Citation
Bosma, T. (2011, June 22). Dynamic testing in practice : shall I give you a hint?. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/1887/17721
Version: Not Applicable (or Unknown)
License: Licence agreement concerning inclusion of doctoral thesis in the Institutional Repository of the University of Leiden
Downloaded from: https://hdl.handle.net/1887/17721
Note: To cite this publication please use the final published version (if applicable).
References
Andersson, U. (2008). Mathematical Competencies in children with different types of learning difficulties. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 48-66
Allinder, R. M. (1994). The relationship between efficacy and the instructional practices of special education teachers and consultants. Teacher and Special Education, 17, 86-95.
Bartholomew, D. J., Steele, F., Moustaki, I., & Galbraith, J. I. (2002). The analysis and interpretation of multivariate data for social scientists Text in statistical science. US:
Chapman & Hall/CRC.
Beckmann, J. (2001). Zur Validierung des Konstruckts des intellektuellen Veranderungspotentials.
[Validating the construct of potential for intellectual change]. Gottingen: Hogrefe Bentler, P. M., & Wu, E. J. C. (2005). EQS 6.1 for windows. Multivariate Software Inc.
Bleichrodt, N., Resing, W. C. M., & Zaal, J. N. (1993). Beoordeling van Schoolgedrag: SCHOBL-R [Judgement of School Behaviour: SCHOBL-R]. Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger.
Bogden, R. C., & Knopp Biklen, S. (2003). Qualitative research for education. An introduction to theories and methods. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Bosma, T. & Resing, W. C. M. (submitted). Need for instruction: Dynamic testing in special education.
Bosma, T., & Resing, W. C. M. (2006). Dynamic assessment and a reversal task: A contribution to needs-based assessment. Educational and Child Psychology, 23, 81-98.
Bosma, T., & Resing, W. C. M. (2008). Bridging the gap between diagnostic assessment and classroom practice. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 7, 174-196.
Bosma, T., & Resing, W. C. M. (2010). Teacher’s appraisal of dynamic assessment outcomes:
recommendations for weak mathematics-performers. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 9, 91-115.
Brown-Chidsey R. (Ed.) (2005a). Assessment For Intervention: A Problem Solving Approach. New York: The Guilford Press.
Brown-Chidsey, R. (2005b). The role of Published Norm – Referenced Tests in Problem- Solving Based Assessment. In R. Brown-Chidsey (Ed.), Assessment For Intervention: A Problem Solving Approach (pp. 247–264). New York: The Guilford Press.
Brown-Chidsey, R. & Steege, M.W. (2005). Solution-Focused Psychoeducational Reports. In R.
Brown-Chidsey (Ed.), Assessment For Intervention: A Problem Solving Approach (pp. 267–
290). New York: The Guilford Press.
Bryant, D. P., Bryant, B. R., & Hamill, D. D. (2000). Characteristic behaviors of students with LD who have teacher-identified math weaknesses. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33, 168- 177.
Büchel, F. P. & Hessels-Schlatter (2001). Analogical Reasoning Learning Test (ARLT). Instruction manual. Geneva: Unpublished manuscript.
Dynamic Testing in Practice
Büchel, F. P., Schlatter, C., & Scharnhorst, U. (1997). Training and assessment of analogical reasoning in students with severe learning difficulties. Educational and Child Psychology, 14, 83–94.
Budoff, M. (1970). Learning potential: Assessing ability to reason in the educable mentally retarded. Acta Paedopsychiatrica: International Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 37, 293-309.
Caffrey, E., & Fuchs, D. (2007). Differences in performance between students with learning disabilites and mild mental retardation: Implications for categorical instruction. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 22, 119-128.
Caffrey, E., Fuchs, D., & Fuchs, L.S. (2008). The predictive validity of dynamic assessment. The Journal of Special Education, 41, 254-270
Campione, J. C., & Brown, A. L. (1987). Linking dynamic assessment with school achievement. In C. S. Lidz (Ed.), Dynamic assessment: An interactional approach to evaluating learning potential (pp. 82-109). New York: Guilford Press.
Campione, J. C., Brown, A. L., & Ferrara, R. A. (1982). Mental retardation and intelligence. In R. J.
Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of human intelligence (pp. 392-490). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Campione, J. C., Brown, A. L., Ferrara, R. A., Jones, R. S. & Steinberg, E. (1985). Breakdowns in flexible use of information: Intelligence–related differences in transfer following equivalent learning performance. Intelligence, 9, 297-315.
Carlson, J. S., & Wiedl, K. H. (2000). The validity of dynamic assessment, in: C. S. Lidz & J. G.
Elliott (Eds.), Dynamic Assessment: Prevailing models and applications (pp. 681-712). New York: Elsevier.
Day, J. D., Engelhardt, J. L., Maxwell, S. E., & Bolig, E. E. (1997). Comparison of static and dynamic assessment procedures and their relation to independent performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 358-368.
De Bruijn, E. E. J., Pameijer, N. K., Ruijssenaars, A. J. J. M., & Aarle, E. J. M. (2003). De diagnostische cyclus. Een praktijkleer. [The Diagnostic cyclus, a practical guide].
Leuven/Voorburg: ACCO.
De Vos, T. (2001) DLE-test Rekenen/wiskunde : handleiding en kopieerbladen [ Didactic learning Equivalent test Atithmatic/ Math: manual and copying-sheets] – Leeuwarden: Eduforce.
Delclos V. R., Burns, M. S., & Kulewicz S. J. (1987). Effects of Dynamic Assessment on Teacher's Expectations of Handicapped Children. American Educational Research Journal, 24(3), 325- 336.
Delclos V. R., Burns, M. S., & Vye, N. J. (1993). A comparison of teachers' responses to dynamic and traditional assessment reports. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 11, 46-55.
Deutsch, R. & Reynolds, Y. (2000). The use of dynamic assessment by educational psychologists in the UK. Educational Psychology in Practice, 16, 311-331.
Dowker, A. (2005). Early identification and intervention for students with mathematics difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38, 324-332
Durost, W. N., Gardner, E. F., & Madden, R. (1970). Analysis of learning potential. New York:
Harcourt, Brace & World.
Elliott, J. G. (2000). Dynamic assessment in educational contexts: Purpose and promise. In C. S.
Lidz & J. G. Elliott (Vol. Eds.), Advances in Cognition and Educational Practice: Vol 6.
Dynamic assessment: Prevailing models and applications (pp. 713-740). New York:
Elsevier.
Elliott, J. G. (2003). Dynamic assessment in educational settings: Realising potential. Educational Review, 55, 2003.
Elliott, J. G., Grigorenko E. L., & Resing W. C. M. (2010). Dynamic Assessment. In: P. Peterson, E.
Baker, B. McGaw, (Ed.), International Encyclopedia of Education (vol. 3), pp. 220-225.
Oxford: Elsevier.
Fabio, R. A. (2005). Dynamic assessment of intelligence is a better reply to adaptive behavior and cognitive plasticity. Journal of General Psychology, 132, 41.
Ferrara, R. A., Brown, A. L., & Campione, J. C. (1986). Children’s learning and transfer of inductive reasoning rules: studies of proximal development. Child Development, 57, 1087-1099 Feuerstein, R., Rand, Y., Hoffman, M., & Hoffman, M. B. (1979). The dynamic assessment of
retarded performers: The learning potential assessment device, theory, instruments and techniques. Baltimore: University Park Press.
Fletcher, J. M., Denton, C., & Francis, D. J. (2005). Validity of alternative approaches for the identification of learning disabilities. Journal of learning disabilities, 38, 545.
Floyd, R. G. (2010). Assessment of Cognitive Abilities and Cognitive Processes: Issues, Applications and Fit within a Problem-Solving Model. In G. G. Peacock, R. A. Ervin, E .J.
Daly III, & K. W. Merell (Eds.), Practical Handbook of School Psychology. Effective Practices for the 21st Century (48-66). New York: Guilford Press.
Freeman L. & Miller, A. (2001). Norm referenced, criterion referenced and dynamic assessment:
what is exactly the point? Educational psychology in practice, 17, 3-16
Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L. S ., Comption, D. L., Bouton, B., Caffrey, E., & Hill, L. (2007). Dynamic assessment as Response to Intervention. A scripted protocol to identify young at-risk readers. Teaching Exceptional Children, 39, 58-63.
Dynamic Testing in Practice
Glaser, R. (1981). The future of testing. A research agenda for cognitive psychology and psychometrics. American Psychologist, 36, 923-936.
Goswami, U. (1992). Analogical Reasoning in Children. Hove, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Grigorenko, E. L. (2009). Dynamic assessment and response to intervention: Two sides of one coin. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 42, 111-132.
Guskey, T. R. (1988). Teacher efficacy, self-concept, and attitudes toward the implementation of instructional innovation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 4, 63.
Hagborg, W. J., & Aiello-Coultier, M. (1994). Teacher’s perceptions of psychologists’ reports of assessment. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 78, 171-176.
Haney, M. R. & Evans, G. E (1999). National Survey of school psychologists regarding use of dynamic assessment and other nontraditional assessment techniques. Psychology in the schools, 36, 295-304.
Harvey, V.S. (1997). Improving readability of psychological reports. Professional Psychology:
Research and Practice, 28, 271-274
Haywood, H. C., & Lidz, C. S. (2007). Dynamic assessment in practice: Clinical and educational applications. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Hennings, J. R. Verhaegh, J., & Resing, W. C. M. (in press). Creating an individualized learning situation using scaffolding in a tangible electronic series completion task. Educational and Child Psychology, 28 (2).
Hessels, M. G. P. (1997). Low IQ but high learning potential: Why Zeyneb and Moussa do not belong in special education. Educational and Child Psychology, 14, 121-136.
Hessels, M. G. P. (2000). The Learning potential test for Ethnic Minorities: A tool for standardized assessment of children in kindergarten and the first years of primary school. In C.S. Lidz &
J. Elliott, Dynamic Assessment: Prevailing models and applications (pp 109-131). New York:
Elsevier.
Hessels, M. P., Berger, J. L. & Bosson, M. (2008) Group Assessment of Learning Potential of Pupils in Mainstream Primary Education and Special Education Classes. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 7, 43-69.
Hessels-Schlatter, C. (2002a). A dynamic test to assess learning capacity in people with severe impairments. Americal Journal on Mental Retardation, 107, 340-351.
Hessles-Schlatter, C. (2002b). Moderate mental retardation and learning capacity: The analogical reasoning test. In G. M. Van der Aalsvoort, W. C. M. Resing & A. J. J. M. Ruijssenaars (Vol.
Eds.), Advances in cognition and educational practice: Vol. 7. Learning potential assessment and cognitive training (pp. 249-271). New York: Elsevier Science Inc.
Hoy, M.P. & Retish, P.M. (1984). A comparison of two reports types of assessment reports.
Exceptional children, 51, 225-22.
Hulburt, J. G. (1995). A comparison of the usefulness of dynamic assessment reports, standard psychological reports and curriculum based assessment reports to pre-school teachers in designing instruction for young children with disabilities. (Doctoral dissertation, Cleveland State University, 1995). Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities & Social Sciences, 56(6-A), 2173.
Janssen, J., Scheltens, F.& Kraemer, J. (2005). Leerling –en onderwijsvolgsysteem. Reken- wiskunde groep 4. Handleiding. [Student and education Monitoring System. Mathematics Grade 2. Teachers manual]. Arnhem: CITO.
Jeltova, I. Birney, D., Fredine, N., Jarvin, L., Sternberg, R. J., & Grigorenko, E. L. (2007). Dynamic assessment as a process-oriented assessment in educational settings. Advances in Speech–
Language Pathology, 9, 1-13.
Kanne, S. M., Randolph, J. K. & Farmer, J. E. (2008). Diagnostic and assessment findings: a bridge to academic planning for children with autism spectrum disorders. Neuropsychology Review, 18, 367-384.
Keen, R. (2010). The development of problem solving in young children: a critical cognitive skill.
Annual Review of Psychology. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.psych.031809.130730.
Klassen, R. M.& Chiu, M. M. (2010). Effect on teachers self-efficacy and job satisfaction: Teacher gender, years of experience, and job stress. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102, 741- 756.
Klassen, R. M., Bong, M., Usher, E. L., Chong, W. H., Huan, V. S., Wong, I. Y. F. & Georgiou, T.
(2009). Exploring the validity of a teachers' self-efficacy scale in five countries.
Contemporary Educational Psychology, 34, 67-76.
Klauer, K. J. (1989). Paradigmatic teaching of inductive thinking. In H. Mandl, E. de Corte, N.
Bennet & H.F. Friedrichs (Eds.), Learning and Instruction. Vol.2. Oxford: Pergamon press.
Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (second edition). New York: The Guilford Press.
Kohnstamm, G. A. (1967). Teaching children to solve a piagetian problem of class inclusion.
Dissertation. ‘s Gravenhage: Mouton & Co.
Kubiszyn, T. & Borich, G.D. (2009). Educational Testing and Measurement. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons
Lauchlan, F. (2001). Adressing the social, cognitve and emotional needs of children: The case for dynamic assessment. Educational and Child Psychology, 18, 4-18.
Lidz, C. S. & Jespen, R. H. (2000). The Application of Cognitive Functions Scale (ACFS). New York:
Unpublished manuscript.
Dynamic Testing in Practice
Lidz, C. S. (1991). Practitioner’s guide to dynamic assessment. New York: Guilford Press.
Lidz, C.S. (1992). Dynamic assessment: some thoughts on the model, the medium, and the message. In J.S. Carlson (Ed.), Advances in Cognition and Educational Practice, Vol. 1.
Theoretical issues: Intelligence, cognition and assessment. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Lidz, C. S. (2002) Mediated learning experience (MLE) as a basis for an alternative approach to assessment. School Psychology International, 23, 68-84.
Lidz, C. S. (2003). Early childhood assessment. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
Lidz, C. S., & Elliott, J. G. (2000). Introduction. In C. S. Lidz & J. G. Elliott (Vol. Eds.), Advances in Cognition and Educational Practice : Vol 6. Dynamic assessment: Prevailing models and applications (pp. 3-13). New York: Elsevier Science Inc.
Lifshitz, H., Tzuriel, D., & Weiss, I. (2005). Effects of training in conceptual versus perceptual analogies among adolescents and adults with intellectual disability. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 5, 144-166.
Lifshitz H., Weiss, I., Tzuriel, D. & Tzemach M. (2011). New model of mapping difficulties in solving analogical problems among adolescents and adults with intellectual disability.
Research in Developmental Disabilities 32, 326–344.
Machek, G. R., & Nelson J. M. (2010). School psychologists' perceptions regarding the practice of identifying reading disabilities: Cognitive assessment and response to intervention considerations. Psychology in the schools, 47, 230-245.
Miller, K. F. (1989). Measurement as a tool for thought: the role of measuring procedures in children’s understanding of quantitative invariance. Developmental Psychology, 25, 589- 600.
Pameijer, N. K. (2006). Towards needs-based assessment: Bridging the gap between assessment and practice. Educational and Child Psychology, 23, 12-24.
Pameijer, N. K., & van Beukering, J. T. E. (2007). Handelingsgerichte diagnostiek: een praktijkmodel voor diagnostiek en advisering bij onderwijsleerproblemen. [ Needs-based assessment: a practitioner’s model for assessment and recommendation regarding educational/learning problems]. Leuven/ Voorburg: ACCO.
Pameijer, N.K. & Beukering, J. T. E. van (2004). Handelingsgerichte diagnostiek: een praktijkmodel voor diagnostiek en advisering bij onderwijsleerproblemen [ Needs-based assessment: a practitioner’s model for assessment and recommendation regarding educational/learning problems]. Leuven/ Voorburg: ACCO
Pelco, L. E., Ward, S. B., Coleman, L., & Young, Y. (2009). Teacher ratings of three psychological report styles. Training and Education in Professional Psychology, 3, 19-27.
Pellegrino, J. W. & Glaser, R. (1982). Analyzing aptitudes for learning: Inductive reasoning. In R.
Glaser (Ed.), Advances in Instructional Psychology Vol. 2. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Peña, E. D. (2000). Measurement of modifiability in children from culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds. Communication Disorders Quarterly, 21, 87-97.
Raven, J. C., Court, J. H., & Raven, J. (1979). Manual for Raven's Progressive Matrices and Vocabulary Scales. London: H. K. Lewis & Co.
Reschly, D. J. (1987). Learning characteristics of mildly handicapped students. Implications for classification, placement, and programming. In: Wang, M.C., Reynolds, M. and Walberg, H.J., Editors. Handbook of special education: Research & practice (pp. 35-58). Oxford, England: Pergamon Press.
Resing, W. C. M. (1990). Intelligentie en leerpotentieel. Een onderzoek naar het leerpotentieel van jonge leerlingen uit het basis- en speciaal onderwijs [Intelligence and learning potential. A study on the learning potential of young children from primary schools and special education]. Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger.
Resing, W. C. M. (1993). Measuring inductive reasoning skills: the construction of a learning potential test. In J. H. M. Hamers, K. Sijtsma, & A. J. J. M. Ruijssenaars (Eds.), Learning potential assessment: Theoretical, methodological and practical issues (pp. 219-242).
Lisse/Berlyn PA: Swets & Zeitlinger.
Resing, W. C. M. (1997). Learning potential assessment: The alternative for measuring intelligence? Educational and Child Psychology, 14, 68-82.
Resing, W. C. M. (2000). Assessing the Learning potential for Inductive Reasoning (LIR) in young children. In C. S Lidz, & J. G. Elliott (Eds.), Advances in cognition and educational practice:
Vol. 6: Dynamic assessment: Prevailing models and applications (pp. 229-262). New York:
Elsevier.
Resing, W. C. M. (2001). BEYOND BINET: All testing should be dynamic testing. Issues in Education, 7, 225-235.
Resing, W. C. M. (2006). Using children’s “ability to learn” in diagnosis and assessment.
Educational and Child Psychology, 23, 6-11.
Resing, W. C. M., Bleichrodt, N., Dekker, P. H. (1999). Measuring personality traits in the classroom. European Journal of Personality, 13, 493-509.
Resing, W. C. M., & Elliott, J. G. (in press). Dynamic testing with tangible electronics: Measuring children’s change in strategy use with a series completion task. British Journal of Educational Psychology, DOI:10.1348/000709909X002006
Dynamic Testing in Practice
Resing, W. C. M., De Jong, F. J., Bosma, T., & Tunteler, E. (2009). Learning during dynamic testing:
Variability in strategy use by indigenous and ethnic minority children. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 8, 22-37.
Resing, W. C. M., Ruijssenaars, A. J. J. M. & Bosma, T. (2002). Dynamic assessment: Using measures for learning potential in the diagnostic process. In J. S. Carlson (Series Ed.) & G.
M. Van der Aalsvoort, W. C. M. Resing & A. J. J. M. Ruijssenaars (Vol. Eds.), Advances in cognition and educational practice: Vol. 7. Learning potential assessment and cognitive training (pp 29-64). New York: Elsevier Science Inc.
Resing, W. C. M., Tunteler, E., De Jong, F. J., & Bosma, T. (2009). Dynamic testing: Individual differences and learning patterns in indigenous and ethnic minority children. Learning and Individual Differences, 19, 445-450.
Richardson, V., & Placier, P. (2001). Teacher change. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (4th ed., pp. 905-947).Washington: American Educational Research Association.
Salvagno, M., & Teglasi., H. (1987). Teacher perceptions of different types of information in psychological reports. Journal of School Psychology 25, 415-424.
Salvia, J. & Ysseldyke, J. E. (2003, 9th edition). Assessment: In special and inclusive education.
New York: Houghton Mifflin.
Schlatter, C. & Büchel, F. (2000). Detecting reasoning abilities of persons with moderate mental retardation: The Analogical Reasoning Learning Test (ARLT), in: C. S. Lidz & J. G. Elliott (Eds). Dynamic Assessment: Prevailing models and applications (pp. 155-186). New York:
Elsevier.
Sheridan, S. M. & Gutkin, T. B. (2000). The Ecology of School Psychology: Examining and Changing Our Paradigm for the 21st Century. School Psychology Review, 29, 485-502.
Siegler, R. S. (1995). How does change occur: A microgenetic study of number conservation.
Cognitive Psychology, 28, 225-273.
Siegler, R. S. (2003). Implications of cognitive science research for mathematics education. In:
Kilpatrick, J., Martin, W. B., & Schifter, D. E. (Eds.), A research companion to principles and standards for school mathematics (pp. 219-233). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Siegler, R. S., & Alibali, M.W., (2005). Children’s Thinking, (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ:
Merrill/Prentice Hall.
Speece, D. L., Cooper, D. H. & Kibler, J. M. (1990). Dynamic Assessment, individual differences, and academic achievement. Learning and Individual Differences, 2, 113-127.
Sternberg R. J. & Nigro, G. (1980). Developmental patterns in the solution of verbal analogies.
Child Development, 51, 27-38.
Sternberg, R. J. (1985). Beyond IQ: A triarchic theory of human intelligence. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Sternberg, R. J., & Grigorenko, E. L. (2002). Dynamic testing: the nature and measurement of learning potential. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Stevenson, C. E, Heiser, W. J., & Resing, W. C. M. (in prep.). Training and transfer of analogical reasoning in young children.
Swanson , H.L.& Beebe-Frankenberger, M. (2004). The relationship between working memory and mathematical problem solving in children at risk and not at risk for serious math difficulties. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 471 -491.
Swanson, H.L. (1995). S-Cognitive Processing Test. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
Taylor, R. L. (1987). Psychological Intervention with Mild retarded children: prevention and remediation of cognitive deficits. In: M. C. Wang, M. Reynolds, & H. J. Walberg, (Eds.), Handbook of special education: Research & practice (pp. 59-75). Oxford, England:
Pergamon Press.
Thurlow, M. L. & Ysseldyke, J. E. (1982). Instructional planning: information collected by school psychologists vs. information considered useful by teachers. Journal of School Psychology, 20, 3-9.
Tschannen-Moran, M., & Woolfolk-Hoy, A. (2001). Teacher efficacy: capturing an elusive construct. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17, 783-805.
Tschannen-Moran, M., & Woolfolk- Hoy, A. (2007). Differential antecedents of self-efficacy beliefs of novice and experienced teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23, 944-956.
Tunteler, E., & Resing, W.C.M. (2007). Effects of prior assistance in using analogies on young children’s unprompted analogical problem solving over time: A microgenetic study.
British Journal of Educational Psychology. 77, 43–68.
Tzuriel, D. 1998). Seria-Think Instrument. Instruction manual. Bar-Ilan University: School of Education.
Tzuriel, D. (2000a). Dynamic assessment of young children: Educational and intervention perspectives. Educational Psychology Review, 12, 385-435.
Tzuriel, D. (2000b). The Seria-Think instrument: A novel measure for assessment and intervention in seriational-computational domain. School Psychology International, 20, 173-190.
Tzuriel , D. (2001). Dynamic assessment of young children. New York: Kluwer.
Tzuriel, D. & Galinka, E. (2000). Children’s conceptual and perceptual analogical modifiability test. Instruction manual. Ramat Gan: School of Education, Bar Ilan University.
Dynamic Testing in Practice
Tzuriel, D. & Klein, P. S. (1985). The assessment of analogical thinking modifiability among regular, specialeducation and mentally retarded children. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 13, 539-552.
Van der Aalsvoort, G.M. (1994). Leerpotentieel bij kinderen van 2 tot 7 jaar met onvoldoende leergedrag. [Learning potential of children age 2 to 7 with insufficient learning behaviors].
Nijmegen: Universiteitsdrukkerij Nijmegen.
Verdel, R. (2007). Writing psychological reports after dynamic assessment and the benefits of the use of video images. Unpublished master thesis, Leiden University.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society. The Development of Higher Psychological Processes.
Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
Wechsler, D. (2005). Wechsler Intelligence Scale for children III. Dutch version. Lisse: Harcourt.
Weisel, A., & Dror, O. (2006). School Climate, sense of efficacy and Israeli teachers' attitudes toward inclusion of students with special needs. Education, Citizenship and Social Justice, 1, 157-174.
Witt, J. C. (1986). Teachers' resistance to the use of school-based interventions. Journal of School Psychology 24, 37-44.
Witt, J. C., Moe, G., Gutkin, T.B., & Andrews, L. (1984). The effect of saying the same thing in different ways: The problem of language and jargon in school-based consultation. Journal of School Psychology, 22, 361-367.
Wolters, C. A., & Daugherty, S. G. (2007). Goal Structures and Teachers' Sense of Efficacy: Their Relation and Association to Teaching Experience and Academic Level. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99 (1), 181-193.
Woolfolk-Hoy, A., & Spero, R. B. (2005). Changes in teacher efficacy during the early years of teaching: a comparison of four measures. Teacher and Teacher Education, 21, 343-356.
Ysseldyke, J. E. (1987). Classification of handicapped students. In: M. C. Wang, M. Reynolds, & H.
J. Walberg (Eds.), Handbook of special education: Research & practice (pp. 253-271).
Oxford, England: Pergamon Press.
Ysseldyke, J. E. (2005). Assessment and Decision Making for Students with Learning Disabilities:
What if this is as good as it gets? Learning Disability Quarterly, 28, 125-128.
