• No results found

A Comparison of Seasonal Hurricane Forecasts: Dynamical Model versus Dynamical–Statistical Model

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Share "A Comparison of Seasonal Hurricane Forecasts: Dynamical Model versus Dynamical–Statistical Model"

Copied!
1
0
0

Bezig met laden.... (Bekijk nu de volledige tekst)

Hele tekst

(1)

A Comparison of Seasonal Hurricane Forecasts: Dynamical Model versus Dynamical–Statistical Model

Hui Wang, Lindsey N. Long, Arun Kumar

NOAA/NWS/NCEP Climate Prediction Center, College Park, MD 20740

1. Background

To support NOAA Hurricane Season Outlooks, several forecast tools have been developed at CPC, including the high-resolution T382 CFSv2 dynamical model and the low-resolution T126 CFSv2-based hybrid dynamical–statistical model. The goals are

1) To apply the hybrid model approach with the T382 CFSv2 for the Atlantic seasonal hurricane forecast,

2) To compare the forecast skills between the dynamical model and the dynamical–statistical model with T382 CFSv2, and

3) To compare the forecast skills between the T382 CFSv2-based and the T126 CFSv2-based hybrid models.

2. Data and methodology

Observational data (1982–2018)

 August–November (ASON) Atlantic tropical storms (TS), hurricanes (H), and accumulated cyclone energy (ACE) index

 Sea Surface Temperature (SST): NOAA OISSTv2

 Vertical Wind Shear (U200–U850): NCEP–DOE Reanalysis Model data (1982–2018)

 T382 CFSv2: Hindcast/forecast initialized in July, 5 members

 T126 CFSv2: Hindcast/forecast initialized in July, 24 members Methodology

 A dynamical–statistical forecast tool is developed based on the empirical relationships between observed seasonal hurricane activity and model predicted SST/U200–U850 (predictors).

 Forecast skill is cross-validated over the 1982–2018 period.

Comparison of forecast skills

4. Summary and conclusions CFSv2 forecast skill for ASO SST and U200–U850

3. Results

Variability of Atlantic tropical storms and hurricanes

Fig. 1. Time series of observed August–November (ASON) Atlantic (a) tropical storms (TS), (b) hurricanes (H), and (c) accumulated cyclone energy (ACE) index from 1982 to 2018, and corresponding linear trend (blue line).

Fig. 2. Anomaly correlation skill of (a) T382 CFSv2 and (b) T126 CFSv2 for ASO SST, and (c) T382 CFSv2 and (d) T126 CFSv2 for ASO U200–U850.

Boxes indicate the Niño-3 region and Atlantic hurricane Main Development Region (MDR).

 A dynamical–statistical model was developed for forecasting Atlantic seasonal hurricanes using SST and vertical wind shear as predictors derived from the T382 CFSv2 forecasts.

 T382 dynamical model vs. T382 CFSv2-based hybrid model:

The hybrid model has overall better skills than the dynamical model.

 T382 CFSv2-based hybrid model vs. T126 CFSv2-based hybrid model: The low-resolution model has better skills than the high- resolution model, likely due to more ensemble members.

Fig. 5. Time series (1982–2018) of ASON Atlantic hurricanes in observations (black), T328 CFSv2 dynamical forecasts (red), and T382 (orange) and T126 (blue) CFSv2-based hybrid dynamical–

statistical model forecasts.

Fig. 6. AC skill of the forecasts with the T382 CFSv2 dynamical model (red) and T382 (orange) and T126 (blue) CFSv2-based hybrid models for ASON Atlantic (a) tropical storms (TS), (b) hurricanes (H), and (c) ACE index, cross-validated over 1982–

2018 using different predictors derived from the CFSv2 forecasts.

Observed preseason North Atlantic SST is an additional predictor.

Relationships between SST/U200–U850 and hurricane activity Fig. 3. Maps of correlation between

detrended observed Atlantic ASON hurricanes and ASO SST in (a) observations (OBS), (b) T382 CFSv2 forecasts, and (c) T126 CFSv2 forecasts over the 1982–2018 period.

Fig. 4. Same as Fig. 3, but for ASO U200–U850 correlated with the observed Atlantic ASON hurricanes.

Fig. 1

Large interannual variation + upward trend

High skill in both the Niño-3 region and MDR Fig. 2

Fig. 4

Fig. 3

Regions of high correlations in Figs. 3 and 4 are used to construct predictors for the dynamical–statistical model by averaging SST and vertical wind shear (VWS) over these regions.

Predictors:

 Niño-3 SST

 Western MDR SST

 MDR VWS U200–U850

Fig. 5

Fig. 6

Referenties

GERELATEERDE DOCUMENTEN

• Probability forecast is based on 60 members of CFSv2 forecasts and NOAA’s definitions of below-, near- and above-normal criteria... Pacific Seasonal Hurricane Activity

The forecast tool developed in this project is a dynamical-statistical model, which uses the dynamical model (GEFS or CFSv2) predicted week-2 SCP as a predictor, and then

Scientists study climate patterns (weather patterns that last for months or longer) to make seasonal hurricane predictions.. Hurricane preparedness is very important for people

Therefore missing data (or missing peak water level data) cannot be used as an explanation for errors. 3) Only 2.4 % of the eSURF prediction points have been used in

The objective is to improve the existing beta eSURF prediction model by introducing Integrated Kinetic Energy (IKE) as a “new” characteristic of the storm, and

We have presented compelling numerical evidence for the validity of the theory of the Ehrenfest-time dependent sup- pression of shot noise in a ballistic chaotic system. 2,5 The

We use ihe open kicked rotator to model Lhe chaotic scatteimg in a balhstic quantum dot coupled by Iwo poinl contacts to election leseivoiis By calculating

The model we introduced is an example of time-dependent random conductances, non- elliptic from below, but bounded from above, since c x,y (ξ t ) ∈ {0, 1}. In a similar fashion, we