BIBLIOGRAFIE ADLER,

(1)

BIBLIOGRAFIE

ADLER, RB. & ROD\1,AN. G. 1985. Understanding human cnmmunicatio:1. :-Jew York: CBS College Publishing. 381 p.

BAlNBRIDGE FRYMIER, A. !993. The rcladom:hip among COn1lnm1/c.Hion apprehension, immediacy and mo!ivruion to Sitley. Commullication reports, 6; H-17, Winter. BASSET, RE & SMYTHE, MJ 1979. Communication aile I!lMrUCllon. :-Je\V York Harper & Row Publishers. 320 p.

B01HA,

H.

& VAN RENSBURG, CJ.J. 19K';. KOlllmunikl1s1c' 'I] ftll!'kende es:;cns<e van opvoeding. Educatr?, 14(1):67-78

BOTBA, M,E, 1990. Metate(!retie~e jJcfspekliewc op die sosia~e \vctcnsbppe. POlchefstroom PU vir CHO. 240 p.

BOURH1S, J. & ALLEN, ;.t, 1992, Meta-analysis of the re!;;Hlor,ship between communicalion apprehension and cognitive perrormance, COIIHlWl!icmiOIf edum!irn;, 41:6~"76. Jan.

BOWERS, CA. & FUNDERS, D.J. J990. Respun~jvc leuching. New '{ork Tencher~ College Press. 211 p.

BROOKS, W.D. 1974. Speech COrnmUJ1Ic<\I)(;n. Dubuque" low;] : WJ,·tC Brown Comp;lnY Puhlishers. 407 p.

BUSS, .A.J1. 1984. A concep!ion of sbynes:s. (in Daly. J.A & McCro5kcy, J.C. cds. Av()idi n§

co;nnn:nicalion. Shyne:>..":, reticence and communicnfion apprehefl!>ion. Geverl), Hills: Sage PtJblka!;(}n~. p, 39·50.)

CAZDEN, CU. 19R8. Ciassroorn dlscour~e. Pon::;moulh, /'; H. : Hell1ema:nn. 230 p,

CIVIKLY,l.M. 1982. Self-coflcepL 5ignif\c.\Ilt mher-'>. and (\;]s::-fOom (olnn:u:llcatint1. (III Barker, L" cd. Cornmunk<,Jion in ihe clah.'\room. Original es:-ays, ;-.Jew Jer~ey : Prenlice~ Hall Inc. p. 146·168.)

(2)

CLEVENGER, T, jr. 19M . .All analysis of r<!l'eBfcl\ on social <"nxieties. (in Daly. l.A & McCroskey, l.C. cds. Avoiding cornmunk,1iiOIL Shyness, reticenee and communication apprehen:o;ion, Beverley f-rill;;: Sage Publications. p. 219-236.).

COl-JEt..;.],C, 1988. Stalistical power analysis for the behoviUJal sciences. 2f'd eu. Hillside. N.J.: L"lwrence Edbal1m. 553 p.

COLBY, N" HOPF, T. & .A YERS, 1. 1993. Nke 10 meel you? Inter/intrnpersonal percclions of comrnUniC;]l!m~ apprenem,ion in initial interactions. COflloHOI/cario!l qUGrter!.\', 41 (2):221-229, Spring

COMADENA. M.E & PRCSANK, DT. 1983. Comrnunie<1iion apprehension :md acaoemic achievement among elemeNary and !1licd!e school SlUtlen:;;. COlHilIUl1iultioll edUCafioJJ., :'7:270·277, Oc\.

DALY, 1.A. 1986. Cornmunicalioll apprehensiof' in the (:(l\1ege classroom, Nelt' directit)fls jor teaching and lean/ill;;' 26:21-31, Junc.

DALY. J,A" & McCROSKEY, J C.

ells

1934. Avoiding eommunicatlon. ShYlles~< reticence and communlc{,(ion apprehensintt Beverley HlIIs' Sage Publica1iom .. 296 p.

DALY, j A. & STAFfORD, L 1984. Implications of qlliclfh!SS: some f:Jels and speculations. (In Dldy, J.A. & McCroskey. J.C, eds. AvoIding commllJl1ention. Shyne~s, reticence and communicallnn apprehension. Be,'erley I-11\!s : Pnblicatiolls, p. 1.2~-J4.:q DANKE, G.L & CLATrERDCCK. G.W, 1990. Human cornmunkn!inn: theory and research. Bdmon!, California: Wadsworth Publishing Company. 351 p.

DE MUNKIK, E.O. 191)8. Die gebrllik van humor a" diuakliese inslrUIllCllt h die onuenvys. (Heferaal gelewer in lanuarie !98g !ydens die ses-en-twintigste kongres van die Opvoedkuf)(:evereniging V,m SlJid~Arfika by die PC vi, CHO) PO!ChefslrOclit 15 p, DEVlTO, JA 1993. Essemia\s of human comrnunicalivn. New York Harper con;n~ College Publishers. 36X p.

DE WET, JJ .. MONTEITH, J.L DE K, STEW" liS. & VENTER. PA )9n Nuvorsingsrnelodes in die npvoedkunde. Durban: 13\1t!erwoJ\h. 348 p.

(3)

ELUS, K 1995, Apprehension, self-perceived competency, and teacher immedia\,.)' in [he laboratory-supported

punlic

speaKing coun:e: trends and relallonships. Cammlll/tealion educa/io!1, 44:64-86, Jan.

ERICSON, P.M, & GARDNER, J,W 1992, Two longitudinal studies of communic;:uion apprehension and its effects on college studenls' success. CO!llll!!micaliOll quarterly, 4()(2): 121. [37, Spri ng,

FE:-.JSTERMACHER, G,O, 1986. Philosophy of research on teaching: three 2,::.pecls, (II! Wiurnck, M,e, ed, lnternatiOl~al handbook 011 researcb of tezching, New Yrrk Macmillan, p. 37-4it)

FISHER, RA. 1978. Perspecdvcs on human communic::niof1, New York: M,H.:Milial:

239 p.

FREiMUTH, V.A. 1982. Communication apprehension iii the dnsHoom. (/11 Darker. L,

cd. Comr:1uoicatioo in the classroom, Origin;:;! essays. I'ew Jersey; Prenlke·Hall. p. 12J·

145,)

GUNTER, M.A., ESTES, T.H, & SCHWAB- J.1-I. 1990. !n:-[nlction. A model$ approJ.ch. Sw;\on : Allyn & 13<1.(011, 2(;9 p.

HANSFORD, R 1988. Teacbcrs ,::mJ da,\sr;}om cOl11munlcation, $ycney : Han;-ourt Grace Jovanovich. 210 p.

I-IEt'I'ING U, 1992, Die invloed van 'n :;pcsialc mikro·omJerrig,program up die komrnunibslehe!uerhcld van onderwysstuder1le. POlchds.troom : PU

vir

CHO, (Prnd:;krif

Ph.D,) [78 p,

HLLS, PJ. 198(i. Teacbing, karning and COn1llHlllieal:on. London: Croom J {clln lll:-: p, HODGF, D. 1993, Teaching a:;. communication. Lolldon : Longlnan. 162 p.

HURT, T.E., SC01T, rvLD. & !vlcCROSKEY, J.e. 1978, CDmmu:1!catiofl in Ihe da:>sf'(!oln. Readir;g, ;viassaCI1\!).('IS; Addison Wesley. 215 p.

JACOBSEN, D., EGGEK, P. & KAUCHAK. D. 1993. Melhodt. for tcaching, A sj..,iH:; upproach. New York: Ylerril. 370 p.

(4)

JANSEN,

r-.:.

& STEINBERG, S. L991. Theore1ic.al approaches (0 comml:nicalJUn. KeJ1\V)'n : Jut;]. 126

p.

JOHNSON, D,W. & JOHNSON,

RT.

1988. Critical thinking through struclured conlrovercy. EducatioNall(!ailer.,ilip, 45:58-64, Ma)"

JONES, W.H., CHEEK) J.M. & BRIGGS, S.R., eds. 1986. Shyness. Perspectives on rc:"earch ;]od treatment, New York: Plenum Press, 398 p.

JOUBERT, M.Y. 1991. K0fl1111uflikasiestrukturc ..:n effektiewe onderrig. Suid·A[rika[{fl5f lytlsknJ vir op·;ocdkll.'ldc. 11(4 ):202·20(i

KELLY, L 1982. A ruse by Hny olher n;tn:e is: !:oliJl a rose: a comparative analysis of reticence, commuilication apprehens.ion, unwillingness lO (ommunicate anJ shyness. liwmHl cOr!)IIHlI1icmioll rl!.~cnrch, 8(2):99-! \3, Wimer.

KOK, J.e & SWART GJ.J. 1988. Doehrellcl;lJe onder-vys ~ Uilr10digende ondefwy~ers.

(Referar:t gelewer in Januarie 19S5 tyden:; uie ses-en-twlnHg5te kOl;gre:s van die Opvoedkunueverenlgmg van Suid-Afrika by die PU vir CHO) Potchefslroom. lJ p.

LEAR Y, lVi, R. 1983. The conceptual distinctions ate important. Another look at communlcalion apprehension 2nd rel:neu clm:;!rucLs. ! 'ullla!! cO/llllumica[iol! rcs{'wch. 10(2):305-312. Winter.

LlITLFJOHN, S.W. 199), The.ories of hum,)n communicatiun, Belmont, California Wau$worth PubliShing Company .. 375 p.

MAAHSCHALK, J. 1985, 'n Instrument urn i1culoslenlie5c beweeglikheid in die klaskamer Ie bevorder. (III Muller, E.C.C, red, Inlemks;e~,\ni:llise. Opleidingsins1rumente vir oflderwysstrudentc. PrelOria: FlAUM. :04 p. 58·71.)

\1cCROSKEY, J.C & Af'DERSEK, J.f. 1976. The rcl:!liol~ship between communication apprehen5ion and aC<:ldem1c achievement among college :;tudenls. NWlIou cOlllllllminJ{(<)J) rcsearch, J-(1):73~81, Fall.

!v1l.:CROSKEY,],C & BEAT1'Y, MJ. 19R6, Oral communkation apprehension. (Ill Jones. W,H1 Cheek, 1M, & Brigg."., S.Rq ed5. Shyne;:,s. Perspeclives on research und lre::Hmem. I"cw York :Plenum Press, 398 p. 279-'29J,)

(5)

McCROSKEY,

le

& DALY, J.A. 1976. Teachers' expeciUtjon~ of !:-tC con::munication

appre:!'ienslve child in lhe elementary schooL Hwno}j cO!l1l1wnlWlio!? research, 3( 1):67·72, FaiL

McCROSKEY,

J.e.

1977a. Oral communicJ!ion apprehension: A ~umrnary of recelH

theory and research. Human COIJ!f1JUl1icafioll research, 4( 1 ):78·96, Fall.

McCROSKEY, J,e 1977b. Classroom consequences of t;on1Hlunication apprehension.

Cummunication criu.cafioll, 26:27·33, Jan.

McCROSKEY,

J.c.

1973, VR!idlty Ot the PRCA ;JS an index of or communication apprehension. COHlIJIUllicalioll mouographs. 45: 192·203, Aug.

McCROSKEY, J.e 1984, The commul1ication apprehem,iol1 perspective. (In Daly, J.A & I'vkCroxkey, J.e, eds. Avoiding cOOllllunic;<.lion. Shyness, reticence., and communication

apprehension. Beverly Bills' Sage Pub!ications. p. 13*38,)

McCROSKEY, J.e., ANDERSEN, IF .. RICHMOND, V.P. & WHEELESS. L.R. 1981. Communication apprehension of e!ementry .11)0 5ecolldary studenlS amj teacher:-. Communication education. 30: 122*132, April.

McCROSKEY, J.e., BOOnl,BC'fTERFlELD & PAYNE. S.K. 1989. 11'0 imp"CI of commUnlcation apprehension on c .. ollege Sludem retention and success. ComwuniColi()II quarterly, J7(2): 100-107, Spring.

:v!cCROSKEY, J.e, DALY, JA, RICHMOND, V.P. & ['ALCIONE, R.L. 1977. Studies of [he relationship between communication <lpprei1ension and selr-seskcm. i!WntUl coJllIJllmic(.aiol"{ research, 3(3}:269·277, Spring.

McCROSKEY,

J.e.

RICHMOND, V.P. & STEWART, RA 1986. One on olle: the foundations of interpersonal communication. Engelwood Cliffs' Prentice-Bnl!. 294 p.

cQUA1L, D. & W1NDAHL., S. 19(;9. Communicatiol1 models for the s~udy of ma~:; communlc;Jtion, LOllllon : Longman. llO p.

..MOORE. K.D. 1989. CI8ssmom leaching !\kills. ;.\ prl!1lCr. New York: Random Hoo:;c. 231

p

(6)

MOSSTON, M. & ASHWORTH. S. 1990. The \pectrum of teaching Slyles: from commund to discovery, Ne\v York: Longman. 327 p,

MYERS. G,E, & MYERS, M.T, 1992. The dynamics of human communicatiun: a labof;)wty approach, New York' Mc(Jr;;1\v-HilL 472 p.

OOSTHU1ZEN, GJ. 1984, 'n Inleiding (01 5iclkumlige slati;;liek. Pmchefstroom : Pro Rege, 76 p

RlCHMOND, VY. & McCROSKEY, J.C 1989. Communica:ion: appreile.lsion, avoidance, and effectiveness. ScolL~(ja!c, AZ: GOf:'.l!ch Scndsbrick Puhlishers.. 138 p. SAS INSTITUTE INC. 19BR SAS/STAT usec's gUide, 611> eel. Cary, t',c. : SAS Im,lllllc,

1028 p,

SEILER, WJ" SCHCELKE, LD, & UEB,BI<lCHART, !l, 191\4, Communicalion for Ihe contemporary clussroom, I\ew York: Huh Rinehart nnd Winston. 215 p.

SHULMA,.'l,

LS.

'J 9B6 Paradigms ar.d rese.:1rch prog;nms ill the StuOl' of teaching: u contemporary perspective. (In Wittrock, M,C., ed, Imernu;ional hand hook of research on lcncning. New York: Macmillan, p, 3-36,)

STATISTIESE KONSUCfASIEDIENS, 1995, Polcilcfslroom: PC vir CHO, STEYN, LN, 1981. Onderrlg-Ieer as wyse .... an opvoetling. Durban: Butterworth. !27 p, STEYN, L;,l, 1988. Onuerrig ver.<;u~ effekliewe onue;rlg: implikasies vir iliuakliese teorievonning. (Referaat gele\ver lydens die ses-en-iwinIIgste kongres van die Opvoedkundeverenig:ng van Suid-Afrika hy die PU vir CHO,) PO!Chefslroom. 14 p. STEYN, l.N, S,3. Kurrikulum!corie: 'n leer- en werkboek, PotchcfSlrnom publikasies. t84 p,

,\1eula

VAN DER KOOL D. & VEENSTRA, C 1988. Rc;;.ponsible public aJdress. Rev. ed. Iowa: Don Col:ege, 162 p,

VAN DER MERWE, M.P. 1993, UitlloJigende kommunika\ie ~Il die llilderw;s.

(7)

R'J

VAN STADEN', H.E, 1994. Kommunikaslevrees onder swan ondefU.,)'sstuden!c. Pmchefstroom . PU \tiT CHO. (Skripsie ; \t ElL) 93 p,

VREKE~, :"-J-J. 1994. A classroom rommunic~H!On model. (Paper read at the Regionul conference of feacher education for teaching accross the curriculum in a second language. University ofZirnbabwe. 6-8 Decemher.) Harare. 7 p.

VREKEN. N.J. 1995. :'v1ondclinge ondcrhoud mel skrywer op 17 OkwbcL

VREKEN, N.J. & VREKEN, R. 1989. Kommunikasievrces in die klnskamer. (Refern<li:

gelew~~r tyuens die cenk~nde NasJooale Konven:;;ie vtln Onderwysers in Wiskunde. N3.lUur-en Skeikunue N3.lUur-en Biologic,) Pretoria. R p.

WILKINSON, LC., ed. 1982. Communicating h the da\SfOOm, New York: Harper & Row. 320 p.

WILLtAMS, F. 1989 Tr,e OC\\; communicalions, Belmont California Publishing Company. 355 p.

(8)

BYLAAG 1

NAAM: __ _ _STU_D_ENTENOMMER:

Manlik GESLAG:

Vroulik

STUDIERIGTING: Na luurwetenskappe Ekonomiese wetensbppe Gees! eswe tens kappe Ed-grade HOD (Sekonder) DceIname aan I?rOenl csprc · Itl~: 2 3 4 5

,

I Ek hall nie daarvan om aan groepbesprekings deel Ie neem nie. 5 4 3 2 I

4

2 Oor die al~emeen vael ek heeltemal gcmaklik wanneer ek deel 5 3 2 I neern aan n groepbespreking.

3 Ek is gespanne en senuweeaglig w<lnneer ck Clan 'n groepbespre 5 4 3 2 I king deelneem.

4 Ek hall dD.D.rvan om be lTokke te wees by groep- S 4 3 2 I besprekings.

5 Om dee! Ie nee rn nan 'n groepbespreking saam met vreerude 5 4 3 2 I

mense mank my gespanne en senuweeaglig.

6 Ek is kalm en onlspanne wanneer ek aan groepbesprekings 5 4 3 2 I

deel neern.

Deelnnme aan vergnderings/b~eenkomste/samesorekings:

7 Oor die alge mee n is eI;, se nuweeagtig wanneer ek aa n 'n ve rgadering/ byeenkoms moe l deel neem.

5 4 3 2 I

8 Gewoonlik is ek kalm en onLS panne te("\vyl ek deel neem nan

vergaderi.llgs.

5 4 3 2 I

9 Ek is b<.lie kalm e n onlspanne wanneer ek op 'n vergadering gevra won.! 9 m my me mng Ie lug. 5

4 3 2 1

10 Ek is bang am my standpunt Ie ste1 op 'n vergadering. 5 4 3 2 1

110m op ve rgaderings Ie praat laat my onge rn aklik vae). 5

,

3 2 I

12 Ek is baie onlJanne wn nneer c k vrae op 'n verg<.lderi ng

moet antwaor .

(9)

91 Deelname san gesprekke

13 As ek in gesprek is met iemand wat ek nuU( ontmoet, is ek baie 5 4 3 2 I senuweeagtig.

14 Ek

is

glad nie bang om my

5e Ie se

in gesprekke nie. 5 4 3 2 1

15 Gewoonlik is ek baie gespanne en senuwee<lgl ig in gesprekke. 5 4 3 2 l

16 Gewoonlik is ek baie kalm en op my gernak in gesprekke. 5 4 3 2 J

17 As ek gesprek vaer met 'n nuwe persoon is ek baie op Illy ge 5 4 3 2 J

mak.

18 Ek is bang om my se Ie se in gesprekke. 5 4 3 2 J

wenn2: van ODenbare loeSDra ke

19 Ek is glad nie b<1Ilg om ' n lOespraak Ie Jewer nie. 5 4 3 2 I

20 Ek is baie gespanne terwyl ek 'n loespraak hou. 5 4 3 2 J

2 1 Ek yael op my gemak terwyl ek 'n lOespraak !lou. 5 4 3 2 I

22 My gerJagles raak deurmekaar wanncer ek 'n loespraak [ewer. S 4 3 2 J

23 Ek henader die ge1eentheill o m 'n lOe~praak Ie lewer mel se lf· ve rt roue

S 4 3 2 l

24 As ek ' n toespraak lewer faak ek so op my senuwees dn l ek van

uie [eile wat ek goed ken heeltemal vergeel.

5 4 J 2 I

ODtrede voar!n klas

2S Oor die algemeen is ek senuweeClgl ig en gespanne wanneer ek voor 'n li.la.s staan. S

4 3 2 I

26 Ek hau daarvan as die kinders vrue stel wanneer eli. klas gee. S 4 3 2 I

27 As ek klas gee raa k my getlagtes t1eurmekaar. S 4 3 2 J

28 Ek gaan 'n kla.s altyd mel selrvemoue tegemoel. S 4 3 2 I

29 As ek klas gee verkies ek dal uie leerlinge liewcrs slil bly en

luister as wat hulle wil snnmpraal oar die onderwcrp. 5

4 3 2 J

30 Dil pIa my glad nie as 'n antler onderwyser of die skoolhoof na een van my lesse luisler nie . S

BIBLIOGRAFIE ADLER,

BIBLIOGRAFIE

H.

ells

punlic

vir

r-.:.

p.

RT.

le

J.e.

J.c.

J.e.

p

LS.

BYLAAG 1

,

,

is

5e Ie se

BYLAAG 2

AANTAL

STUDENTE

WAT VRAELY

S

TE INGEVUL HET,

VOLGENS

GESLAG

EN

STUDI

ER

I

G

TING : 1990

-

1994

GESLAG

STUDIERIGTINGS

Mans

2

3

4

5

35

134

1

2

27

24

21

9

1

8

1

1990

24

79

2

15

21

42

5

13

9

105

S

22

93

12

59

I

17

1

0

121

1

8

7

8

2