TP BRONNELYS

(1)

BRONNELYS

+BARKER

L.L.

1982. Commu:1:cation in the classroom: original essays. E:::glewood Cliffs : Prer:t:ce-Hall. l74p.

BAJNBPJDGE FRYMIER, A 1993. The relationship among communication

apprehension, immediacy and motivation to study. Communicat.ion reports.6( I ) :8-17, Winter.

1-BOOTH-BUTTERF1t:LD, S. 1988. Instructional :ntervent1ons for reducing situational anxiety and avoidance. Communication education, 37:214-223, Jul.

BOOTH-BUTTPWIELD. M & BOOTH-BJTTERF1ELD. S. 1993. The role of cognitive "performance orientation" in communication anxiety. Communication quarterly, 41 (2): 198-209, Spring.

BOTHA. H. & VAN RENSBURG, C.J.J. 1985. Kommumkasie: 'n miskende essensie van opvoeding. Educare, 14(1):67-78.

BOURHIS, J. & AllEN, M. 1992. Meta-analysis of the relationsh1p between communication apprehension and cognitive performance. Communication education, 41:68-76, Jan.

BROOKS, W.O. 1974. Speach communication. Dubuque: Brom1. 408 p.

BROOKS, W.O. & FRIEDRJCH. G.W. 1973. Teaching speach communication in the secondary school. Boston : Houghton Mifflin. 355 p.

BYBEL. 1954. Die Bybel: dit is die ganse Heilige Skrif wat aldie kanonieke boeke van die Ou en Nuwe Testament bevat. Kaapstad: Britse en Buite1andse

(2)

Bybe1genootskap.

COMANDENA, _vf.E. & PRUSANK, D.T. 1988. Communication app:-el':ension and academic achievement among elementar1 and middle school students.

Commuruc

ati

on education,

37:270-277, Oct.

DALY, J.A. 1986. Communication apprehension in the co!;eJe classroom. New

directions for te

achi

ng and

learning, 26:2

1-31, Jun.

DE WET.

J,J.,

MONTEI":'H. J.~. DEK., STEYN. H.S. &VENT:::~. P.A. 1981. Navorsingsmetodes in die opvoedkunde. Durban : Butterworths. 348 p.

DeVITO. J.A. 1993. Essentials of numan communication. New York : HarperCollins College Publishers. 368 p.

DRINKWATER, M. 1996. Die aard en omvang van komr:~·...!r:ikasieVTees van HOD-studente. Potchefstroom: PU vir CI-:0. (Skripsie-M.Ed.) 92 p.

ERICSON, P.M. & GARDNER, J.W. 1992. Two longitudinal studies of communication apprehension and its effects on college students' success.

C

om

munication

quarterly,

40(2): 127-137, Spring.

FENSTERMACHER. G.D. 1986. Philosophy of research on teaching: three aspects. (In Wittrock, M.C.. ed, Handbook of research on teaching. New York: McMillan. p.37-48.)

FREIMliTH, V.S. 1982. Communication apprehension in the classroom. (in 3aker,

L.L..

ed.

Communication in the classroom: original essays. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall. p. 121-145.)

(3)

226 p.

HENNING,

I.J.

~ j92. O:e :nvloed van 'n spesiale mikro-onderwysprogram op die kommunikasiehelderheid van onderwysstudente. Potchefstroom :?-:..:-vir CHO. (Proefsknf-D.Pr,;;.; 178 p.

'I- HJLLS, P.J. 1986. Teaching, learning and com::~unication. Kent :Biddies. ~ ~

J

p.

HURT. H.T .. SCOTT. M.D. & McCROSKEY, J.C. 1978. Communication in the classroom. Reading: Addison-Wesley. 205 p.

JANSEN. N. & STEINBERG. S. 1991. Theoretical approaches to commun.icatlon. Ken-wyn : ]uta. 26 p.

JOUBERT, M.Y. 1991. Kommunikasiestrukture en effektiewe onderrig.

Suid-Afrik

aans

e

tydskrif

vir

o

pvoed.kun

de,

ll (4):202-206.

KELLY, L. 1989. Implementing a skills training program for reticent communicators.

Com

muni

cat10

n education

.

38:85-99, April.

KRITZINGER, M.S.B., red. 1971. Verklarende Afrikaanse woordeboek. Pretoria : J.L. van Schaik. p. 329-330.

LANDMAN. W.A. 1988. Navorsingsmetodologie grondbegrippe. Pretoria : Servo. 102 p.

LEARY, M.R. 1983. The conceptual distmctions are important: another look at communication apprehension and related constructs.

Hum

an

comm

unicatio

n

research. 1 0(2):305-312. Winter.

(4)

Wadsworth. 31 5 p.

McCROSKEY. ].C. 1977a. Classroom consequences of co:-::::nunicatJon

apprehension.

Communication Education.

26:27-35, Jan.

McCROSKEY, J.C. 1977b. Oral communication apprehension: a sumn:ary of recent

theory and research.

Human

c

ommunication research,

4(1):78-96, fall.

McCROSKEY, J.C. 1978. Vahdity of ?RCA as an index of oral communication.

Communication monographs

,

45:192-203, Aug.

McCROSKEY, ].C. 1984. The communication appre~e~sion perspective. (In Daly, J.A. & McCroskey, ].C., eds. Avoiding communication: shyness, reticence, and communication apprehension. Beverly Hills: Sage. p. 13-38.)

McCROSKEY, J.C. & BEATTY, M.J. 1986. Oral communication apprehension.

Un

Jones, H.J., Cheek, J.M. & Briggs, S.R., eds. Shyness: perspectives on research and

treatment. New York : Plenum. p. 279-293.)

McCROSKEY, J.C. & DALY, ].A. 1976. Teachers' expectations of the communication

apprehensive child in the elementary school.

Human

comm

u

mcation

research,

3(1 ):6 7-72, fall.

McCROSKEY, J.C., ANDERSEN. J.f., RICHMOND, V.P. &

WHE

c

...

ESS, L.R. 1981. Communication apprehension of elementary and secondary students and

teachers.

Comm

u

nicati

o

n ed

u

cation,

30:122-132, April.

McCROSKEY, J.C., BOOTH-BUTTERF1ElD, S. & PAYNE, S.K. 1989. The impact of

communication apprehension on college student retention and success.

Comm

u

nicati

o

n Q

u

arte

r

ly

,

37(2): 100-l 07, Spring.

(5)

94

McCROSKEY, J.C., RICHMOND, V.P., fALCIONE. R.L. &

DALY,

J.A. 1977. Stud1es of

the relationship between communication apprehensive and self-esteem.

Human

commumcation research.

3(3):269-277, Spring.

McCROSKEY. J.C., RICHMOND, V.P. & STEWART. R.A. 1986. One on one: the

foundations of interpersonal communication. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall. 294 p.

McQUAIL, D. & VVINDAHL, S. 1987. Communication models for the study of mass

communication. New York: Longman. 110 p.

~ MOORE. K.D. 1989. Classroom teac:,ing skills. New York: Random House. 23 ~ p.

MULDER, J.C. 1981. Statistiese tegnieke in opvoedkunde. Pretoria: Haum. 253 p.

MYERS. G.E. & MYERS. M.T.

1992.

The dynamics of human communication: a

laboratory approach. New York: McGraw-Hill. 472 p.

RICHMOND. V.P. & McCROSKEY. J.C. 1989. Communication: apprehension,

avoidance and affectiveness. Scottdale : Gorsuch Scarisbnck. 138 p.

SEILER. W.J .• SCHUELKE. L.D. & LlEB-BRilJ-iA.RT, B. 1984. Communication for the

contempory classroom. New York: Holt. Rinehart and Winston. 215 p.

SINGLETARY, M. W. & STONE, G. 1988. Commumcation theory & research

applications. Ames : Iowa State University Press. 207 p.

STEYN, LN. 1988. Onderrig versus effektiewe onderrig: implikasies vir die

didaktiese teorievorming. OVSA-referaat. Potchefstroom : PU vir CHO.

(6)

tegnologtese era. Suid-Afrikaanse tyd.skrif v1r opvoedkunde, 11 (4):244-247.

1 VAN MENTS, M. 1990. Active talk: the effective use of discussion in learning. London : Kogan Page. 144 p.

VAN STADEN, H.E. 1994. Kommunikastevrees onder swart ondervvysstudente. Potchefstroom: PU vir CHO. (Skripsie-M.Ed.) 93 p.

VREKEN, N.J. 1993. Klasaantekeninge, didakt1ese opvoedkunde (D005 ll ).

Didaktiese vaardighede. Potchefstroom : PU vir CHO. Departement Opvoedkunde. 60p. (ongepubliseer.)

VREKEN. N.J. & DRINKVVATER. M. 1995. Comrr:unication apprehens1on: an obstacle in the development of communication skills. (Referaat gelewer : SASE een-en-twintigste konferensie 31Aug.- 4Sept.) Windhoek. 10 p.

VREKEN, N.J. & VREKEN,

R.

1989. Kommunikasievrees in die klaskamer. (Referaat gelewer tydens die dertiende Nasionale Konvensie van Onderwysers in Wiskunde. Natuur- en Skeikunde en Biologie.) Pretoria. 9 p.

WATSON. A.K., & DODD. C.H. 1984. Allevtating communicahon apprehension through rational emotive therapy: a comparative evaluation.

Communication

education,

33:257-258, July.

WATSON, A.K., MONROE. E.E. & ATTERSTROM, H. 1989. Comparison of

communication apprehension across cultures: American and Swedish ch!ldren.

Communication quarterly,

37(] ):67-75, Winter.

(7)

am ·a·ururc

VRAELYS OOR KOMl\fUNIKASIF:VAARDI<;HEUE

Dankie uat u bereiu is om ons te help met hierdie navorsingsprojek. Die Joel van hieruie vraelys

is om ·n opname te maak van leerlinge se belcwing (of gevoel) ryuens ·n kommunikasieproses

binne verskillenue siruasies. U mo<:t asseblief eerlik ancwooru opal <.lie vrae. U naam word nerens gevra nie en aile inligting bly Jus anoniem.

Maak asseblief 'n kruisie in <.lie lOepaslike hlokkie van u keuse.

1 ALGEMENE INLIGTING

1.1 Vraelysnommcr (1-3)

1.2 Geslag Manlik Vroulik (4)

1.3

Huiswal Afr Eng Antler (5)

l 2 3

l.4 Prestasie in Afrikaans

SG

HG

(6)

0-34

I

.35-3Y 40-49 1 so-s9

60-1)9

70-79

80-89

90 +

₍₇₎

0 _I

1

2 I

.) 4

5

6

7

1.5 Gemiddelde prestasie vir a! jou vakke ~aam

'

I

40-49 1

so-s9

I

0-34 I 35-YJ 60-119 70-79

8

0 -89

90+ I

i

t I

0

l ~ .... "' ₄

₅

₆

₇

I

_I

1 .)

(8)

2 KOMMUNIKASIEVAARDIGHEID IN VERSKILLENDE TJPE

gz

SITUASIES €

_...

-

...

..

E

-

...

..

c: ~

.

_t:!

....

..

-

..

0 ...

..

...

_•

.

_""

~

..

._

-

..

...

~ c::

...

V> _"' 0 > >

1 Ek hou rue daarvan om aan groepbesprekings 5 4

3

2 1 (9)

dee! te neem nie.

2 Oor die algemeen voel ek heeltemal gemaklik 5 4

3

2 1 ( 10)

ng-/byeenkoms moet deelneem.

8 Gewoonlik is ek kalm en ontspanne terwyl ek 5 4

3

2 1 (16) deelneem aan besprekings op vergaderings.

9

Ek is baie kalm en ontspanne wanneer ek op 'n 5 4

3

2 1 (17) vergadering gevra word om my mening te lug.

10 Ek is bang om my standpunt te stel op 'n ver- 5 4

3

2 1 (18) gadering.

11 Om op vergaderings te praat laat my onge- 5 4 3 2 1 (19)

maklik voel.

12 Ek

i

s

baie ontspanne wanneer ek vrae op 'n ver- 5 4

3

2 1 (20)

(9)

li"

-...

_e

...

₉₈

-

~

"'

~ •

...

c

..

V' .,.. C> > ,...

13

As ek

in gesprek

is met

iemand

wat ek

pas

5

4 3 2 1 (21)

ontmoet,

i

s

ek

baie

senuweeagtig.

14

Ek is

glad

n

i

e bang om my

se

te

se in 'n ge-

5

4 3 2 1 (22)

sprek nie.

15

Gewoonlik is

e

k

baie gespanne en

senuwee-

5 4 3 2 1 (23)

agtig

wanneer ek

'n

gesprek moet voer.

16 Gewoonlik is ek baie kalm en

op

my

gemak

5

4 3 2 1 (24)

wanneer

ek 'n gesprek

moet

voer.

17 As ek

gesprek voer

met iemand

wat

ek pas

(25)

ontmoet

het,is

ek baie

op

my

gemak.

18

Ek is bang om my

se

te

se

in

'n gesprek.

5

4 3 2 1 (26)

2.4 Openbare toesprake:

19

Ek is

glad

22

My

g

edagtes raak deurmekaar

wanneer ek 'n

toe

5 4 3 2 1 (30)

s

praak hou.

23

Ek benader die

geleentheid om

'n toespraak

te

5

4 3 2 1 (31)

hou

met selfvertroue.

24 As ek

'n

toespraak

hou, raak ek so

op my

senu-

5 4 3 2 1 (32)

w

_

ees

dat ek

so

mmi

ge va

n

die

feite

wat

ek

goed

ken heeltemal

vergeet.

2.5 Optrede in die klas:

25

Oor di

e

algemeen is

ek

sen

uwee

agt

ig wanneer

ek 5

4 3 2 1 (33)

iets moet

se

in die klas.

26

Ek hou daarvan

as die onderwyser vrae

s

tel in die

5 4 3 2 1 (34)

(10)

28

29

30 "

~

-

~ ~ E ~

:::

< ;;: ~

-

~ 0

-

..

~ a ~

-

c

"

q ~

-> ~ ~

-

--

~ ~ !;

_"

• -

~ ~ _;; ~ '-.;; ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ _>

As ek in die

kla~

'n vraag moet antwoord raak 5

¥~r_l

my gedagtes dcurmekaar.

-~lJ

Ek

is nooit bang om na 'n klas toe te gaan me.

5

4 I

3E

1

In 'n klas verkies ek dat die onderwyser die praat

~

~~

2 [

~-~

werk doen en dat ek net boef te luister.

m·

_u_j

Dit pia my

glad nie

wa~n-e~~ek

'n vmag

m~et-

5 4 3

I

2

I

1 I

beantwoord in die klas nie. , •

I

I I I

2.6 Kommunikasie in EngeL>:

31 Ek

gee glad om om in enige van bogenoem-de

situasies

Engels te praat nie.

32 Ek

is gespanne en senuweeagtig wanneer

ek Engels moet praat. Baie dankie vir u samewerkingt

99

(35) (36) (37) (38)

(39)

(40)

(11)

1 ...

BYLAAG2

AANTAL LEERllNGE WAT DIE VRAELYS INGEVUL HI:.!, VOLGENS GESLAG, HUISTAAL EN DIE VLAK WAAROP HULLE AFRIKAANS NEEM.