• No results found

Developmental morphological diversity in caecilian amphibians: systematic and evolutionary implications Müller, H.

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Developmental morphological diversity in caecilian amphibians: systematic and evolutionary implications Müller, H."

Copied!
2
0
0

Bezig met laden.... (Bekijk nu de volledige tekst)

Hele tekst

(1)

Developmental morphological diversity in caecilian

amphibians: systematic and evolutionary implications

Müller, H.

Citation

Müller, H. (2007, November 8). Developmental morphological diversity in caecilian amphibians: systematic and evolutionary implications. Leiden University Press. Retrieved from

https://hdl.handle.net/1887/12462

Version: Corrected Publisher’s Version License:

Licence agreement concerning inclusion of doctoral thesis in the Institutional Repository of the University of Leiden

Downloaded from: https://hdl.handle.net/1887/12462

Note: To cite this publication please use the final published version (if applicable).

(2)

Acknowledgements

259

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

I would like to thank all people of the London caecilian and theory lab and its global affiliates, who have been great company over the years: Simon, Sam, Alex, James, Julia, Davide, Diego, Biju, Claire, Simon, Andrea and Ian. Further thanks go to the members of the fish research and curation group for being very pleasant neighbours: Ralf, Lukas, James, Patrick and Olli.

I also like to thank the people in Leiden who made each and every of my far too infrequent visits to Leiden a wholly enjoyable experience, especially Merijn de Bakker and Christoph Bagowski.

I am also indebted to many people who helped in various ways in the realization of this work, be it through the loan of material, a place to sleep away from home, help with fieldwork, help with lab work or a some words of encouragement, especially Ron Nussbaum, Werner Himstedt, Ralf Britz, Simon Loader, Alex Kupfer, Marc Jones, Stefan Richter, Darrell Frost, Greg Schneider, Alan Resetar, Christian Wirkner, John Measey, Jarujin Nabithabata, Damaris Rotich, Patrick Malonza. My apologies to all those, whose name is not listed here but should have been. Special thanks also to Tine Huyse and Kenneth de Baets for their help with the Dutch summary.

I also thank the staff of the Department of Zoology, The Natural History Museum, for making me feel welcome from the very first day until the very last of my time spent in London and off course to the Department for setting up the Zoology PhD Studentship, without which this work would not have been possible.

A big thanks also to my mother for her constant encouragement throughout my life and finally to my wife Maria, who also provided a lot of encouragement and support during the course of my work on this thesis.

Referenties

GERELATEERDE DOCUMENTEN

As representative of a viviparous species, the ontogeny of the scolecomorphid Scolecomorphus kirkii was studied (Chapter 6). Foetuses and juveniles of S. kirkii show a highly

Their results proved very influential in the debate about the phylogenetic position of caecilians and the evolution of their unique skull morphology, although more recent

A small dermal ectopterygoid ossification (cf. 3G) is present lateral to the anterior pterygoid process and posterolaterally to the maxillopalatine.. bone are present in the

Larvae and adults of both I. kohtaoensis have a virtually identical configuration of the hyobranchial skeleton. In larvae it is entirely cartilaginous and consists of five pairs

(2005) and Müller (2006; Chapter 2) described the development of the skull in the direct developing Gegeneophis ramaswamii and Hypogeophis rostratus, respectively, and

Amphibians are renowned for their diverse forms of parental investment including hiding, guarding, transporting or feeding their offspring (Lehtinen and Nussbaum, 2003;

pterygoideus originates form either the pterygoid or the pterygoid process of the quadrate and inserts on the medial side of the retroarticular process of the lower jaw

As with cranial morphology, larval cranial musculature and hyobranchial morphology is more similar among larvae of different species than between larvae and adults and musculature