO Regulation . . . 115
3. What was not Harmonised by the EAPO Regulation? . . . 120
4. Conclusion . . . 122
Harmonising Access to Information and Evidence: Th e Directives on Intellectual Property and Competition Damages Enrique Vallines García . . . 123
1. Introduction . . . 124
2. Access to Information and Evidence in the Intellectual Property Rights Enforcement Directive and the Competition Damages Directive . . . 127
3. Th e Core of the IPRED and the CDD Rules . . . 131
4. Particular Issues about the IPRED and CDD Rules . . . 144
5. Conclusion: Th e IPRED and CDD Rules as an Inspiration for New
Rules Applicable to All Civil Cases . . . 157
Intersentia
vii
Contents
Harmonisation of Confi dential Information Protection in Legal Proceedings: Th e Trade Secrets Directive
Patricia Llopis Nadal . . . 161
1. Introduction . . . 162
2. Th e Trade Secrets Defi nition According to the EU Directive . . . 162
3. Protection of Confi dential Information in the Course of Trade Secrets Proceedings . . . 164
4. Final Remarks . . . 171
Procedural Harmonisation and Private Enforcement in the GDPR Marta Requejo Isidro . . . 173
1. Introduction . . . 174
2. Setting the Scene . . . 176
3. Th e GDPR and Private Enforcement . . . 179
4. Assessment . . . 184
5. Conclusion . . . 194
PART III. CURRENT INITIATIVES FOR FURTHER HARMONISATION
Th e ELI/UNIDROIT ProjectTh e ELI/UNIDROIT Project: A General Introduction Elisabetta Silvestri . . . 199
1. Th e ELI/UNIDROIT Project: Th e Challenges Ahead . . . 201
2. “Obligations of Parties, Lawyers and Judges”: Th e Achievements of the Working Group . . . 202
3. Conclusions . . . 204
Th e ELI/UNIDROIT European Rules of Civil Procedure: Access to Information and Evidence Michael Stürner . . . 205
1. Background and Purpose . . . 205
2. General Principles . . . 208
3. Use of “Modern” Technology . . . 209
4. Standard of Proof . . . 210
5. Illegally Obtained Evidence . . . 211
6. Access to Information and Evidence Held by the Opponent or a Th ird Party . . . 214
7. Th e Possible Impact of the Rules . . . 217
Intersentia Contents
viii
Harmonisation of the Rules on Judgments and Appeals in Europe:
A Few Remarks from the Inside
Christoph A. Kern . . . 223
1. Introduction . . . 224
2. Terminology and Preconceptions . . . 224
3. Procedural Rules and Court Organisation . . . 228
4. Structure of Proceedings and Particular Procedural Forms . . . 230
5. Constitutional Limits to Procedural Harmonisation . . . 231
6. Simplifi cation and Sophistication . . . 234
7. Conclusion . . . 237
Th e 2017 Directive Proposal on Common Minimum Standards of Civil Procedure
Th e 2017 Directive Proposal on Common Minimum Standards of Civil Procedure in the European Union Fernando Gascón Inchausti . . . 241
1. Origins and Scope of the Proposal . . . 242
2. Content: Th e Proposed Minimum Standards . . . 244
3. A General Assessment . . . 258
Th e 2017 Proposal of the European Parliament on Common Minimum Standards of Civil Procedure Vincent Richard . . . 265
1. Introduction . . . 265
2. Pitfalls of Establishing Common Minimum Standards in EU Procedural Law . . . 268
3. From Common Minimum Standards to Detailed Bespoke Rules . . . 276
4. Conclusion . . . 283
A Final Comment on the Future Evolution of Civil Procedure in Europe Elisabetta Silvestri . . . 285
Index . . . 289
Intersentia
ix
LIST OF CASES
NATIONAL COURTS BELGIUM
Belgian Constitutional Court, 30 June 2014, N ° 99/2014 . . . 66 Belgian Cour de Cassation, 17 March 2016, N ° C.15.0235.N . . . 63 Belgian Cour de Cassation, 23 January 2015, N ° C.13.0034.N,
Rechtskundig Weekblad 2016 – 17, 503 . . . 53 , 55
ENGLAND
Google Inc. v. Vidal Hall , [2016] QB 1003, [2015] EWCA Civ 311 . . . 188 Lloyd v. Google LLC [2018] EWHC 2599 (QB) . . . 186
FRANCE
French Cour de Cassation, 7 July 2006, C é sar é o . . . 47 French Cour de Cassation, 7 July 2017, N ° 15-25.651 . . . 64
GERMANY
Bundesgerichtshof 15 May 2018, VI ZR 233/17, DE:BGH:2018:
150518UVIZR233.17.0 . . . 213
USA
International Shoe Co. v. Washington , 326 U.S. 310 (1945) . . . 233 Intel Corporation v. Advanced Micro Devices 542 U.S. 241 (2004) . . . 130 Echavarria et al v. Facebook, Inc. , No. 3:2018cv05982 Document 185
(N.D. Cal. 2019) . . . . . . 195
Intersentia List of Cases
x
COURT OF JUSTICE OF THE EUROPEAN UNION
C-6/60, Jean E. Humblet v. Belgian State [EU:C:1960:48] . . . 28 C-26/62, Van Gend en Loos v. Netherlands Inland Revenue Administration
[EU:C:1963:1] . . . . . 24 – 26 C-6/64, Flaminio Costa v. ENEL [EU:C:1964:66] . . . 24 – 26 C-34/67, L ü ck v. Hauptzollamt K ö ln-Rheinau [EU:C:1968:24] . . . 27 C-51/71 to 54/71 International Fruit Company, NV and others v. Produktschap
voor groenten en fruit [EU:C:1971:128] . . . 28 C-94/71, Schl ü ter & Maack v. Hauptzollamt Hamburg-Jonas [EU:C:1972:45] . . . 33 C-33/76 Rewe-Zentralfi nanz eG and Rewe-Zentral AG v. Landwirtschaft skammer
f ü r das Saarland [EU:C:1976:188] . . . 28 – 29 , 32 , 37 – 38 , 42 , 77 C-45/76, Comet [EU:C:1976:191] . . . 29 C-106/77, Amministrazione delle Finanze dello Stato v. Simmenthal SpA
[EU:C:1978:49] . . . 25 – 26 , 29 , 41 C-138/77, Ludwig v. Hamburg [EU:C:1978:151] . . . 83 C-120/78, Rewe-Zentral [EU:C:1978:151] . . . 84 C-125/79, Denilauler [EU:C:1980:130] . . . 81 , 112 C-158/80 Rewe v. Hauptzollamt Kiel [EU:C:1981:163] . . . 40 C-199/82, Amministrazione delle Finanze dello Stato v. San Giorgio
[EU:C:1983:318] . . . . 37 , 40 C-14/83, Sabine Von Colson and Elisabeth Kamann v Land Nordrhein-Westfalen ,
[EU:C:1984:153] . . . . 25 , 42 C-103/88, Fratelli Costanzo SpA v Comune di Milano , [EU:C:1989:256] . . . 25 C-177/88, Elisabeth Johanna Pacifi ca Dekker v. Stichting Vormingscentrum
voor Jong Volwassenen (VJV Centrum) Plus [EU:C:1990:383] . . . 41 C-106/89, Marleasing SA v. La Comercial Internacional de Alimentacion SA
[EU:C:1990:395] . . . . 25 , 60 C-213/89, Th e Queen v Secretary of State for Transport, ex parte Factortame Ltd
and others [EU:C:1990:257] . . . 26 , 41 , 65 C-6/90 to C-9/90 Andrea Francovich and Danila Bonifaci and others v.
Italian Republic , [EU:C:1991:428] . . . 26 , 41 – 42 C-208/90, Th eresa Emmott v. Minister for Social Welfare and the Attorney General
[EU:C:1991:333] . . . . . . . 42 C-261/90, Reichert Kockler v Dresdner Bank AG [EU:C:1992:149] . . . 246 C-271/91, Marshall v. Southampton and South-West Hampshire Area Health
Authority ( Marshall II ) [EU:C:1993:335] . . . 42 C-338/91, H. Steenhorst-Neerings v. Bestuur van de Bedrijfsvereniging voor
Detailhandel, Ambachten en Huisvrouwen [EU:C:1993:857] . . . 41 C-20/92 Anthony Hubbard (Testamentvollstrecker) v. Peter Hamburger
[EU:C:1993:280] . . . . . . 107 C-398/92, Mund & Fester v. Hatrex Internationaal Transport [EU:C:1994:52] . . . 107 C-410/92, Johnson II , EU:C:1994:401 . . . 41 C-62/93 BP Soupergaz Anonimos Etairia Geniki Emporiki-Viomichaniki kai
Antiprossopeion v. Greek State [EU:C:1995:223] . . . 37 C-312/93, Peterbroeck, Van Campenhout & Cie SCS v. Belgian State [EU:C:1995:437] . . . . 38 , 42 C-430/93 and C-431/93 Jeroen van Schijndel and Johannes Nicolaas Cornelis
van Veen v. Stichting Pensioenfonds voor Fysiotherapeuten
[EU:C:1995:441] . . . 30 , 35 , 38 – 39 , 59 , 61 , 87
Intersentia
xi
List of Cases
C-261/95, Rosalba Palmisani v. Istituto nazionale della previdenza sociale
(INPS) , EU:C:1995:351 . . . 32 , 34 C-391/95, Van Uden Maritime BV, trading as Van Uden Africa Line v.
Kommanditgesellschaft in Firma Deco-Line and Another [EU:C:1998:543] . . . 247 C-99/96, Hans-Hermann Mietz v. Intership Yachting Sneek BV [EU:C:1999:202] . . . 247 C-326/96, B.S. Levez v. T.H. Jennings (Harlow Pools) Ltd. [EU:C:1998:577] . . . 35 – 36 C-126/97, Eco Swiss China Time Ltd v. Benetton International NV [EU:C:1999:269] . . . . 39 C-224/97, Erich Ciola ν . Land Vorarlberg [EU:C:1999:212] . . . 40 C-78/98, Preston and others v. Wolverhampton Healthcare NHS Trust and others;
Fletcher and others v. Midland Bank plc [EU:C:2000:247] . . . 36 C-240/98 to C-244/98, Oc é ano Grupo Editorial SA [EU:C:2000:346] . . . 39 C-376/98, Germany v. Parliament and Council [EU:C:2002:326] . . . 21 C-453/00, K ü hne & Heitz NV v. Produktschap voor Pluimvee en Eiere
[EU:C:2004:17] . . . . . 40 , 61 C-473/00, Cofi dis SA v. Jean-Loius Fredout [EU:C:2002:705] . . . 39 C-63/01, Evans [EU:C:2003:650] . . . 86 C-198/01, Consorzio Industrie Fiammiferi (CIF) v. Autorit à Garante della
Concorrenza e del Mercato [EU:C:2003:430] . . . 25 C-224/01, Gerhard K ö bler v. Republik Ö sterreich [EU:C:2003:513] . . . 40 , 66 C-276/01, Steff ensen [EU:C:2003:228] . . . 87 C-30/02, Recheio – Cash & Carry SA v. Fazenda P ú blica/Registo Nacional de Pessoas
Colectivas, and Minist é rio P ú blico [EU:C:2004:373] . . . 51 C-116/02, Gasser [EU:C:2003:657] . . . 84 C-201/02, Th e Queen, on the application of Delena Wells v. Secretary of State
for Transport, Local Government and the Regions [EU:C:2004:12] . . . 29 – 30 C-453/03 and C-194/04, ABNA [EU:C:2005:741] . . . 41 C-234/04, Rosmarie Kapferer v. Schlank & Schick GmbH [EU:C:2006:178] . . . 40 , 47 C-295/04 to C-298/04, Manfredi [EU:C:2006:461] . . . 62 C-341/04, Eurofood [EU:C:2006:281] . . . 81 C-344/04 Th e Queen, on the application of International Air Transport
Association (IATA) and European Low Fares Airline Association (ELFAA) v
Department for Transport , [EU:C:2006:10] . . . 21 C-473/04, Plumex v. Young sports NV [EU:C:2006:96] . . . 282 C-506/04, Wilson [EU:C:2006:587] . . . 85 , 87 C-119/05, Ministero dell ’ Industria, del Commercio e dell ’ Artigianato v.
Lucchini SpA [EU:C:2007:434] . . . 40 , 47 C-222/05 to C-225/05, J. van der Weerd and Others v. Minister van Landbouw,
Natuur en Voedselkwaliteit [EU:C:2007:318] . . . 39 C-426/05, Tele2 Telecommunication GmbH v. Telekom-Control-Kommission
[EU:C:2008:13] . . . . . . 54 C-432/05, Unibet (London) Ltd and Unibet (International) Ltd v. Justitiekanslern
[EU:C:2007:163] . . . . . . . 43 C-283/05, ASML [EU:C:2006:787] . . . 87 C-275/06, Productores de M ú sica de Espa ñ a (Promusicae) v. Telef ó nica
de Espa ñ a SAU [EU:C:2008:54] . . . 133 , 141 C-450/06, Varec SA v. É tat belge [ECLI:EU:C:2008:91] . . . 166 C-455/06, Heemskerk and Schaap [EU:C:2008:650] . . . 79 C-14/07, Ingenieurb ü ro Michael Weiss und Partner GbR v. Industrie- und
Handelskammer Berlin [EU:C:2008:264] . . . 105 , 248 , 256
Intersentia List of Cases
xii
C-322/07, C-327/07, C-338/07 P, August Koehler [EU:C:2009:500] . . . 87
C-385/07 P, Der Gr ü ne Punkt [EU:C:2009:456] . . . 87
C-394/07, Marco Gambazzi v. DaimlerChrysler Canada Inc. and CIBC Mellon Trust Company [EU:C:2009:219] . . . 81 , 98 C-420/07, Apostolides [EU:C:2009:271] . . . 82
C-557/07, LSG-Gesellschaft zur Wahrnehmung von Leistungsschutzrechten (order) [EU:C:2009:107] . . . 133 , 141 C-2/08, Fallimento Olimpiclub [EU:C:2009:506] . . . 47
C-12/08, Mono Car Styling [EU:C:2009:466] . . . 78
C-40/08, Asturcom [EU:C:2009:615] . . . 47
C-63/08, Pontin [EU:C:2009:666] . . . 86
C-118/08, Transportes Urbanos y Servicios Generales SAL v Administraci ó n del Estado [EU:C:2010:39] . . . 33 , 58 – 59 , 62 C-243/08, Pannon GSM [EU:C:2009:350] . . . 39
C-317/08 to C-320/08, Alassini and Others [EU:C:2010:146] . . . 78 , 86 , 107 C-406/08, Uniplex [EU:C:2010:45] . . . 86
C-439/08, VEBIC [EU:C:2010:739] . . . 78
C-542/08, Barth [EU:C:2010:193] . . . 86
C-35/09, Speranza [EU:C:2010:393] . . . 86
C-89/09 P, Commission v. Ireland [EU:C:2010:772] . . . 87
C-243/09, Fu ß v. Stadt Halle [EU:C:2010:609] . . . 78
C-272/09 P, KME [EU:C:2011:810] . . . 87
C-279/09, DEB [EU:C:2010:811] . . . 76 , 78 , 81 , 86 C-291/09, Francesco Guarnieri & Co [EU:C:2011:217] . . . 76
C-403/09 PPU, Deti č ek [EU:C:2009:810] . . . 80
C-452/09, Iaia [EU:C:2011:323] . . . 86
C-457/09, Chartry [EU:C:2011:101] . . . 75
C-69/10, Samba Diouf [EU:C:2011:524] . . . 77 , 85 – 86 C-73/10 P, IFG Weichert (order) [EU:C:2010:684] . . . 86
C-213/10, F-Tex SIA [EU:C:2012:215] . . . 75
C-292/10, G v. Cornelius de Visser [EU:C:2012:142] . . . 86 , 105 , 255 C-327/10, Hypote č n í banka a.s. v Udo Mike Lindner [EU:C:2011:745] . . . 81 , 86 , 105 , 255 C-386/10 P, Chalkor [EU:C:2011:815] . . . 87
C-389/10 P, KME [EU:C:2011:816] . . . 87
C-393/10, O ’ Brien [EU:C:2012:110] . . . 85
C-426/10 P, Bell & Ross v. OHIM [EU:C:2011:612] . . . 86
C-461/10, Bonnier Audio AB and others v. Perfect Communication Sweden AB , [EU:C:2012:219] . . . 133 , 141 C-491/10 PPU, Aguirre Zarraga [EU:C:2010:828] . . . 87
C-500/10, Belvedere Costruzioni [EU:C:2012:186] . . . 79 , 87 C-507/10, X [EU:C:2011:873] . . . 87
C-603/10, Pelati [EU:C:2012:639] . . . 86
C-619/10, Trade Agency [EU:C:2012:531] . . . 86 – 87 , 248 C-170/11, Maurice Robert Josse Marie Ghislain Lippens and Others v. Hendrikus Cornelis Kortekaas and Others [EU:C:2012:540] . . . 96
C-175/11, H.I.D. [EU:C:2013:45] . . . 86
C-199/11, Otis [EU:C:2012:684] . . . 85 – 87 C-260/11, Edwards [EU:C:2013:221] . . . 86
C-277/11, M.M. [EU:C:2012:744] . . . 87
Intersentia
xiii
List of Cases
C-325/11, Krystyna Alder and Ewald Alder v. Sabina Orlowska and
Czeslaw Orlowski [EU:C:2012:824] . . . 2 , 86 , 98 C-332/11, ProRail BV v. Xpedys NV and Others [EU:C:2013:87] . . . 96 , 250
C-396/11, Radu [EU:C:2013:39] . . . 86
C-399/11, Stefano Melloni v. Ministerio Fiscal [EU:C:2013:107] . . . 278
C-415/11, Aziz [EU:C:2013:164] . . . 78
C-418/11, Texdata Soft ware GmbH [EU:C:2013:588] . . . 79 , 86 – 87 C-472/11, Banif Plus Bank [EU:C:2013:88] . . . 79 , 87 C-478/11 P, Gbagbo [EU:C:2013:258] . . . 86
C-483/11, Boncea [EU:C:2011:832] . . . 75
C-488/11 Dirk Frederik Asbeek Brusse and Katarina de Man Garabito v. Jahani BV [EU:C:2013:341] . . . 30 , 36 C-492/11, Di Donna [EU:C:2013:225] . . . 75
C-501/11 P, Schindler [EU:C:2013:522] . . . 87
C-536/11, Donau Chemie [EU:C:2013:366] . . . 78
C-578/11 P, Deltafi na [EU:C:2014:1742] . . . 87
C-625/11 P, PPG [EU:C:2013:594] . . . 86
C-32/12, Soledad Duarte Hueros v. Autociba SA and Autom ó viles Citro ë n Espa ñ a SA , [EU:C:2013:637] . . . 52
C-32/12, Duarte Hueros [Opinion of AG. Kokott], [EU:C:2013:128] . . . 53
C-40/12 P, Gascogne [EU:C:2013:768] . . . 87
C-60/12, Bal á ž [EU:C:2013:733] . . . 87
C-69/12 P, Noscira v. OHIM (order) [EU:C:2012:589] . . . 86
C-93/12, ET Agrokonsulting-04 ET Agrokonsulting-04-Velko Stoyanov v. Izpalnitelen direktor na Darzhaven fond “ Zemedelie ” – azplashtatelna agentsia [EU:C:2013:432] . . . 34 , 44 , 78 C-131/12, Google Spain and Google [EU:C:2014:317] . . . 192
C-156/12, GREP (order) [EU:C:2012:342] . . . 76 , 81 , 86 C-239/12, Abdulrahim v. Council [EU:C:2013:331] . . . 87
C-295/12, P Telef ó nica de Espa ñ a [EU:C:2014:2062] . . . 87
C-334/12 RX-II, Arango Jaramillo [EU:C:2013:134] . . . 86
C-413/12, ACICL [EU:C:2013:800] . . . 78
C-470/12, Photovost ’ s.r.o. [EU:C:2014:101] . . . 78
C-479/12, Gautzsch Gro ß handel [EU:C:2014:75] . . . 86
C-438/12, Weber v. Weber [EU:C:2014:43] . . . 80
C-530/12, P OHIM v. National Lottery Commission [EU:C:2014:186] . . . 87
C-535/12, P Faet Oltra [EU:C:2013:373] . . . 86
C-555/12, Loreti [EU:C:2013:174] . . . 75
C-580/12 P, Guardian Industries [EU:C:2014:2363] . . . 87
C-73/13, T [EU:C:2013:299] . . . 75
C-102/13 P, Germany v. Commission (order) [EU:C:2014:2054] . . . 86
C-112/13, A v. B and others [EU:C:2014:2195] . . . 2 , 76 , 79 , 86 , 105 , 255 C-119/13, eco cosmetics [EU:C:2014:2144] . . . 81 , 86 C-129/13, Kamino International [EU:C:2014:2041] . . . 87
C-161/13, Idrodinamica Spurgo Velox [EU:C:2014:307] . . . 86
C-213/13, Impresa Pizzarotti [EU:C:2014:2067] . . . 47 , 61 – 62 C-222/13, TDC [EU:C:2014:2265] . . . 85
C-224/13, Lorrai [EU:C:2013:750] . . . 75 C-258/13, Sociedade Agr í cola e Imobili á ria da Quinta de S. Paio
[EU:C:2013:810] . . . 75 , 85 – 86
Intersentia List of Cases
xiv
C-314/13, Peft ief [EU:C:2014:1645] . . . 86
C-371/13, SC Schuster & Co. [EU:C:2013:748] . . . 75
C-437/13, Unitrading [EU:C:2014:2318] . . . 79
C-467/13 P, ICF [EU:C:2014:2274] . . . 87
C-497/13, Froukje Faber v. Autobedrijf Hazet Ochten BV [EU:C:2015:357] . . . 39
C-501/13 P, Page Protective Services Ltd. (order) [EU:C:2014:2259] . . . 86
C-510/13, E.ON. F ö ldg á z Trade [EU:C:2015:189] . . . 77 – 78 C-519/13, Alpha Bank Cyprus [EU:C:2015:603] . . . 86
C-567/13, Bacz ó [EU:C:2015:88] . . . 78
C-570/13, Gruber [EU:C:2015:231] . . . 78
C-580/13, Coty Germany GmbH v. Stadtsparkasse Magdeburg [EU:C:2015:485] . . . 133 , 136 , 138 , 141 C-662/13, Surgicare [EU:C:2015:89] . . . 79
C-681/13, Diageo Brands BV v. Simiramida-04 EOOD [EU:C:2015:471] . . . 2 , 82 C-682/13 P, Andechser Molkerei Scheitz v. Commission [EU:C:2015:356] . . . 86
C-28/14, Pa ń czyk [EU:C:2014:2003] . . . 75
C-32/14, ERSTE Bank Hungary [EU:C:2015:637] . . . 78
C-45/14, B á lazs and Papp [EU:C:2014:2021] . . . 75
C-49/14, Finanmadrid [EU:C:2016:98] . . . 78
C-61/14, Orizzonte Salute [EU:C:2015:655] . . . 78 , 86 C-71/14, East Sussex County Council [EU:C:2015:656] . . . 87
C-74/14, Eturas [EU:C:2016:42] . . . 86
C-146/14 PPU, Ali Mahdi [EU:C:2014:1320] . . . 87
C-169/14, S á nchez Morcillo and Abril Garcia [EU:2014:2099] . . . 76 , 78 , 85 , 87 C-203/14, Consorci Sanitari del Maresme [EU:C:2015:664] . . . 85
C-300/14, Imtech Marine Belgium [EU:C:2015:825] . . . 76 , 81 – 83 , 86 C-381/14 and C-385/14, Sales Sinu é s [EU:C:2016:252] . . . 57
C-384/14, Alta Realitat (order) [EU:C:2016:316] . . . 86
C-419/14, WebMindLicenses Kft . [EU:C:2015:832] . . . 79
C-439/14, Star Storage [EU:C:2016:688] . . . 86
C-495/14, Tita [EU:C:2016:230] . . . 78 , 86 C-543/14, Ordre des barreaux [EU:C:2016:605] . . . 86 – 87 C-559/14, Rudolfs Meroni v. Recoletos Limited [EU:C:2016:349] . . . 2 , 81 – 82 C-35/15 P(R), Commission v. Vanbreda (order) [EU:C:2015:275] . . . 86
C-52/15 P, Lambauer (order) [EU:C:2015:549] . . . 86
C-70/15, Lebek [EU:C:2016:524] . . . 86
C-119/15, Biuro podr ó ż y “ Partner ” [EU:C:2016:987] . . . 79
C-205/15, Toma [EU:C:2016:499] . . . 78 , 86 – 87 C-278/15 P, Royal County of Berkshire Polo Club Ltd. (order) [EU:C:2016:20] . . . 87
C-319/15, Overseas Financial Limited (order) [EU:C:2016:268] . . . 87
C-354/15, Henderson [EU:C:2017:157] . . . 76 , 86 C-380/15, Garz ó n Ramos [EU:C:2016:112] . . . 75
C-407/15, Ripanu [EU:C:2016:167] . . . 75
C-427/15, New Wave CZ a.s. v. ALLTOYS, spol. s.r.o. , [EU:C:2017:18] . . . 155
C-520/15, Aiudapds [EU:C:2016:124] . . . 75
C-532/15, Eurosaneamientos [EU:C:2016:932] . . . 75 , 86 C-607/15 P, Magyar Benc é s Kongreg á ci ó Pannonhalmi F ő ap á ts á g (order) [EU:C:2016:329] . . . . 86 – 87 C-612/15, Kolev [EU:C:2018:392] . . . 87
Intersentia
xv
List of Cases
C-670/15, Š alplachta [EU:C:2017:594] . . . 76 , 272
C-682/15, Berlioz Investment Fund SA [EU:C:2017:373] . . . 79
C-685/15, Online Games [EU:C:2017:452] . . . 78
C-3/16, Lucio Cesare Aquino v. Belgische Staat [EU:C:2017:209] . . . 29
C-64/16, Associa ç ã o Sindical dos Ju í zes Portugueses v Tribunal de Contas [EU:C:2018:117] . . . 66 , 74 , 85 , 258 C-73/16, Peter Pu š k á r v. Finan č n é riadite ľ stvo Slovenskej republiky and Krimin á lny ú rad fi nan č nej spr á vy [EU:C:2017:725] . . . 77 , 86 – 87 , 107 , 208 C-75/16, Menini and Rampanelli v. Banco Popolare – Societ à Cooperativa [EU:C:2017:457] . . . 107 , 250 C-122/16 P, British Airways [EU:C:2017:861] . . . 87
C-147/16, Karel de Grote – Hogeschool Katholieke Hogeschool Antwerpen VZW v Susan Romy Jozef Kuijpers [EU:C:2018:320] . . . 30 , 32 , 39 , 62 C-210/16, Unabh ä ngiges Landeszentrum f ü r Datenschutz Schleswig-Holstein v. Wirtschaft sakademie Schleswig-Holstein GmbH [EU:C:2018:388] . . . 192
C-214/16, King [EU:C:2017:914] . . . 77
C-321/16, Pardue [EU:C:2016:871] . . . 75
C-326/16 P, LL [EU:C:2018:83] . . . 86
C-348/16, Moussa Sacko [EU:C:2017:591] . . . 86
C-403/16, El Hassani [EU:C:2017:960] . . . 77
C-411/16 P, Holistic Innovation Institute (order) [EU:C:2017:445] . . . 86
C-414/16, Egenberger [EU:C:2018:257] . . . 75
C-464/16 P, PITEE (order) [EU:C:2017:291] . . . 86
C-483/16, Sziber [EU:C:2018:367] . . . 78
C-498/16, Schrems , EU:C:2018:37 . . . 186
C-508/16, Boudjellal , [EU:C:2017:6] . . . 75
C-572/16, INEOS K ö ln GmbH v. Bundesrepublik Deutschland [EU:C:2018:100] . . . 31
C-589/16, Filippi [EU:C:2018:417] . . . 75
C-40/17, Fashion ID GmbH & Co. KG [EU:C:2019:629] . . . 192
C-131/17, H é lder Jos é Cunha Martins [EU:C:2017:902] . . . 75
C-136/17, G.C., A.F., B.H., E.D. v. Commission nationale de l ’ informatique et des libert é s (CNIL) [EU:C:2019:14] . . . 188
C-176/17, Profi Credit Polska [EU:C:2018:711] . . . 77
C-177/17, Demarchi Gino Sas [EU:C:2017:656] . . . 75
C-234/17, XC and Others v. Generalprokuratur [EU:C:2018:853] . . . 40 , 47 – 48 , 85 – 86 C-246/17, Ibrahima Diallo v. É tat belge [EU:C:2018:499] . . . 31
C-300/17, Hochtief [EU:C:2018:635] . . . 86 – 87 C-303/17, Headlong [EU:C:2018:333] . . . 73 , 86 C-344/17, IJDF Italy [EU:C:2017:924] . . . 75
C-378/17 Th e Minister for Justice and Equality and Commissioner of the Garda S í och á na v. Workplace Relations Commission (Opinion of AG Wahl) [EU:C:2018:698] . . . 25 , 34 – 35 C-379/17, Societ à Immobiliare Al Bosco [EU:C:2018:806] . . . 73
C-448/17, ESO KSI Slovensko s.r.o. v J á n Danko and Margita Dankov á , [EU:C:2018:745] . . . . . . . 58
C-505/17, Groupe L é a Nature v. EUIPO , EU:C:2019:15 . . . 188
C-518/17, Stefan Rudigier [EU:C:2018:757] . . . 32
C-18/18, Glawischnig-Piesczek (Opinion of AG Szpunar)[EU:C:2019:458] . . . 188 C-216/18 PPU, LM [EU:C:2018:586] . . . 85 , 258
Intersentia List of Cases
xvi
C-325/18 PPU, CE [EU:C:2018:739] . . . 86
Opinion 1/91 on the Draft Treaty on a European Economic Area [EU:C:1991:490] . . . 24
Opinion 2/13 on the Accession of the European Union to the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (Full Court) [EU:C:2014:2454] . . . 95
EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS
Abaluta v. Romania , Appl. No. 38196/05 . . . 73Al-Dulimi and Montana Management Inc. v. Switzerland , Appl. No. 5809/08 . . . 71
Andrejeva v. Latvia , Appl. No. 55707/00 . . . 73
Ankerl v. Switzerland , Appl. No. 17748/91 . . . 72
Arlewin v. Sweden , Appl. No. 22302/10 . . . 71
A ž daji ć v. Slovenia , Appl. No. 71872/12 . . . 72 , 86 Baka v. Hungary , Appl. No. 20261/12 . . . 73
B ă rbulescu v. Romania , Appl. No. 61496/08, . . . 212
Beer v. Austria , Appl. No. 30428/96 . . . 72
Bricmont v. Belgium , Appl. No. 9938/82 . . . 71
Colozza v. Italy , Appl. No. 9024/90 . . . 72
Deryan v. Turkey , Appl. No. 41721/04 . . . 73
Dilipak and Karakaya v. Turkey , Appl. Nos. 7942/05 and 24838/05, . . . 72
Dombo Beheer v. Netherlands , Appl. No. 14448/88 . . . 72
Godorozea v. Moldova , Appl. No. 17023/05 . . . 72
Gospodinov v. Bulgaria , Appl. No. 62722/00 . . . 72
Hadjanastassiou v. Greece , Appl. No. 12945/87 . . . 72
Hirvisaari v. Finland , Appl. No. 49684/990 . . . 73
Hornsby v. Greece , Appl. No. 42338/98 . . . 73
K.H. and others v. Slovakia , Appl. No. 32881/04 . . . 136 , 154 Jussila v. Finland , Appl. No. 73053/01 . . . 72
Keroj ä rvi v. Finland , Appl. No. 17506/90 . . . 71
Kr č m á r v. Czech Republic , Appl. No. 35376/97 . . . 72
Lawyer Partners AS v. Slovakia , Appl. No. 54252/07 . . . 71
Lay Lay Company Ltd. v. Malta , Appl. No. 30633/11 . . . 72
Levages Prestations Services v. France , Appl. No. 21920/93 . . . 73
L.L. v. France , Appl. No. 7508/02 . . . 213
Lobo Machado v. Portugal , Appl. No. 15764/89 . . . 72
McGinley and Egan v. United Kingdom , Appl. No 10/1997/794/995-996 . . . 136
Micallef v. Malta , Appl. No. 17056/06 . . . 73
Miholapa v. Latvia , Appl. No. 61655/00 . . . 72
Na ï t-Liman v. Switzerland , Appl. No. 51357/07 . . . 71
Niemietz v. Germany , Appl. No. 13710/88 . . . 140
N.N. and T.A. v. Belgium , Appl. No. 65097/01 . . . 213
Ö v ü s v. Turkey , Appl. No. 42981/04 . . . 72
Perez v. France , Appl. No. 47287/99 . . . 71
Poitrimol v France , Appl. No. 14032/88 . . . 72 – 73 Ruiz Mateos v. Spain , Appl. No. 12952/87 . . . 72
Schuler-Zgraggen v. Austria , Appl. No. 14518/89 . . . 72
Intersentia
xvii
List of Cases
Sejdovic v. Italy , Appl. No. 56581/00 . . . 72
Soci é t é Colas Est and others v. France , Appl. No. 37971/97 . . . 140
Steel and Morris v. UK , Appl. No. 68416/01 . . . 71
S ü rmeli v. Germany , Appl. No. 75529/01 . . . 73
Weber v. Germany , Appl. No. 4769/02 . . . 72
Weissman v. Romania , Appl. No. 63945/00 . . . 71
Intersentia
