• No results found

University of Groningen Tensions in sustainable supply chain management: instrumental, institutional, and paradoxical perspectives Xiao, Chengyong

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "University of Groningen Tensions in sustainable supply chain management: instrumental, institutional, and paradoxical perspectives Xiao, Chengyong"

Copied!
14
0
0

Bezig met laden.... (Bekijk nu de volledige tekst)

Hele tekst

(1)

University of Groningen

Tensions in sustainable supply chain management: instrumental, institutional, and

paradoxical perspectives

Xiao, Chengyong

IMPORTANT NOTE: You are advised to consult the publisher's version (publisher's PDF) if you wish to cite from it. Please check the document version below.

Document Version

Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record

Publication date: 2019

Link to publication in University of Groningen/UMCG research database

Citation for published version (APA):

Xiao, C. (2019). Tensions in sustainable supply chain management: instrumental, institutional, and paradoxical perspectives. University of Groningen, SOM research school.

Copyright

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons).

Take-down policy

If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim.

Downloaded from the University of Groningen/UMCG research database (Pure): http://www.rug.nl/research/portal. For technical reasons the number of authors shown on this cover page is limited to 10 maximum.

(2)

91

References

Abbasi, M., & Nilsson, F. (2012). Themes and challenges in making supply chains environmentally sustainable. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 17 (5), 517-530.

Adams, M., & Hardwick, P. (1998). An analysis of corporate donations: United Kingdom evidence. Journal of Management Studies, 35 (5), 641-654.

Aguilera, R.V., Rupp, D.E., Williams, C.A., & Ganapathi, J. (2007). Putting the S back in corporate social responsibility: A multilevel theory of social change in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 32 (3), 836-863.

Aguinis, H., & Glavas, A. (2012). What we know and don’t know about corporate social responsibility: a review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 38 (4), 932-968.

Akaike, H. (1987). Factor analysis and AIC. Psychometrika, 52 (3), 317-332.

Andriopoulos, C., & Lewis, M.W. (2009). Exploitation-exploration tensions and organizational ambidexterity: Managing paradoxes of innovation. Organization Science, 20 (4), 696-717.

Angus-Leppan, T., Benn, S., & Young, L. (2010). A sensemaking approach to trade-offs and synergies between human and ecological elements of corporate sustainability. Business Strategy and the Environment, 19 (4), 230-244.

Antonakis, J., Bendahan, S., Jacquart, P., & Lalive, R. (2010). On making causal claims: A review and recommendations. The Leadership Quarterly, 21 (6), 1086-1120.

Arya, B., & Zhang, G. (2009). Institutional reforms and investor reactions to CSR announcements: evidence from an emerging economy. Journal of Management Studies, 46 (7), 1089-1112.

Bansal, P. (2005). Evolving sustainably: a longitudinal study of corporate sustainable development. Strategic Management Journal, 26 (3), 197-218.

Bansal, P., Gao, J., & Qureshi, I. (2014). The extensiveness of corporate social and environmental commitment across firms over time. Organization Studies, 35 (7), 949-966.

Bansal, P., & Roth, K. (2000). Why companies go green: a model of ecological responsiveness. Academy of Management Journal, 43 (4), 717-736.

Barnett, M.L. (2007). Stakeholder influence capacity and the variability of financial returns to corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 32 (3), 794-816.

Barnett, M.L., & Salomon, R.M. (2012). Does it pay to be really good? Addressing the shape of the relationship between social and financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 33 (11), 1304-1320.

Basu, K., & Palazzo, G. (2008). Corporate social responsibility: A process model of sensemaking. Academy of Management Review, 33 (1), 122-136.

Becker, T.E. (2005). Potential problems in the statistical control of variables in organizational research: A qualitative analysis with recommendations. Organizational Research Methods, 8 (3), 274-289.

Bergkvist, L., & Rossiter, J.R. (2007). The predictive validity of multiple-item versus single-item measures of the same constructs. Journal of Marketing Research, 44 (2), 175-184.

Böhringer, C., & Jochem, P.E. (2007). Measuring the immeasurable—A survey of sustainability indices. Ecological Economics, 63 (1), 1-8.

(3)

92

Bourgeois, L.J. (1981). On the measurement of organizational slack. Academy of Management Review, 6 (1), 29-39.

Bourlakis, M., Maglaras, G., Aktas, E., Gallear, D., & Fotopoulos, C. (2014). Firm size and sustainable performance in food supply chains: Insights from Greek SMEs. International Journal of Production Economics, 152, 112-130.

Brammer, S., & Millington, A. (2004). The development of corporate charitable contributions in the UK: A stakeholder analysis. Journal of Management Studies, 41 (8), 1411-1434.

Brown, B. (1997). How Do Reputations Affect Corporate Performance?: Stock Market Valuation of Reputation for Corporate Social Performance. Corporate Reputation Review, 1 (1), 76-80.

Bush, S.R., Oosterveer, P., Bailey, M., & Mol, A.P. (2015). Sustainability governance of chains and networks: a review and future outlook. Journal of Cleaner Production, 107, 8-19.

Busse, C. (2016). Doing well by doing good? The self-interest of buying firms and sustainable supply chain management. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 52 (2), 28-47.

Busse, C., Schleper, M.C., Niu, M., & Wagner, S.M. (2016). Supplier development for sustainability: contextual barriers in global supply chains. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 46 (5), 442-468.

Campbell, J.R., & Hopenhayn, H.A. (2005). Market size matters. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 53 (1), 1-25.

Campbell, J.L. (2006). Institutional analysis and the paradox of corporate social responsibility. American Behavioral Scientist, 49 (7), 925-938.

Campbell, J.L. (2007). Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways? An institutional theory of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 32 (3), 946-967.

Carter, C.R., & Rogers, D.S. (2008). A framework of sustainable supply chain management: moving toward new theory. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 38 (5), 360-387.

Chan, J., & Pun, N. (2010). Suicide as protest for the new generation of Chinese migrant workers: Foxconn, global capital, and the state. The Asia-Pacific Journal, 37 (2), 1-50.

Chan, J., Pun, N., & Selden, M. (2013). The politics of global production: Apple, Foxconn and China's new working class. New Technology, Work and Employment, 28 (2), 100-115.

Chang, Y.K., Oh, W., Park, J.H., & Jang, M.G. (2017). Exploring the relationship between board characteristics and CSR: Empirical evidence from Korea. Journal of Business Ethics, 140 (2), 225-242.

Chapple, W., & Moon, J. (2005). Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) in Asia: A Seven-Country Study of CSR Web Site Reporting. Business & Society, 44 (4), 415-441.

Christmann, P. (2004). Multinational companies and the natural environment: Determinants of global environmental policy. Academy of Management Journal, 47 (5), 747-760.

Chung, S. (2015). Explaining compliance: A multi-actor framework for understanding labour law compliance in China. Human Relations, 68 (2), 237-260.

Clarke, P., Crawford, C., Steele, F., & Vignoles, A.F. (2010). The choice between fixed and random effects models: some considerations for educational research.

(4)

93

Clarkson, M.E. (1995). A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review, 20 (1), 92-117.

Crifo, P., Diaye, M., & Pekovic, S. (2016). CSR related management practices and firm performance: An empirical analysis of the quantity–quality trade-off on French data. International Journal of Production Economics, 171, 405-416.

Crilly, D., Zollo, M., & Hansen, M. (2012). Faking it or muddling through? Understanding decoupling in response to stakeholder pressures. Academy of Management Journal, 55 (6), 1429-1448.

Dahlsrud, A. (2008). How corporate social responsibility is defined: an analysis of 37 definitions. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 15 (1), 1-13.

Daniel, F., Lohrke, F.T., Fornaciari, C.J., & Turner Jr, R.A. (2004). Slack resources and firm performance: a meta-analysis. Journal of Business Research, 57 (6), 565-574.

Darnall, N., Henriques, I., & Sadorsky, P. (2010). Adopting proactive environmental strategy: the influence of stakeholders and firm size. Journal of Management Studies, 47 (6), 1072-1094.

David Diltz, J. (1995). The private cost of socially responsible investing. Applied Financial Economics, 5 (2), 69-77.

Davison, M.L., Kwak, N., Seo, Y.S., & Choi, J. (2002). Using hierarchical linear models to examine moderator effects: Person-by-organization interactions. Organizational Research Methods, 5 (3), 231-254.

Dawson, J.F., & Richter, A.W. (2006). Probing three-way interactions in moderated multiple regression: development and application of a slope difference test. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91 (4), 917.

Deegan, C., & Shelly, M. (2014). Corporate social responsibilities: Alternative perspectives about the need to legislate. Journal of Business Ethics, 121 (4), 499-526.

Delmas, M.A., & Toffel, M.W. (2008). Organizational responses to environmental demands: Opening the black box. Strategic Management Journal, 29 (10), 1027-1055.

Demeter, K., Boer, H., Wiengarten, F., Fynes, B., Pagell, M., & de Búrca, S. (2011). Exploring the impact of national culture on investments in manufacturing practices and performance: an empirical multi-country study. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 31 (5), 554-578.

DiMaggio, P.J., & Powell, W.W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48 (2), 147-160.

Dimick, D.E., & Murray, V.V. (1978). Correlates of substantive policy decisions in organizations: The case of human resource management. Academy of Management Journal, 21 (4), 611-623.

Distelhorst, G., Hainmueller, J., & Locke, R.M. (2016). Does lean improve labor standards? Management and social performance in the Nike supply chain. Management Science, 63 (3), 707-728.

Doh, J.P., & Guay, T.R. (2006). Corporate Social Responsibility, Public Policy, and NGO Activism in Europe and the United States: An Institutional‐Stakeholder Perspective. Journal of Management Studies, 43 (1), 47-73. Donaldson, T., & Preston, L.E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20 (1), 65-91.

Dubey, R., Gunasekaran, A., & Ali, S.S. (2015). Exploring the relationship between leadership, operational practices, institutional pressures and environmental performance: A framework for green supply chain. International Journal of Production Economics, 160, 120-132.

(5)

94

Dubey, R., Gunasekaran, A., Childe, S.J., Papadopoulos, T., Hazen, B., Giannakis, M., & Roubaud, D. (2017). Examining the effect of external pressures and organizational culture on shaping performance measurement systems (PMS) for sustainability benchmarking: Some empirical findings. International Journal of Production Economics, 193, 63-76.

Dubey, R., Gunasekaran, A., Childe, S.J., Papadopoulos, T., Wamba, S.F., & Song, M. (2016). Towards a theory of sustainable consumption and production: Constructs and measurement. Resources, Conservation and

Recycling, 106, 78-89.

Egels-Zandén, N. (2007). Suppliers’ compliance with MNCs’ codes of conduct: Behind the scenes at Chinese toy suppliers. Journal of Business Ethics, 75 (1), 45-62.

Egels-Zandén, N. (2014). Revisiting supplier compliance with MNC codes of conduct: Recoupling policy and practice at Chinese toy suppliers. Journal of Business Ethics, 119 (1), 59-75.

Eisinga, R., Grotenhuis, M.t., & Pelzer, B. (2013). The reliability of a two-item scale: Pearson, Cronbach, or Spearman-Brown?. International Journal of Public Health, 58 (4), 637-642.

Ferri, L.M., & Ferri, L.M. (2017). The influence of the institutional context on sustainability reporting. A cross-national analysis. Social Responsibility Journal, 13 (1), 24-47.

Festinger, L. (1962). Cognitive dissonance. Scientific American, 207 (4), 93-106.

Flammer, C. (2015). Does corporate social responsibility lead to superior financial performance? A regression discontinuity approach. Management Science, 61 (11), 2549-2568.

Foerstl, K., Azadegan, A., Leppelt, T., & Hartmann, E. (2015). Drivers of Supplier Sustainability: Moving Beyond Compliance to Commitment. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 51 (1), 67-92.

Gao, J., & Bansal, P. (2013). Instrumental and integrative logics in business sustainability. Journal of Business Ethics, 112 (2), 241-255.

Garcia-Castro, R., Ariño, M.A., & Canela, M.A. (2010). Does social performance really lead to financial performance? Accounting for endogeneity. Journal of Business Ethics, 92 (1), 107-126.

Gilbert, D.U., Rasche, A., & Waddock, S. (2011). Accountability in a global economy: The emergence of international accountability standards. Business Ethics Quarterly, 21 (1), 23-44.

Gimenez, C., Sierra, V., & Rodon, J. (2012). Sustainable operations: Their impact on the triple bottom line. International Journal of Production Economics, 140 (1), 149-159.

Gioia, D.A., Corley, K.G., & Hamilton, A.L. (2013). Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research notes on the Gioia methodology. Organizational Research Methods, 16 (1), 15-31.

Glover, J., Champion, D., Daniels, K., & Dainty, A. (2014). An Institutional Theory perspective on sustainable practices across the dairy supply chain. International Journal of Production Economics, 152, 102-111.

Golicic, S.L., & Smith, C.D. (2013). A Meta‐Analysis of Environmentally Sustainable Supply Chain Management Practices and Firm Performance. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 49 (2), 78-95.

Golini, R., Longoni, A., & Cagliano, R. (2014). Developing sustainability in global manufacturing networks: The role of site competence on sustainability performance. International Journal of Production Economics, 147, 448-459.

González-Benito, J., & González-Benito, Ó. (2006). The role of stakeholder pressure and managerial values in the implementation of environmental logistics practices. International Journal of Production Research, 44 (7), 1353-1373.

(6)

95

Greenwood, R., Raynard, M., Kodeih, F., Micelotta, E.R., & Lounsbury, M. (2011). Institutional complexity and organizational responses. The Academy of Management Annals, 5 (1), 317-371.

Guide, V.D.R., & Ketokivi, M. (2015). Notes from the Editors: Redefining some methodological criteria for the journal. Journal of Operations Management (37), v-viii.

Hahn, T., Pinkse, J., Preuss, L., & Figge, F. (2015). Tensions in corporate sustainability: Towards an integrative framework. Journal of Business Ethics, 127 (2), 297-316.

Hahn, T., Preuss, L., Pinkse, J., & Figge, F. (2014). Cognitive Frames in Corporate Sustainability: Managerial Sensemaking with Paradoxical and Business Case Frames. Academy of Management Review, 39 (4), 463-487. Hargrave, T.J., & Van de Ven, Andrew H. (2017). Integrating dialectical and paradox perspectives on managing contradictions in organizations. Organization Studies, 38 (3-4), 319-339.

Hart, S.L. (1995). A natural-resource-based view of the firm. Academy of Management Review, 20 (4), 986-1014.

Hassini, E., Surti, C., & Searcy, C. (2012). A literature review and a case study of sustainable supply chains with a focus on metrics. International Journal of Production Economics, 140 (1), 69-82.

Hillman, A.J., & Keim, G.D. (2001). Shareholder value, stakeholder management, and social issues: what's the bottom line?. Strategic Management Journal, 22 (2), 125-139.

Huq, F.A., Chowdhury, I.N., & Klassen, R.D. (2016). Social management capabilities of multinational buying firms and their emerging market suppliers: An exploratory study of the clothing industry. Journal of Operations Management, 46, 19-37.

Huq, F., Stevenson, M., & Zorzini, M. (2014). Social sustainability in developing country suppliers: An exploratory study in the ready-made garments industry of Bangladesh. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 34 (5), 610-638.

Ibrahim, N.A., & Angelidis, J.P. (2011). Effect of board members’ gender on corporate social responsiveness orientation. Journal of Applied Business Research (JABR), 10 (1), 35-40.

Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2012). What drives corporate social performance: The role of nation-level institutions. Journal of International Business Studies, 43 (9), 834-864.

Jackson, G., & Apostolakou, A. (2010). Corporate social responsibility in Western Europe: an institutional mirror or substitute? Journal of Business Ethics, 94 (3), 371-394.

Jamali, D., Lund-Thomsen, P., & Khara, N. (2017). CSR Institutionalized Myths in Developing Countries: An Imminent Threat of Selective Decoupling. Business & Society, 56 (3), 454-486.

Jarzabkowski, P., Lê, J., & Van de Ven, Andrew H. (2013). Responding to competing strategic demands: How organizing, belonging, and performing paradoxes coevolve. Strategic Organization, 11 (3), 245-280.

Jay, J. (2013). Navigating paradox as a mechanism of change and innovation in hybrid organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 56 (1), 137-159.

Jiang, B. (2009). The effects of interorganizational governance on supplier's compliance with SCC: an empirical examination of compliant and non-compliant suppliers. Journal of Operations Management, 27 (4), 267-280. Jones, T.M. (1995). Instrumental stakeholder theory: A synthesis of ethics and economics. Academy of Management Review, 20 (2), 404-437.

(7)

96

Julian, S.D., & Ofori‐Dankwa, J.C. (2013). Financial resource availability and corporate social responsibility expenditures in a sub‐Saharan economy: The institutional difference hypothesis. Strategic Management Journal, 34 (11), 1314-1330.

Kanashiro, P., & Rivera, J. (2017). Do Chief Sustainability Officers Make Companies Greener? The Moderating Role of Regulatory Pressures. Journal of Business Ethics, 1-15.

Kannan, D. (2018). Role of multiple stakeholders and the critical success factor theory for the sustainable supplier selection process. International Journal of Production Economics, 195, 391-418.

Kassinis, G., & Vafeas, N. (2006). Stakeholder pressures and environmental performance. Academy of Management Journal, 49 (1), 145-159.

Ketokivi, M., & Choi, T. (2014). Renaissance of case research as a scientific method. Journal of Operations Management, 32 (5), 232-240.

Khor, K.S., Udin, Z.M., Ramayah, T., & Hazen, B.T. (2016). Reverse logistics in Malaysia: The contingent role of institutional pressure. International Journal of Production Economics, 175, 96-108.

Krause, D.R., Vachon, S., & Klassen, R.D. (2009). Special topic forum on sustainable supply chain management: introduction and reflection on the role of purchasing management. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 45 (4), 18-25.

Lance, C.E., Butts, M.M., & Michels, L.C. (2006). The sources of four commonly reported cutoff criteria what did they really say? Organizational Research Methods, 9 (2), 202-220.

Lange, D., & Washburn, N.T. (2012). Understanding attributions of corporate social irresponsibility. Academy of Management Review, 37 (2), 300-326.

Langley, A. (1999). Strategies for theorizing from process data. Academy of Management Review, 24 (4), 691-710.

Lee, M.P. (2008). A review of the theories of corporate social responsibility: Its evolutionary path and the road ahead. International Journal of Management Reviews, 10 (1), 53-73.

Lee, M.P. (2011). Configuration of external influences: The combined effects of institutions and stakeholders on corporate social responsibility strategies. Journal of Business Ethics, 102 (2), 281-298.

Lee, S., & Klassen, R.D. (2008). Drivers and enablers that foster environmental management capabilities in small‐and medium‐sized suppliers in supply chains. Production and Operations Management, 17 (6), 573-586. Lewis, M.W. (2000). Exploring paradox: Toward a more comprehensive guide. Academy of Management Review, 25 (4), 760-776.

Lewis, M.W., & Smith, W.K. (2014). Paradox as a metatheoretical perspective: Sharpening the focus and widening the scope. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 50 (2), 127-149.

Liao, H., & Rupp, D.E. (2005). The impact of justice climate and justice orientation on work outcomes: a cross-level multifoci framework. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90 (2), 242-256.

Lim, S., & Phillips, J. (2008). Embedding CSR values: The global footwear industry’s evolving governance structure. Journal of Business Ethics, 81 (1), 143-156.

Lindell, M.K., & Whitney, D.J. (2001). Accounting for common method variance in cross-sectional research designs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86 (1), 114-121.

(8)

97

Lin-Hi, N., & Müller, K. (2013). The CSR bottom line: Preventing corporate social irresponsibility. Journal of Business Research, 66 (10), 1928-1936.

Linton, J.D., Klassen, R., & Jayaraman, V. (2007). Sustainable supply chains: an introduction. Journal of Operations Management, 25 (6), 1075-1082.

Locke, R.M. (2013). The promise and limits of private power: Promoting labor standards in a global economy. New York, Cambridge University Press.

Locke, R.M., & Romis, M. (2012). Improving work conditions in global supply chains. MIT Sloan Management Review, 48 (2), 54-62.

Locke, R., Amengual, M., & Mangla, A. (2009). Virtue out of necessity? Compliance, commitment, and the improvement of labor conditions in global supply chains. Politics & Society, 37 (3), 319-351.

Longoni, A., Golini, R., & Cagliano, R. (2014). The role of New Forms of Work Organization in developing sustainability strategies in operations. International Journal of Production Economics, 147, 147-160. Luck, C.G., & Pilotte, N. (1993). Domini social index performance. The Journal of Investing, 2 (3), 60-62. Lund-Thomsen, P., & Lindgreen, A. (2014). Corporate social responsibility in global value chains: where are we now and where are we going?. Journal of Business Ethics, 123 (1), 11-22.

Luo, X., & Bhattacharya, C.B. (2006). Corporate social responsibility, customer satisfaction, and market value. Journal of Marketing, 70 (4), 1-18.

Lüscher, L.S., & Lewis, M.W. (2008). Organizational change and managerial sensemaking: Working through paradox. Academy of Management Journal, 51 (2), 221-240.

Luzzini, D., Brandon-Jones, E., Brandon-Jones, A., & Spina, G. (2015). From sustainability commitment to performance: The role of intra-and inter-firm collaborative capabilities in the upstream supply chain. International Journal of Production Economics, 165, 51-63.

Margolis, J.D., Elfenbein, H.A., & Walsh, J.P. (2007). Does it pay to be good? A meta-analysis and redirection of research on the relationship between corporate social and financial performance. Ann Arbor, 1001, 48109-41234.

Margolis, J.D., & Walsh, J.P. (2003). Misery loves companies: Rethinking social initiatives by business. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48 (2), 268-305.

Markman, G.D., & Krause, D. (2016). Theory building surrounding sustainable supply chain management: Assessing what we know, exploring where to go. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 52 (2), 3-10. Matten, D., & Moon, J. (2008). “Implicit” and “explicit” CSR: A conceptual framework for a comparative understanding of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 33 (2), 404-424.

Matthews, L., Power, D., Touboulic, A., & Marques, L. (2016). Building Bridges: Toward Alternative Theory of Sustainable Supply Chain Management. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 52 (1), 82-94.

McGuire, J.B., Sundgren, A., & Schneeweis, T. (1988). Corporate social responsibility and firm financial performance. Academy of Management Journal, 31 (4), 854-872.

McPherson, C.M., & Sauder, M. (2013). Logics in Action: Managing Institutional Complexity in a Drug Court. Administrative Science Quarterly, 58 (2), 165-196.

(9)

98

McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2000). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: correlation or misspecification? Strategic Management Journal, 21 (5), 603-609.

Meyer, J.W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83 (2), 340-363.

Mitchell, R.K., Agle, B.R., & Wood, D.J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22 (4), 853-886. Montabon, F., Pagell, M., & Wu, Z. (2016). Making sustainability sustainable. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 52 (2), 11-27.

Moon, J. (2014). Corporate social responsibility: A very short introduction, Oxford University Press.

Neilson, J., & Pritchard, B. (2011). Value chain struggles: Institutions and governance in the plantation districts of South India. John Wiley & Sons: Oxford.

Neumayer, E. (2001). The human development index and sustainability—a constructive proposal. Ecological Economics, 39 (1), 101-114.

Ngai, P. (2005). Global production, company codes of conduct, and labor conditions in China: A case study of two factories. The China Journal, 54, 101-113.

Ngai, P., & Chan, J. (2012). Global capital, the state, and Chinese workers the Foxconn experience. Modern China, 38 (4), 383-410.

Nohria, N., & Gulati, R. (1996). Is slack good or bad for innovation?. Academy of Management Journal, 39 (5), 1245-1264.

Oikonomou, I., Brooks, C., & Pavelin, S. (2014). The financial effects of uniform and mixed corporate social performance. Journal of Management Studies, 51 (6), 898-925.

Orlitzky, M. (2001). Does firm size comfound the relationship between corporate social performance and firm financial performance? Journal of Business Ethics, 33 (2), 167-180.

Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F.L., & Rynes, S.L. (2003). Corporate social and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Organization Studies, 24 (3), 403-441.

Ortiz‐de‐Mandojana, N., Aguilera‐Caracuel, J., & Morales‐Raya, M. (2016). Corporate governance and environmental sustainability: The moderating role of the national institutional context. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 23 (3), 150-164.

Osono, E., Shimizu, N., & Takeuchi, H. (2008). Extreme Toyota: Radical contradictions that drive success at the world's best manufacturer, Wiley.

Pagell, M., & Gobeli, D. (2009). How plant managers' experiences and attitudes toward sustainability relate to operational performance. Production and Operations Management, 18 (3), 278-299.

Pagell, M., Katz, J.P., & Sheu, C. (2005). The importance of national culture in operations management research. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 25 (4), 371-394.

Pagell, M., & Shevchenko, A. (2014). Why research in sustainable supply chain management should have no future. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 50 (1), 44-55.

Parboteeah, K.P., Addae, H.M., & Cullen, J.B. (2012). Propensity to support sustainability initiatives: A cross-national model. Journal of Business Ethics, 105 (3), 403-413.

(10)

99

Parmigiani, A., & Rivera-Santos, M. (2015). Sourcing for the base of the pyramid: Constructing supply chains to address voids in subsistence markets. Journal of Operations Management, 33-34, 60-70.

Pava, M.L., & Krausz, J. (1996). The association between corporate social-responsibility and financial performance: The paradox of social cost. Journal of Business Ethics, 15 (3), 321-357.

Peloza, J. (2009). The challenge of measuring financial impacts from investments in corporate social performance. Journal of Management, 35 (6), 1518-1541.

Peng, M.W., Li, Y., Xie, E., & Su, Z. (2010). CEO duality, organizational slack, and firm performance in China. Asia-Pacific Journal of Management, 27 (4), 611-624.

Perez-Batres, L.A., Doh, J.P., Miller, V.V., & Pisani, M.J. (2012). Stakeholder pressures as determinants of CSR strategic choice: Why do firms choose symbolic versus substantive self-regulatory codes of conduct? Journal of Business Ethics, 110 (2), 157-172.

Perrini, F., Russo, A., Tencati, A., & Vurro, C. (2011). Deconstructing the relationship between corporate social and financial performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 102 (1), 59-76.

Podsakoff, P.M., MacKenzie, S.B., Lee, J., & Podsakoff, N.P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88 (5), 879-903.

Porter, M.E. (2008). Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance, Simon and Schuster. Porter, M.E., & Van der Linde, C. (1995). Green and competitive: ending the stalemate. Harvard Business Review, 61, 119-134.

Power, D., Klassen, R., Kull, T.J., & Simpson, D. (2015). Competitive goals and plant investment in environment and safety practices: Moderating effect of national culture. Decision Sciences, 46 (1), 63-100. Preacher, K.J., Curran, P.J., & Bauer, D.J. (2006). Computational tools for probing interactions in multiple linear regression, multilevel modeling, and latent curve analysis. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 31 (4), 437-448.

Raisch, S., Birkinshaw, J., Probst, G., & Tushman, M.L. (2009). Organizational ambidexterity: Balancing exploitation and exploration for sustained performance. Organization Science, 20 (4), 685-695.

Rao, P. (2002). Greening the supply chain: a new initiative in South-East Asia. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 22 (6), 632-655.

Raudenbush, S.W., & Bryk, A.S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods, Sage Publications: London.

Rauer, J., & Kaufmann, L. (2015). Mitigating External Barriers to Implementing Green Supply Chain

Management: A Grounded Theory Investigation of Green‐Tech Companies' Rare Earth Metals Supply Chains. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 51 (2), 65-88.

Rivoli, P., & Waddock, S. (2011). “First they ignore you…”: The time-context dynamic and corporate responsibility. California Management Review, 53 (2), 87-104.

Roberts, D., Engardio, P., Bernstein, A., Holmes, S., & Ji, X. (2006). ‘Secrets, Lies, and Sweatshops. Business week, 27, 50-58.

(11)

100

Robertson, D.C. (2009). Corporate social responsibility and different stages of economic development: Singapore, Turkey, and Ethiopia. Journal of Business Ethics, 88 (4), 617-633.

Roth, A.V., Tsay, A.A., Pullman, M.E., & Gray, J.V. (2008). Unraveling the food supply chain: strategic insights from China and the 2007 Recalls. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 44 (1), 22-39.

Russo, M.V., & Fouts, P.A. (1997). A resource-based perspective on corporate environmental performance and profitability. Academy of Management Journal, 40 (3), 534-559.

Ruwanpura, K.N., & Wrigley, N. (2011). The costs of compliance? Views of Sri Lankan apparel manufacturers in times of global economic crisis. Journal of Economic Geography, 11 (6), 1031-1049.

Sagar, A.D., & Najam, A. (1998). The human development index: a critical review. Ecological Economics, 25 (3), 249-264.

Saka‐Helmhout, A., Deeg, R., & Greenwood, R. (2016). The MNE as a Challenge to Institutional Theory: Key Concepts, Recent Developments and Empirical Evidence. Journal of Management Studies, 53 (1), 1-11. Sarkis, J., Gonzalez-Torre, P., & Adenso-Diaz, B. (2010). Stakeholder pressure and the adoption of

environmental practices: The mediating effect of training. Journal of Operations Management, 28 (2), 163-176. Schad, J., Lewis, M.W., Raisch, S., & Smith, W.K. (2016). Paradox research in management science: Looking back to move forward. Academy of Management Annals, 10 (1), 5-64.

Schneiberg, M., & Soule, S.A. (2005). Institutionalization as a contested, multilevel process. Social movements and organization theory, 122-160.

Schreyögg, G., & Sydow, J. (2010). CROSSROADS—Organizing for fluidity? Dilemmas of new organizational forms. Organization Science, 21 (6), 1251-1262.

Schultz, F., & Wehmeier, S. (2010). Institutionalization of corporate social responsibility within corporate communications: Combining institutional, sensemaking and communication perspectives. Corporate Communications: an international journal, 15 (1), 9-29.

Seifert, B., Morris, S.A., & Bartkus, B.R. (2004). Having, giving, and getting: Slack resources, corporate philanthropy, and firm financial performance. Business & Society, 43 (2), 135-161.

Seles, Bruno Michel Roman Pais, de Sousa Jabbour, Ana Beatriz Lopes, Jabbour, C.J.C., & Dangelico, R.M. (2016). The green bullwhip effect, the diffusion of green supply chain practices, and institutional pressures: Evidence from the automotive sector. International Journal of Production Economics, 182, 342-355. Servaes, H., & Tamayo, A. (2013). The impact of corporate social responsibility on firm value: The role of customer awareness. Management Science, 59 (5), 1045-1061.

Shane, P.B., & Spicer, B.H. (1983). Market response to environmental information produced outside the firm. Accounting Review, 521-538.

Sharma, G., & Bansal, P. (2017). Partners for Good: How Business and NGOs Engage the Commercial–Social Paradox. Organization Studies, 38 (3-4), 341-364.

Sharma, S., & Henriques, I. (2005). Stakeholder influences on sustainability practices in the Canadian forest products industry. Strategic Management Journal, 26 (2), 159-180.

Siche, J., Agostinho, F., Ortega, E., & Romeiro, A. (2008). Sustainability of nations by indices: Comparative study between environmental sustainability index, ecological footprint and the emergy performance indices. Ecological Economics, 66 (4), 628-637.

(12)

101

Silvestre, B.S. (2015). Sustainable Supply Chain Management in Emerging Economies: Environmental Turbulence, Institutional Voids and Sustainability Trajectories. International Journal of Production Economics, 167, 156-169.

Slawinski, N., & Bansal, P. (2015). Short on time: Intertemporal tensions in business sustainability. Organization Science, 26 (2), 531-549.

Smith, W.K., & Lewis, M.W. (2011). Toward a theory of paradox: A dynamic equilibrium model of organizing. Academy of Management Review, 36 (2), 381-403.

Smith, W.K., & Tushman, M.L. (2005). Managing strategic contradictions: A top management model for managing innovation streams. Organization Science, 16 (5), 522-536.

Spicer, B.H. (1978). Investors, corporate social performance and information disclosure: An empirical study. Accounting Review, 94-111.

Stake, R.E. (1995). The art of case study research, Sage Publications: London.

Surroca, J., Tribó, J.A., & Waddock, S. (2010). Corporate responsibility and financial performance: The role of intangible resources. Strategic Management Journal, 31 (5), 463-490.

Tang, Z., Hull, C.E., & Rothenberg, S. (2012). How corporate social responsibility engagement strategy moderates the CSR–financial performance relationship. Journal of Management Studies, 49 (7), 1274-1303. Thomas, J.B., Clark, S.M., & Gioia, D.A. (1993). Strategic sensemaking and organizational performance: Linkages among scanning, interpretation, action, and outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 36 (2), 239-270.

Thornton, L.M., Autry, C.W., Gligor, D.M., & Brik, A.B. (2013). Does Socially Responsible Supplier Selection Pay Off for Customer Firms? A Cross‐Cultural Comparison. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 49 (3), 66-89.

Thornton, P.H., & Ocasio, W. (2008). Institutional logics. The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism, 840, 99-128.

Thornton, P.H., Ocasio, W., & Lounsbury, M. (2012). The institutional logics perspective: A new approach to culture, structure, and process, Oxford University Press.

Van der Byl, Connie A, & Slawinski, N. (2015). Embracing tensions in corporate sustainability: A review of research from win-wins and trade-offs to paradoxes and beyond. Organization & Environment, 28 (1), 54-79. Vatn, A. (2009). Sustainability, institutions and behavior. in Institutions and Sustainability, Springer. Venkatraman, N., & Ramanujam, V. (1986). Measurement of business performance in strategy research: a comparison of approaches. Academy of Management Review, 11 (4), 801-814.

Waddock, S.A., & Graves, S.B. (1997). The corporate social performance-financial performance link. Strategic Management Journal, 8 (4), 303-319.

Wagner, M. (2010). The role of corporate sustainability performance for economic performance: A firm-level analysis of moderation effects. Ecological Economics, 69 (7), 1553-1560.

Walker, H., Di Sisto, L., & McBain, D. (2008). Drivers and barriers to environmental supply chain management practices: Lessons from the public and private sectors. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 14 (1), 69-85.

(13)

102

Wang, H., & Choi, J. (2013). A New Look at the Corporate Social–Financial Performance Relationship The Moderating Roles of Temporal and Interdomain Consistency in Corporate Social Performance. Journal of Management, 39 (2), 416-441.

Wicks, A.C., Berman, S.L., & Jones, T.M. (1999). The structure of optimal trust: Moral and strategic implications. Academy of Management Review, 24 (1), 99-116.

Wiengarten, F., Pagell, M., Ahmed, M.U., & Gimenez, C. (2014). Do a country's logistical capabilities moderate the external integration performance relationship? Journal of Operations Management, 32 (1), 51-63.

Wijen, F. (2014). Means versus ends in opaque institutional fields: Trading off compliance and achievement in sustainability standard adoption. Academy of Management Review, 39 (3), 302-323.

Wilhelm, M.M., Blome, C., Bhakoo, V., & Paulraj, A. (2016). Sustainability in multi-tier supply chains: Understanding the double agency role of the first-tier supplier. Journal of Operations Management, 41, 42-60. Wilhelm, M.M, Blome, C., Wieck, E., & Xiao, C.Y. (2016). Implementing sustainability in multi-tier supply chains: Strategies and contingencies in managing sub-suppliers. International Journal of Production Economics, 182, 196-212.

Wong, C.W., Lai, K., Shang, K., Lu, C., & Leung, T. (2012). Green operations and the moderating role of environmental management capability of suppliers on manufacturing firm performance. International Journal of Production Economics, 140 (1), 283-294.

Wu, Z., Ellram, L.M., & Schuchard, R. (2014). Understanding the role of government and buyers in supplier energy efficiency initiatives. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 50 (2), 84-105.

Wu, Z., & Pagell, M. (2011). Balancing priorities: Decision-making in sustainable supply chain management. Journal of Operations Management, 29 (6), 577-590.

Xu, E., Yang, H., Quan, J.M., & Lu, Y. (2015). Organizational slack and corporate social performance: Empirical evidence from China’s public firms. Asia-Pacific Journal of Management, 32 (1), 181-198. Yin, J., & Zhang, Y. (2012). Institutional dynamics and corporate social responsibility (CSR) in an emerging country context: Evidence from China. Journal of Business Ethics, 111 (2), 301-316.

Yin, R.K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods, Sage publications: Thousand Oaks.

Young, O.R. (2002). The institutional dimensions of environmental change: fit, interplay, and scale, MIT press: Cambridge, MA.

Young, O.R., King, L.A., & Schroeder, H. (2008). Institutions and environmental change: principal findings, applications, and research frontiers, MIT Press: Cambridge, MA.

Yu, X. (2008). Impacts of corporate code of conduct on labor standards: A case study of Reebok’s athletic footwear supplier factory in China. Journal of Business Ethics, 81 (3), 513-529.

Zhang, J., & Luo, X.R. (2013). Dared to care: Organizational vulnerability, institutional logics, and MNCs’ social responsiveness in emerging markets. Organization Science, 24 (6), 1742-1764.

Zhu, Q., & Sarkis, J. (2004). Relationships between operational practices and performance among early adopters of green supply chain management practices in Chinese manufacturing enterprises. Journal of Operations Management, 22 (3), 265-289.

Zhu, Q., Sarkis, J., & Lai, K. (2008). Confirmation of a measurement model for green supply chain management practices implementation. International Journal of Production Economics, 111 (2), 261-273.

(14)

103

Referenties

GERELATEERDE DOCUMENTEN

More specifically, in countries with low levels of sustainability performance, firms with limited slack resources are more likely to focus on short-term goals

As a country enforces the laws on environmental integrity and social equity, and the overall social and environmental performance improves, firms located in this country will

In contrast, in countries that have high levels of sustainability performance, slack resources will have limited impact on the relationship between stakeholder pressures and

Moreover, we would encourage future researchers to take a “triadic” perspective to explore how buying firms (both their sustainability managers and purchasing managers) and

Together, these chapters jointly highlight the important role of social, economic, and institutional context for sustainable supply chain management: the context can profoundly

In lijn met de hypothese blijkt dat bedrijven die beschikken over aanzienlijke slack resources in landen waar de meeste bedrijven op het gebied van duurzaamheid niet zo

Together, these chapters jointly highlight the important role of social, economic, and institutional context for sustainable supply chain management: the context can profoundly

Tensions in sustainable supply chain management: instrumental, institutional, and paradoxical perspectives..