University of Groningen
Objectivity without Reality Veluwenkamp, Herman
DOI:
10.33612/diss.147440153
IMPORTANT NOTE: You are advised to consult the publisher's version (publisher's PDF) if you wish to cite from it. Please check the document version below.
Document Version
Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record
Publication date: 2020
Link to publication in University of Groningen/UMCG research database
Citation for published version (APA):
Veluwenkamp, H. (2020). Objectivity without Reality: Implications of Conceptual Role Semantics in Metaethics. University of Groningen. https://doi.org/10.33612/diss.147440153
Copyright
Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons).
Take-down policy
If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim.
Downloaded from the University of Groningen/UMCG research database (Pure): http://www.rug.nl/research/portal. For technical reasons the number of authors shown on this cover page is limited to 10 maximum.
Stellingen behorende bij het proefschrift OBJECTIVITY WITHOUT REALISM
Implications of Conceptual Role Semantics in Metaethics Herman Veluwenkamp
1. Moral representationalists hold that the truth value of a moral judgement is explained by moral reality, while moral expressivists deny this. (Chapter 1)
2. A wide conceptual role semantics is compatible with robust moral realism. (Chapter 2)
3. The deliberative indispensability of moral judgements does not justify a belief in robust moral truths. (Chapter 3)
4. Inferentialism without minimalism about truth can still be attractive to antirealists. (Chapter 4)
5. Parfit’s and Scanlon’s non-metaphysical moral realism fails to be more realistic than contemporary versions of antirealism. (Chapter 5)
6. Non-naturalists should stop complaining about the anti-realist’s account of moral objectivity. (Chapter 6)
